User talk:Abraham Vázquez

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Abraham Vázquez!

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Abraham Vázquez!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categorías escudos

[edit]

Hola Abraham, veo que has empezado a categorizar los escudos en Category:Heráldica municipal de España, pero como puedes ver en esa categoría aparece el aviso de que tiene que estar vacía, y los escudos tienen que ir en las categorías de su provincia, como Category:Coats of arms of municipalities of Pontevedra.

Otra cosa, te recomiendo que los escudos que subas tengan el menor blanco posible a su alrededor, porque al ponerlos en las fichas de las localidades aparecen muy pequeños (por ejemplo Mondariz o Caldas de Reis).

Un saludo.

Escudo de Fregenal de la Sierra

[edit]

Hola Abraham.

He visto que has realizado un escudo heráldico de Fregenal de la Sierra. Simplemente quería decirte que su necesitas inspiración sobre éste escudo tan peculiar te dejo una copia del mismo ya que el campo del que esá rodeado es diferente al que le has realizado. Gracias, ante todo, por escuchar: Atentamente --Fregenal01 (talk) 15:21, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retoques para el escudo de La Garrovilla

[edit]
File:La Garrovilla.svg

Hola Abraham, antes de nada quiero darte las gracias por tu labor en la campo de la heráldica. Quería preguntarte que si es posible que realices algunos cambios en el escudo de La Garrovilla, pues según la descripción al escudo le faltan la espada (levantada con su mano derecha sobre la cabeza) y la rodela del Arcángel San Miguel. Asimismo, al arcángel también hay que añadirle sus alas, de acuerdo a su iconografía habitual. Se puede ver en la página oficial de la diputación de Badajoz, aquí. Muchas gracias.--Alonso de Mendoza (talk) 14:42, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Begonte

[edit]

En este informe de error se dice que el escudo de Begonte que realizaste coincide con el del Vaticano. Sé que varios escudos incluyen la tiara papal, pero como no he podido encontrar el blasón de Begonte, no pude verificar que sea correcto. ¿Podrías confirmarlo? Ggenellina (talk) 09:40, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Castro Caldelas

[edit]

Hola, Abraham. El escudo de Castro Caldelas (y la bandera) han sido cambiados. Este es el link, por si quieres hacer una nueva versión: Decreto del DOG. Un saludo, y gracias por tu trabajo: --Xabier Cid (talk) 22:55, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:O_Rosal.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

. HombreDHojalata.talk 10:14, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Becerreá

[edit]

Estimado señor: un mensaje anónimo en w:Wikipedia:Informes de error informa que el escudo de Becerreá, que ud. ha subido (), contiene en su diseño un perro, mientras que en el escudo original, que se puede consultar en la página del Ayuntamiento de Becerreá [1] se puede ver claramente una becerra. Es una verdadera lástima, porque el perro había quedado muy bonito, pero sería bueno que lo reemplazara ud. por un diseño más ajustado al diseño original.

Sin más, saludo a ud. atentamente. --200.32.116.2 12:26, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ciertamente. Decreto 89/1992, do 26 de marzo, polo que se aproba o escudo heráldico do Concello de Becerreá (Lugo).: <<De gules, sobre una terraza de verde unha becerra de outo á dereita e unha torre de prata á esquerda, acompañadas dun sol figurado de outo no cantón destro do xefe. o escudo tímbrase coa coroa real cerrada>>. Diario Oficial de Galicia n.º 68 de 8 de abril de 1992. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 09:30, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Crear bandera de La Garrovilla

[edit]

Hola Abraham, como autor de la imagen en formato .svg del escudo de La Garrovilla te pedí hace más de un año que hicieses unos retoques en el mismo, algo que cumpliste estupendamente, y me gustaría pedirte otro favor: que elaboraras la bandera de la misma localidad. Las instrucciones oficiales están en este documento del DOE, en la segunda página arriba a la izquierda, y dicen así: «Bandera cuadrada, roja, campeando en su centro el escudo municipal». Muchísimas gracias de antemano y un saludo cordial, Alonso de Mendoza (talk) 16:16, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

La bandera ha quedado bien, pero ¿se podría hacer más grande, sin espacio por sus cuatro lados? Es que puesta en artículo de la wikipedia se ve muy pequeña. Espero que no sea molestia.--Alonso de Mendoza (talk) 15:30, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Muchas gracias por todo, saludos cordiales. Alonso de Mendoza (talk) 17:37, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want it to be a square red flag, or to be a rectangular flag with white stripes on either side of the red? I could fix it either way, but it looks kind of funny the way it now is... AnonMoos (talk) 16:04, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed this one... AnonMoos (talk) 16:13, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Murla.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Teoamez (talk) 17:12, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Melide.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 13:43, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Higuera de la Serena.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

212.169.188.238 09:32, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:E.L.M. de Valdivia (Villanueva de la Serena).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cultura Valdivia (talk) 17:37, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:San Vicente de Alcántara.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

176.10.65.7 19:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Albatera.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Macondo (talk) 08:10, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beniarrés.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Macondo (talk) 08:50, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Garrovilla - Bandera.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alonso de Mendoza (talk) 14:14, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Message by Kandedo

[edit]

Hi Abraham Vázquez, following notice by Kandedo was accidently posted on your user page on 0:43, 29 November 2017 instead of your talk page:

Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 20:42, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of arms os Ejea de los Caballeros.png

[edit]

Hola, este escudo no es el oficial de Ejea de los Caballeros, por eso rogaría que lo borrase ya que se incluye en las páginas de Ejea y de Javier Lambán cuando no es un escudo "verdadero".

Gracias, Sergiospaingh

File:Granja de Torrehermosa.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

81.36.107.229 11:11, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oliva de Mérida.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

46.25.119.87 15:38, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cabeza del Buey.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BIBLIOTECA CABEZA DEL BUEY (talk) 18:35, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:La Garrovilla 2.svg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:La Garrovilla 2.svg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:La Garrovilla 2.svg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lemonaka (talk) 07:14, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]