User talk:AerobicFox

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Please see...

[edit]

... my question back to you at Commons talk:Sexual content#Support. - Jmabel ! talk 01:47, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've responded. --AerobicFox (talk) 02:38, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Commons nudity header

[edit]

Hi, you seem to be removing all these from categories. Has this been discussed anywhere? I don't believe this particular header was being used as justification for inappropriate speedy deletion and there is an ongoing problem of the Commons being used as a dump for all sorts of useless images. --Simonxag (talk) 10:58, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was mass reverting User:The Honorable who was inappropriately mass tagging things with it(see contbributions). I'm fine if you want to go reinsert, but areas like Category:Zentai—a fetish involving wearing a full body zentai suit— are obviously inappropriate for a nudity tag. Similarly, all the categories that were of sex toys without human beings at all shouldn't posses a nudity tag. AerobicFox (talk) 17:23, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I guess this template should concern nudity and/or sexuality. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:40, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The primary defense of this template has been to prevent low quality pictures of gentalia. This template could be used to mark all topics(like astronomy or bed posts) since all it says is that low quality pics can be deleted. It should probably be limited however to where there is an actual problem with many low quality pictures.AerobicFox (talk) 16:49, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Water_polo_shot.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Morning Sunshine (talk) 09:02, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blue Dream.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 22:01, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Turkey Balloon Animal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 20:15, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shibari at (Caserta) Italy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.235.159.92 15:47, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shibari at (Caserta) Italy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

151.75.158.203 15:19, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shibari at (Caserta) Italy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

151.75.158.203 15:21, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]