User:Heubergen/Archiv

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

TUSC token 4b18c133b2427d652503a221d0936812

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

This section was archived on a request by: Heubergen (talk) 19:51, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

TUSC token 19086b5b88d88607ee0f4b9caf7e4b62

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

This section was archived on a request by: Heubergen (talk) 19:51, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--ARTEST4ECHO talk 14:04, 20 March 2012 (UTC):This section was archived on a request by: Heubergen (talk) 19:51, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--ARTEST4ECHO talk 19:26, 20 March 2012 (UTC):This section was archived on a request by: Heubergen (talk) 19:51, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Bot move check

Hallo! Ich möchte dich bitten, Bot moves anders zu prüfen als bspw. hier. Bei source müssen keine unterschiedlichen Sprachversionen eingetragen werden, die Vorlagen {{Self-photographed}} bzw. {{Own}} regeln das eigenständig und mit mehr Sprachen. Bei GFDL-lizenzierten Dateien, die den Lizenzumzug mitgemacht haben, sollte die Lizenz {{GFDL|migration=relicense}} sein (siehe {{GFDL}}), damit sichtbar ist, dass der Original-Uploader die CC-BY-SA-Lizenz nicht eigenhändig vergeben hat. Vor allem lass bitte das Original upload log stehen. Wenn das fehlt, fehlt die Verbindung zur Versionsgeschichte auf Wikipedia. Am einfachsten wäre es übrigens, wenn du das Cleanup-Script von Magog the Ogre verwendest. Da muss hier und da zwar auch nachgearbeitet werden, der Aufwand ist aber deutlich geringer als es per Hand zu machen. Und die Fehlerquote sinkt auch. Viele Grüße, NNW (talk) 10:47, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Werde ich ab sofort beachten. Wegen dem Script: Was sind den genau die Vorteile gegenüber "meinem" aktuellen?
Kann ich auch einfach ein Button klicken und alles wird hochgeladen?--Heubergen (talk) 14:13, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Was du für ein Skript nutzst, weiß ich nicht. Das Skript von Magog the Ogre ist nur für den Check da und lädt nichts hoch. Aber es macht automatische Ersetzungen wie eben {{Self-photographed}} aus „Selbst photografiert“, entfernt überflüssige Vorlagen und bereinigt den Quelltext, setzt internationalisierte Überschriften wie {{int:filedesc}} und {{int:license-header}}, schaut, soweit möglich, ob die Lizenzmigration in Ordnung ist usw. NNW (talk) 15:08, 11 October 2012 (UTC):This section was archived on a request by: Heubergen (talk) 19:51, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

TUSC token 4b18c133b2427d652503a221d0936812

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

This section was archived on a request by: Heubergen (talk) 19:51, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

TUSC token 19086b5b88d88607ee0f4b9caf7e4b62

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

This section was archived on a request by: Heubergen (talk) 19:51, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--ARTEST4ECHO talk 14:04, 20 March 2012 (UTC):This section was archived on a request by: Heubergen (talk) 19:51, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--ARTEST4ECHO talk 19:26, 20 March 2012 (UTC):This section was archived on a request by: Heubergen (talk) 19:51, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Bot move check

Hallo! Ich möchte dich bitten, Bot moves anders zu prüfen als bspw. hier. Bei source müssen keine unterschiedlichen Sprachversionen eingetragen werden, die Vorlagen {{Self-photographed}} bzw. {{Own}} regeln das eigenständig und mit mehr Sprachen. Bei GFDL-lizenzierten Dateien, die den Lizenzumzug mitgemacht haben, sollte die Lizenz {{GFDL|migration=relicense}} sein (siehe {{GFDL}}), damit sichtbar ist, dass der Original-Uploader die CC-BY-SA-Lizenz nicht eigenhändig vergeben hat. Vor allem lass bitte das Original upload log stehen. Wenn das fehlt, fehlt die Verbindung zur Versionsgeschichte auf Wikipedia. Am einfachsten wäre es übrigens, wenn du das Cleanup-Script von Magog the Ogre verwendest. Da muss hier und da zwar auch nachgearbeitet werden, der Aufwand ist aber deutlich geringer als es per Hand zu machen. Und die Fehlerquote sinkt auch. Viele Grüße, NNW (talk) 10:47, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Werde ich ab sofort beachten. Wegen dem Script: Was sind den genau die Vorteile gegenüber "meinem" aktuellen?
Kann ich auch einfach ein Button klicken und alles wird hochgeladen?--Heubergen (talk) 14:13, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Was du für ein Skript nutzst, weiß ich nicht. Das Skript von Magog the Ogre ist nur für den Check da und lädt nichts hoch. Aber es macht automatische Ersetzungen wie eben {{Self-photographed}} aus „Selbst photografiert“, entfernt überflüssige Vorlagen und bereinigt den Quelltext, setzt internationalisierte Überschriften wie {{int:filedesc}} und {{int:license-header}}, schaut, soweit möglich, ob die Lizenzmigration in Ordnung ist usw. NNW (talk) 15:08, 11 October 2012 (UTC):This section was archived on a request by: Heubergen (talk) 19:51, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
File:Asking Alexandria Logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

rubin16 (talk) 08:14, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Heubergen (talk) 17:41, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
File:Andhra Pradesh Siegel.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antemister (talk) 19:51, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Heubergen (talk) 17:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

FYI

Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Seligenstadt-orgel-einhardsbasilika.JPG. Regards --Rosenzweig τ 17:35, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Heubergen (talk) 17:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Bayerischer Poetentaler.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Krd 12:40, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Heubergen (talk) 12:35, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Andhra Pradesh Siegel.gif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 13:08, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Heubergen (talk) 12:35, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
File:100.000-Đồng-Note-Vorderseite.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

INeverCry 17:31, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Heubergen (talk) 12:35, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Brenzone-Stemma.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 11:55, 1 August 2013 (UTC) :This section was archived on a request by: 84.75.221.122 11:04, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Traenheim.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 01:56, 8 September 2013 (UTC) :This section was archived on a request by: 84.75.221.122 11:04, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Manner schnitten.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

darkweasel94 20:42, 12 September 2013 (UTC) :This section was archived on a request by: 84.75.221.122 11:04, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Arms-staffs.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 21:18, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

:This section was archived on a request by: 84.75.221.122 11:04, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
File:Arms-staffs.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 07:38, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

:This section was archived on a request by: 84.75.221.122 11:04, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Nola-stemma.gif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 09:26, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

:This section was archived on a request by: 84.75.221.122 11:04, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Unblock request

Unblock request granted

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request.

Request reason: "please unblock me"
Unblock reason: "No reason given"
This template should be archived normally.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  suomi  हिन्दी  македонски  русский  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

(Heubergen (talk) 18:19, 11 October 2018 (UTC))

This section was archived on a request by: Heubergen (talk) 18:26, 2 April 2019 (UTC)