User talk:Ahonc/Archives/December 2013
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi, I like to ask why you did this change. This is resulting wrong language , minimum in German. In German the template text is not in genitiv. Maybe that conflicts other languages, but perhaps you'll find a way arround.... Thx. --JuTa 08:14, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- But at least Ukrainian and Russian need it. What to do with them?--Anatoliy (talk) 08:50, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, I now asked on the village pump for help of our little problem - see here. I hope there will be someone with high template skills who could create a workarround that languages can use "their" grammar inividualy. regards --JuTa 16:20, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
euromaidain in Kyiv
hello. please, look through my today's uploads. there are bad ones - please delete them. thanks --アンタナナ 00:06, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
- Not now. Maybe tomorrow.--Anatoliy (talk) 00:08, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
- I deleted everything which was out of focus.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:11, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
- thank you very much ;) --アンタナナ 09:10, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- I deleted everything which was out of focus.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:11, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Editor @ ar.wiki
Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 13:52, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Перейменування
Вітаю! Хотів вас попросити перейменувати файл File:Chernomorec.jpg на щось, щоб відповідало зображення. Там зображений не чорноморець, а запорожець, гляньте на чорно-білу версію: File:Запорожець.jpg. З повагою. --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 08:21, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Перейменував.--Anatoliy (talk) 12:07, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Дякую! --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 12:21, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Борзна в Кинашівці.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Борзна в Кинашівці.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 04:20, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Вітаю! Зверніть будь ласка увагу на цю істоту! --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 16:27, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Panorama 2012-05-05 stadium.jpg
- File:The biggest stadium of Ukraine.jpg
- File:НСК «Олімпійський» 2012-05-05.jpg
- File:НСК «Олімпійський» під час матчу.jpg
- File:НСК «Олімпійський» після реконструкції. Жовтень 2011 року.jpg
- File:НСК «Олімпійський». 111111.jpg
- File:НСК «Олімпійський». Поле.jpg
- File:НСК «Олімпійський». Салют.jpg
- File:НСК «Олімпійський».jpg
Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 21:13, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 21:13, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!Dear Ahonc/Archives, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, |
![]() |
Видалення описів файлів українською мовою
Прошу вас звернути увагу на користувача User:Musichistory2009. Він видаляє із файлів гербів опис українською мовою. Приклад тут. Спочатку я виправляв його дії, але бачу, що це - системно. Прошу прийняти міри. З повагою. --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 06:41, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Your block of BaseSat
This is just to let you know that I find your block of BaseSat (talk · contribs) a misjudgement, and I think it was uncalled for. Let me remind you that admins should try to avoid blocking people they are in an active disagreement with. I would prefer that you did not use admin tools to influence that discussion (or any discussion, for that matter) — I believe that BaseSat acted in good faith, and nothing that he was doing was so disastrous that it required a block. Blocking an active user can have damaging consequences (such as discouraging them from contributing to a project), and should only be reserved for particularly serious offences. odder (talk) 13:43, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- I'd block him to short term, let him discuss that issue before doing changes.--Anatoliy (talk) 13:45, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
![]() |
Happy Holidays! |
G'day, just a quick greeting wishing you and your family happy holidays and all the best for 2014. And of course, a big thank you for putting a leg up by doing what you do on Commons, and helping to make it the fantastic project that it is. Greetings from a warm west coast of Aussie. russavia (talk) 01:26, 24 December 2013 (UTC) |
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Donbass Arena 2.jpg
- File:Donbass Arena construction.jpg
- File:Donbass Arena.jpg
- File:DonbassArena03.jpg
- File:Euro 2012. 2012-06-27. Donetsk. Park near Donbass Arena 01.jpg
- File:Euro 2012. 2012-06-27. Donetsk. Park near Donbass Arena 02.jpg
- File:Euro 2012. 2012-06-27. Donetsk. Park near Donbass Arena 03.jpg
- File:Первый матч на Донбасс Арене.jpg
Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 06:49, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Why have you deleted the file? --BaseSat (talk) 17:13, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- hello. i have asked ahonc to delete this file --アンタナナ 17:15, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- @Antanana: And? What rule assumes that uploaded may ask deletion in any time and sysop is to execute that? --BaseSat (talk) 18:18, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- @Ahonc and Antanana: any progress in finding the answer? :) --BaseSat (talk) 12:46, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- It was deletion of unused file by uploader request. What problem?--Anatoliy (talk) 12:48, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- I ask not a reason by the rule that gives green light to use this reason as appropriate for deletion. --BaseSat (talk) 13:50, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Commons:Personality_rights#Remedy --Anatoliy (talk) 14:10, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- I have asked a rule but you link to an essay. Could you provide a link to a rule, please? --BaseSat (talk) 14:13, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Commons:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#General_reasons, r.7.--Anatoliy (talk) 14:25, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- As a matter of fact, this is not a rule either but just a proposal for it. --DixonD (talk) 15:12, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Do you know more official criteria?--Anatoliy (talk) 01:34, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- @Ahonc: Are you kidding? It was you who deleted the file and now you ask DixonD about appropriate criteria that can justify this action? BTW, I'm still awaiting a appropriate, based on the rules deletion reason for the file. --BaseSat (talk) 12:40, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- I'd provide it above.--Anatoliy (talk) 12:41, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- What you have provided are essay and rule's proposal. Can you provide an approved rule, please? Otherwise file shall be restored. --BaseSat (talk) 13:23, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Do you know other rules for speedy deletion? If not, speedy deleteion should be forbidden in you opinion, shouldn't it?--Anatoliy (talk) 13:25, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- It is you who are an administrator atm not I. There is a policy which regulates deletions. Have you ever seen it? --BaseSat (talk) 14:46, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, I have.--Anatoliy (talk) 14:51, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- It is you who are an administrator atm not I. There is a policy which regulates deletions. Have you ever seen it? --BaseSat (talk) 14:46, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- Do you know other rules for speedy deletion? If not, speedy deleteion should be forbidden in you opinion, shouldn't it?--Anatoliy (talk) 13:25, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- What you have provided are essay and rule's proposal. Can you provide an approved rule, please? Otherwise file shall be restored. --BaseSat (talk) 13:23, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- I'd provide it above.--Anatoliy (talk) 12:41, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- @Ahonc: Are you kidding? It was you who deleted the file and now you ask DixonD about appropriate criteria that can justify this action? BTW, I'm still awaiting a appropriate, based on the rules deletion reason for the file. --BaseSat (talk) 12:40, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Do you know more official criteria?--Anatoliy (talk) 01:34, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- As a matter of fact, this is not a rule either but just a proposal for it. --DixonD (talk) 15:12, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Commons:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#General_reasons, r.7.--Anatoliy (talk) 14:25, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- I have asked a rule but you link to an essay. Could you provide a link to a rule, please? --BaseSat (talk) 14:13, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Commons:Personality_rights#Remedy --Anatoliy (talk) 14:10, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- I ask not a reason by the rule that gives green light to use this reason as appropriate for deletion. --BaseSat (talk) 13:50, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- It was deletion of unused file by uploader request. What problem?--Anatoliy (talk) 12:48, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- @Ahonc and Antanana: any progress in finding the answer? :) --BaseSat (talk) 12:46, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
- @Antanana: And? What rule assumes that uploaded may ask deletion in any time and sysop is to execute that? --BaseSat (talk) 18:18, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Mygijski porogy 1.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Mygijski porogy 1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:20, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Your nominations on QI project
You nominated a lot of photos at the QI project. Just want to remind you, that some of the photos need the attention of their owners because there are requests for further enhancing. It would be appreciated, when you keep an eye on your nominations and inform the authors of the photos, if further postprocessing is needed. Thank you. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 07:43, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- I've nominated best images of WLM in my country and in the world. When I nominate images I add authors' names there and users will get notifications that they are mentioned on that page.--Anatoliy (talk) 10:55, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- Perfect. Thank you, then it is all upon the authors duty to take the appropriate steps. Cheers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 11:36, 27 December 2013 (UTC)