User:ComputerHotline/Archive 17
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-03-18 15-33-34-rosemontoise-valdoie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-03-18 15-35-41-rosemontoise-valdoie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-03-20 13-19-57-egl-st-georges-vesoul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-03-20 13-21-11-egl-st-georges-vesoul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-03-20 13-00-24-egl-st-georges-vesoul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-03-22 14-26-43-savoureuse-valdoie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-03-22 16-21-35-verbote-serma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-03-22 16-18-20-piste-cycl-evette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-03-20 14-06-21-lac-vesoul-vaivre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-03-27 10-51-06-Notre-Dame-de-la-Motte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-03-27 12-58-30-Eglise-Saint-Georges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-03-27 13-04-18-Eglise-Saint-Georges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Photos
[edit]Bonjour, j'ai été agréablement surpris en voyant les magnifique photos que vous avez télécharger sur Commons, je parle notamment des photos du lac de Vaivre et des photos de la ville de Vesoul. Merci beaucoup pour les photos. J'espère en revoir plein d'autres sur Vesoul et sa région. Nerio9 (talk) 15:49, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
- Merci pour vos compliments. Mais je n'y retournerai pas de si tôt car j'y étais pour raison pro. --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:25, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-03-27 13-20-16-Eglise-Saint-Georges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-03-27 13-39-59-Eglise-Saint-Georges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-03-27 13-55-53-Eglise-Saint-Georges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-03-22 16-15-53-piste-cycl-serma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Re: Please categorize...
[edit]Hello ComputerHotline. You are just right. In future I will try to do my best. Thanks for your advice.
Best Regards.
Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 18:55, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-04-02 14-51-28-savoureuse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-04-02 13-48-58-ouv-monceau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-04-01 15-02-43-bois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-03-27 12-34-13-Durgeon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-03-27 10-57-31-Notre-Dame-de-la-Motte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-03-27 10-57-58-Notre-Dame-de-la-Motte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-03-27 10-48-36-Notre-Dame-de-la-Motte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-03-27 13-15-23-Eglise-Saint-Georges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
[edit] |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:F. Müllhaupt's Militarische & Verkehrs-Karte der Deutsch-Französischen Grenze...jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:F. Müllhaupt's Militarische & Verkehrs-Karte der Deutsch-Französischen Grenze...jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Bonsoir,
J'ai pris sur moi de décrire la photographie en question en me basant sur les données GPS de ton fichier. Dis-moi ce que tu en penses. Cela permettra à ton fichier à être promu au rang d'image de qualité.-- Bertrand GRONDIN 
→ (Talk) 18:37, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- Merci. J'ai corrigé une faute de frappe. --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:10, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-04-08 13-07-43-porte-cochere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-04-08 13-13-22-porte-cochere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
[edit] |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Deutsch-französische Grenzländer, mit genauer Einzeichnung der französischen Befestigungs-Anlagen.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Deutsch-französische Grenzländer, mit genauer Einzeichnung der französischen Befestigungs-Anlagen.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-04-02 14-41-39-savoureuse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-04-02 14-34-16-savoureuse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-04-02 14-36-21-savoureuse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-04-01 14-33-55-cascade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-04-01 14-21-25-cascade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-04-14 12-35-39-resine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-04-17 11-08-25-paon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-04-21 11-07-28-etamine-28f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-04-21 10-59-02-etamines-64f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-04-14 12-34-41-resine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-04-30 15-45-03-Papilio-palinurus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-04-30 15-40-34-Idea-leuconoe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-04-30 13-56-22-Idea-leuconoe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
2013-04-30 14-38-21-ocelle-caligo-3f.jpg
[edit]Bravo elle est très bonne cette image. Mais Biopic a raison il faut l'espèce. As-tu fait une autre image de ce papillon; si c'est le cas montre moi là je dois pouvoir la reconnaître. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:13, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
- Non, je n'en ai pas d'autres. Je ne connais que le genre : Caligo. --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:18, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Blind category editing
[edit]Please stop with the automatic category editing! Most changes that you have been making are wrong. Why inserting a category of "Unidentified xxx" in a species which is fully identified? You should go over all your edits and revert the wrong ones. Best regards, Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:54, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
- So if it's correctly identified, it should be correctly categorized. --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:07, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
- But in all the cases I saw the species was categorized correctly! Apparently, what triggered your edits was the fact that the genus or the family was also categorized. For example, if a species was categorized as Daucus carota and also as "Apiaceae", you changed the categorization to "Unidentified Apiaceae". See, for example, the story of this image. A different case is this poster showing different species of bees and wasps, which was correctly categorized as Hymnoptera and you changed to Unidentified Hymnoptera. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:12, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-05-14 15-32-31-diptera.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-05-14 15-39-20-diptera.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-05-14 16-09-20-chenille.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-05-11 22-06-40-gouttes.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-05-11 22-07-22-gouttes.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-05-11 22-03-08-gouttes.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-05-14 15-37-43-diptera.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-05-14 15-38-30-diptera.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-05-14 15-40-18-diptera.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Recently promoted QIs
[edit]Hi CH, this edit is a "negative contribution", you deleted more (of mine) than included. May I revert it to decrease the backlog? Regards, Poco2 16:02, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-06-10 09-41-34-savoureuse-valdoie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-06-10 09-45-58-savoureuse-valdoie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-06-09 15-52-03-coleoptera.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-06-09 16-31-13-syrphidae.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-06-07 21-14-27-thomisidae.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-06-04 16-07-46-Coleoptera.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-06-04 16-06-24-Coleoptera.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
What's with the sprays? -mattbuck (Talk) 19:28, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-06-12 23-01-22-braises.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-06-04 15-33-34-Hemiptera.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-06-14-Sedum-acre-9f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-06-14-Sedum-acre-14f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-06-10 10-14-22-savoureuse-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-06-10 10-22-34-savoureuse-belfort.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-06-07 21-02-52-Clytus-arietis.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-06-07 15-26-02-salpetre-10f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-06-04 15-34-47-Hemiptera.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-06-07 21-06-46-Graphosoma-italicum.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-06-07 16-08-35-thomisidae.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-06-21 15-35-32-Orthetrum-cancellatum.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg){kind=link}
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-06-21 14-48-16-syrphidae.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-06-23 15-57-28-Idea-leuconoe.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-06-17 22-53-41-lightnings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-06-17 22-58-10-lightnings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-08-07 04-23-26-foudre-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-08-06 19-18-46-Argiope-bruennichi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-08-15 16-25-30-Acanthosomatidae.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-08-16 16-06-22-batterie-eperon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-08-16 15-44-18-batterie-eperon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
[edit] |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:2013-08-16 14-49-26-batterie-eperon.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2013-08-16 14-49-26-batterie-eperon.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-08-21 23-22-00-bassin-champagney-moonlight.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-08-21 23-14-24-bassin-champagney-moonlight.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-08-21 23-29-28-bassin-champagney-moonlight.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-08-21 23-03-37-bassin-champagney-moonlight.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-08-16 15-51-51-batterie-eperon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-08-27 11-32-54-musee-minal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-08-27 11-35-36-musee-minal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-08-27 11-36-17-musee-minal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-08-27 11-38-14-musee-minal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-08-27 11-40-09-musee-minal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
[edit] |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:2013-08-07 04-23-26-foudre-belfort.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2013-08-07 04-23-26-foudre-belfort.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
