User talk:5 albert square

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, 5 albert square!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Request

Hi.

Would you be kind enough to unblock me on en.wiki? The indef was made in response to my own request on July 14. I would very much appreciate it. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:57, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

JFYI, I had sent an e-mail to Dmies earlier and he took care of it. Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:39, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Glad to see you back.--5 albert square (talk) 10:44, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Unblock

Hello 5 albert square,

as edit rights are not given at the moment I try to respond here. I follow the point which you portray in the e-mail regarding the lift of the indefinite block regarding the 2 blocks. However it was said, if I remember correctly, by an admin that eventhough this block was placed indefinite and overall, it does not mean it was utterly indefinite. Now over a year has passed and I have no intention at all to edit on the pages involved that lead to the block or have any interactions in this kind again with other editors. I also feel ashamed and bad to what happened. Nevertheless, it has to be added that it was not an utterly clear thing (like at the first block where it was absolute obvious) in the sense, that I made an edit, like vandalism, and hence there was a block. It was in general a rather complex situation and with all respect, and also by observation of other users, quite none involved were behaving absolutely in accordance to the WP guidelines. (Blatant harassing on my talkpage, accusing me of things I never did, insinuating agenda editing on silly things like, and I am not kidding, including simple sources on the article of "London" where even a template was indicating that sources are needed. Go check the edit history on the London WP article, history section, to see the edits) Things like that, which for whatever reason, were utterly neglected by the admin community at that time when I pointed out to that. Of course that does not mean that other interactions were not ok as well by me, which in the end lead to the block. I acted in a way that was unacceptable which lead to the ban. But to point out again, it was a complicated thing with quite a lot of smearing from the opposite accusing side, which lead to such strange accusations that simple sources or a rearrangemend of a pie chart would be a "bad" intended editing. Probably it would be too much for you to dig in that matter, but surely one could if one would, as this goes actually through multiple talkpages, articles, and notice board discussions. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=791171801#User_continues_to_remove_sourced_material (That should be the right link I found from my edit history, from there on once could check the entire discussion) The last thing I intend to be is a "trouble maker". My question now would be if it is really such an utterly aweful and negative edit/behavior I did back then to keep the block forever or if there is any possibility and outlook to give me the chance to proof myself to give much value and contribution to this project? Thanks, Joobo (talk) 08:11, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi, if you do not agree with my decision, the best I can suggest is to lodge another appeal through UTRS. I stand by my decision on UTRS so I will then refrain from reviewing your appeal. Thanks.--5 albert square (talk) 23:50, 28 September 2018 (UTC)