User talk:Лобачев Владимир/Archive 1

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Лобачев Владимир!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

File tagging File:F002d_Астра_ромашковая2.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:F002d_Астра_ромашковая2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:F002d_Астра_ромашковая2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

shizhao (talk) 20:02, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Височное кольцо северцев.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:38, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Лобачев Владимир!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 13:45, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Маршрут похода на половцев.gif was uncategorized on 24 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:45, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Герб Северной страны 1672 года.gif was uncategorized on 24 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:45, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Gerb Polotska 1781.svg was uncategorized on 25 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:21, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Печать Олега, князя Черниговского. 1094 г..jpg was uncategorized on 25 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:21, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Печать Лугвена Ольгердовича.svg was uncategorized on 25 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:21, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Krapivenskoe gorodische 2010.jpg was uncategorized on 26 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:24, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Kolomni Gedimin.svg was uncategorized on 27 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:55, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Погоня Сигизмунда Кейстутовича.svg was uncategorized on 27 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:55, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Река Корень.jpg was uncategorized on 29 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:15, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Река Корень2.jpg was uncategorized on 29 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:15, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Колокольчик широколистный.jpg was uncategorized on 5 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Ветреница лесная.jpg was uncategorized on 5 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Дятел большой пестрый.jpg was uncategorized on 5 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Лен желтый1.jpg was uncategorized on 5 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Зубянка пятилистная.jpg was uncategorized on 5 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Первоцвет (Примула)1.jpg was uncategorized on 5 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Лук неравный.jpg was uncategorized on 5 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Ковыль перистый.jpg was uncategorized on 5 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Воронец колосистый.jpg was uncategorized on 5 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Балка Каменный лог.jpg was uncategorized on 5 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Зубянка клубненосная.jpg was uncategorized on 5 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Хохлатка Маршалла2.jpg was uncategorized on 5 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Очиток степной.jpg was uncategorized on 5 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Петров крест чешуйчат.jpg was uncategorized on 5 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Истод сибирский3.jpg was uncategorized on 5 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Вороний глаз.jpg was uncategorized on 5 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Горечавка крестовидная.jpg was uncategorized on 5 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Лен многолетний1.jpg was uncategorized on 5 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Тимьян или Чабрец.jpg was uncategorized on 5 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Дремлик морозниковый2.jpg was uncategorized on 5 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Krapivenskoe gorodische 2010 .jpg was uncategorized on 6 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:38, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Река Корень3.jpg was uncategorized on 6 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:38, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob РОСВОДРЕСУРСЫ.svg was uncategorized on 6 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:38, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Крапивенское городище 09.jpg was uncategorized on 9 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Крапивенское городище 04.jpg was uncategorized on 9 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Шершень.jpg was uncategorized on 9 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Крапивенское городище 13.jpg was uncategorized on 9 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Крапивенское городище 12.jpg was uncategorized on 9 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Крапивенское городище 03.jpg was uncategorized on 9 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Крапивенское городище 05.jpg was uncategorized on 9 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Gorodische Titul.jpg was uncategorized on 9 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Крапивенское городище 07.jpg was uncategorized on 9 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Ящерица прыткая.jpg was uncategorized on 9 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Кряква.jpg was uncategorized on 9 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Крапивенское городище 06.jpg was uncategorized on 9 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Крапивенское городище 08.jpg was uncategorized on 9 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Лягушка травяная.jpg was uncategorized on 9 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Крапивенское городище 10.jpg was uncategorized on 9 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Крапивенское городище 02.jpg was uncategorized on 9 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Крапивенское городище Крест.jpg was uncategorized on 11 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:14, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Дмитриевское городище титул.gif was uncategorized on 13 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:43, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Coats of arms Shebekino.svg was uncategorized on 13 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:43, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Кошлаково Тыквы.jpg was uncategorized on 15 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:35, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Лес в мае.jpg was uncategorized on 15 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:35, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Крапивенское городище Стелла.jpg was uncategorized on 15 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:35, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob gerb Glinski.svg was uncategorized on 15 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:35, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob gerb ivan3.png was uncategorized on 15 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:35, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Кошлаково Гуси.jpg was uncategorized on 15 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:35, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Крапивенское городище Меловой откос.jpg was uncategorized on 15 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:35, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob flag ivan4.gif was uncategorized on 15 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:35, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Карта татарских княжеств XV в.svg was uncategorized on 16 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob flag moskovskiy.svg was uncategorized on 16 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Подвеска роменской культуры.jpg was uncategorized on 21 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:37, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Dm Gorodische Titul.jpg was uncategorized on 21 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:37, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Koren Krapivnoe.jpg was uncategorized on 27 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:08, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Балка Каменный лог1.jpg was uncategorized on 27 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:08, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Крапивенское городище 14.jpg was uncategorized on 27 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:08, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Яндекс Бродки.gif was uncategorized on 27 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:08, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Wolstonian Stage.jpg was uncategorized on 27 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:08, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Река Корень мост.jpg was uncategorized on 27 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:08, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Яндекс Ионовка.gif was uncategorized on 27 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:08, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Eco.svg was uncategorized on 1 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:12, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Rodus.svg was uncategorized on 2 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:03, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Vvedenie.jpg was uncategorized on 7 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:18, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Kapustnik.jpg was uncategorized on 7 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:18, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Predzimye.jpg was uncategorized on 8 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:40, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Medoviy Spas.jpg was uncategorized on 8 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:40, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Spas.jpg was uncategorized on 8 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:40, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Sreten.jpg was uncategorized on 8 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:40, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Lelnik.jpg was uncategorized on 8 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:40, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Hleb.jpg was uncategorized on 8 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:40, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lob Zhavoronki.jpg was uncategorized on 9 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:13, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lob kolomni gedemin.gif

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:38, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Lob pechat gedimin.gif

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:39, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Copyright violations

Hello Лобачев Владимир.

You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

High Contrast (talk) 18:36, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:R3 2 2d eneolith bull.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 22:38, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Lob Donets Belgorodskaya oblast.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Lob Donets Belgorodskaya oblast.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Dmitry89 (talk) 10:40, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lob_Lelnik.jpg

File:Lob_Lelnik.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Shakko (talk) 07:56, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lob_Spas.jpg

File:Lob_Spas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Shakko (talk) 07:59, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lob Medoviy Spas.jpg from [3] - файл взят из коллекции клипартов, находящейся в свободной продаже. Моя компьютерная обработка. кадрирование.
file:Lob Zhavoronki.jpg - это мой файл. Авторское фото.
file:Lob Dozhynki.jpg - это мой файл. Авторское фото.
file:Lob Telega.jpg - файл подготовлен мною: компьютерная обработка, цветокоррекция, кадрирование.
File:Lob_Lelnik.jpg - да это картина Бориса Ольшанского "Волхова с радугой". Она выложена на многих сайта. Конечно надо было подписать.
Вообще, кроме файла R3 2 2d eneolith bull.jpg, все остальные из моей коллекции.
Файл Lob schedriy.jpg я думаю перезалить авторской работой (Lob schedriy2.jpg). --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 09:34, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Korocha river2.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Korocha river2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Korocha river2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Laim (talk) 11:04, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Lob А Г Дьяченко.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Lob А Г Дьяченко.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Lob А Г Дьяченко.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Laim (talk) 11:05, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Severians

какой смысл в этйо категории? Вы добавляете туда всё подряд.--Anatoliy (talk) 17:04, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Severians — это северяне (северы), древний народ или этнографическая группа. Вместе с полянами составили ядро Киевской Руси. Есть гипотеза, что это были ославянившиеся потомки сарматов. В данной категории хотелось бы собрать рисунки по территории проживания северов и их быту, культуре. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 06:55, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Lob Палец Big.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Lob Палец Big.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Lob Палец Big.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

—LX (talk, contribs) 13:12, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Lob Gorodische Titul Big.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Lob Gorodische Titul Big.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Lob Gorodische Titul Big.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

—LX (talk, contribs) 14:05, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trinity day (XX).jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 22:20, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Krizius 4.jpg

File:Krizius 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:16, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hunt Farmyard-friends 1921.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 05:19, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for uploading File:Orlovski Vladimir Donatovich Houses in summer day 1870.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the file correctly? If you are not able to do this, the file will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the Help desk. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 22:19, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Litwins

Category:Litwins has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--glossologist (talk) 08:37, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Orel coat of arms 1730.png

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 10:20, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Добрый вечер

Здравствуйте. Ваша версия герба Харькова перецвечена/переярчена. В частности, цвет фона чересчур в стиле "чтоб всем было красиво". На самом деле фон несколько другой: толстый рог, тонкий рог - цвет одинаковый. Не могли бы вы перегрузить свг-файл? Спасибо. --Vizu (talk) 15:36, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Перезалил. Сейчас все цвета герба соответствуют его изображению на флаге (Они ведь одинаковые?). И какой герб настоящий: с толстым рогом или тонким? Первоначально на сайте гор. Администрации был тонкий, а сейчас толстый, и не в геральдических цветах (в растяжках, т.е. с плавными переходами). В файле "2009KharkovHerb.jpg" цвета не правильные: жёлтый (золотой) — не жёлтый, а белый (серебряный) — не белый. Может более точные в файле "KharkovTownflag.png" для толстого варианта? У меня он тоже есть векторный. Но он должен быть согласован с цветами на флаге. Да-а, с цветами гербов и флагов в Харькове и области — чехарда. Я в свое время подбирал цвета гербов — см. gerb.bel.ru, по официальным сайтам и практике рекламных агентств Харькова. Можете сказать источник Вашей информации? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 19:59, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Источник - Иван Саратов, самый знающий краевед Слобожанщины, специальзирующийся именно на геральдике, плюс сам герб в зале заседаний Совета. Там и флаг города есть - в зале горсовета (пл. Конституции), а флаг области - в зале облсовета (ул. Сумская). Есть ещё чехарда с гербом Изюма. Исторический герб города (1781) - три кисти красного винограда. А сейчас - три кисти зелёного в городе и красного - в районе. А иногда и в городе - красный) --Vizu (talk) 06:09, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Впрочем, при перезаливке всё равно уклон фона в салатный цвет. Цвет флага не соответствует цвету герба - специально сфотографировал флаг города, фон флага зримо светлее фона герба. Настоящие цвета фона герба вот - [1], File:Kharkiv-town-herb.gif. --Vizu (talk) 18:35, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Фотография не точно передает цвета (они не геральдические). Какой из цветов классический зелёный -- фон герба, листва в роге или фон флага? Если фон гербового щита -- то листва будет темнее, а флаг светлее. Может как геральдический возмем за основу цвет щита (образец с флага Болгарии или Италии)? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 20:26, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Это если одна фогорафия герба. А их залито достаточно много, и цвета фона совпадают (если это фотография, а не производное изображение). --Vizu (talk) 09:54, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Причём тут Италия и Болгария? Есть оригинал герба в городском совете, местном органе власти, с определённым цветом. И так тянет всё посветлее и поярче сделать?) Убавьте яркость средних тонов, пожалуйста. --Vizu (talk) 09:40, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Вот оригинал герба 1787 года. С обсыпавшейся краской. Фон достаточно тёмный. В общем, на современном официальном (эталонном) флаге города фон самого флага - именно такой, как вы сделали фон герба. Но фон щита герба на флаге темнее, - просто зелёный, достаточно глубокий зелёный. Вот такой: File:Kharkiv-town-herb.gif. --Vizu (talk) 15:50, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Я еще раз открыл описание флага: "Флаг города представляет собой прямоугольное полотнище ... светло-зеленого цвета с изображением в центральной части герба города". Герб: "На зеленом поле щита изображенные перекрещенные рог благосостояния (наполненный плодами и увенчанный) и кадуцей (золотой жезл с серебряными крыльями)". Таким образом у щита стандартный зеленый цвет, а у флага — светло-зеленый. Попробую подобрать цвета по системе шкал. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 19:13, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Любые оттенки цветов: http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Участник:Vizu/Названия_цветов --Vizu (talk) 19:32, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Залил с новыми цветами. Цвета подобраны как для экрана, так и для полиграфического исполнения, с учетом существующих стандартов. Листва светло-зеленого цвета, каким должен быть и основной фон флага. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 19:38, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Фон несколько не тот. Ещё раз: фон герба - достаточно глубокий зелёный. Никаких салатных светлых оттенков, как на фоне флага. А на Вашей заливке не глубокий зелёный, а скорее салатно- либо изумрудно=зелёный. В ещё большей степени это относится к гербу области, загруженному вчера, 28 октября. Цвет фона герба вот такой: Non green colour. Original colour - File:2009KharkovOblastHerb.jpg. Цвет фона герба города на оригинале (эталоне) герба в городском совете - именно такой: File:Kharkiv-town-herb.gif. --Vizu (talk) 09:40, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Цвет флага в органах власти -- еще не показатель, они сами путаются часто. Главное -- описание и рисунок из приложения к Решению. Согласно описанию -- цвет щита геральдический зеленый. Посмотрите Флаг Ирландии, флаг Италии. И вообще -- я устал. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 10:01, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ну и не надо рисовать свг вообще. Кому оно надо? Для чего? Гербов расплодили немеряно в категории. Гораздо проще нарисовать рукой то же самое. Вот, например, герб-то области имеет разный цвет фруктов. Они отнюдь не все одинаково красного цвета, вот как на официальном бланке областной государственной администрации: [2]. И кому надо переделывать на один цвет? Зачем? "Чтоб было". Спасибо, извините за беспокойство. --Vizu (talk) 10:08, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Прошу прощение за вмешательство, но беседа выше несколько бессмысленна. Конкретные оттенки, если они не закреплены в законе о гербе (именно в законе, а не в картинках на сайтах, которые вообще не имеют юр. силы), могут использоваться любые, в рамках разумного, разумеется, художественного вкуса. Если же в законе прямо названы оттенки (такое бывает, хотя и не принято в геральдике), то их и надо использовать. --Azgar (talk) 15:15, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Поясню. 1.Имеется эталон метра, килограмма, и т.п. А есть эталоны герба города, области и флага. Они находятся в органе власти. Их утвердили. Они стоят на сессиях. На них принимают присягу мэры. Их можно посмотреть. Но не это главное.

2. Главное то, что уже иногда получается так: как нарисуешь - так и будет. Данная прорисовка в свг иногда становится АИ (раньше такого не бывало). Девочка в администрации выкачивает из статьи Харьков герб, который там находится, и распечатывает его как оф. символ администрации! (это не анекдот). Не тот, который в зале заседаний (эталон), а из интернета. Почему? Потому что власть поменялась, компьютер пуст (бланка там не оказалось). Какой герб в ВП был бы - тот и распечатала.. Потому, если цвет фруктов в гербе области на бланке обладминистрации разный - это реально, с эталона, и имеет значение. Но это было в 2004 году. Цвет вашего флага города тоже не эталонный. У вас преобладают (-али) холодные тона. Эталон темнее и тёпло-зелёный. То есть почти как в предыдущей версии. --Vizu (talk) 22:33, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ваши гербы

Я понимаю, что вы не обязаны разбираться в геральдике, но тем не менее замечу, что некоторые отрисованные вами гербы не соответсвуют их блазонам, т.е. являются неверными. Почти везде бы самовольно добавили чёрную узкую кайму, которая является фигурой, понижающей статус армигера (как и любая другая кайма). Никакой каймы в блазоне нет, а значит не может быть и на рисунке герба. Далее, например, Ракитняский район, блазон "В серебряном поле на зеленых берегах прямо текущей лазоревой (синей, голубой) реки – две наклоненные друг к другу зеленых с золотыми тройными стволами ракиты. В вольной части герб Белгородской области". В вашей же отрисовке не видно ни тройные стволы ракитниц, ни их наклоненность. --Azgar (talk) 17:26, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"добавили чёрную узкую кайму" -- это не кайма, а рамка, ограничивающая щит, учитывая, что в некоторых гербах фон имеет белый цвет (правда может толстовата?).

Прорисовывались гербы с приложений к постановлениям Администраций и Советов депутатов районов. Все гербы, кроме Ровеньского района (самый поздний), показывались зам. руководителя геральдической комиссии Белгородской области Пальвалю-младшему -- замечаний не последовало. Большая часть гербов районов (щит-планшет на здание, табличка на входе или сувенирная продукция) заказывались или в рекламном агентстве, где я работал или в агентствах, где работали мои знакомые, и я всегда сверял свои рисунки с требованиями заказчика. Кроме того директор фирмы, которая делала все гербовые печати районов Белгородской области -- мой друг. Так что информация перепроверялась. Причем, кроме Ракитянского герба, обновленные (вторые версии) есть у Грайворонского, Ивнянского и Ровеньского районов (именно они сейчас представлены на Викискладе). На момент прорисовки гербов я плотно общался с организаторами сайтов Geraldika.ru (Ю. Росич) и Flagoved.narod.ru (М. Ревнивцев). И кстати, все гербы районов области, имеющиеся в ВикиМедиа, прорисованы мною, и предоставлены для сайтов Geraldika.ru и Vector-Images.com. Сечас я не прорисовываю, а только перевожу цвета из CMYK в RGB, затем конвертирую в SVG.

О Ракитянском гербе. Такой вариант у меня был, пока в 2007 или 2006 году не пришел заказчик (именно я от фирмы "Неон-дизайн" с ним работал) и не принес иной рисунок герба и объяснил, что это официальный вариант, и герб нужен для конференц-зала Администрации района. Рисунок ему дали в протокольной части Администрации и сказали, что теперь именно так выглядит герб. На нем, кстати, появилась возможность показать "золото" стволов ракит. А наклон там присутствует, хотя и не большой, да и ствол расходится на три части. С точки зрения ботанической -- именно так растёт ракита (ива ломкая), а не кустом. Старый вариант векторный тоже делал (где-то в архиве лежит). А вот Чернянского флага я не видел и нарисовал только по описанию -- поэтому могут быть неточности. Я хочу залить гербы всех районов Белгородской области, поэтому, если есть замечания и предложения -- готов выслушать "до того, как". P.S. Можно полюбопытствовать -- откуда взято описание герба Ракитянского района? С уважением, Лобачев Владимир (talk) 21:12, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Никакой видимой (заметной глазу) рамки быть не должно, ибо рамка - это и есть кайма. Толста это да, если её и делать, то едва заметной.

Кто делает прорисовку в данном случае не важно, важно только то, чтобы она соответствовала блазону. По поводу качества самой прорисовке нареканий я не имею, качествовполне завидное.

Ещё раз повторю - герб может выглядеть как угодно, это зависит от стиля конкретного художника, но при этом любая графическая версия должна соответсвовать блазону. Т.е. герб меняется только тогда, когда меняется его блазон (официальное описание, зафиксированное законом). Описание взято с сайта администрации района, т.е. должно (по идее) соттветсвовать закону о гербе и флаге. --Azgar (talk) 15:08, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Lob Жаворонки 95.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lob Жаворонки 95.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) Ю. Данилевский (talk) 04:34, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Благодарю. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 05:20, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emblem of the Byelorussian SSR.svg

Mind you, this was redrawn by someone. I need a source pic, if you wouldn't mind.

Почтовые карточки БНР

Re: File:Postcard_BNR.jpg

Основная проблема была добиться белого, там где он белый. Вы, естественно, в праве поменять теплоту. Но следует помнить, что восприятие цветов во многом зависит от настроек Вашего монитора. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 19:00, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Я имел в виду то, что мой монитор может отображать цвета неверно - с уклоном в синий (или в cyan в системе координат CMYK). Вы вправе произвести цветокоррекцию, только жаль будет утратить белые цвета. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 19:20, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- То есть убавить синего - попробуйте. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 19:29, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Оригинал хранится вечно в истории правок и всегда доступен для скачивания. Только созданный Вами файл уже не есть открытка, а совершенно иной продукт. С таким же успехом можно было бы отвекторизовать Вами созданный файл, ибо это уже не цветокоррекция исходного выцветшего за годы висения на стене пришпиленным на кнопку (ее след прекрасно виден) оригинала открытки. А белорусского я не знаю, был в Белорусской ССР два дня на экскурсии и все. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 20:56, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Печать

Здравствуйте. А вы когда-нибудь не могли бы прорисовать вторую печать Александра Невского? (первая очень хорошо получилась). --Vizu (talk) 02:15, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

В отличии от предыдущей, прорисованной В. Л. Яниным, это печать (прорисовка) заметно реже встречается. Можете указать кто автор прорисовки или на каком документе она привешена? Желательно и год ее первого использования. Мне бы хотелось быть уверенным, что эта печать принадлежала А. Невскому и насколько она типична. Я уже попадал в ситуацию, когда печати путаются как по дате, так и по владельцу. Не хочу снова наступить на эти грабли. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 07:22, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Свежий пример: File:Печать Иван Калита.JPG. На печати написано: "Печате гняза великого Ивана", название файла: "Печать Иван Калита.JPG". В описании файла: "Печать Дмитрия Донского" ("The seal of Dmitry Donskoy"). --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 07:44, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Это была ошибка) С Калитой - это Калита. Даты печати А. Невского - не знаю. Не написано в источнике. Сказано - печать, и всё. --Vizu (talk) 17:45, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Masopust držíme 14.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 07:41, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Masopust držíme 15.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 07:41, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Petrasova Babske hody 1959.jpg

File:Petrasova Babske hody 1959.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Liliana-60 (talk) 06:47, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcom User:46.174.26.245

Dear User: 46.174.26.245, i can not find the source of your information? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 18:36, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tadeusz Popiel Pierwsza gwiazdka.jpg

Изображение УЖЕ верно категоризированно. См. Category:Christmas Eve. Зачем вьі добавляете категорию Category:Koliada? Какие основания? --Zozula (talk) 22:33, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Могу я спросить, по Вашему с какого времени (дня, часа или приметы) начиналось первое колядование на Святках? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 22:50, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Мне кажется что должно пояснить вам другое. Категоризация на викискладе чуть отличается от илюстрирования статьи на википедии. Ели для илюстрирования статьи мьі можем использовать подходящее изображение то для категории в викискладе незачем включать изображение асоциативно. Надеюсь я понятно обьяснил. И даже в категории Святий вечір (извините русский Сочельник не подходит понятие и слово) незачем создавать подкатегорию Перша зірка разве что изображений на тему первой звездьі станет уж совсем много. --Zozula (talk) 23:24, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Это непосредственно относится к обряду, а не ассоциативно. Да, а можете еще привести в качестве примера изображение встречи первой звезды накануне Рождества? Или "изображений на тему первой звездьі станет уж совсем много" является голословным утверждением? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 23:34, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Золотые дубовые листья

Герб ХО не имеет обрамление цветов украинского флага (жёлто-блакитное). Цвет гербовый золотой и лазоревый. Вы нарисовали неправильно. Цвета лент вот такие File:Харьковская губ 1878 МВД Бенке.jpg --109.86.219.58 18:09, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Судя по описанию — Ваша правда. Но мне достался такой рисунок. И судя по истории с флагом, вполне допускаю, что рисунок герба Харьковской области из приложения к Решению от 11 мая 1999 года может отличаться от описания. Можете привести скан рисунка из решения обл. Совета? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 21:04, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Это невозможно, поскольку архив облрады не в открытом доступе. В архиве облрады также запрещено фотографирование и сканирование документов (только ч/б ксерокопирование). В исторический же музей Харькова был передан эталон герба ХО (ручная вышивка) с его описанием. В краеведческом музее Волчанска имеется эталон герба и флага Волчанского района (на флаге - герб). Ленты обрамления у этих эталонов гербов области и района видимо совершенно одинаковы и не имеют общего с желто-блакитным флагом Украины. Описания также одинаковы. Цвет и описания полностью соответствуют лентам герба Харьковской губернии в официальном гербовнике МВД - это золотой геральдический цвет дубовых осенних листьев (с некоторым уклоном в бронзу) и лазоревый (не яркий) цвет ленты. Откуда вообще в вашем гербе взялись жёлтый и голубой цвета современного флага Украины? Это непонятно. В облраде, в историческом музее и краеведческом музее нет таких цветов и никогда не было. В официальных описаниях гербов также нет так таких цветов. Пожалуйста, исправьте. --109.86.219.58 15:50, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Цвет и описания полностью соответствуют лентам герба Харьковской губернии в официальном гербовнике МВД". Откуда эта фраза? Мне сказали, что именно так нарисовано в приложении к решению обл. Рады. Без образца рисунка к приложению обл. Рады я не смогу исправить. На сайте обл. Рады каемка присутствует. Предлагаю обсудить этот вопрос в Википедии на странице герба. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 16:17, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Вот скан герба с официального бланка (обращение губернатора ХО). Цвета лент согласно описанию (на вашем рисунке-нет). Фрукты/цветы в роге изобилия разноцветные (на вашем рисунке не так). Отмечу, что приложение с рисунком герба области, вероятно, чёрно-белое (чертёж с размерами; цвета же описаны). С уважением, --Vizu (talk) 17:35, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Во-первых, на этом бланке присутствует жёлтая каёмка (чего нет, как Вы правильно заметили, в описании). Во-вторых, к сожалению, областные Администрации как на Украине, так и в России сплошь и рядом не соблюдают собственные геральдические решения. Пример с флагом Харьковской области или гербом Киева это наглядно демонстрирует. Поэтому мне нужен рисунок герба Харьковской области из приложения к Решению от 11 мая 1999 года. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 19:18, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Но исправить цвета в своем рисунке согласно описанию в гербе ХО вы можете? По поводу же приложения - это очень сложно. Нет доступа. (Кстати, тут же слева цвет флага области). --Vizu (talk) 19:33, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

«Цвет соответствуют лентам герба Харьковской губернии» (т. е. голубая лента без каёмки) и «скан герба с официального бланка», где есть жёлтая каёмка. Рог изобилия обычно рисуется с плодами. На данном скане изображена роза (или иной цветок). И как мне после этого "исправить цвета в своем рисунке"? Предлагаю сначала достигнуть консенсуса в укрВике или руВике (на Ваше усмотрение). --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 20:50, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

По поводу приложений: а вы не пробовали отправить запрос в облсовет, ссылаясь на закон о доступе к публичной информации? User:AMY 81-412 отправлял подобные запросы в Киевский горсовет с просьбой прислать приложения к решению о переименовании улиц. И ему прислали ответ. Если Киевский горсовет прислал приложения, то, я думаю, Харьковский облсовет тоже должен прсилать, ведь закон одинаковый для всех.--Anatoliy (talk) 20:01, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:COA of Kiev Voivodship XVII.gif

В описі файлу ви зазначили власне авторство і проставили ліцензію Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. Однак група Исторический Киев / Historical Kiev в соціальній мережі Facebook вже віддавна (раніше 27 жовтня 2012 року) користується цим зображенням в якості аватарки. Як ви це поясните? --Zozula (talk) 19:26, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

На моей странице "История герба Украины" он появился давно (там еще много того, что разошлось по интернету). А недавно я решил и в Commons загрузить. Имеется и векторный вариант. Чуть попозже думаю тоже загрузить. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 19:42, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Дуже цікаво. Але на вказаному вами сайті авторство не зазначене. На сайті зібрані зображення, які походять з різних джерел. Крім того, жодні інші ознаки не дозволяють ототожнити вас з автором цього зображення. Можливо можете привести додаткові докази на доведення власного авторства? Оскільки ваших слів зовсім не достатньо. --Zozula (talk) 20:05, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Придётся выложить вектор (File:COA of Kiev Voivodship XVII.svg). Его нигде нет. Этого достаточно? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 20:42, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category for discussion

Владимир, если Вы не готовы вести дискуссию на английском, не используйте шаблон {{Category for discussion}}. А если использовали - создавайте страницу дискуссии, на которую указывает красная ссылка в шаблоне. Иначе Ваши упорные действия по его простановке - не меньший вандализм, чем тот, за который заблокировали Вашего анонимного оппонента. В дальнейшем прошу Вас воздержаться от войны правок, тем более в случаях, когда Вы не совсем чётко понимаете, что делаете. Иначе в следующий раз вас заблокируют вместе. --Kaganer (talk) 00:23, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dozynki_Slupsk_1938.jpg

Polski: Dobry wieczór. Skąd Pan wie że na tym zdjęciu są przedstawieni Słowińcy ? Z linku źródłowego na stronie Słupska (skąd pochodzi fotka) wynika jedynie że są to dożynki. Wygląda to raczej na typową ustawkę poropagandową niemieckich nazistów z aryjskimi dziećmi.

Deutsch: Guten Abend. Woher wissen Sie es daß es auf dem Bild Slovinzen dargestellt sind ? Die Link-Umleitug zur der Słupsk Seite sagt gar nichts darüber daß es Slovinzen sind. Es steht lediglich geschrieben daß es sich um Erntedankfest/Dożynki handelt. Die ganze Darstellung sieht eher wie ein Nazi-propaganda akt mit arischen Kindern. Über Slovinzen steht dort doch gar nichts da. Woher haben Sie das ?

77.187.167.174 18:29, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Polski: Być może się myliłem.

--Лобачев Владимир (talk) 06:22, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Polski: Dzień dobry. Dziękuję za odpowiedź. W takim razie z braku dowodów, że są to Słowińcy usunę (za Pańską zgodą) kwestionowaną kategorię z opisu tej fotografii. pozdr.

77.187.167.174 13:13, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism by User:Silar

Ru: Файлы и категории, из которых удаляет категории User:Silar.
En: Files and categories, of which removes categories User:Silar.

File:Kolędnicy.jpg
File:Mummers Play in Poland.jpg
File:Kolędnicy 2008.JPG
File:Zapusty-w-Podmoklach-Wielkich 1950.jpg
File:Chodzenie-z-turoniem pocztowka.jpg
File:Kolędnik Turoń.jpg
File:Yagacroc.jpg
File:Лубок Медведь с козою прохлаждается.png
File:Мишенька Иваныч.jpg
File:Открытка Медведь и коза.jpg
File:Лубок Медведь с козою прохлаждается.jpg
File:Franz Riss Skomorokhs in a village.jpg
File:Лубок Гулянье в Марьиной роще 1874.jpg
File:Каверзнев Ряженые XIX.jpg
File:Рождественская открытка.jpg
File:Андриолли Вождение-козы.jpg
File:Slowinzen Weihnachten 1937.jpg
File:Turonie Krakow 04.jpg
File:Gwiżdże - kolędowanie 024.JPG
File:Kolęda 404.jpg
File:Kolęda 404.jpg
File:Gwiazdor kolędnicy.jpg

File:Three Magi Slovakia 1.JPG
File:Koledniki-valvasor.jpg
File:MTR animal costumes 01.jpg
File:Steaua, Bucharest, 1842 crop.jpg

Category:Kračun in Czechoslovakia
Category:Bear guiding (ritual)
Category:Mummers Play in Russia (Svyatki)

--Лобачев Владимир (talk) 22:41, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Capra Bucuresti.JPG

Explain your delete categories on the page File talk:Capra Bucuresti.JPG, otherwise it will be like vandalism. --sm 17:34 PM, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Category:Dożynki Jasnogórskie

Please explain the reasons for removal of Category:Dożynki Jasnogórskie and indicate the sources. --ms 17:35 PM, 3 January 2013 (UTC) Tfficial the name in english is Harvest not any Dozhinki.

harvest thanksgiving ceremony in Poland's Jasna Gora Catholic sanctuary in Czestochowa [3] please! ms 18:35 PM, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- I also dont know ethnographic folk books of president ms 19:35 PM, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

File:MTR animal costumes 01.jpg

Explain your delete categories on the page File talk:MTR animal costumes 01.jpg, otherwise it will be like vandalism. --ms 11:51 AM, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Please do not edit war

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ русский ∙ 日本語 ∙ +/−

You currently appear to be participating in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, and once it is known that there is a disagreement should discuss the issues on the relevant talk page rather than repeatedly undoing other users’ contributions. If necessary you can ask for more input at Commons:Dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to ask for temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing – even if you are right about the content issue.

Érico Wouters ^msg 01:51, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Commons. The reason for the block is edit warring (block log). If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Érico Wouters ^msg 01:57, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Герб чего

Добрый день. Это именно герб Х области? Понятно, что его девочка-секретарша на обложку ставила) --Vizu (talk) 10:22, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Судя по рисунку -- это герб именно Харьковской области. Правда в усеченном виде без дополнительных украшений. Необходимые атрибуты герба имеются: рисунок на геральдическом щите. Украшения -- возможный, но не обязательный атрибут. У Харькова иной рисунок, с более мелкими листьями и иным расположением плодов. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 10:55, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Это понятно. Просто нелогично - "Телефоны Харькова", Горсовет. --Vizu (talk) 11:46, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Просто нелогично". С гербами это не редкость в СНГ. Увы. А как они принимаются(!) -- это ещё отдельная песня. Я столкнулся, с тем, что даже, например, председатель геральдической палаты Белгородской области допускает серьёзные ляпсусы. Это жизнь. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 13:11, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Дискуссия перенесена на стр. File talk:Герб Харькова Телефон книга 2010.jpg

А этот?) Это опять горсовет.. --Vizu (talk) 19:52, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Я думаю, это показатель геральдической культуры гос. служащих Муниципалитета и отсутствия качественного изображения городского герба в свободном доступе (в интернете). --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 20:18, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Это показывает, как сейчас девочки-секретарши ищут в Интернете герб для муниципальной охраны города. --Vizu (talk) 20:40, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Loose-semla.jpg

File:Loose-semla.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Haxpett (talk) 00:59, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Балка Каменный лог.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:16, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

фотографии Белгородского театра кукол

Добрый день! Разрешение OTRS 2013041610004738 дано на фотографии со страницы [4], а не на все фотографии сайта. Нужно либо попросить Белгородский театр расширить их разрешение, либо нам придется удалить эти фотографии. Надеюсь на Ваше понимание rubin16 (talk) 09:05, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Хорошо, попрошу. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 19:12, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Письмо пришло, можно под этим же тикетом все грузить. Большое спасибо! rubin16 (talk) 15:05, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

параскева

Пожалуйста, объясните, нафига вы не присоединяете "параскеву пятницу" к святой параскеве? и зачем вы включаете иконы святой в эту категорию? раз уж это мифологический праздник, то пожалуйста, туда только мифологические картинки славян и крестьян. Иконы должны быть в святой. --Shakko (talk) 07:06, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

«Параскева Пятница — в народной традиции православных славян мифологизированный образ, основанный на персонификации пятницы как дня недели и культе святой Параскевы. На Параскеву Пятницу были перенесены некоторые признаки и функции главного женского божества славянского пантеона — Мокоши» (см. Параскева Пятница (мифология)). Примерно в половине случаев Параскеву изображали не как реальную святую, а в соответствии с апокрифами, перенося на нее черты языческих богинь, и делая ее небесной царицей. Т.е. это те изображения "христианской святой", которые "христианская церковь" не очень приветствовала. Поэтому формально — это святая Параскева, вобравшая образ Параскевы Сербской, а фактически — Мокошь или Богородица (Мать — Сыра Земля). --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 07:18, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

тот же вопрос по дню дмитрию. Почему вы тогда заносите туда 5 икон, а остальные 100 - нет? чем они отличаются? не делайте так. Иконы должны лежать в иконах. --Shakko (talk) 07:09, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Иконы св. Дмитрия, где он убивает славянского (болгарского) царя Калояна особенные — они не очень соответствуют христианской морали "не убий". Особенно "странно" выглядит почитание таких икон именно в Болгарии. Тем более странно такое изображение, т.к. Калояна не убивали на поле битвы. Все это дает предположение о каком-либо апокрифе. Дмитриев день считался началом дмитриевского полугодия, продолжающегося до Юрьева дня 23 апреля (6 мая), который открывал второе, юрьевское, полугодие. Пограничный характер праздника отразился в поверье, согласно которому в ночь на Дмитриев день (как и на Юрьев день) ведьмы сбрасывают с неба луну, превращают её в корову и доят. Возможно именно поэтому св. Дмитрия порой изображали вместе с со св. Георгием, и практически в таком же образе, только на красном коне и скачущего в другую сторону. Где-то считали, что зимнее полугодие начинается со дня арх. Михаила, и тогда его иконописный лик изображался на коне с копьём, поражающим сатану. Имеется икона, где всадниками в похожих позах изображены: св. Дмитрий, Илья-пророк, св. Георгий, арх. Михаил (пример: File:Огненное восхождение пророка Илии многочастная 1800.jpeg). А посмотрите на историю почитания икон св. Трифона — его стали почитать на Руси только после легенды о птице, севшей на святого (см. File:Св Георгий пророк Илия архангел Михаил и мчн Трифон.jpeg). В Болгарии с дня Трифона начинаются весенние работы (подрезка виноградной лозы), а на Руси это было предпразднество Сретенья, когда "зима с весною встречается".

Так как апокрифы часто ведут свои истоки из дохристианских представлений — то вполне логично, как мне представляется, создать особую категорию с апокрифичным изображением святого. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 08:51, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Becool logo.svg

File:Becool logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

// Gikü said done Friday, 23 August 2013 15:22 (UTC) 15:22, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Михелич Ряженые 1960.jpg

File:Михелич Ряженые 1960.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 12:03, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Гербовое-знамя 1696.gif

File:Гербовое-знамя 1696.gif has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Skrod (talk) 07:46, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ataman museum Lob 15.JPG

The orgiginal gives an 404 error. Could you please upload the file again as a new version? --McZusatz (talk) 12:19, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ataman museum Lob 15.JPG

File:Ataman museum Lob 15.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

McZusatz (talk) 13:58, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maska-Turon.jpg

File:Maska-Turon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Liliana-60 (talk) 17:35, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Покладне-маске Србија.jpg

File:Покладне-маске Србија.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Liliana-60 (talk) 17:41, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Вожак с медведем 1962.jpg

File:Вожак с медведем 1962.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Liliana-60 (talk) 17:44, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Мед-напиток 1957.jpg

File:Мед-напиток 1957.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Liliana-60 (talk) 17:47, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vlachos-2.jpg

File:Vlachos-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Bogomolov.PL (talk) 11:07, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Река Нежеголь зимой.jpg

File:Река Нежеголь зимой.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Dogad75 (talk) 21:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Река Нежеголь ранней весной.jpg

File:Река Нежеголь ранней весной.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Dogad75 (talk) 21:12, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Вождение стрелы обряд.jpg

File:Вождение стрелы обряд.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Niklem (talk) 10:56, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Мастерица-ткачея за работой над Александрийкой (особый вид пестряди).jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Мастерица-ткачея за работой над Александрийкой (особый вид пестряди).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded (

[[:File:Мастерица-ткачея за работой над Александрийкой (особый вид пестряди).jpg]]

) and the above demanded information in your request.

Evil Russian (talk) 07:51, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Novorossia gerb.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Novorossia gerb.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Novorossia gerb.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Anatoliy (talk) 00:03, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Празднование Зеленых святок в Музее-Заповеднике народного быта.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Празднование Зеленых святок в Музее-Заповеднике народного быта.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded (

[[:File:Празднование Зеленых святок в Музее-Заповеднике народного быта.jpg]]

) and the above demanded information in your request.

Evil Russian (talk) 20:58, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Стенка на стенку.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Стенка на стенку.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Стенка на стенку.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Evil Russian (talk) 20:59, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Limba noastra moldoveneasca.svg

File:Limba noastra moldoveneasca.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 13:55, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eu vorbesc limba moldovenească.jpg

File:Eu vorbesc limba moldovenească.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Codrin.B (talk) 10:13, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Eu vorbesc limba moldovenească.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Eu vorbesc limba moldovenească.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Eu vorbesc limba moldovenească.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Psychonaut (talk) 19:38, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Belogorie Nature Reserve Logo.svg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Belogorie Nature Reserve Logo.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Ankry (talk) 20:47, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not edit war

You have been blocked from editing Commons. The reason for the block is edit warring (block log). If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

~~Longer block this time as you editwar again. ~~Ankry (talk) 10:04, 29 June 2014 (UTC)~~~~ [reply]

~~I am sorry for my mistake with blocking you. I was mislead by your similar edits in other files. Ankry (talk) 16:34, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]~~
File:В Юрьев день 2.jpg
[edit]

File:В Юрьев день 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

~~Psychonaut (talk) 11:53, 2 July 2014 (UTC)~~ [reply]

File:В Юрьев день 1.jpg
[edit]

File:В Юрьев день 1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

~~Psychonaut (talk) 11:53, 2 July 2014 (UTC)~~ [reply]

File:В Юрьев день 7.jpg
[edit]

File:В Юрьев день 7.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

~~Psychonaut (talk) 11:53, 2 July 2014 (UTC)~~ [reply]

File:В Юрьев день 3.jpg
[edit]

File:В Юрьев день 3.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

~~Psychonaut (talk) 11:54, 2 July 2014 (UTC)~~ [reply]

File:В Юрьев день 6.jpg
[edit]

File:В Юрьев день 6.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

~~Psychonaut (talk) 11:54, 2 July 2014 (UTC)~~ [reply]

File:В Юрьев день 5.jpg
[edit]

File:В Юрьев день 5.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

~~Psychonaut (talk) 11:54, 2 July 2014 (UTC)~~ [reply]

File:В Юрьев день 4.jpg
[edit]

File:В Юрьев день 4.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

~~Psychonaut (talk) 11:54, 2 July 2014 (UTC)~~ [reply]

File:Fest logo ultimate.jpg
[edit]

File:Fest logo ultimate.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

~~XXN (talk) 22:00, 3 July 2014 (UTC)~~ [reply]

File:Плакат «Хутор Гремячий».JPG
[edit]

File:Плакат «Хутор Гремячий».JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

~~Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 20:58, 25 September 2014 (UTC)~~ [reply]

File:Плакат «Село Устинка».JPG
[edit]

File:Плакат «Село Устинка».JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

~~Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 20:58, 25 September 2014 (UTC)~~ [reply]

File:Плакат «Хутор Новая заря»1.JPG
[edit]
~~#invoke:Autotranslate Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 21:00, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]~~
File:Плакат «Хутор Новая заря»2.JPG
[edit]
~~Template:Copyvionote/layout Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 21:00, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]~~
File:Coat of arms Russian Empire Central Lob.svg
[edit]
Здравствуйте! Не могли ли Вы сделать аналогичный герб, только немного в других цветах — золотой орёл на красном щите и золотой на прозрачном фоне? Был бы Вам очень признателен! --Коваленко Кирилл (talk) 16:01, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Так это ж получится современный герб России, который уже есть на складе. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 18:57, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Не совсем - цветовое рашение как в нынешнем гербе, но орлы то разные. --Коваленко Кирилл (talk) 07:53, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Polisianka.jpg
[edit]
~~Template:Copyvionote/layout Оксана Косміна впізнала себе у 80-х[5] --Навка (talk) 22:24, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]~~
File:Polaznik.jpg
[edit]
~~Template:Autotranslate Ju Ta 20:01, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]~~
Переименование
[edit]
Коллега, предлагаю переименовать этот файл по аналогии с этим, по сути одинаковые изображения. Заодно удалить категорию в этих файлах:File:Белгородский госуниверситет.jpg, File:Белгородская слобода 2013 79.JPG, File:Фонтан Ника Белгород.JPG. Понятно, что фото сделаны на этом мероприятии, но не одно из изображений не несет в себе информацию о нем.--Sheek ([[User talk:Sheek|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:43, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Заявку на переименование файла подал. По категориям: мне кажется, что вреда для файлов не будет, а вот фестиваль в тот год проходил именно в этом месте, а секции собирались проходили в университете, так что это определённая характеристика фестиваля 2013 года. Можете пояснить причину удаления категорий, чтобы я понял лучше. --Лобачев Владимир ([[User talk:Лобачев Владимир#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:05, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Например, это изображение представляет собой здание БГУ. Место проведения фестиваля напрямую связано с университетом, но мы же не включаем все файлы о БГУ в категорию Belgorodskaya sloboda KR 2013. Кадр был сделан на мероприятии, но не выражает сути происходящего на нем.--Sheek ([[User talk:Sheek|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:27, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Если настаиваите — можете удалить категорию. --Лобачев Владимир ([[User talk:Лобачев Владимир#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:37, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Categories
[edit]
Hello. I assume you are able to read English. I have reverted your edit on File:Крестьянин уезжает от помещика в Юрьев День.jpg where you put it back in Category:16th century. Categories such as by century and by year and by county are high up in the category hierarchy so they should only contain files that have a very close relationship to that subject. This is because they are very broad subjects and thee are tens of thousands of files they could potentially belong in them. IF tens of thousands of files were to be placed in these categories they become useless for those who use Commons. Regards. Alan Liefting ([[User talk:Alan Liefting|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:51, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Apeigine saule.jpg
[edit]
~~Template:Autotranslate Stefan4 ([[User talk:Stefan4|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:55, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]~~
Татьянин день
[edit]
Здравствуйте, Владимир, я категорию вашу убрал, так как она предназначена для изображений, сделанных в Татьянин день и непосредсвенно с ним связанных. Например, праздничных мероприятий, обрядов. --A.Savin 21:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Я так понял, что на фото церковь, названная именно в честь Татьяны (как и день) и отмечающая свой праздник в Татьянин день. А то получается, что и фото в статье "не по теме"? --Лобачев Владимир ([[User talk:Лобачев Владимир#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:38, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Я за статью не отвечаю и за то, кто какие фото туда добавляет и уместны ли они там. Фото находится в категории Church of Saint Tatiana in Moscow State University, которая, в свою очередь, подчинена категории Tatiana of Rome --00:09, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate
[edit]
~~Template:Autotranslate Affected:~~
~~File:Kiev coat of arms 2009 project.png~~

~~Yours sincerely, Anatoliy (talk) 22:30, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]~~
File:Перро Сборщица-яблок 1879.jpg
[edit]
~~Template:Autotranslate A1AA1A ([[User talk:A1AA1A|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:03, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]~~
Дубль
[edit]
Доброго времени суток, коллега. Возник дубль категорий (Category:Roads_in_Belgorod и Category:Streets_and_squares_of_Belgorod). Может я неправильно понял назначение одной из них? Если действительно дубль то, я склоняюсь к оставлению второго варианта, потому что удобнее потом по улицам категории создавать.--Sheek ([[User talk:Sheek|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:55, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Дело в том, что «улицы» (Streets) — это явление в населённом пункте. Тогда как «дорога» (Roads) — это проезжая часть как правило вне населённого пункта. Хотя иногда эти понятия могут пересекаться. --Лобачев Владимир ([[User talk:Лобачев Владимир#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Заглянул в другие города, по примеру Москвы кое-как склеил (создал аналогичную структуру категорий, с погрешностью на разность статусов). По идее, должно было правильно получится.--Sheek ([[User talk:Sheek|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:43, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Есть вопрос (см. Category talk:Streets and squares of Belgorod). --Лобачев Владимир ([[User talk:Лобачев Владимир#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:08, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Zhniwniok_in_Silesia
[edit]
~~Template:Autotranslate Atlasowa ([[User talk:Atlasowa|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:24, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]~~
File:Stiag ioanna groznogo 1552.png
[edit]
~~Template:Autotranslate Andrei Romanenko ([[User talk:Андрей Романенко|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:47, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]~~
File:Ivan Kupala Day in 2011 11.jpg
[edit]
~~Template:Autotranslate Noname2013 ([[User talk:Noname2013|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:32, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]~~
File:Березка Танец.jpg
[edit]
~~Template:Autotranslate PereslavlFoto ([[User talk:PereslavlFoto|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:13, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]~~
Template:Autotranslate
[edit]
~~Template:Autotranslate Juggler2005 ([[User talk:Juggler2005|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:36, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]~~
File:Белгородские известия титульная страница.jpg
[edit]
~~Template:Autotranslate Juggler2005 ([[User talk:Juggler2005|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:01, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]~~
File:Teberda Nature Reserve emblem2.svg
[edit]
~~Template:Autotranslate Juggler2005 ([[User talk:Juggler2005|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:05, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]~~
File:Teberda Nature Reserve emblem.svg
[edit]
~~Template:Autotranslate Juggler2005 ([[User talk:Juggler2005|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:05, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]~~
File:Teberda Nature Reserve emblem 1.svg
[edit]
~~Template:Autotranslate Juggler2005 ([[User talk:Juggler2005|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:05, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]~~
Template:Autotranslate
[edit]
~~Template:Autotranslate Juggler2005 ([[User talk:Juggler2005|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:19, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]~~

User talk:Лобачев Владимир/Archive 1

File tagging File:F002d_Астра_ромашковая2.jpg

Tip: Categorizing images

Copyright violations

File tagging File:Lob Donets Belgorodskaya oblast.jpg

File tagging File:Korocha river2.jpg

File tagging File:Lob А Г Дьяченко.jpg

File tagging File:Lob Палец Big.jpg

File tagging File:Lob Gorodische Titul Big.jpg

Добрый вечер

Ваши гербы

FP Promotion

File:Emblem of the Byelorussian SSR.svg

Почтовые карточки БНР

Печать

Welcom User:46.174.26.245

Золотые дубовые листья

Category for discussion

Vandalism by User:Silar

Please do not edit war

Герб чего

Quality Image Promotion

фотографии Белгородского театра кукол

параскева

File tagging File:Мастерица-ткачея за работой над Александрийкой (особый вид пестряди).jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Novorossia gerb.jpg

File tagging File:Празднование Зеленых святок в Музее-Заповеднике народного быта.jpg

File tagging File:Стенка на стенку.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Eu vorbesc limba moldovenească.jpg

File tagging File:Belogorie Nature Reserve Logo.svg

Please do not edit war

Переименование

Categories

Татьянин день

Дубль

Navigation menu

Search