User talk:Žiga/Archive 1
Welcome to the Commons, Žiga/Archive 1!
I certainly like your Buendia family tree! Great work. 150.199.97.20 12:25, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
Thx., somehow it slipped. It is a PD-self. --Ziga 14:43, 5 June 2006 (UTC) 20 minutes without moving to wait which this installation in front of me: -) Thank you for your vote --Luc Viatour 09:00, 12 June 2006 (UTC) Orgullomoore 20:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 20:03, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Categories[edit]Tip: Categorizing images[edit]
Hello, Žiga!
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them. Here's how: 1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense: 2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets". When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.Thx, I'm doing my best http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Sl-Ziga --Ziga 12:54, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:TrobentarAndrej.JPG[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:TrobentarAndrej.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well. If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 22:24, 28 December 2006 (UTC) Thx., it happens rarely (hm. percentually?) , but sometimes I miss the tag. --Ziga 19:19, 29 December 2006 (UTC) POTY 2006[edit]The arrangements for the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition are now complete, and voting will start tomorrow, Feb 1st. All the featured pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As the creator of one or more images nominated for the election we invite you to participate in the event. Alvesgaspar 10:25, 31 January 2007 (UTC) Commons Picture of the Year 2006 Competition[edit]
The arrangements for the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition are now complete, and voting will start tomorrow, Feb 1st. All Featured Pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As a past contributor to Featured Pictures, we invite you to participate in the competition (but please wait until tomorrow to vote). --MichaelMaggs 20:35, 31 January 2007 (UTC) I have restored both the images. Sorry for the incovenience. / Fred Chess 13:03, 3 February 2007 (UTC) Orgullomoore 10:55, 8 April 2007 (UTC) Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Thx., it slipped. Ziga 17:10, 8 April 2007 (UTC) Orgullomoore 12:50, 16 April 2007 (UTC) Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --
Hi. I have noticed, that the description next to the picture of the document was not correct. As I have read from the file it is not the foundation act. With my basic latin I found that it is the document from 1146 issued by Bertrand. I have changed description accordingly to the [1]. Best regards :) Navportus Thx. The document is located in Ljubljana City hall; I never took the trouble to read the narrow writing, perhaps I'll go check it again (to se what is written on the description paper below the frame), or even make a better photo. Ziga 12:20, 22 July 2007 (UTC) Fotografije[edit]Živjo. Sprevidela sem, da je bolje da tukaj nadaljujem pogovor s teboj. Prvo me zanima, s kako opremo fotografiraš in kaj si uporabljal pred tem. malo sem namreč gledala tvoje fotografije, ene so dobre, druge pa od tega izstopajo po kvaliteti - sklepala sem, da morda zato, ker nisi imel ustrezne tehnologije zanje. mi lahko odgovoriš? --Inki 12:54, 29 July 2007 (UTC) (Canon IXY, japonska verzija IXUS-a) prejšnji teden se mi je pokvaril, pa sem si kupil IXUS 75. Sicer ne maram digitalne fotografije, vendar sem sklenil, da bom tole našo Dolino Šentflorjansko opremil s slikami, kolikor se da. S trotelzihri je stvar najbolj praktična. Topogledno delam informativne in ne umetniške slike, kakšni malo pomagam s PhotoShopom, drugim spet ne. Sicer sem začel fotografirati v konec 80.-ih in za analogne fotografije še vedno uporabljam tudi svoj prvi foteljc, Canon AE-1 (seveda z vsemi objektivi vred), imel sem tudi Yashico-široki format, delal sem ČB slike, ker so bili ČB filmi skoraj zastonj (ORWO) in sem seveda razvijal v lastni temnici. Aha, imam še en popolnoma genialen foteljc: Kodak iz ca. 1950, na "harmoniko" se ven objektiv potegne. Vendar je mehanika potrebuje popravila. Zakaj se kvaliteta na wp. naloženih slik tako razlikuje: ker jih mnogo naredim zares na hitro, tudi v slabih pogojih - in predvsem zato, ker s to mašinerijo (japanci rade za nas) nimam tolikšnega užitka (t.j. odnosa) fotografirati, kot ročno. Užitek mi je večinoma predvsem v faktični, ne pa toliko v estetski informaciji, ki jo nosi slika za wp. lp., Ziga 13:09, 29 July 2007 (UTC) Žiga, en popravek, pred gradom na Mirni ni ribnik ampak bazen, bolj take domače izdelave, že zelo star. Noter namreč do zdaj še nisem videla ribe in stvar je bila že od nekdaj za kopanje namenjena-:)--Inki 16:04, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you. This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Yep, I didn' notice that I uploaded 2 pics. One pic must be deleted, but it would better be Image:Vurnik-Ljubljana.JPG to be deleted. Reason:
thx., Ziga 20:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you. This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:29, 21 March 2008 (UTC) added license Ziga 11:34, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
?? Came too late. Anyway, I don't remember to have uploaded a pic by this name. ?? It's a pitty for a non-commons-admin not to see at least the description of file, when it is deleted. Ziga 06:53, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
discuss: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:PST-zemljevid.JPG Ziga 07:01, 12 May 2008 (UTC) quote: The map was created after the WWII (not pd-old) and it has not been proven that it is in public domain by any other means. Works by the municipality of Ljubljana are not public domain per default. --Eleassar (t/p) 17:13, 10 May 2008 (UTC) :May be so. Though, it is meant to be in public use and 100% none will claim rights. This map is reproduced around the city x-times to describe historical fact and is not of great aesthetical/economical value. {{Copyrighted free use}} should be the right licence, but if it bothers you, change it or delete the image, as you please. Ziga 06:17, 12 May 2008 (UTC) ::Unfortunately 'copyrighted free use' is not the right license, due to the second sentence of ZASP, paragraph 5. For the works in public places it prohibits the usage in the 3D form, usage for the same purpose as the original work, and usage for commercial purposes. --Eleassar (t/p) 12:46, 13 May 2008 (UTC) If you are certain, that this image cannot stay at wp/commons, then please *move it to wp sl (change licence) *delete it thx., Ziga 16:49, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Pozdrav[edit]Pozdrav Ziga, tvoje fotografije su genijalne!!!! pozdrav --Modzzak (talk) 20:52, 19 September 2008 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion[edit]
A very useful graph, only should be updated. --Eleassar (t/p) 15:25, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
UFO?[edit]I'm not sure about what ray of light you are talking about, but you can sleep without worries, it's either lens flare, stars or a moving aircraft (a third of the pictures are a 10 seconds panorama). Thanks for your vote. --S23678 (talk) 18:09, 26 October 2008 (UTC) Heh, that was a joke - but seriously, on Image:Pont de Brooklyn de nuit - Octobre 2008.jpg, there are interesting lights above one of the buildings. I made a crop to show it, Image:Pont_de_Brooklyn_de_nuit_-_Octobre_2008-lights-crop.jpg, which can be deleted after viewing. Ziga (talk) 22:40, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I found several typos in that file - Rachmaninoff is misspelled, and the second excerpt should be in D major. So it should read A - F# - G - A - D. Also, I don't mean to be nitpicky, but the spacing between the fourth and fifth notes of both excerpts is a bit off. Thanks, —La Pianista (T•C) 07:11, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images[edit]
Hello, Žiga!
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them. Here's how: 1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense: 2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets". When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.
Yes, I have missed them before. Done. Ziga (talk) 10:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Tržič, Slovenia (Radetzky's Neuhaus Castle)[edit]photo:Ziga 12:07, 21 October 2006 (UTC) Is this castle one that was owned by Count John Joseph Wenceslaus Radetzky of Radetz ? In 1798 married Countess Francisca von Strassoldo Grafenberg, from Trzic. He was my great great great grandfather. I am curious about the history and perhaps previous ancestors to him. Thank you amazonendurance@yahoo.com A little bit about this castle is written here, but it doesn't have whole article yet (in Slovene). Unfortuanately, I only took the picture and am not aware of historical background. There must be literature in Slovene language, though; try "castles of slovenia" or sl:Seznam plemiških rodbin na Slovenskem (list of nobles in Slovenia). Aha, I checked: owner was sl:Josef Radetzky, which is the same as you stated. The guy who got the famous Strauss march. Ziga (talk) 21:23, 6 September 2009 (UTC) Please help replace this outdated license[edit]Hello! Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed. The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page. Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370. The images we would like you to check are:
BotMultichillT 21:13, 8 January 2010 (UTC) I added new licence, where the strike is, other are more complicated, pic 1 and 2 are not mine, pic 4 hangs in the slovenian modern gallery... Ziga (talk) 19:33, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
uploaded from wp. en., if deleted there and not PD, delete. Ziga (talk) 15:32, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Stupica-VelikiSvetliAvtoportret-1959.jpg[edit]
File tagging File:Stupica-VelikiSvetliAvtoportret-1959.jpg[edit]
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Comment I took the picture with approoval of gallery, who holds its rights. However, I don't collect and save permits for taking a photo.. Ziga (talk) 05:35, 2 November 2011 (UTC) Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Talkback[edit]Hi, you may be interested in the new developments at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Slavko Osterc.jpg. — Jeff G. ツ 23:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC) SUL[edit]
|