User talk:2marco4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, 2marco4!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 13:55, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:MBLAQ- Just Blaq.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Túrelio (talk) 14:02, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ciudad de Rosario Skyline.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ciudad de Rosario Skyline.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:23, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Erase it and replace it with something better. Thanks 2marco4 (talk) 05:20, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your postings

[edit]
čeština  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  italiano  日本語  português  русский  українська  +/−
Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions
Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions
As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

--SignBot (talk) 01:14, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Bandera de Lomas

[edit]

Entiendo, voy igual a buscar algo más de info al respecto, y si lo considero procedente, agregaré esos rayos que están faltando. Saludos. —Frodar (talk) 17:07, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, suerte. 2marco4 (talk) 20:46, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ya hurfer los hizo 2marco4 (talk) 16:16, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Bandera de Castelli

[edit]

¿Cómo estás? Si, ya la había visto, tengo que hacerme un tiempo e intentar el diseño, te agradezco la mención. —Frodar (talk) 02:05, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias. 2marco4 (talk) 16:15, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Licencia inválida

[edit]

Hola, querìa decirte que el template "{{Argentina-Gov-Symbol}}" no es una licencia válida de copyright, sino un template creado para recategorizar todos los archivos que contenía la (ex)licencia {{PD-AR-Gov}}, que fue declarada inválida en esta discusión. Por lo tanto, te pido que no lo utilices como licencia, porque la idea es precisamente ir revisando todos las banderas y escudos que utilizaban PD-AR-Gov y colocar nuevas licencias.

Cualquier consulta, no dejes de hacérmelo saber, gracias. Fma12 (talk) 15:33, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

¿Y por qué estás invalidando los archivos de las banderas municipales argentinos? 2marco4 (talk) 16:15, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, no estoy invalidando nada, en el enlace de la discusión que te copié arriba, se decidió que PD-AR-Gov no es una licencia válida, por lo cual hay que revisar todos los emblemas uno por uno.

¿Hay una categoría para nombrar como alternativa al dominio público por ser una bandera municipal? 2marco4 (talk) 16:19, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

El hechod de ser una bandera/escudo municipal, ya no alcanza para ser de libre uso, lamentablemente. Las licencias que pueden utilizarse son {{PD-AR-Anonymous}} o {{PD-old-70}} en caso de corresponder, claro. Caso contrario, se borrarán. Fma12 (talk) 16:54, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Entonces, haga o que sea correcto. Eso hablalo con Hurfer porque el publicó varias imagenes. Quizas lo habías ya hablado y no te contestó. 2marco4 (talk) 19:21, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, no lo hablé con Hurfer porque el no cambió la licencia de ninguna imagen, sí le fui notificando (como a todos) la necesidad de permiso en las imágenes que no cumplen los cometidos que te expliqué arriba. Fma12 (talk) 20:36, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

O sea que esos símbolos lo categorizan como Trademark o algo así? 2marco4 (talk) 23:08, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Algo así, los símbolos se consideran copyright si tiene cierta elaboración. No son considerados de dominio público. Fma12 (talk) 09:58, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bandera de Castelli (Buenos Aires).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bandera de Castelli (Buenos Aires).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Fma12.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 19:26, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bandera de Lomas.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bandera de Lomas.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Fma12 (talk) 14:44, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Licencias CC

[edit]

Hola, vi que subiste dos banderas, las de Escobar y Bolívar indicando en ambos casos una licencia CC. Buscando en las web de ambos municipios, no encontré ninguna leyenda que indique estas licencias (como por ej, sí la hay en la web de Bahía Blanca)

¿Podrías pasarme los links de los municipios donde citan las licencias? Si no tuvieran un permiso válido, los van a volver a borrar...

Por otra parte, te comento que deshice tu edición en la bandera de Exaltación de la Cruz, porque {{Argentina-Gov-Symbol}} no es una licencia válida, sino un template temporal creado a partir de esta discusión donde se estableció que todos los símbolos municipales debía tener una licencia válida.

Saludos, Fma12 (talk) 09:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No sabía que el sitio web de Bahía tenía en la parte de abajo una licencia 2.5.
En este caso las puede volver a borrar. 2marco4 (talk) 14:38, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Si, cuando los sitios web tienen licencias CC, generalmente las incluyen en la pàgina de inicio, como Rosario.gob.ar Fma12 (talk) 15:14, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Tampoco creo que sea facil contactarme por un tema de licencias para banderas municipales, no creo que conozcan el tema. Especialmente en municipios bonaerenses del interior. 2marco4 (talk) 15:19, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
¿Entonces por qué no revisa también las otras banderas en busca de licencias válidas? La mayoría no las tienen.
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Banderas_de_municipios_de_la_Argentina
PD: Bahía Blanca no cuenta por ser una de las pocas bonaerenses (quizás la única) en tener una licencia válida. 2marco4 (talk) 16:02, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Y quién te dijo que no revisé las otras banderas? Algunas no están licenciadas pero al ser de diseños simples, se categorizan como {{PD-ineligible}}. Otras que veo (como la de Las Varillas) sobrepasan largamente ese umbral, y deberían tener permiso.
Tené en cuenta que muchas banderas no están correctamente categorizadas, como puedo encontrar una bandera que está dentro de la categoría category:flags? es imposible, tendría que ser adivino. Fma12 (talk) 22:58, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
PD: si te parece que alguna de las banderas que me listaste no debería estar en commons (por tener elementos complejos), no tenés más que marcarla como "no permission since". De hecho, yo he marcado algunas como la de Caa Catí. Fma12 (talk) 23:02, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
En serio no quiero pelear con vos. Soy novato, no sabía antes de que hay banderas que tienen diseños muy simples, que no necesitan tener licencia, quizás fondo blanco con escudo. En fin te dejé mensaje en tu discusión introduciéndome. 2marco4 (talk) 23:15, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pero quedate tranquilo, no deseo pelear tampoco, simplemente te estoy diciendo que todas las banderas o escudos que vea que exceden la simplicidad, las marco. Me vino bien la página que me mostraste porque encontré ahí banderas que no había visto antes.
Si, vi tu msj en mi talkpage y te respondí. Sé que las múltiples normativas y disposiciones de Commons no son tan fáciles de entender para los recién llegados (me pasó, y me ayudaron), así que si puedo asistirte con algún tema que no conozcas o entiendas, avisame, lo haré con gusto. Gracias desde ya Fma12 (talk) 23:45, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hola, te respondí en mi página sobre permisos de archivos ajenos Fma12 (talk) 09:42, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Bandera Carmen de Areco.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية  Deutsch  English  español  français  日本語  മലയാളം  polski  português  slovenščina  svenska  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

--EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete that file. I uploaded it last year as reference. 181.229.238.231 15:50, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Bandera de Adolfo Gonzales Chaves.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Q28 (talk) 10:36, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The flag was actually a template of the other flag. You may erase that flag. It was for personal use only 2marco4 (talk) 16:03, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]