Jump to content

User talk:Adeletron 3030/Archive 9

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Hello

I have responded to your message on my talk page. Thanks in advance and let me know if im missing anything Pyraminxsolver (talk) 06:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Solving problems with my older uploads

Good morning, @Adeletron 3030.

Can you take a look at my old uploads that got deleted? All the ones from the French military should be Open License 2, and those from Italy should be PD-Italy. I didn't know how to place licenses back then. I didn't know how to do anything, actually. I didn't even know the messages I received - and only way later found - were from people. I thought they were bots.

Best regards.

Filipe46 (talk) 14:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

{{Japanyear2}}{{Japanmonth2}}内で引数が必要な場合とそうでない場合

作成された{{Kanazawayear}}{{{1|}}}, {{{2|}}}と引数が2つありますよね。こういう場合は、Template:Japanyear2に入れる際はこの{{Japanyear2}}の中で引数を指定してやらないと、{{Higashiosakamonth}}の時と同じようにExpression error: Unexpected > operator and Error: Invalid time.と出ますよ。例えばCategory:2022 in Kanazawaを作成しようとするとき、{{Kanazawayear}}と単にやっても駄目で、{{Kanazawayear|202|2}}としなければならないのと同じことです。指定の仕方はこれです。{{Japanyear2/a}}と{{Japanyear2/b}}が引数{{{1|}}}{{{2|}}}の代わりになります。上の方のKaruizawaが単に{{Karuizawayear}}となっているのは、{{Karuizawayear}}自体が引数不要の仕様で作ってあり、そもそも不要なためです。ちなみにCategory:2022 in Kanazawaの例では、{{Kanazawayear|{{Japanyear2/a}}|{{Japanyear2/b}}}}としても行けます。それを常に指定してあるのが{{Japanyear2}}というわけです。最初は誰でも分からないと思いますが、せめて理解しようとする努力はなさって下さい。よろしく。--トトト (talk) 11:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

@トトト 丁寧に説明してくださりありがとうございます。今後は気をつけます。 Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:06, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

"botgalleries" question

Could you please provide a link to this bot's User:Adeletron 3030/botgalleries/Sports page? Thank you, -- Ooligan (talk) 19:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

@Ooligan Are you asking how to set it up? I don't remember the exact steps but it's through User:OgreBot/gallery. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 20:41, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Haddock at the Ashvale.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 00:29, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Adeletron 3030/botgalleries/Sports, has failed. Your gallery has a hard upper-limit of about 8000 files per day, while your gallery would have had 30582 files (including files already on the page).

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal at User talk:OgreBot/gallery within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 11:53, 5 December 2024 (UTC))

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Adeletron 3030/botgalleries/Sports, has failed. Your gallery has a hard upper-limit of about 8000 files per day, while your gallery would have had 22800 files (including files already on the page).

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal at User talk:OgreBot/gallery within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 11:53, 6 December 2024 (UTC))

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Adeletron 3030/botgalleries/Ballsports, has failed. Your gallery has a hard upper-limit of about 8000 files per day, while your gallery would have had 22605 files (including files already on the page).

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal at User talk:OgreBot/gallery within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 11:53, 6 December 2024 (UTC))

Happy Holidays

A1Cafel (talk) 04:44, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello Adeletron 3030. I have obtained more details about the file File:PedrinhoPresidenteVasco.jpg, and permission from its author. I would like to know how to reverse its deletion. Ryan Domingos (talk) 01:04, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

@Ryan Domingos You can follow the steps described at COM:UNDEL. It’ll also be a good idea to document the permission by following the process described at COM:VRT. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 03:00, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
I contacted permissions-pt@wikimedia.org via email, and sent the messages and permission given by the author. Ryan Domingos (talk) 13:20, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
I haven't gotten any response yet... Ryan Domingos (talk) 21:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
@Ryan Domingos Have you posted an undeletion requested at COM:UNDEL? Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:45, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello! You reverted the flickrreview on this file. If you think the photo is flickrwashed I think it would be better to nominate the file for deletion. I you just revert it then the file will fill up Category:Flickr images from bad authors and someone else have to worry about it. MGA73 (talk) 11:07, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

@MGA73 Sorry, I'm not quite sure what I wanted for that file. I have my doubts about all the files from that Flickr account, but I don't have any evidence that this particular image is Flickrwashed, so I restored the passed review template. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:42, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi! It just shows that you are like the rest of us. It is not really easy to find a good solution for such files when some files from an account is good and some are bad :-) Any reason you are not an image reviewer? --MGA73 (talk) 13:45, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

1980年代の京都市の写真について

編集お疲れ様です。Marie-Sophie Mejanという人が1985年頃に撮影した京都市内の写真を昨年12月31日にCategory:April 1985 in Kyotoに移動されてますが、正しい日付なのでしょうか。例えば葵祭は5月、祇園祭は7月開催で、4月ではないはずですが(祇園祭の方は専用カテゴリCategory:Gion Matsuri 1985があるので外しました)。 Phronimoi (talk) 02:22, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

@Phronimoi コメントありがとうございます。説明文にApril 1985とあったのでカテゴリー変更を行いましたが、確かに祇園祭の写真もありますし他にも間違いがあります(白川郷が”North of Kyoto”とあったり)。エラーの指摘と変更の差し戻しありがとうございます。 Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:47, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Spam

Next time you find pictures whose uploaders are using the metadata for spam, we don't need to delete the pictures - just the spam URLs. DS (talk) 20:09, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing out. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 21:31, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Your hard work is being appreciated by me. Suke75 (talk) 02:29, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

please delete it

Hello and greetings to you. Please delete the image I uploaded in the past; I did not know about copyright policies at that time. Please delete it. File:2019-7-99c6a2d7-b172-4a4f-ba57-c89d8e210269-638baaa9bc2e137a535335ae.webp Delta-light (talk) 13:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello Adeletron 3030. Regarding files File:New Juaben South Municipal District logo.png and File:Cape Coast Metropolitan Assembly Logo.png, I have noticed that you had tagged the images with the {No permission since} templete. With the reason your given for those files, wouldn't that make the rest of the files associated with Category:Logos associated with administrative units of Ghana fall under what you had stated? Just wondering. — Preceding unsigned comment added by August2 (talk • contribs) 23:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

@August2 thanks for pointing that out. I don’t think I was correct in tagging the images so I’ve reverted my changes. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 02:46, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Palace of Auburn Hills CFD

Category discussion warning

Palace of Auburn Hills has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at Commons:Categories for discussion/2025/01/Category:Palace of Auburn Hills.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Astros4477 (talk) 00:10, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

LaLiga photos

Hi Adeletron 3030, I'm happy to start a conversation about the content (photos) we have uploaded to Wikimedia in the past months. This editor account FotosLaLiga, corresponds to LaLiga (the organisation that manages football with the clubs in Spain). Our email address is: prensa@laliga.es , but I can't see what your email address is for this editor account.

All the photos published are our property and we have the copyright on them so, in each of the uploads, we have granted the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, and almost all the photos, except the one of Javier Tebas from 2024, are on our website, accessible to everyone. As for this photo, it is true that the author is Rafa Aparicio, who is one of our photographers, so we will soon send a letter to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with his express authorisation...

I don't know what else we can do, we think we are complying with the rules but we always get problems with some of the photos we have uploaded. I would ask you to please tell me how we have to do so that the photos are not deleted. We have already written to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with all the details so that the photos are replaced and new ones are not deleted. I hope that this is the correct procedure, the truth is that it is complicated and difficult.

Best regards FotosLaLiga (talk) 17:01, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Respectfully, Ooligan (talk) 23:15, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ooligan (talk) 00:31, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Re: New Denmark image

I realize this may be a dumb question, but what qualifies this image for the "misgeneration" category? Viriditas (talk) 21:42, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Mostly the bicyclists in the background. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 23:10, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
I think you have a point. The lady riding a bicycle on the beach in the far left appears to have no bicycle at all. Viriditas (talk) 00:00, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
Apologies if this is another dumb question, but to generate an image without misgeneration, wouldn't that require me to edit it in post? Viriditas (talk) 00:02, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
I think a better question might be, how can I create an image on DALL-E for use in the Denmarkification article that won't get deleted? Viriditas (talk) 01:24, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:17, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Kenny McCormick

This character is copyrighted and Marko Mijajlović80 (talk · contribs) upload files of him by pretend it was his own files.

Another file detected : Kenny McCormick old.png.

Thanks. Manchesterunited1234 (talk) 15:51, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

撮影年月について

はじめまして、Adeletron 3030 さん。Krorokeroro と申します。Adeletron 3030 さんにはいつも日本で撮影されたファイルのカテゴリ付与をして下さり、どうも有難うございます。日頃の Adeletron 3030 さんのコモンズでの活動には本当に感謝いたしております。さて、お願いがあるのですが、先ほど日本標準時で2月18日にアップロードされた画像について2月19日撮影とカテゴリを付与されていましたので、私が取り消させて頂きました。Tokumeigakarinoaoshima さんが撮影された画像(File:Drug Akakabe Yoshita shop.jpg など)なのですが、これらは全て日本時間2025年2月18日にアップロードされております。2月19日撮影はあり得ません。Tokumeigakarinoaoshima さんは撮影された画像をすぐにアップロードされる方ですから、おそらく2月撮影というのは正しいと思うのですが(確証はなく、おそらくです)2月18日アップロードなので2月19日撮影にはなりません。どうか撮影年月のカテゴリ付与については日本時間で何時にアップロードしたかというのを御考慮頂ければ幸いです。はじめての Adeletron 3030 さんへの投稿がこのような形になり誠に心苦しいのですが、Adeletron 3030 さんの日頃のコモンズでの活動にはいくら感謝しても感謝し切れない気持ちに変わりございません。どうか今後ともよろしくお願い申し上げます。--Krorokeroro (talk) 18:44, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

@Krorokeroroさん、コメントありがとうございます。確かに Tokumeigakarinoaoshimaさんの写真の日付設定にズレがあるようですね。ご指摘と修正していただき、ありがとうございます。今後もよろしくお願いします。 Adeletron 3030 (talk) 01:26, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Please delete it

Hello and greetings to you. I just realized that I published an image that is not yet in the public domain. Please delete it. File:Barcelona equipo v Realmadrid 1936.jpg

Kind regards. Barr Theo (talk) 17:52, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

@Barr Theo I think it's fine. We don't know the original photographer and it's 89 years old. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:11, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
Hello. The name of the original photographer is literally written on the bottom left corner: Antoni Campañà.
Kind regards. Barr Theo (talk) 14:16, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
File:Railway Museum, Saitama, 2015-07-21 DSC 3293 (19264647044).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 05:02, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

File:Railway Museum Saitama 2020-08-21 DSC02982 (50250118338).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 05:03, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

IP reverts are correct, NP template was added by a LTA. Please beware. Phương Linh (talk) 05:55, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

@Hide on Rosé Sorry about that. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

mazání obrázků

Drahý mazači, obrázky jsou evidentně z mobilu a s volnou licencí. Prosím používej hlavu, ne robota, komplikuješ práci jiným. Díky, Colaagri (talk) 15:58, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

@Colaagri No, it's not clear that they're free photos. Almost every photograph you find on the internet, no matter what kind of camera it's taken on, is copyright protected. You say the photos are from Flickr but you forgot to link to the individual image pages. Please fix that. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:09, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
File:The Queen of New Zealand, 1986.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Celia Homeford (talk) 13:04, 24 March 2025 (UTC)