User talk:Agassiz Almeida

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Agassiz Almeida!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:58, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Gunnex (talk) 22:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Yours sincerely, El Grafo (talk) 11:15, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked Indefinitely
Blocked Indefinitely
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.
See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you.

azərbaycanca  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  kurdî  la .lojban.  magyar  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Эlcobbola talk 21:04, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "I request the unblocking of my user. The administrator claims that I am trying to load files that have already been deleted, but I am trying to correct copyright information in order to correctly use the images on my page."
Decline reason: "for lying in unblock request. Taivo (talk) 08:40, 26 January 2019 (UTC)"[reply]
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  Simple English  Tiếng Việt  suomi  svenska  македонски  русский  हिन्दी  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

  •  Oppose You are blocked for sock-puppetry; the copyvios and recreations of deleted files out of process are secondary. "The administrator claims that I am trying to load files that have already been deleted, but I am trying to correct copyright information in order"--your "but" does not refute or excuse the "claim" (which is, rather, not a claim, but objective fact). For example:
  • 23 March 2013 - you uploaded File:Agassiz mdb.jpg - it was deleted 16 February 2016
  • 01 March 2016 - you reuploaded the same image with the identical copyright information (!!!) - it was deleted 4 February 2018
  • 08 March 2018 - you reuploaded the same image using a sock account, Raonikulesza, with the identical copyright information (!!!) - it was deleted 9 March 2018
  • 13 March 2018 - you reuploaded the same image changing the source from "own" to "Acervo" (archive/collection)
This sequence of events happened for multiple other images. That you are "trying to correct copyright information" seems untrue. You've either changed nothing in the recreated files, or changed nothing of substance--you did not even bother to participate at the DR or, apparently, read it to learn the concern: in addition to the images' being previously published and attributed to various and inconsistent persons, you purport to be Agassiz Almeida, the mere subject of these images. Copyright is held by the author (photographer), not the subject. You would need to arrange for the authors to provide permission directly, or provide written conveyances that transferred to you the copyrights using the process at COM:OTRS. There is no information you could add to the image description ("trying to correct copyright information") to resolve this. This, again, also is in addition to the issue of sock-puppetry. Эlcobbola talk 16:01, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]