User:The Ivory Cowboy

This user is a sockpuppet of Donald Trung and has been blocked indefinitely. Please refer to confirmed for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks.

 

Notes by Donald Trung. 📝

I will admit that I should've only used the correct channels, but all my contributions as The Ivory Cowboy 🤠 were completely helpful and benefited the project and other than WP:EVASION this could've been considered a valid alternative account otherwise, obviously what I originally wrote here could be seen in WP:BADFAITH so I will first restore the user page from English Wikipedia (as this one here was deleted against policy as user pages are usually blanked and not deleted, but thankfully the admin that did this has been de-sysopped for life 😆😆😆). The things I wrote on the user page were purely regarding bad actions done by the same person and as the majority of my dissatisfaction with Commonswiki came from that admin I don't hold that much of a grudge against the rest of... “the community”.

Kind of the old page.

Ride steady. 🤠

What do we have here you might ask? A lone, lone man avenging those of the fallen no contribution shall remain deleted for the ivory warrior watches over. What does it all mean? That I am the protector of good and expel the bad. 🤠 Ivory is keratin and all cowboys do is herd cows, but these two very mundane things are not considered mundane once you call them ivory and cowboys.

Explaining it.

The Ivory Cowboy 🤠 is the only sock account to which I had the password, in fact in my E-mail 📧 inbox I kept it under the name “the last sock” so I had little intention to continue socking afterwards. The majority of the edits made on English Wikipedia with this account were in articles for deletion, and in case anyone wonder I’ve literally never socked in Articles for Deletion to “double vote”, in fact when I write “Keep” I don’t see it as “voting” as Articles for Deletion aren’t a democracy, despite what Checkusers assumed in bad faith I have literally never socked to “double vote”, I make arguments in articles for deletion I don't “vote”. Also despite admins often taking Articles for Deletions as “voting contests” this is against policy and the best arguments should always win, as an inclusionist I believe that all articles should be given a chance, even if it takes 10 years. An example of several successes would be the likes of stubs like w:en:Vietnamese cash and w:en:Japanese mon (currency). So whenever so see an article being discussed for deletion watch the arguments presented and not the people making the arguments, that’s basic etiquette. 😉

Sent from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) (Sockpuppets 🎭) (Articles 📚) 08:45, 27 September 2017 (UTC)