User talk:青子守歌
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
SieBot 08:36, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:39, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Many cars in Hokkaido University.JPG is uncategorized since 11 March 2009. BotMultichillT 06:39, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Ferry Hamanasu's restaurant.JPG is uncategorized since 11 March 2009. BotMultichillT 06:39, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:02, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Moved from Japanese Wikipediaの確認
[edit]はじめまして、Sabuellと申します。恐れ入ります。
Template:Moved from Japanese Wikipediaのついて確認させてください。ja:特別:アップロード(厳密にいうとja:Template:Informationですが)に出典/Sourceという項目がありますが、Template:Moved from Japanese Wikipediaにはそれに該当するラベルが見当たりません。念のため履歴も確認してみましたが、初版からTemplate:InformationにはSourceがありました。Template:Moved from Japanese Wikipediaに概要や履歴などがあって、出典がないのには何か理由があってのことなのでしょうか。
よろしくお願いします。--Sabuell (talk) 20:09, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- (回答)こんにちは。たぶんSabuellさんは少々混乱されているのだと思いますが、{{Moved from Japanese Wikipedia}}はウィキペディア日本語版にあった元ファイルの情報を表示するテンプレートであり、出典(source)を含むそのファイル自体の説明は従来通り{{Information}}へ書くように設計されています(例:File:Mugi police station.jpg)。それゆえ、そのような引数は設定されていません。--aokomoriuta (talk) 01:25, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
返信ありがとうございます。
わかりました。ご親切にファイルやテンプレートの説明文の手直しまでしていただき、重ねて御礼申し上げます。--Sabuell (talk) 04:04, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:54, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:55, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
OTRSご協力のお願い
[edit]はじめまして、RSSFSOと申します。まだまだCommons経験が浅いですが、何卒よろしくお願いします。
実は宮内庁ホームページから天皇の画像をアップロードしようと思うのですが、天皇や皇族の肖像画は政府標準利用規約(第2.0版)とは別の利用ルールが適用されるので、アップロードできません。また規約によると、それらの画像を利用する場合は電話で確認するようにと記載されていますが、これでは証明にならないのでOTRSを利用しようと思った次第です。
私は政府標準利用規約(第2.0版)に準拠したファイルは複数回アップロードした経験があるのですが、OTRSは未経験かつ使い方を知らないので、青子守歌さんにお願いしたいと思います。ご迷惑は承知ですが、ご協力いただけると幸いです。--RSSFSO (talk) 12:02, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
小柴ホール
[edit]こんにちは、失礼ですが、私は日本を訪れたことのある台湾人です。あなたが数年前に撮影した東京大学の写真をWikipediaで見たので、失礼ながらご連絡します。どうかお許しください。
2016年に東大を訪れ、小柴ホールの写真を撮ったことがありますが、当時は設備が悪く写真がぼやけていました https://www.flickr.com/photos/138479723@N04/albums/72177720304482625
現在、小柴ホールの展示内容が変更されているため、撮影を再開する機会がなかったのはずっと残念でした。
同じ場所を撮影した写真があれば、あなたからそれらを購入できますか?私は個人的なコレクションだけを使用しています。これは失礼な要求ですが、お許しください。
私のメッセージを読んでくれてありがとうございました。Kt Meursault (talk) 07:51, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
About Category:Beam support
[edit]I saw that you created Category:Beam support. I have some questions about it:
- Can you tell what Category:Beam support is about? Could you perhaps give a better description of it? Is it about supporting beams, or about beams that themselves are supporting something?
- Shouldn't there be one or more extra parent categories, something with support and/or architecture/construction?
- What kind of files are allowed here? Only drawings, or also photos of real situations?
JopkeB (talk) 13:09, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- @JopkeB:
- As you can see the categorized files, they are about structural support on beam theory, currently mainly (professional) figures. You can add a better description by your hand.
- I don't need them. I believe you know that "Beam support" is used only for beam theory. Beam theory is naturally categorized under some engineering.
- Permission is not my work. I am not the category owner (nor is anyone else on the Commons). You can propose the rule to the Commons community if you need it.
- aokomoriuta (talk) 20:51, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for your answers.
- Sorry, I have not so much knowledge about constructions, that I can see it (@1), that I can make a proper description (@1), nor that I know the first thing about beam theory (@2), and I guess a lot of people visiting Commons have neither. And I think Commons categories should be understandable for all visitors, even if they are about technical subjects. That is why I asked you these questions. Since it looks like you do have that knowledge, please:
- Would you make a more extensive description, explaining to visitors with less knowledge of the subject what this category is about? You do not have to explain the whole theory, just an indication of what this category is about, what should be in it and what not. No indeed, you are not the category owner, but you started it, have knowledge about it and can enlighten the rest of us. And I would appreciate that.
- JopkeB (talk) 05:04, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
- I have received your request. I will try to make it when I have enough free time in the future. But making by your own hand could be a better choice to adapt to what/how you want to get (because we are in wiki). aokomoriuta (talk) 06:37, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. I'll wait until you have time to make the description. JopkeB (talk) 15:35, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
- Can you give me an indication of when you might have time to make a description? JopkeB (talk) 06:00, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
- I don't know. As I said, DIY if you need. aokomoriuta (talk) 08:49, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
- Can you give me an indication of when you might have time to make a description? JopkeB (talk) 06:00, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. I'll wait until you have time to make the description. JopkeB (talk) 15:35, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
- I have received your request. I will try to make it when I have enough free time in the future. But making by your own hand could be a better choice to adapt to what/how you want to get (because we are in wiki). aokomoriuta (talk) 06:37, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
This discussion continues on Commons:Categories for discussion/2023/10/Category:Beam support. --JopkeB (talk) 04:01, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Beam support has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |