User:Taivo/Archive14 Oct–Dec

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wooodcut of li hua.png

Hello Taivo. I thank for your processing, but I inform that there is unsigned.--Y.haruo (talk) 13:04, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

 Done Taivo (talk) 09:45, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

BSicons

Hi Taivo, thanks again for everything! I have listed several recently uploaded icons that duplicate already existent ones. I've replaced all relevant usage, so they can be deleted straight away. Could you include a link to the other icon is their deletion logs, so that the original user knows which icons to use instead? YLSS (talk) 11:33, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

 Done Taivo (talk) 13:10, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

And again thanks ;) Could you also delete the 18 files listed directly below? We seem to be unanimous WRT getting rid of them. YLSS (talk) 21:07, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

 Done Taivo (talk) 21:35, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

CleanDeleteReasons

Have a look at this. Without having CleanDeleteReasons enabled in your Preferences/Gadgets/Tools for authorized users, you'll often leave spamlinks and other unwanted material visible in the summary of your deletion. INeverCry 06:17, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

^^

TOUTES LES PHOTOS MISE EN LIGNE PAR MES SOINS SONT TOUTES ET JE DIS BIEN EN INTEGRALITE L'OUEVRE DE MON TRAVAILLE PERSONEL !!!! JAMAIS JE NE MAMUSERAIS A POSTER DES PHOTOS D'UN TIER !!!!! J'AIMERAIS MAINTENANT QUE CE CIRQUE CESSE !!!! SI PAR CONTRE UNE PHOTO OU DEUX SONT DE MOINS BONNES QUALITE JE VOUS LAISSE LE SOIN DE LES ENLEVER !!! D'AUTRE PART JE TRAVAILLE EN PARRALLELE SUR D'AUTRE SUPPORT, ET IL EST POSSIBLE QUE PARFOIS LES FICHIERS CE RESSEMBLE !! NEENMOIN JE N'IRRAIS PAS, DE SES AUTRES SUPPORTS FAIRE DES RECLAMATIONS DE COPYRIGHT, CELA VA DE SOIT !!!

"ALL PHOTOS BY POSTING MY CARE AND I SAY ARE ALL WELL IN MY ENTIRE WORK WORK CREW !!!! I DO NOT POST A MAMUSERAIS PICTURES OF A TIER !!!!! NOW I'D LIKE THIS CIRCUS CONTINUES !!!! HOWEVER IF A PICTURE OR TWO ARE LESS GOOD QUALITY I WILL LEAVE THE TASK OF REMOVING !!! ON THE OTHER HAND I WORK IN parrallel ON OTHER SUPPORT, AND SO SOMETIMES LIKE THIS FILE !! I DO NOT NEENMOIN IRRAIS , ITS OTHER MEDIA MAKING CLAIMS OF COPYRIGHT, OR THAT MOVES !!!"

Cedricguppy (talk) http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMfduJqzmBY3sthfDR9h5Rw

Commons:Bureaucrats/Requests/Odder (de-bureaucrat)

In the discussion at Commons:Bureaucrats/Requests/Odder (de-bureaucrat) you have expressed an opinion that Odder's bureaucrat status should be kept or removed, but you did not express the reasoning behind that opinion. I would appreciate it if you would return to the discussion and share why you believe Odder's actions were or were not appropriate for a bureaucrat. This will help avoid future drama by making it clear why (or why not) the community believes bureaucrats should be free to act in this way. Thank you. Thryduulf (talk) 17:25, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Image copyrights

Hello.

I can safely say that I possess the ownership of the pictures you added to the nomination page HERE. Therefore, I believe your dispute of copyright claims on my images are invalid. --KalyEV. ^talk 8 October 2014 | 20:09 (UTC)

Forward, thanks.

You said in commons talk:Deletion requests/Files of KalyEV, that the files were firstly uploaded into Facebook. I can safely say, that you do not possess the ownership of these pictures, because Facebook claims copyright to every picture, uploaded into Facebook. These files are now Facebook's property and cannot be uploaded into Commons without Facebook's permission. Taivo (talk) 06:30, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

verwijderingsnominatie

De laatste maanden ben ik actief op wikipedia en heb ook een aantal foto's geplaatst. Nu kreeg ik een waarschuwing dat deze genomineerd waren voor verwijdering omdat ik geen toestemming heb, incl. een krantenartikel en een zelfgemaakte foto. Nu blijkt dat niet Moira, maar U heeft genomineerd. Ik heb naar haar gereageerd, maar intussen zijn de foto's gewist. Zie User talk:Oemoemenoe#Kennisgeving verwijderverzoek. De foto's zijn meer dan 70 jaar oud en de fotograaf is in alle gevallen onbekend. Ze komen deels uit familiebezit, een collectie of uit een archief. Ik heb geen achtergrondkennis hoe ik daar mee moet omgaan. Kun je mij een korte toelichting of een verwijzing geven. En ook wat te doen als de maker onbekend is. Mag ik wel een foto gebruiken die elders op internet in gebruik is. Kan de verwijdering nog voor een moment teruggedraaid worden? Met vriendelijke groeten, Oemoemenoe (talk) 12:40, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

I do not understand Dutch. I do not understand, what do you write. Can you write in English (or at least in German)? If you got these photos from family archive, then they are not necessarily free. I am not sure, that these photos are really anonymous. Taivo (talk) 13:18, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Vor einigen Monaten war ich erstmals auf Wikipedia aktiv und habe auch einige Fotos veröffentlicht. Ich bekam eine Warnung, dass ich dafür keine Erlaubnis hatte. Auch nicht für ein Zeitungsartikel und ein hausgemachtes Foto. Ich dachte dass MoiraMoira mich nominiert hat und habe korrespondiert. Sehe bitte https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Oemoemenoe#Kennisgeving_verwijderverzoek. Jetzt sind die Bilder gelöscht worden. Die Fotos sind über 70 Jahre alt und der Fotograf ist in allen Fällen unbekannt. Die kommen teilweise aus Familienbesitz oder aus einem Archiv. Ich weiß nicht was ich weiter tun sollte. Können Sie mir bitte eine kurze Verweisung geben. Was zu tun, wenn der Hersteller nicht bekannt ist. Kann ich ein Foto von Internet gebrauchen? Oemoemenoe (talk) 14:59, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Das Diskussion war hier: Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Oemoemenoe. Das Lizenz war falsch. Sie sagen, das der Fotografer ist 70 Jahren tod. Aber wir können nicht wissen das, Fotografer ist unbekannt. Und Creative Commons Lizenz existiert nicht in 1940. Fotos in Familienarchiv sind nicht gut für Commons. Und bitte gebrauch nicht Fotos von Internet, dieses Fotos haben Copyright. Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Netherlands sagt, das vielleicht {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} ist korrekt Lizenz. Aber unbekannt ist nicht anonymus. Und wenn dieses Fotos sind publiziert? Taivo (talk) 08:52, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

File:RandiMotocoltivApps2.JPG

I am working on response to the OTRS ticket concerning this image and I am a bit surprised the deletion reason. Could you, please point me the request you mention in the deletion log? Ankry (talk) 07:50, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Undelete&target=File%3ARandiMotocoltivApps2.JPG&timestamp=20141009130550&diff=prev . He nominated a lot of his other uploads also for speedy deletions and I deleted them. Taivo (talk) 07:53, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. So I have closed the tickets as outdated. Ankry (talk) 12:23, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Content by KMDiKS12

Hi, Taivo. You just deleted the two files by KMDiKS12 (File:Pressja 1.JPG and File:Pressja 2.JPG), which meet the criteria "Non-free magazine cover". I already noticed that there is such more! Please pay attention to the entire contribution by KMDiKS12. --46.113.118.41 11:00, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

 Done Taivo (talk) 20:07, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Linggu-Gates-Pixiu-2898.jpg

Tigers... or puxiu?

Thank you for your comments and questions in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Linggu-Gates-Pixiu-2898.jpg.

I actually have a photo of the quadrilingual (Zh/En/Jp/Kr) information plaque nearby, which talks about the gate and the statues. I have added the Zh and En text to the description of the image. Curiously, the statues are described as "stone Pixiu (a kind of fabulous wild beast recorded in ancient books)" in English, but merely "石虎" ("stone tigers") in Chinese. In the Japanese text they are also called pixiu (貔貅 - this has its own pronunciation in Japanese of course, different from Chinese), with a description of the creatures' properties that is somewhat more interesting than in the English version. But, in any events, they are never called lions!

The plaque tells who wrote the text above the arch, but, alas, does not talk about the sculptor. Anyway, since the statues were donated by the same 17th army, they must have been created ca. 1929 as well. So if the sculptor managed to survive WWII (not an easy thing in Nanjing...), he may have died less than 70 years ago. However, PRC has a broadly understood Freedom of panorama, which makes the photos legal for us to keep. -- Vmenkov (talk) 03:51, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

P.S. Various articles in Chinese also describe these creatures as pixiu. E.g. in 灵谷寺 we have, "此兽似虎非虎，名叫貔貅" ("These creatures look like tigers but are not tigers; they are called pixiu"). Alas, still no mention of the sculptor... -- Vmenkov (talk) 04:20, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Ardo Varres.jpg

Can be restored. Have OTRS permisson. Kruusamägi (talk) 01:43, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

 Done Ivo, palun lisa OTRS-luba. Aega selleks on umbes novembri lõpuni. Taivo (talk) 14:54, 16 November 2014 (UTC)