User talk:Stïnger/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Stïnger!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:04, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Dios rogando y con el mazo dando (26063764226).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 09:02, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I haven't problems to the deletion. --Ks [在这里找到答案] 18:33, 21 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Categories in Wikimedia

[edit]

Please read COM:CAT, and especially COM:OVERCAT to learn how to categorise your uploads here in Wikimedia Commons. You could also try to limit the amount of photos that you upload in future. There isn't much use for having 8 nearly-identical photos as they only take up space. Thank you. - Takeaway (talk) 20:33, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.
I know from policies. These categories are automatically uploaded in tools.wmflabs.org/flickr2commons/ I don't usually have time to control the categories in Wikimedia, because in the time I have other things to do. In commons I have only time to upload files and create categories of Russian monuments, then I can't control the categories placed automatically by Flickr2commos, due to lack of time. I'm not the one who spends all his time uploading images with valid license, but yes an automated tool that allows a lot of edits while I do something else. Like any problem, please notify me. Thanks --Ks [在这里找到答案] 21:16, 21 April 2016 (UTC).
In the future, don't use the automated category of Flickr2commos. Create a special category for your batch uploads and please upload to this category only. Otherwise you are creating a huge amount of work for other people to clear out some 400 files from many different categories. You are making people clean up after you this way just because you "have no time". - Takeaway (talk) 21:24, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. The editions are automatic. I do other things while licensed files are loaded with that tool. And I understood. thank you for the advice. --Ks [在这里找到答案] 21:26, 21 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]
File:Kiev Ukraine (8299063497).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 15:51, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kiev Ukraine (8299066079).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 15:52, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moving of the "Splendour of the Seas" picture

[edit]

Hello Ks-M9!

Just for your information, I was about to decline the renaming request that you processed here (you beat me on this by 30 seconds or so), as this kind of minor orthographic adjustments is actually dealt with (and forbidden) in the "do not's" at COM:FR. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 20:30, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Hello. Thanks for your notice. I agree about your comment. I thought was correct, because the former name of the picture was, for me, bad (the name it was all together). If you want to correct it, just you tell me. Regards. Ks [在这里找到答案] 20:41, 18 July 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Let's keep the talk thread together at one page - I copy-pasted your comment here and I'm watching your talk page. :-) Undoing the move would be an avoidable hassle, as an administrator has to take care (=deleting) of the redirect left over, an ordinary filemover cannot overwrite it, AFAIK. And as long as the original filename remains as redirect, I guess that stuff like InstantCommons won't be broken. We shall leave this file as it is now - my remark was just an information about and for future proceedings. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 20:50, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's ok :-) Ks [在这里找到答案] 20:54, 18 July 2016 (UTC).[reply]
File:Volviendo a casa (25343120224).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 23:58, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pajaro vecino (25842932744).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 23:59, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Base (talk) 01:48, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Dear Patroller!

[edit]

English  español  മലയാളം  Türkçe  +/−


Counter Vandalism Unit

Hi Stïnger,

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.

We could use your help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:48, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Ks [在这里找到答案] 23:57, 31 August 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Pieve di Santa Cecilia, Crevole (Murlo)

[edit]
you renamend my file by request of Goletta for: renaming criterion #2: To change from a meaningless or ambiguous name to a name that describes what the image displays. I do not agree. The changes are not any better, the name and the description is very clear, and maybe i had some reasons for the name, seen that i would like to keep an overview over the Municipalities in Tuscany and file done or missing. Please undo! LigaDue (talk) 19:03, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@LigaDue: ✓ Done. Ks [在这里找到答案] 19:10, 4 September 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Thank you! LigaDue (talk) 19:18, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming files

[edit]

Regarding Commons:Deletion requests/File:General Escobar.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Escobar 1807-1891 Public Domain.jpg, please remember, that per Commons:File_renaming#Which_files_should_not_be_renamed.3F point 4, files with pending copyright issues should not be renamed. Reventtalk 00:46, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Revent: In this moment, I didn't know that the image has been nominated for deletion. If I'm not mistaken, the template has been removed erase a few days ago before being renamed, then they placed the template {{rename}}. I not reviewed the history, sorry for my mistake in this moment. Next time I will try to review the history. --サンティ [talk] 00:56, 12 October 2016 (UTC).[reply]
The history is indeed convoluted, it's hard to determine what exactly happened, in what order. I was not 'yelling' at you, was just a reminder. Reventtalk 01:08, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cat-a-lot

[edit]

Hello, You are flooding watchlists. Please stop, this task is processed by bots. Thanks :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:12, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks. I want to help :) --サンティ [talk] 12:13, 13 November 2016 (UTC).[reply]
[edit]

Hola, San! Espero haber licenciado correctamente mi imagen, tal como me pediste. Si sigue habiendo cualquier problema, te ruego que me lo comentes. Gracias por tu ayuda.--Climent Sostres (talk) 00:43, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hola. La licencia está bien por lo que veo. No hay problema :-) a menos que un admin de Commons venga a aclarar unos asuntos. Saludos. --サンティ [talk] 00:45, 16 November 2016 (UTC).[reply]
File:Honolulu Hawaii (8296426866).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

howcheng {chat} 05:04, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Berlin Germany (8290584924).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:30, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

[edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Stïnger,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

[edit]

Hello Ks-M9, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

File:04-1529-DSC05384 (20957753039).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Drabdullayev17 (talk) 19:03, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]