User talk:Abrar nabi wani
The General Theory Of Emptiness
[edit]The General Theory of Emptiness
Abrar Nabi Wani
Class 12th Student (Currently Studying B. Sc OTT 1st year at Punjab India)
Kangan District: Ganderbal, State: Kashmir, Country: India (+91 7006482849)
abrar.in@yahoo.com
261abrar@gmail.com
Abstract In the present paper an attempt has been made to explore the theory of emptiness and answer fundamental questions like why do galaxies expand, how black holes die and why do we feel weightless at the centre of Earth. Also one of the most fascinating theories, The Big Bang theory has been explained from the author’s perspective.
Keywords — Big Bang, Black hole, Gravity, Vacuum, Galaxy, Space, Worm holes etc.
Introduction AS PER SIR ISAAC NEWTON IF SUN SUDDENLY DISAPPEAR THE PLANET EARTH LEAVES THE ORBIT AND MOVES AWAY FROM THE SUN. AS PER ALBERT EINSTEIN LIGHT TAKES 8 MINUTES AND 20 SECONDS TO REACH EARTH AND NOTHING CAN TRAVEL FASTER THAN LIGHT. SO, THE GRAVITATIONAL FIELD ALSO SHOULD TAKE 8 MINUTES AND 20 SECONDS TO REACH EARTH. SO AS PER ALBERT EINSTEIN IF THE SUN SUDDENLY DISAPPEAR THE PLANET EARTH LEAVES THE ORBIT AFTER 8 MINUTES 20 SECONDS AND GOES AWAY FROM THE SUN.
AS PER MY CONCEPT IF THE SUN SUDDENLY DISAPPEAR THE PLANETS EARTH FALLS ON THE CENTRE OF SUN. AS WE KNOW SPACE IS NET LIKE STRUCTURE AND GRAVITY IS DUE TO THIS NET WHEN IT IS BENDED BY ANY OBJECT. IT MEANS AT THE PLACE OF OBJECT THERE IS NO PRESENCE OF NET. SO IF THE SUN SUDDENLY DISAPPEARS AN EMPTY SPACE WILL OCCUR AND THE NET STRUCTURE WHICH IS AROUND THE OBJECT FALLS ON THIS EMPTY SPACE. WHEN THIS NET FALLS ON THE EMPTY SPACE THE OBJECT ON THE NET WILL ALSO FALLS ON EMPTY SPACE IT MEANS EARTH WILL FALL ON THE SUN'S PLACE.
BUT HERE WILL ARISE TWO MAIN OPTIONS A. FIRST IF NET WILL FALLS ON THE EMPTY SPACE MEANS EARTH WILL FALL ON THE SUN'S PLACE. B. 2ND EMPTY SPACE IS ALSO A SPACE FILLED WITH NOTHING. AS PER THIS CONCEPT IF THE SUN SUDDENLY DISAPPEAR NOTHING CAN HAPPEN WITH ALL THE PLANETS THEY WILL REMAINS CONTINUE REVOLVING AROUND SUN'S PLACE. BECAUSE FORCE ON SUN IS DUE TO NET AND IT REMAINS ALSO EQUAL ON EMPTY SPACE (IF NET COMES AT EMPTY'S PLACE THEN, WHERE WILL THE EMPTY SPACE GOES.)
“E.G. TAKE FULLY COVERED BOTTLE FILLED WITH WATER HAVING TWO HOLES. WATER WILL COME OUT WHEN TWO HOLES ARE OPEN. BECAUSE WATER COMES OUT WHEN SOMETHING TAKE THE PLACE OF WATER AND THIS PLACE IS TAKEN BY AIR SO, LIKE THAT IF EMPTY SPACE GETS FILLED WITH NET BUT WHERE WILL EMPTY GOES” SO, THE NET CAN'T ENTER INTO THE EMPTY SPACE, FORCE DUE TO NET AROUND SUN'S PLACE REMAINS CONSTANT. IT MEANS GRAVITY REMAINS CONSTANT. PLANETS KEEP REVOLVING AROUND EMPTY SPACE SO AS PER THIS CONCEPT GRAVITY IS NOT DEPEND ON MASS IT DEPENDS ON HOW SPACE IS CURVED WE CAN GENERATE GRAVITY WITHOUT ANY MASS. IN 2ND OPTION SPACE IS CURVED BY EMPTY SPACE SO THE PLANETS REMAINS ROTATING
AS PER 2ND OPTION BLACK HOLES ARE EMPTY BUBBLES CREATED DURING EXPLOSION OF STAR, DURING SUPERNOVA. A NEW SPACE IS CREATED DURING SUPERNOVA WHICH IS EMPTY AND KNOWN AS BLACK HOLES. IN BLACK HOLE THE FORCE IS ONE SIDED, FROM OUTER SIDE FORCE IS STRONG AND INNER SIDE BLACK HOLES ARE EMPTY SO FORCE IS STRONG FROM OUTER SIDE. THAT IS WHY BLACK HOLES ARE HAVING MUCH MORE ATTRACTIVE FORCE. THERE IS NO GRAVITATIONAL FORCE INSIDE BLACK HOLE. GRAVITY WORKS ONLY FROM OUTER TO EVENT HORIZONS NOT WORKS INSIDE BLACK HOLE. EVENT HORIZONS IS THE OUTER LINING OF EMPTY SPACE. AS PER OPTION FIRST BLACK HOLE ALSO WORKS AND PRINCIPAL FIRST CAN BE ALSO APPLIED BLACK HOLES. BECAUSE THE NET FALLS IN THE EMPTY SPACE MEANS ATTRACTION, AFTER SUPERNOVA NET FALLS IN THE EMPTY SPACE FOR LONGER TIME AND THEN VANISH.
WHY BLACK HOLES ARE SMALL BUT STRONG, MORE GRAVITATIONAL FORCE THAN EARTH. THE EARTH IS NOT FULLY SOLID OR NOTHING IS FULLY SOLID BECAUSE ATOM HAS ALSO EMPTY SPACE BETWEEN FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLES. SO GRAVITY DOESN'T WORK PROPERLY SOME NEGATIVE GRAVITATIONAL FORCE IS PRODUCED. WHERE THERE IS SPACE THERE ARE GRAVITATIONAL CAUS Abrar nabi wani (talk) 14:34, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
|
File:God And Dimension.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yelena Mordovtseva (talk) 04:15, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
 |
File:Mr Abrar.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
