User:Böhringer/Archive 5
Frage zu Panoramen
[edit]Hi Böhringer, da du viele großartige Panoramen erstellst und dich wahrscheinlich auch mit der Nachbearbeitung auskennst, wage ich mal um Rat zu fragen. In diesem Panorama sieht man in der Voransicht anscheinend mehrmals irgendwelche komischen Artefakte, insb. an den Kanten (z.B. am Himmel um den Kirchturm herum). Damit meine ich die Ansicht 800x294 bei der Dateibeschreibung, in Vollauflösung scheint alles OK zu sein. Daher nun die Frage, ob das überhaupt am Bild selbst liegt, und falls ja, wie kriegt man diese Artefakte weg, so dass alles auch in 800x294 schön glatt ist. Besten Gruß - A.Savin 09:18, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hallo A.Savin
Gute Frage, ich kann da nicht viel sehen. Für mich ist das Bild ausgezeichnet gut. Im Übrigen ist in der Bildbetrachtung die Vollauflösung massgebend. Bei Panos kann es schon passieren, dass die Nahtstellen nicht sauber zusammengebaut werden. Oft sieht man dies bei Bäumen. Noch ein Tipp: Ich würde auf keinen Fall die Einzelbilder nachschärfen sondern, wenn nötig das Panorama. Einzelbilder bearbeite ich nur zum Nachbelichten. Und wenn der Himmel zu sehr rauscht kannst du das mit Gimp sehr gut glätten, aber dann auch nur dort, wo es notwendig ist, sonst geht das wieder in die Hose :-) l.g. --Böhringer (talk) 10:47, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Alles klar, vielen Dank für die Tipps! Schönen Gruß - A.Savin 17:15, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Project: Science 2, Physical | Secondary [Proyecto: Ciencia 2, Física | Secundaria]
[edit]I send warm greetings!
I am writing Ríos de Tinta, a publishing house dedicated to publishing educational books and children's literature-www.riosdetinta.com. We are currently doing the editing of book titled, tentatively, “Física”. It has been our interest to include this photo.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tautropfen.JPG
It corresponds to its collection. That is why I am writing to ask for reprint permission. Credit will be scheduled iconographic [name of photographer] and tell us.
Attentive to your comments,
Education through the dissemination, Franco Corona | Iconography and Management of Copyrights
Morelos 16 Piso 5 Centro 06040 Delegación Cuauhtémoc; México, Distrito Federal | [jose.corona@riosdetinta.com] | www.riosdetinta.com | 01 55 5140 4900 | Ext.31962 | Móvil: 045 55 2259 9556
Please think about the environment before printing this message
- No problem, they may use the image. You just write "Photo by Böhringer Friedrich," that's enough.
Projekt: Informatik 2, Physikalische | Sekundäre [Proyecto: Ciencia 2, Física | Secundaria]
[edit]Mit freundlichen Grüßen!
Ich schreibe Tinte Rivers, ein Verlag zu veröffentlichen pädagogische Bücher und Kinder-und Jugendliteratur-www.riosdetinta.com gewidmet. Wir unternehmen derzeit die Veröffentlichung eines Buches "Physik". Es war in unserem Interesse, dieses Foto enthalten: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tautropfen.JPG
Gleiche Adresse für Ihre Sammlung. Deshalb habe ich mich schriftlich für Nachdruck Erlaubnis fragen werde. Kreditkarten werden ikonographische [Name des Fotografen] zitiert werden und uns sagen.
Aufmerksam auf Ihre Kommentare,
Erziehung durch die Verbreitung, Franco Corona | Ikonographie und Copyright-Management
Morelos 16 Piso 5 06040 Zentrum Cuauhtemoc, Mexiko Stadt, Mexiko | [jose.corona @ riosdetinta.com] | www.riosdetinta.com | Januar 55 5140 4900 | Ext.31962 | Mobil: 2259 045 55 9556
Bitte denken Sie an die Umwelt vor dem Drucken Diese Nachricht
- No problem, they may use the image. You just write "Photo by Böhringer Friedrich," that's enough.
I use one of your photos
[edit]Hi Böhringer!
I have use some photos of Libellula quadrimaculata and Triturus carnifex in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" (http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia)
You can see directy in the follow links and click over each thubnail:
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/ficha-imagenes.php?id=598 http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/ficha-imagenes.php?id=4348
If you wish, you can send me some letters or/and a photo for your "contributor card" in Animalandia: http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Friedrich%20B%F6hringe
This is my "contributor card", for example: http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Fernando%20Lis%F3n%20Mart%EDn
In the future, I use more of your photos, I sure!
Thank you for the licence and, of course, for your splendid photos!! Regards! Fernando Lisón --Fernando.lison (talk)
- Sehr schön, wenn meine Bilder mehr Verwendung finden. :-)
meine Lizenz ist Friedrich Böhringer nicht Friedrich Böhringe! Bitte noch ändern, danke. --Böhringer (talk) 09:36, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- Dear Friedrich, I apologize my mistake with your name, already is OK. Have you think about your contributor card? Cheers! Fernando Lisón --Fernando.lison (talk)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ready Maid Skulptur von Gottfried Bechtold 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Alpenmurmeltier, Marmota marmota 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schnee Zitrone Citrus × limon 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Baustein "Schweizerisches Inventar der Kulturgüter"
[edit]Hallo Böhringer, habe gesehen, dass Du einen "Baustein" bei der Kategorie:Reformierte Kirche Gais gesetzt hast. Dieser führt auf die englische Seite der "Kulturgüter". Gibt es eine Möglichkeit, damit der Link direkt auf Seite führt? Es ist ja ein Objekt in der deutschsprachigen Schweiz. Gruss --Schofför (talk) 21:38, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Edit
[edit]Hi:
The image Commons:Featured_picture_candidates#File:Catopsilia_pomona_by_kadavoor.JPG is updated by an edit by Paolo Costa to reduce the jpeg artifacts and overexposure. So I request you to update your opinion too.
Regards, Jee -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:05, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Piazza della Riforma, Lugano 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Troll-Abwahlaktion
[edit]Hallo Friedrich,
nachdem nicht mal vor einem Jahr mein Bild vom Schloss Neuschwanstein mit rechtdeutlicher Mehrheit gewählt wurde, ist in einer Nacht-und-Nebel-Aktion ohne vorherige Information an mich vor einigen Tagen diese Abwahl gestartet worden Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Hohenschwangau - Schloss Neuschwanstein1.jpg. Vielleicht willst Du als ehemaliger Wähler dem entgegen treten. Viele Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:26, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Teichfrosch, Pelophylax esculentus, mit Schallblasen 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pelophylax esculentus mit Schallblasen von vorne.gif, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Hi
[edit]Is it possible to obtain this picture (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fiat_Nuova_500_21.JPG) in a best quality. I would like print this picture with large size : 3,50 m * 1,70m. Your name will be written on the picture. This photo is very nice !
Thank you.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Coenagrion puella Paarung 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zitronenfalter ♂ Gonepteryx rhamni 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Time UTC
[edit]Hi Böhringer,
- Only to inform you that I've replaced your pictures candidates in QIC at the good place and date. We have to change the date only at 00:00 UTC.
- Best regards, --Jebulon (talk) 22:22, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hufeisen-Azurjungfer ♂ Coenagrion puella 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hufeisen-Azurjungfern, Coenagrion puella Paarung 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kleines Wiesenvögelchen, Coenonympha pamphilus 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Margerite, Leucanthemum vulgare 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Rodoç Greece
[edit]hi, beautiful pictures from Rodoç. I was there in 1978 and fell in love with the place & people I met. Do you, by chance, have a photo from the Main Gate of the Grand Master's palace? There were crossed axes above the key-stone - important symbols. That is the place of 1st "University" in Europe (7 of the then-spoken European languages plus more sciences), with the symbols of the early Christianity mosaics, alabaster windows and beautiful furniture.
In late 12th century & early 13th, the first Turkish/Otoman Empire hordes invade the island, on Sunday they lock the Church on the top of the island with 200 students and tutors and set the complex on fire. Until 14th century they have been successfully repelled by the knights. The next Grand Master requests Karl Emmanuel I Savoyen MATEO for the isle of Malta to reconstruct the Colleges and move the Knighthood there.
I will be sincerely grateful if you could share a photo of this particular detail from the Mansion.
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Zitronenfalter ♂ Gonepteryx rhamni 4.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zitronenfalter ♂ Gonepteryx rhamni 4.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Purpurfruchtwanze, Carpocoris purpureipennis 5.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Coenonympha pamphilus 6.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Coenonympha pamphilus 6.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Hyponephele lycaon, Kleines Ochsenauge .JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hyponephele lycaon, Kleines Ochsenauge .JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Colias hyale, Goldene Acht 7.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Colias hyale, Goldene Acht 7.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:08, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Brenthis ino, Violetter Silberfalter 07.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brenthis ino, Violetter Silberfalter 07.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wiesen-Storchenschnabel, Geranium pratense 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gebänderte Prachtlibelle, Calopteryx splendens 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wiesen-Klee, Trifolium pratense 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Brauner Waldvogel Aphantopus hyperantus Mating.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brauner Waldvogel Aphantopus hyperantus Mating.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
- State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
- If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
- Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
- Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.
If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.
It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.
You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.
Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.
Thank you.This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it,if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 10:57, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brenthis ino, Violetter Silberfalter 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! ♀ Blaue Federlibelle, Platycnemis pennipes 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Asiatische Marienkäfer, Harmonia axyridis auf einer Weizenähre 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Kleine Fuchs, Aglais urticae 6.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kleine Fuchs, Aglais urticae 6.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:06, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Nutzungsrechte Grüne Zwergzikade für Ausstellung Moor EXTREM
[edit]Sehr geehrter Herr Böhringer,
wir, das Atelier impuls aus Erlangen, planen momentan die Ausstellung Moor EXTREM in Bad Wurzach / Deutschland. In diesem Rahmen moechten wir gerne ein Zwergzikadenfoto von Ihnen verwenden, siehe Link und Attachement.
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gr%C3%BCne_Zwergzikade oberstes, grosses Bild, Hochkantformat
Das Foto soll auf einem Grafikband, Groesse ca DIN-A4 zu sehen sein. Die Ausstellung Moor EXTREM ist zeitlich unbefristet und dient keiner kommerziellen Nutzung. Umweltbildung und Oeffentlichkeitsarbeit stehen im Vordergrund. Ich bitte Sie mir ein Lizenzangebot nach Moeglichkeit fuer eine zeitlich unbefristete Nutzung zu unterbreiten. Da das Ausstellungsbudget begrenzt ist bitte ich Sie uns in der Höhe der Lizenzkosten entgegen zu kommen. Ich freue mich von Ihnen zu hören,
Mit freundlichen Gruessen, Heike Franke
Impuls GmbH &Co KG Gerberei 19 91054 Erlangen
- Hallo Frau Franke
sie dürfen das Bild uneingeschränkt und kostenfrei benutzen. Schön wäre, wenn irgendwo "Foto Friedrich Böhringer" steht. Das ist die einzige Lizenz (Namensnennung) Liebe Grüsse --Böhringer (talk) 07:57, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Raupe des Buchsbaumzünsler, Cydalima perspectalis 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
BEAUTIFULL YOUR PHOTO:
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Hauhechel-Bläuling, Polyommatus icarus Paarung 3.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hauhechel-Bläuling, Polyommatus icarus Paarung 3.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Monkey Puzzle
[edit]Hi Böhringer:
Congrats and thank you for your efforts for File:Monkey_Puzzle_Rathinda_amor_by_kadavoor_edit_by_böhringer.jpg -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 11:22, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:360° Panorama auf der Roggalspitze 2673 m.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:360° Panorama auf der Roggalspitze 2673 m.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Boloria aquilonaris, Hochmoor Perlmuttfalter 13.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Boloria aquilonaris, Hochmoor Perlmuttfalter 13.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Ich konnte mich nicht zurückhalten...
[edit]lb Fred, hier habe ich etwas über Dich geschrieben...--Hubertl (talk) 23:58, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
- Bitte kannst du die Scans der Briefmarken hochladen? --Hubertl (talk) 10:10, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
- mach ich --Böhringer (talk) 13:30, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
- Danke für den Upload! Sehe ich es richtig, dass es keine Lizenzhinweise gibt? Auch nicht eine Namensnennung? Zumindest kann ich das von deinem Foto her nicht ausmachen... Ich halte das für höchst bedenklich, denn irgendwie - wenn man bedenkt, dass du gar nicht informiert wurdest von der Fertigstellung - ist das schon fast hinterhältig!--Hubertl (talk) 21:03, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
- oh du bist schnell! Doch, in der Präsentationsmappe wird auf der Innenseite zu jedem Bild eine Kurzbeschreibung und das C Friedrich Böhringer angegeben. Ich habe leider keinen guten Scaner bei mir. Muss morgen in der Firma nachsehen, ob wir da was brauchbares haben. Momentan verlinke ich alle 17 Bilder mit dem Übersichtsbild. s. Braunvieh --Böhringer (talk) 21:12, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
- Wir haben gerade darüber diskutiert, dass deine Lizenzangaben für eine durchschnittlich mit Urheberrechten vertraute Person schlichtweg missverständlich sind, eigentlich nicht vorhanden. Du bietest zwar eine Handlungsanweisung an, aber die kann ziemlich beliebig interpretiert werden, für jemanden, der mit dem Thema CC nicht ständig zu tun hat, völlig unverständlich. Ich selbst halte den Hinweis auf der Präsentationsmappe für völlig unzureichend, hier sollte man an der Handlungsanweisung feilen. Üblicherweise werden auch auf Briefmarken die Namen der Urheberrechtsinhaber genannt (wenn auch aus meiner Sicht fälschlich, denn die Urheber von Fotos werden nicht genannt, die Grafiker, welche teilweise ein paar Buchstaben ohne Schöpfungshöhe zusammenstellen, sehr wohl). Das Nennen der tatsächlichen Urheber macht auch Sinn, denn die Präsenstationsmappe ist nicht inhärenter Bestandteil des Briefmarkenbogens, auch die Kompilation des Bogen selbst ist nicht als Bestandteil der Marken zu sehen. Im Falle der Verwendung wird die Briefmarke selbst dauerhaft vom Rest getrennt und ist ein eigenständiges Objekt. In dem Sinne, wie die Post damit umgegangen ist, würde ein Hinweis auf der Website im Online-Shop dasselbe sein. Da müsste man nicht extra dann auf der Marke anführen. An diesem Beispiel sieht man, wie unlogisch das dann wird.
- Mein Tipp: Ändere deine Vorlage, verzichte auf das Wort "Please" - das steht im Widerspruch zu den Lizenzforderungen, aber sag genau wie du das haben willst. Unmissverständlich. Schreib nicht rein, dass es dich freuen würde, ein Belegexemplar zu bekommen, sondern schreib rein, dass das Belegexemplar Teil der Bedingung ist. Punkt. Wen interessiert es, der billig zu einem Foto kommen will, was dich freut? Die meisten halten uns ja eh für Idioten, dass wir was herschenken.
- Bitte betrachte das nicht jetzt direkt an Dich gerichtet, sondern es ist schlicht ein Moment wo wir darüber nachdenken müssen, wie wir mit Menschen kommunizieren, die mit der Materie nicht vertraut sind. In diesem speziellen Fall halt mit Briefmarken. Und das betrifft uns alle. KLar, die Commonsbilder-User können sich nicht auf Irrtum berufen, aber würden es tun, wenn es dazu kommt. "Ach ja, es tut mir ja so leid, aber ich hätte gedacht, dass das nicht zwingend ist sondern auch dann gilt, wenn man..... bla bla"! Entweder Public Domain oder klare Handlungsanweisungen. --Hubertl (talk) 07:32, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
- mach ich --Böhringer (talk) 13:30, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
- hast ja Recht. Gibt es eine Vorlage wo das schon drinnen steht? Ich bin da nicht so fit.--Böhringer (talk) 09:33, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
FYI
[edit]Hi:
Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates#Cydalima_perspectalis -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 10:11, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hofsteigstraße 46, Lustenau 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Spuller See Panorama von Westen.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spuller See Panorama von Westen.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Küngs Maisäß Panorama.jpg
[edit]Hi, Böhringer ! Just a few words about your beautiful panorama. I've added three notes concerning three very slight stiching errors you can easily fix... But my problem concerns the light : did you take the different photos at three (or four) different hours within the same day ? IMO, the picture on the left was taken with the sun on the left, the picture of the house in the middle has no shadow, so it was probably taken at noon and, on the other side of the pano, the sun is on the right... Of course this detail has no influence on the quality of your photo, which is a FP. I just want to know if I'm wrong or not, just because I generally appreciate your work on Commons and because I like panoramic photography. -- Sorry for my English. -- Best regards.JLPC (talk) 08:10, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
- Hallo JLPC, Thanks for the compliments. The stitching errors I fix soon. The panorama has an angle of 270 °. The sun was directly behind me. In the EXIF data you see the Aufnamezeit 11:15 clock. When you go into the spatial data on Google Earth, you see the same random shadows. My english is not too good :-) --Böhringer (talk) 10:25, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 10:37, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Distelfalter , Vanessa cardui.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Distelfalter , Vanessa cardui.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Distelfalter auf einer Silberdistel 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Admiral auf einer Silberdistel 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! C-Falter auf einer Silberdistel 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kiefer Zapfen, Pine cones 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! SBB A13 Brücke St Margrethen 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! SBB A13 Brücke St Margrethen 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Acorns of Quercus robur, Eichel der Stieleiche 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Acorns of Quercus robur, Eichel der Stieleiche 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Strahlenbüschel oder Lichtbüschel 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grünes Heupferd ♀ Tettigonia viridissima 5.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Acorns of Quercus robur, Eichel der Stieleiche 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Acorns of Quercus robur, Eichel der Stieleiche 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Acorns of Quercus robur, Eichel der Stieleiche 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! ÖBB Rheinbrücke 2012 Lustenau 26.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! ÖBB Rheinbrücke 2012 Lustenau 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! SBB A13 Brücke St Margrethen 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Strahlenbüschel oder Lichtbüschel 2.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Strahlenbüschel oder Lichtbüschel 2.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
Excellent Photographer's Barnstar
[edit]Excellent Photographer's Barnstar | |||
I hereby award Böhringer Friedrich this special barnstar for 100 Featured pictures and some other nice contributions. Great work! The community can be proud to have You as a member. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, George Chernilevsky talk 16:01, 30 September 2012 (UTC) |
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Altstätten, Appenzeller Bahn.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Altstätten, Appenzeller Bahn.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Wikimedia Blog Feature
[edit]Hi Böhringer,
My name is Jawad Qadir and I'm a communications intern with the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco. We have a feature on the Foundation blog [1] to profile the photographers behind the beautiful photos that become Picture of the Day (POTD) on the Commons home page. You can see some of our past POTD posts here: https://blog.wikimedia.org/c/communications/picture-of-the-day/
Given that your photo is scheduled for 23 November 2012, we'd love to do a short interview with you either by phone, Skype, or email to discuss your work and your POTD. Please let me know if you think you'd be interested!
Thanks, Jqadir (WMF) (talk) 22:07, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
Sorry for the late response. Can you email me directly at jqadir@wikimedia.org? I will send you some questions from there!
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pfarrkirche hl. Nikolaus (Wolfurt) Twilights 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Feldkirch Alte PK Hl Michael und Friedhof 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kälber in Mellenstock, Bizau 6.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Admiral auf einer Mostbirne 1.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Admiral auf einer Mostbirne 1.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Alpenmurmeltier Marmota marmota of Rätikon 5.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!Dear Böhringer, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, |
- Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 22:18, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Blätter der Ahornblättrige Platane, Platanus × hispanica 28.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dürrenbachgletscher 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Alpenmurmeltier Marmota marmota of Rätikon 5.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alpenmurmeltier Marmota marmota of Rätikon 5.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 22:03, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Karhorn Gipfel Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Karhorn Gipfel Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 06:05, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wälderbahntrasse bei Kennelbach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Herz Jesu Kloster - Sacré Coeur Riedenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Junger Höckerschwan, Cygnus olor 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Batzenalpen in Schröcken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Junger Höckerschwan, Cygnus olor 09.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Junger Höckerschwan, Cygnus olor 09.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Junger Höckerschwan, Cygnus olor 04.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Junger Höckerschwan, Cygnus olor 04.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gamschol in Gams SG Panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oberes Belvedere mit Weihnachtsmarkt, Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gamschol in Gams SG Flurkreuz Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gamschol in Gams SG Flurkreuz 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Macro shot of a Taraxacum sect. Ruderalia
[edit]Thanks very much for your stunning photo Macro shot of a Taraxacum sect. Ruderalia Beautiful. Have used it in a blog post here - and credited you. Let me know if I've not got any details right http://markmeynell.wordpress.com/2012/11/28/the-malice-of-time-and-the-flowers-of-the-field/ yours Mark
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Rathaus Adventfenster Dornbirn 14.JPG
- File:Rathaus Adventfenster Dornbirn 21.JPG
- File:Rathaus Adventfenster Dornbirn 23.JPG
- File:Rathaus Adventfenster Dornbirn 24.JPG
- File:Rathaus Adventfenster Dornbirn 5.JPG
- File:Rathaus Adventfenster Dornbirn 9.JPG
Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 21:18, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
Verwendung Ihrer Bilder
[edit]Sehr geehrter Herr Böhringer,
wir, die ZENDOME GmbH, bewundern Ihre tolle Arbeit auf Wikimedia Commons. Für eines unser Websiteprojekte verwendeten wir das Bild 'Nikolauszug.JPG'. Den Link finden Sie anbei. http://www.zendome.de/unternehmen/news/238_zendome.nikolaus.html Sollten Änderungswünsche bzgl. der Angabe des Urhebers vorliegen, können Sie mich gerne kontaktieren.
Vielen Dank und mit freundlichen Grüßen
Philipp Baartz
- nett, dass Sie mich anschreiben. Freut mich, wenn das Bild eine Verwendung gefunden hat. Die Lizenzangaben passen so. Liebe Grüsse aus dem Ösiland, Böhringer
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schwedenfeuer Detail 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Klösterle, Wäldlitobel-Viadukt Arlbergbahn Westrampe 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Schwedenfeuer Detail 04.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schwedenfeuer Detail 04.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 22:29, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oberer Geißkopf, Schwarzenberg Vorarlberg 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Feldkirch Schattenburg NordOstSeite.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open
[edit]Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 08:56, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Betonei von Oberhauser & Schedler 5.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Betonei von Oberhauser & Schedler 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Berliner Höhenweg Nr 526 über dem Schlegeisspeicher 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Speicher Zillergründl 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Speicher Zillergründl 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Friesenbergsee und Friesenberghaus, Zillertaler Alpen 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Speicher Zillergründl 08.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Speicher Zillergründl 08.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 06:05, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Friesenbergsee und Friesenberghaus, Zillertaler Alpen 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Olpererhütte im August 2011 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 17:43, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dalaas, Kath PK Hl Oswald Pfarrhaus 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ludesch, Kath PK Hl. Sebastian mit Friedhof 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palast Hohenems Winterpanorama 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
How to make a pic. a featured pic.
[edit]If i think an image i have taken is good enough to be a featured picture in wikimedia commons. what will i have to do? is it like just uploading the picture in commons enough and the people will automatically make it a featured pic. If it is not so just PLEASE TELL ME STEP-BY-STEP in detail what all stuff i will have to do with that image and the procedure? Please Help.
Featured Picture
[edit]i just want to know how do u get an image as the featured picture.can u tell me the exact procedure to convert my image into featured image.I really have a few very good images and i think they can be there. i am new to commons. Help me with it.Just tell me in detail the step-by-step procedure.
- bitte wende dich an [2]
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Geroldsegg Schwarzenberg Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oberfallenberg Rheintal Panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Geroldsegg Schwarzenberg Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Geroldsegg Schwarzenberg Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Bödele Winterpanorama 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bödele Winterpanorama 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Steirische Scheckenziege 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Watzenegg Dornbirn Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oberfallenberg Rheintal Panorama 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bildstein Kirchdorf Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 360° Panorama mit hl Maria und Gh Fetz auf dem Bödele.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bödele Reihenhäuser 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Don't hide your light under a bushel!
[edit]Dein Kommentar bei FP ehrt mich auch. Stell mal dein Licht nicht unter den Scheffel, was du hier für Wikipedia beträgst ist vom Feinsten. Ich bin sogar ein wenig neidisch, und zwar auf die wundervollen Landschaften und Motive die quasi vor deiner Haustür liegen;-) In diesem Sinne frohe Ostern nach Österreich. --Ritchyblack (talk) 22:11, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
- danke dir. Ja, wir haben hier wirklich sehr viele und schöne Motive bei uns im Ösiland. Und da mache ich gerne Panoramas damit die Leute, die es nicht so schön haben wenigstens in Bildern blättern können. Ich freue mich sehr, wenn da aus aller Welt Kommentare und Fragen kommen. Das macht die Sache noch viel interessanter. Wir leben hier und nehmen die Dinge um uns gar nicht mehr so wahr und für selbstverständlich. was ich dich noch fragen wollte Mit welcher Stitching-Software machst du deine Panos zusammen? Liebe Grüsse aus dem Ländle --Böhringer (talk) 08:29, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- Da ich ein fauler Hund bin und so gut wie nie ein Stativ mitschleppe brauche ich für meine aus der "Hüfte" (Hand) geschossenen Panoramaserien eine Software die gut mit solchem Ausgangsmaterial klar kommt. Da hat sich bei mir Autopano Giga als sehr gut erwiesen. Ich kann die Software in Lightroom integrieren und daraus meine Pano-Bearbeitung starten. Ich werde dieses Jahr nach Island reisen und habe mir geschworen auf meinen Wanderungen Stativ und Pano-Adapter immer mitzunehmen, da werde ich nichts dem Zufall überlassen. Wenn ich HDR-Panos erzeugen möchte geht es ohne diese Gerätschaften nicht. Gruß Stefan --Ritchyblack (talk) 15:03, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
- danke dir. Ja, wir haben hier wirklich sehr viele und schöne Motive bei uns im Ösiland. Und da mache ich gerne Panoramas damit die Leute, die es nicht so schön haben wenigstens in Bildern blättern können. Ich freue mich sehr, wenn da aus aller Welt Kommentare und Fragen kommen. Das macht die Sache noch viel interessanter. Wir leben hier und nehmen die Dinge um uns gar nicht mehr so wahr und für selbstverständlich. was ich dich noch fragen wollte Mit welcher Stitching-Software machst du deine Panos zusammen? Liebe Grüsse aus dem Ländle --Böhringer (talk) 08:29, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- danke für die Info. ja bei HDR (hab mich damit noch nicht angefreundet) wirst du wohl ein Stativ brauchen. Bei Panoramas, wo alle Objekte weit genug weg sind reicht es, wenn man die Bilder "aus der Hüfte" schießt. Ein Stativ wird erst richtig notwendig, wenn die Bilder ganz scharf sein sollen und Objekte wie Bäume, Häuser u.a. ganz nah da sind.
Island, würde mir auch sehr gefallen. Ich freue mich für dich und zeig uns wie es dort aussieht. Schöne Grüße Fred --Böhringer (talk) 19:31, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! ♂ Hufeisen-Azurjungfer, Coenagrion puella 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Großes Ochsenauge Maniola jurtina 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Colias hyale, Goldene Acht 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oberfallenberg Dornbirn.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kapelle hl. Maria auf dem Bödele 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ahorn auf dem Bödele 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:360° Panorama mit hl Maria und Gh Fetz auf dem Bödele.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:360° Panorama mit hl Maria und Gh Fetz auf dem Bödele.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kleiner Fuchs, Aglais urticae 011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kleiner Fuchs, Aglais urticae 007.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Erodierter Sandstein an der Bregenzerache 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bödele Reihenhäuser 7.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Westliche Honigbiene, Apis mellifera auf Weidenkätzchen, Salix 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! ♂ Gebänderte Prachtlibelle Calopteryx splendens 5.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Große Heidelibelle, Sympetrum striolatum 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Oberfallenberg Rheintal Panorama 3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oberfallenberg Rheintal Panorama 3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Post
[edit]Wenn auch verspätet: Du hast Post. --Tuxyso (talk) 16:40, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Oberlose Schwarzenberg Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oberlose Schwarzenberg Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Blauäugiger Waldportier, Minois dryas.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
liebe Grüße + ein Hinweis
[edit]On ne voit bien qu'avec le cœur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux." - Le Petit Prince, chap. XXI. --Hubertl (talk) 07:28, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Großes Ochsenauge Maniola jurtina 3.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Großes Ochsenauge Maniola jurtina 3.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Blauäugiger Waldportier, Minois dryas.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Blauäugiger Waldportier, Minois dryas.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Use of your picture for a book
[edit]Hi,
We’d like to use one of your pictures for a book that will be publish next fall. On wikimedia, it says that the picture is copyright free.
The title of the book is Secrets de plantes 2 and the name of the author is Fabien Girard. The initial print run will be 1000 copies.
We’d like to have your autorisation by e-mail to use this picture. If you accept, what is the exact name of the source that we must write beside the picture?
Here are the link of the picture.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Echium_vulgare_1.JPG
Stéphane Aubut Editor assistant for Les Éditions JCL
stephane@jcl.qc.ca
Foto auf Wikify.ru
[edit]Hallo Böhringer, dein Schwedenfeuer-Foto wird auf der Website wikify.ru derzeit offensichtlich lizenwidrig (keine Urheberangabe, keine Lizenznennung) genutzt. Bedauerlicherweise gehört diese Website anscheinend einem auf :ru und Commons tätigen Admin. Wenn du möchtest, kannst du hier oder hier einen Kommentar abgeben. Das wäre insbesondere relevant, falls du dem betroffenen User:Gruznov eine Nutzung deines Fotos unter von der CC-Lizenz abweichenden Bedingungen eingeräumt hast, weil es sich dann ja nicht mehr um eine URV handeln würde. --Túrelio (talk) 08:14, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- danke für den Hinweis. Leider kann ich nicht englisch und eine Kommunikation ist nicht gut möglich. Ich habe ca. 12.000 Bilder in die Commons hochgeladen und finde sehr oft URV (Urheberrechtsverletzungen). Was soll ich machen? Alle klagen? Liebe Grüsse und danke nochmal --Böhringer (talk) 19:51, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- hat er nicht bekommen! Ich kenne ihn nicht einmal. --Böhringer (talk) 19:58, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- Wenn ich mich (als Initiator der Beschwerde) einmischen darf. Zu deiner Frage was zu machen ist: Abmahnen (lassen), notfalls klagen. Zumindest bei URVen von Webseiten, deren Anbieter in DE/AT/CH sitzen. --A.Savin 22:41, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- hast du das selbst schon einmal gemacht? Wie bist du vorgegenagen, mit einem Anwalt? --Böhringer (talk) 08:05, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Richtig. Wobei für die Erstabmahnung ein Anwalt gar nicht erforderlich ist. Ich glaube, User:Raymond hatte früher vorgefertigte Texte und Rechnungen für solche Fälle veröffentlicht, jetzt finde ich die auf Anhieb nicht mehr, frag am besten bei ihm nach. --A.Savin 08:54, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- hast du das selbst schon einmal gemacht? Wie bist du vorgegenagen, mit einem Anwalt? --Böhringer (talk) 08:05, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Cygnus olor, nests with eggs, Höckerschwan mit Nest.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cygnus olor, nests with eggs, Höckerschwan mit Nest.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Großes Walsertal Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Großes Walsertal Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cygnus olor, Höckerschwan Bodensee 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cygnus olor, Höckerschwan Bodensee 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cygnus olor, nests with eggs, Höckerschwan mit Nest 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schlangenstraße, Windegg Rorschacherberg Altenrhein.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Basenji, Kongo Terrier 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gewöhnlicher Buchsbaum, Buxus sempervirens .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Höckerschwan mit Nest, Cygnus olor, nests with eggs 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Anser indicus, Streifengans 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Blässhuhn im Nest, Fulica atra 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! ♂ Stockente Anas platyrhynchos 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chiesa di San Bernardino da Siena (San Bernardino) 7.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Höckerschwan mit Nest, Cygnus olor, nests with eggs 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Colias hyale, Goldene Acht 04.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Colias hyale, Goldene Acht 04.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Eintagsfliege, Ephemeroptera .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
species identification
[edit]Dear Böhringer This is not a Plebejus argus but probably Aricia sp.
Regards
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gais Panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:360° Grad Oberzalimalpe, Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:360° Grad Oberzalimalpe, Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Speicher Zillergründl 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Friesenbergsee und Friesenberghaus, Zillertaler Alpen 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Westliche Honigbiene, Apis mellifera auf Weidenkätzchen, Salix 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kleines Wiesenvögelchen, Coenonympha pamphilus 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Große Pechlibelle, Ischnura elegans 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Singapore Airlines Airbus A380 9V-SKL@ZRH 26 07 2013 6.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gletscherfalter, Oeneis glacialis.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Alchemilla alpina, Alpen-Frauenmantel 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rotenbrunnebach im Gadental 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kleiner Fuchs, Aglais urticae 014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schwalbenschwanz, Papilio machaon 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lasiommata maera, Braunauge 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Balzende Senfweißlinge, Leptidea sinapis 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Verzinkung
[edit]Hi Böhringer, du hast 2008 einige schöne Zeichnungen zum Thema Verzinkung gemacht (de:Holzverbindung#Zinkung und Gratung). Könntest du bitte auch noch eine Zeichnung machen, die die Keilzinkung zeigt. Schließlich ist Keilzinkung heute Artikel des Tages geworden. Gruß --Thirunavukkarasye-Raveendran (talk) 07:39, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:360° Gottvaterspitze Walgau Rätikon.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:360° Gottvaterspitze Walgau Rätikon.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Caligo eurilochus, Gewöhnlicher Bananenfalter.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Malachitfalter, Bambuspage, Siproeta stelenes 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Caligo memnon, Dicke Banane.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Malachitfalter, Bambuspage, Siproeta stelenes 3.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Malachitfalter, Bambuspage, Siproeta stelenes 3.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:32, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Neue Version des Yosemite FPC, freue mich über Unterstützung
[edit]Hallo Böhringer! ch habe eine neue Version meine FPCs hochgeladen, das du zuvor unterstützt hast, s. Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panoramic Overview from Glacier Point over Yosemite Valley 2013.jpg. Die von dir ursprünglich unterstützte Version hatte kleinere perspektivische Probleme. Ich würde mich über Unterstützung der neuen Version freuen. --Tuxyso (talk) 10:43, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Botanischer Garten Meran 57.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gewöhnlicher Buchsbaum, Buxus sempervirens.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Parasol oder Riesenschirmpilz, Macrolepiota procera 3b.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Parasol oder Riesenschirmpilz, Macrolepiota procera 3a.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File:ANTONY GORMLEY Hasenfluh Zürs 13.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:52, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
re: Damülser Horn im Nebel
[edit]Haha danke schön!! Ich glaube, dass es ein tolles Bild ist, wirklich. Möchtest du es nominieren in QI oder FP? Auf wiederhören! (oder -lesen? meine deutsche Zweifeln... ) --Kadellar (talk) 11:37, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
FP promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:360° Grad Parzelle Höfle im Lecknertal.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:360° Grad Parzelle Höfle im Lecknertal.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/JKadavoor Jee 17:03, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Thank-you for reviewing and supporting this picture. Following FP comments, I've reworked the image to restore detail in the trees. You may wish to review the image to ensure you are still happy with it. -- Colin (talk) 21:49, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Leckner See, Hittisau 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Leckner See, Hittisau 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kreisviuadukt der Räthischen Bahn in Brusio 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Damülser Horn im Nebel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Leckner See, Hittisau 10.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leckner See, Hittisau 10.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/JKadavoor Jee 08:51, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brusio mit Kreisviadukt der Rhätischen Bahn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lago Bianco & Lago Nero auf dem Berninapass .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Plan da la Rösa an der Hauptstraße 29 zum Berninapass .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Regionalzug auf der Berninalinie am Lago Bianco.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Regionalzug auf der Berninalinie am Lago Bianco.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/JKadavoor Jee 08:37, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
"Happy Diwali!"
[edit]Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rehetobel AR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Noli Ligurien am Strand.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Wiki Loves Monuments CH 2013
[edit]
Liebe Teilnehmerin/Lieber Teilnehmer von Wiki Loves Monuments CH Gerne möchten wir uns hiermit für deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments bedanken. Die Award Show, in deren Rahmen die Gewinner bekanntgegeben und ausgezeichnet werden, wird am 30. November, von 11:00 - 16:00Uhr, in der Nationalbibliothek in Bern (Hallwylstrasse 15, 3003 Bern) stattfinden. Verpasse nicht das spannende Rahmenprogramm: Führung durch das Eidgenössische Archiv für Denkmalpflege, Einführungs-Workshop und Schreibateliers sowie eine Foto-Ausstellung der ausgezeichneten Bilder - ergänzt mit Bildern aus dem Eidgenössischen Archiv für Denkmalpflege. Für die Award-Show kann man sich hier anmelden: Anmeldung Award Show. Für weitere Infos kannst du ebenfalls unsere Website unter http://www.wikilovesmonuments.ch konsultieren oder uns unter info@wikimedia.ch schreiben. Mit besten Grüssen, Das Organisations-Kommittee |
Cher participant-e au concours WLM CH, Le gagnants seront annoncés pendant la cérémonie de clôture qui aura lieu de 11h00 à 16h00 le samedi 30 novembre à la Bibliothèque Nationale (Hallwylstrasse 15, 3003 Bern). Cette cérémonie de remise des prix comprendra un repas de midi et un programme intéressant: une visite guidée des archives, des ateliers d'édition de Wikipédia, et une exposition des photos gagnantes accompagnées d'images des archives fédérales de monuments historiques. Vous pouvez vous inscrire à cet évènement en remplissant le formulaire Registration for Award Show. Pour tout autre renseignement, veuillez consulter notre site web http://wikilovesmonuments.ch ou envoyez un e-mail à info@wikimedia.ch. Avec nos salutations les meilleures, Le comité d'organisation |
Dear WikiLovesMonuments CH-participant, We would like to thank you very much for your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. The award show, where the winning pictures will be announced, will take place on November 30, from 11:00 - 16:00 o'clock, in Bern in the National Library (Hallwylstrasse 15, 3003 Bern). This award show will be accompanied by a lunch and an interesting frame program: A guided tour through the archives, workshops/editing sessions and an exhibition of the winning pictures with additional pictures from the Federal Archives of Historical Monuments. You can register for this event if here: " Registration for Award Show. For any further information you can check our website on http://wikilovesmonuments.ch or write us on info@wikimedia.ch. With our best regards, The organization's committee |
Gentile partecipante a Wiki Loves Monuments CH Vogliamo ringraziarti molto per la partecipazione. La cerimonia finale, in cui le foto vincitrici saranno annunciate, avrà luogo il 30 novembre dalle 11:00 alle 16:00 alla Biblioteca Nazionale di Berna (Hallwylstrasse 15, 3003 Bern). La premiazione sarà accompagnata da un pranzo e da un programma di contorno interessante: una visita guidata agli archivi, workshops e un'esposizione delle foto vincitrici con l'aggiunta delle foto provenienti dagli Archivi Federali dei Monumenti Storici. Ci si può registrare presso la pagina web: Registrazione per la cerimonia finale. Per ogni altra informazione si prega di consultare il nostro sito http://www.wikilovesmonuments.ch o di scrivere a info@wikimedia.ch. Saluti, Il Comitato Organizzatore |
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.Dear Böhringer, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, |
Copyright status: File:Lingenau Kath PK Hl. Johannes d.T. Inside 01.JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Lingenau Kath PK Hl. Johannes d.T. Inside 01.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 04:48, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
|
Freedom of Panorama This picture of an otherwise copyrighted work may be distributed under the conditions of § 54 (1) Z. 5 of the Austrian copyright law which allows to reproduce, distribute, and publish architectural works of an actual building or other works of visual arts which were created to permanently remain at a public place. Note: Due to the principle of Lex loci protectionis, this applies only to reuse of this picture in Austria. Reuse in other countries is subject to local law. Further information can be found on Commons and in German Wikipedia.
|
Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!Dear Böhringer, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, |
This page requires further opinion from you. Thanks, Jee 03:27, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
2014 !
[edit]* * * 2014! * * * | |
Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Happy holidays! -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:24, 23 December 2013 (UTC) |
Merry Christmas
[edit]Fragen zu Lizenzen und Tags
[edit]Hallo Fred, ich habe im Dezember meine ersten beiden Bilder auf Commons hochgeladen und habe vor noch weitere beizutragen. Allerdings ist mir aufgefallen, dass ich in den EXIF-Daten bei »Urheberrechte« CC-BY als Lizenz angegeben habe (wird automatisch von der Kamera eingetragen), beim Upload Wizard aber CC-BY-SA. Jetzt ist meine Frage, ob ich die Bilder in Commons anders lizensieren sollte oder ob ich das so lassen kann. Für mich scheint es sich so wie es jetzt ist jedoch zu widersprechen. Eine andere Frage: Ist der Tag in den EXIF-Daten überhaupt dafür gedacht die Lizenz anzugeben? Gibt es eine bevorzugte Lizenz auf Commons also lieber CC0, CC-BY oder CC-BY-SA? Ich würde mich über eine Antwort freuen. —MRosetree (talk) 08:10, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- Hallo MRosetree,
grundsätzlich ist es nicht falsch, wenn in den Exif-Daten deine Lizenz steht. Diese exif können aber verlosren gehen, wenn das Bild bspw. heruntergeladen wird und in einem Fotobearbeitungsprogramm bearbeitet werden. Deshalb ist es wichtig, dass die Lizenzangabe beim Bild auf der Commons Seite steht. So kann sich später niemand "rausreden". Die derzeit aktuellste Lizenz für Österreichische Bildautoren lautet "cc-by-sa-3.0-at" Ich würde diese nehmen, vorausgesetzt du bist ein Österreicher. Bei Deutschland ist die Endung einfach de stat at. Hoffe ich konnte dir helfen. lg. --Böhringer (talk) 12:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Deine Meinung ist gefragt...
[edit]Hallo Böhringer! Ich bin inzwischen auch Besitzer eines NPA (Nodal Ninja 4) und habe ein paar erste Panoramen damit erstellt. Mich würde insbesondere deine Meinung zu
interessieren. Es handelt es um einen Blickwinkel von etwa 180° eines Martplatzes mit umliegenden Gebäuden. Was kann man besser machen? Was ist gut gelungen? Was weniger gut? U.a. kam die Kritik, dass die Perspektive etwas unnatürlich wirke. Ich denke, dass bei einem so extremen Blickwinkel eine gewisse "Unnatürlichkeit" unvermeidbar ist. Ich habe Wert darauf gelegt, die vertikalen Linien auch vertikal zu belassen. Ein weiteres Architektur-Panorama, das 360° abdeckt ist unter
zu finden. Dort gibt es kleinere Imperfektionen (insbesondere in den Ästen), da der Wind sehr stark wehte. Fällt dir daran etwas besonderes auf? Verbesserungspotenzial insbesondere bzgl. der Perspektive?
Vielen Dank schon mal für deine Rückmeldung. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:29, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hallo Tuxyso erstmal finde ich beide Panoramen sehr gut. Ich würde bei beiden etwas vom unteren Bildrand wegschneiden. Und wenn du die Kamera etwas mehr hochschwenkst, so dass die Dachkanten der Gebäude mehr in die Bildmitte kommen verzieht es die Objekte weniger. Es wird aber immer bei einem zylindrischen Panorama diesen Effekt haben. Beim 360° habe ich dir den 360° Viewer dazu gestellt. Bei diesem Bild habe ich im Gegensatzt zum ersten Bild Stichingfehler gefunden. Die sind aber nicht weg zu bekommen, weil gerade Bäume sehr schwierig sind zu stichen. Man sieht es dort, wo die Äste verschwommen sind. Das ist kein Wind. Ich versuche einen Baum, wenn möglich immer auf ein ganzes Bild zu bekommen. Die Kirche beim ersten Bild würde ich partiell aufhellen, aber das gehört nicht zu diesem Thema. Ich hoffe, ich konnte dir etwas weiter helfen. Liebe Grüsse --Böhringer (talk) 16:36, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hallo Böhringer! Vielen Dank für die Antwort - ich bin für jeden Tipp dankbar. Deine Panoramen gelten ja, zu Recht, praktisch als Referenz auf Commons... Bei File:Sunderplatz Mülheim Heimaterde 2014.jpg ließe sich sicher ganz gut etwas wegschneiden, ich werde mir das später mal anschauen. Bei File:Marktplatz Heißen Kirche 2014.jpg habe ich hingegen bewusst so beschnitten, damit die Pflasterung noch gut erkennbar ist. So sieht man z.B., dass alle helleren Steine vom Zentrum, vom Brunnen, abgehen.
Eine Nachfrage noch zum Hochschwenken: Es handelt sich ja um mehrzeilige Panoramen. Würdest du dann eine Reihe so aufnehmen, dass die Dachkanten recht exakt in der Mitte der Hochkantaufnahme sind? Ich hatte bei den Aufnahmen darauf geachtet, dass ich eine Reihe exakt vertikal ausgerichtet aufnehme. Das ist aber vermutlich nicht unbedingt nötig, da später in der Pano-Software ohnehin begradigt wird, oder? Danke schon mal für die Infos, --Tuxyso (talk) 08:11, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hallo Böhringer! Vielen Dank für die Antwort - ich bin für jeden Tipp dankbar. Deine Panoramen gelten ja, zu Recht, praktisch als Referenz auf Commons... Bei File:Sunderplatz Mülheim Heimaterde 2014.jpg ließe sich sicher ganz gut etwas wegschneiden, ich werde mir das später mal anschauen. Bei File:Marktplatz Heißen Kirche 2014.jpg habe ich hingegen bewusst so beschnitten, damit die Pflasterung noch gut erkennbar ist. So sieht man z.B., dass alle helleren Steine vom Zentrum, vom Brunnen, abgehen.
- du schmeichelst mir :-) .... wusste nicht, dass du mehrzeilige Panos machst. Aber ich denke schon, dass wenn eine Dachkante die horizontal verläuft mehr zur Bildmitte rückt, gerader wird. Probier mal die horizontale Ausrichtung und zeig dann das Ergebnis. Fix ist, je nächer das Gebäude bei dir ist um so mehr bekommst du diese Krümmung rein. Was du auch machen könntest (geht aber nur, wenn du genügend Platz hast) geh vom Objekt weiter weg und beschneide dann das Panorama mehr. Ist auch bei Bäumen besser. Hast dir zum Starten von Panos nicht gerade die einfachsten Motive ausgesucht :-) Liebe Grüsse Fred --Böhringer (talk) 11:32, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hallo Fred! Vielen Dank für deine schnelle Rückmeldung. Was heißt schmeicheln, das sind die Fakten :) Ich habe auch schon zuvor eine Reihe Panoramen ohne NPA gemacht. Man ist überrascht, was alles aus der Hand geht. Sobald aber etwas mehr Vordergrund auf das Bild kommt, wird es ohne NPA kritisch. Ich habe bewusst mit etwas schwierigeren Motiven angefangen, damit ich direkt sehe, an welchen Stellen mögliche Probleme auftreten. Die Bearbeitung von File:Sunderplatz Mülheim Heimaterde 2014.jpg (zweizeilig) hat mich in den Wahnsinn getrieben - vor allem was die Bäume angeht, dagegen war File:Marktplatz Heißen Kirche 2014.jpg deutlich einfacher - dort habe ich nur einige vertikale Linien hinzugefügt. Sind Bäume mit Laub eigentlich auch so kritisch? File:Gnadenkirche Heißen Highres 2014.jpg ist übrigens dreizeilig. Den Marktplatz werde ich ggf. noch mal fotografieren und dann deinen Tipp bzgl. der Häuserkanten umsetzen. Dann sag' ich mal weiterhin "gut Licht" :) --Tuxyso (talk) 07:07, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- nein Laub resp. Blätter sind etwas besser, weil da kann mann einzelne Blätter reinkopieren und andere ggf. wegretuschieren. Freue mich auf deine neuen Panos. Bin momentan wenig in der Wiki, weil ich sehr viel Aufträge von Innenaufnahmen machen darf und zusammen mit einem bekannten Buchautor für Vorarlberg 4 Denkmalführer in den nächsten 2 Jahren auf den Markt bringe. Ein weitertes Buch über Vorarlbergs Industriezeitalter um die Jh.Wende kommt im März auf den Markt (Alle Bilder von Böh. ausser den ganz alten) da habe ich zusammen mit dem Vlbg Wirtschaftsarchiv, dem BDA Vorarlberg und zwei Autorinnen mitgewirkt. Liebe Grüsse Fred --Böhringer (talk) 10:10, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- mit nahezu 7000 Stunden uploads und vielen Recherchen wohl noch nicht. Aber "wer säht, der erntet" bekanntlich. Ein Start ist es allemal, dank Wikipedia. lg Fred --Böhringer (talk) 13:26, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hallo Tuxyso erstmal finde ich beide Panoramen sehr gut. Ich würde bei beiden etwas vom unteren Bildrand wegschneiden. Und wenn du die Kamera etwas mehr hochschwenkst, so dass die Dachkanten der Gebäude mehr in die Bildmitte kommen verzieht es die Objekte weniger. Es wird aber immer bei einem zylindrischen Panorama diesen Effekt haben. Beim 360° habe ich dir den 360° Viewer dazu gestellt. Bei diesem Bild habe ich im Gegensatzt zum ersten Bild Stichingfehler gefunden. Die sind aber nicht weg zu bekommen, weil gerade Bäume sehr schwierig sind zu stichen. Man sieht es dort, wo die Äste verschwommen sind. Das ist kein Wind. Ich versuche einen Baum, wenn möglich immer auf ein ganzes Bild zu bekommen. Die Kirche beim ersten Bild würde ich partiell aufhellen, aber das gehört nicht zu diesem Thema. Ich hoffe, ich konnte dir etwas weiter helfen. Liebe Grüsse --Böhringer (talk) 16:36, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
[edit]Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!
[edit]- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Archive 5⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
[edit]Picture of the Year 2013 Results
[edit]- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear Böhringer,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Eurasian Lynx
[edit]Hello! My name is Darla Sue Dollman and I write about animals on www.blessedlittlecreatures.blogspot.com/ I am participating in an alphabet challenge and chose the Eurasian Lynx for the letter E. I appreciate being able to use your photo on my blog and wanted to thank you for making your photos available for public use. It is a lovely photograph!
Best to you! Darla Sue Dollman
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:BregenzToscaBühnenbild2.JPG
- File:BregenzToscaBühnenbild3.JPG
- File:BregenzToscaBühnenbild4.JPG
- File:BregenzToscaBühnenbild5.JPG
Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 13:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Umbenennen
[edit]Hi Böhringer, um ein Bild umzubenennen, musst du es nicht erneut hochladen. Rechts oben gibt es einen Menüpunkt Move / Verschieben, mit dem geht das halbvollautomatisch (inkl. aller Verwendungen). Wenn du diesen Menüpunkt nicht hast, dann kannst du das Umbenennen über die Vorlage {{Rename}} beantragen. Siehe auch Commons:Dateien_verschieben. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:15, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Au Rehmen hl JosefBöhringer 6.JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Au Rehmen hl JosefBöhringer 6.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 11:43, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
in der ersten Kandidatur zu diesem Bild hast du mit pro gestimmt. Ich hatte die Kandidatur seinerzeit wegen einem Stitching-Fehler beendet, den ich nun behoben habe. Würde mich natürlich freuen, wenn du das Bild diesmal auch unterstützen würdest. Viele Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:49, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
A beer for you!
[edit]I was very amused :D Grüße von Nordmensch (talk) 00:40, 20 August 2014 (UTC) |
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Pisciadù und Pisciadùhütte, Panorama, Böhringer.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pisciadù und Pisciadùhütte, Panorama, Böhringer.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Kapelle St. Michael in Finkenbühl 01.JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Kapelle St. Michael in Finkenbühl 01.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:12, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 - Wiki4Alps edition
[edit]
Liebe/r Teilnehmer/in des Wettbewerbs Wiki Loves Monuments CH 2013, Die Ausgabe 2014 des Wettbewerbs Wiki Loves Monuments hat Montag 8 September begonnen. Dieses Jahr fokussiert sich der Schweizer Wettbewerb auf die Region der Alpen. Die vergangenen Wettbewerbe haben ermöglicht, dass mehrere tausend Fotos von Schweizer Denkmälern gesammelt werden konnten. Dank euch hat es auf Wikimedia Commons Bilder von zahlreichen Denkmälern. Jedoch haben wir festgestellt, dass die Denkmäler, welche sich in den alpinen Regionen befinden, dabei nur sehr gering vertreten sind. Aus diesem Grund fokussiert sich der diesjährige Wettbewerb spezifisch auf die Alpen, um auch diesen Lebensraum auf Wikimedia Commons besser dokumentiert vorzufinden. Denkt daran: Hochgeladen werden können die Bilder vom 8.September bis und mit dem 8.Oktober 2014. Um am Wettbewerb teilzunehmen, könnt ihr jedoch auch Bilder hochladen, die ihr zu einem beliebigen Zeitpunkt gemacht habt. Die Fotos müssen nicht während der Wettbewerbszeit entstanden sein. Wikimedia CH organisiert mehrere Wikiexpeditions während dieser Wettbewerbs-Zeit, um Fotos von Denkmälern zu machen, die nur sehr spärlich auf Commons dokumentiert sind. Wenn ihr an diesen Wikiexpeditions teilnehmt, habt ihr auch die Möglichkeit, die Drone von Wikimedia CH im Einsatz zu sehen: Commons:Wiki4Involvement. Habt ihr ausserdem bereits darüber nachgedacht, in euren Familien-Archiven zu stöbern? Vielleicht entdeckt ihr ja den ein oder anderen Schatz aus den 50iger Jahren. Oder habt ihr noch hunderte von Dias, die man digitalisieren könnte? Kontaktiert uns, wir helfen euch gerne dabei! Auf der Wettbewerbsseite http://wiki4alps.ch findet ihr alle notwendigen Informationen, oder ihr könnt euch auch gerne an info@wikimedia.ch wenden. Mit den besten Grüssen, Das Organisationskomittee |
Cher participant-e au concours WLM CH 2013, L'édition 2014 du concours Wiki Loves Monuments a débuté lundi 8 Septembre. Cette année le concours suisse se focalise sur la région des Alpes. Les éditions précédentes du concours ont permis de collecter plusieurs milliers de photos concernant les monuments suisses. Grâce à vous Wikimedia Commons comporte une image pour de nombreux monuments, mais nous avons remarqué que les monuments se situant dans les Alpes sont particulièrement peu représentés. Wikimedia CH organise plusieurs Wikiexpeditions pendant le concours pour aller prendre des photos des monuments peu illustrés dans Commons, en participant à ces Wikiexpeditions vous aurez l'occasion de voir en oeuvre le drone de l'association. Plus d'informations Commons:Wiki4Involvement. Rappelez vous que pour participer au concours, les images peuvent avoir été prises à n'importe quelle période, pas seulement pendant le concours! Avez vous déjà pensé à fouiller dans les archives familiales? Peut-être avez vous quelques trésors de photos datant des années 50! Des centaines de diapositives à numériser ? Contactez-nous, nous pouvons vous aider! Vous trouverez sur le site web du concours http://wiki4alps.ch ou envoyez un e-mail à info@wikimedia.ch. Avec nos salutations les meilleures, le comité d'organisation. |
Dear participants to the WLM CH contest 2013, The 2014 edition of the Wiki Loves Monuments contest began Monday 8th September. This year the contest specifically focuses on the Alps. The previous editions enabled to collect thousands of pictures related to Swiss monuments. Thanks to you, Wikimedia Commons has a picture for many monuments but we realised that the ones located in the Alps were under represented. Wikimedia CH organises several Wikiexpeditions during the contest to go and take pictures of monuments for which we have little content in Commons. By participating to those Wikiexpeditions you will have the opportunity to see the drone of the association in action. For more information, check out the link Commons:Wiki4Involvement. Remember that to participate, the pictures may have been taken at any point in time, not only during the present time of the contest. Have you already thought of searching in family archives? Maybe you have treasures such as pictures dated from the 50's! Hundreds of slides to scan? Do contact us, we can help! You will find the contest's website http://wiki4alps.ch necessary information there or you may write to us using the following address: info@wikimedia.ch. With our warmest regards, The organising committee |
Gentile partecipante a Wiki Loves Monuments CH 2013 L'edizione 2014 del concorso Wiki Loves Monuments è iniziata lunedì 8 settembre. Il concorso di quest'anno si concentra sul territorio alpino svizzero. Le precedenti edizioni del concorso hanno raccolto migliaia di foto di monumenti svizzeri. Grazie a voi Wikimedia Commons ha un'immagine di molti monumenti, ma abbiamo notato che i monumenti che si trovano nelle Alpi sono scarsamente rappresentate. Ricordate che per partecipare al concorso le immagini possono essere prese in qualsiasi momento, non solo durante il concorso! Wikimedia CH organizzerà diverse Wikiexpeditions durante la gara per catturare le immagini di monumenti poco illustrati in Commons, e partecipando a queste Wikiexpeditions si avrà la possibilità di vedere il drone dell'associazione. Per ulteriori informazioni: Commons:Wiki4Involvement Hai mai pensato di cercare negli archivi di famiglia? Forse avete qualche fotografia degli anni '50! Centinaia di diapositive da digitalizzare? contattateci, possiamo aiutarvi! Si prega di visitare il sito web http://wiki4alps.ch o potete scrivere a info@wikimedia.ch. Con i nostri migliori saluti, Il Comitato Organizzatore |
Einelementige Commonskategorien
[edit]Hallo Böhringer, ich bin überwältigt von der großen Menge deiner WLM Vorarlbergbilder. Bei manchen Objekten bin ich über von dir angelegte ein-elementige Kategorien gestoßen. Du versteckst damit deine Bilder in einen Haufen von Unterkategorien und behinderst damit eine Gesamtschau über z.B. eine Straße, weil dort tendenziell weniger Bilder zu finden sind. Und mehr Kategorien. Willst du das wirklich? Worin siehst du den Vorteil einelementiger Kategorien? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 05:53, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
- überwältigend war die Arbeit der vielen Innenaufnahmen aller Sakralbauten im ganzen Bezirk Bregenz, der mehr oder weniger nun vollständig ist.
- mit den Kategorien bin ich noch nicht so vertraut wie du bemerkt hast. Ich verfolge da nicht wirklich ein Ziel. Durch die nächtelangen Sitzungen ist es durchaus möglich, dass ich da was vergessen habe. Andereseits möchte ich dir nicht mehr Arbeit machen, als du eh schon hast. Hoffe auf ein herzliches Wiedersehen in Wien ?! :-) Liebe Grüsse --Böhringer (talk) 09:09, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
Crop
[edit]Hallo Böhringer, habe mir erlaubt, dein Bild etwas zu beschneiden, hatte leichten weißen Rand. Ich hoffe, das passt, sonst gerne rückgängig. wir sehen uns vermutlich in Wien. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:29, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sacré Coeur Klosterkirche Riedenburg Bregenz, 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Herz-Jesu-Kirche Mittelschiff (Bregenz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gallusstift Stichkappe der Kuppel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marienberg Villa Raczyński, Böhringer 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schwarzach hl Sebastian 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sulzberg Thal hl Franz Xaver 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Innerbraz Pfarrkirche hl Nikolaus 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sulzberg hl Laurentius 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dom St Nikolaus, Feldkirch 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Klostertal Museum Werkstatt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Alte Batzenalpe 2014 Interior 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Feldkirch Alte PK hll Kornelius und Cyprian.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oberberg 1 Dafins, hl Josef in Zwischenwasser.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Waldfriedgasse 1 Feldkirch Villa Waldfried.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Herz-Jesu-Kirche (Weiler) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oberes Belvedere Wien, Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kennelbach hl Josef 6.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hl Jakobus (Fraxern) 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Villa Tschavoll Margarethenkapf 1, Feldkirch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Weidachknoten von oben.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Vorarlbergexperte gesucht
[edit]Hallo Böhringer, kannst du mir bitte helfen das Bild aus der Bregenzer Oberstadt (?) zu identifizieren? Die ID in der Filebeschreibung ist ziemlich sicher falsch. Du kennst die Gegend ja wie deine Westentasche. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 12:47, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- Nach dem Titel Spruch am Eingang zur Oberstadt von Bregenz würde ich das eher beim Durchgang in die Oberstadt vermuten. [3] (tschuldige, habe nicht extra auf den Titel hingewiesen). lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:33, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
- mein Kollege meint auch, das dieser Sprucd am Eingangstor steht. Ich kontrolliere dies nochmal, habe jedoch die ID und den Text entsprechend angepasst. lg --Böhringer (talk) 09:09, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Herz-Jesu-Kirche Mittelschiff (Bregenz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Au hl Leonhard Indoor Böhringer 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ansitz Mittelweiherburg, Hard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Hallo Böhringer,
hast du vergessen, dieses Bild nach der Perspektiven-Korrektur zu beschneiden? Sieht auf jeden Fall schräg aus...
Liebe Grüße, Anna reg (talk) 22:46, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Möggers Pfarrkirche hl Ulrich 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Burg Hohenbregenz, Gebhardsberg .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oberes Belvedere Wien, Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Burg Hohenbregenz, Gebhardsberg .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! GH Löwen Gaststube, Au Rehmen, Böhringer 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Alte Batzenalpe 2014 Interior 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality images of Cultural heritage monuments in Italy
[edit]Dear Böhringer, I saw that you reverted my change that was removing the files from the category "Quality images of Cultural heritage monuments in Italy", so let me explain my reasons for emptying that category (in view of deleting it): 1. It is arguable as to what a "quality image" is, therefore the name of the category is ambiguous and misleading; 2. There were only a few photos from a location in South Tyrol, pointing to the fact that it is a category created and used by a single user, and that the definition of what constitutes a "quality image" was made by its own author 3. It may be seen as a form of promotion 4. Those images originally in the category are already categorised under sub-categories that lead upper in the structure to the category "Cultural heritage monuments in Trentino-South Tyrol", so the category "Quality images of Cultural heritage monuments in Italy" is redundant.
Based on these considerations, I would strongly opt for the deletion of the category. Best,--Desyman (talk) 08:57, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- Have taken out again. such categories there are in Switzerland, Austria ... which is why I have one created for Italy z.B.: Quality images of the canton of St. Gallen
- I beg your pardon Desymen. What you write here does not make sense at all. It is NOT "arguable" that these quality images (QI) passed a reviewing process at Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list and have the QI seal. Ad 2. You are probably referring to me saying that "definition of what constitutes a "quality image" was made by its own author" which is pure nonsense since all the images have the QI seal. You might be right saying that it is a form of promotion but there is nothing wrong in promoting hard work done for the benefit of a Wiki project listing all the Cultural heritage monuments in South Tyrol. It is auspicable that such y pilot project should expand to all of Italy, so wy kill it at its beginning. Regards --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:50, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
- danke Wolfgang --Böhringer (talk) 19:11, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
- Have taken out again. such categories there are in Switzerland, Austria ... which is why I have one created for Italy z.B.: Quality images of the canton of St. Gallen
- Dear Böhringer (and Wolfgang), I was unaware of the QI process, so the criteria issue for calling them "quality images" is not a problem. However, I still have doubts about the necessity of having such a category. The purpose of categories in commons, as we know, is to help users finding what they are looking for rather than having to search in the chaos. Now, a user would most likely search per topic, geographic area, type of monument, etc. and probably not by "image quality". In a nutshell: although after your explanation I see that the criteria is not arbitrary, I still see no usefulness in having such a category (in fact the vast majority of the photos rated as "QI" are not categorized as such, but only contain the template in the photo's detail page, which I think is the best approach). Best,--Desyman (talk) 10:00, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Deine Bilder Hans Sontheimer
[edit]Hallo Böhringer, Danke für deine Bilder der Fresken Fresko 1 und Fresko 2 von Hans Sontheimer die ich in meinem Artikel gut einbauen konnte. Leider sind die Bilder etwas dunkel und vielleicht könntest du sie ein bischen aufhellen, auch mit mehr Kontrast. LG --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 23:46, 10 October 2014 (UTC) Done hoffe das passt so lgFred --Böhringer (talk) 08:09, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
- Danke aber das Bild ist immer noch ziemlich grau. Grüße --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:09, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Herz-Jesu-Kirche Seitenschiff re (Bregenz).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
schief
[edit]Hallo Böhringer, jetzt hast du dich eben für die Umbenennung von File:Sulzberg Thal hl Franz Xaver 1.jpg bedankt, und dann kann ich es nicht lassen, dir zu sagen, dass das Bild nach links hängt. Wenn die Kirche nicht naturschief ist, vielleicht kannst du das trotz QI richten? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:17, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- sehr heikel der Herzi Plinki :-) ja, der Altar ist schiefer als die Brüstung von der Empore - die dafür nur minimal. Ich korrigiere das am Abend - habe bei der Arbeit keine Möglichkeit. lgFred
- Done um 1° gedreht --Böhringer (talk) 20:04, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Photographer's Barnstar | |
Für das Bild der Nikolauskirche in Altstätten! Aarp65 (talk) 02:58, 17 October 2014 (UTC) |
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 03.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 04.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 05.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 06.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 07.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 08.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 09.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 11.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 12.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 13.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 14.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 15.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 16.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 17.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 18.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 19.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 20.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 21.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 22.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 23.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 24.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 25.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 26.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 27.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 28.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 29.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 30.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 31.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 32.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 34.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 35.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 36.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 37.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 38.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 39.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 40.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 41.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 42.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 43.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 44.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 45.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 46.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 47.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 48.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 49.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 50.JPG
- File:Fieramilano Rho Pero 51.JPG
Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 03:25, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Schwalbenschwanz, Papilio machaon.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schwalbenschwanz, Papilio machaon.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:14, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
verkehrt
[edit]Hallo Böhringer! Das Bild ist umgefallen, könntest Du das bitte richten? Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 17:57, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
- Schaut doch so viel besser aus! Ich nehme an, daß auch dieses Bild verkehrt ist. Und danke, daß Du (als bisher einziger) meinem (Jury-)Aufruf gefolgt bist! Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 13:32, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Fotografenorden
[edit]Fotografenorden | |
Mit diesem Orden werden Benutzer ausgezeichnet, die in diesem Wiki besonders häufig freie und qualitativ hochwertige Fotografien bereitstellen, sowie sich in diesem Bereich sehr engagieren.
Danke für all die SUPER Fotos welche du hochgeladen hast. --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:07, 25 October 2014 (UTC) |
hello
[edit]Hi,
I would like to use your Juppentracht image on my baby swaddle package commercially. The license says you are permitted to use it commercially, but I wanted to make sure. I will give you credit.
It is a truly beautiful image. Please let me know if that is ok.
Thanks,
John Owens owensjg@gmail.com
- Hello John Owens (your email does not work)
if you "Photo: Friedrich Böhringer" write less, that's ok for me. This calls for the license. best regards --Böhringer (talk) 06:51, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Böhringer Friedrich
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 360° Little planet Latschaustraße 14, Tschagguns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gebrüder Weiss GmbH Lauterach.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Deine Bauernstube
[edit]So, wie dieses Bild aufgebaut ist, entspricht es einem QI. Hattest du Angst, dass man es missverstehen könnte? Die Kombination mit dem runden Etwas in der Mitte hat leider Postkartenniveau - das Bild selbst ist mMn. zweifellos FT-Niveau.
Ich kann deine Befürchtungen vertehen, dass man es missinterpretieren kann und es nur als perspektivische Spielerei abtun könnte. Aber aus meiner Sicht ist es gerade das, was das Bild nämlich ausmacht. Geht man in die 1:1 Darstellung dann eröffnet sich erst die gesamte Dimension mit einem Wow nach dem anderen.
Ich finde, dass du den runden Kitsch im Inneren rausnehmen solltest. Dann hat das Bild für mich FT-Qualität. Die Frage ist halt nur, ob man das ohne merkliche Beeinträchtigung durch den ja vorhandenen Fotografenstandort (und den damit verbundenen Problem mit dem Teppich in der Mitte) photoshoptechnisch zustandebringt. --Hubertl (talk) 08:42, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- Desgleichen würde ich mir bei solchen Bildern wünschen, dass es mehr Information bzgl. des technischen Zustandekommens gäbe. So kann man nur raten (3 Aufnahmen mit Tone-mapping - welches Programm (?), welches Weitwinkel, welche Software verwendest du für das Zusammensetzen). Wir sind mehr als eine Galerie, es soll Teil der offenen Unterstützung der Community sein, damit diese sich anhand solcher meisterlichen Arbeiten mit ihren eigenen Ansprüchen selbst zu steigern vermag. Je höher die Arbeiten in Folge einzustufen sind, umso wertvoller wird alles, was nach QI-Contest usw. riecht. Die Qualitätsanmutung- bzw. -forderung bei FP ist gottseidank vorhanden (wenn es auch im Gegensatz zu den exzellenten Bildern in WP gesittet zugeht), daber was bei QI abläuft ist doch unter jeder Sau, es geht doch im Grunde genommen nur noch darum, dass eine Gruppe von ca 15 Leuten sich gegenseitig in den Arsch kriecht, in der Hoffnung, damit prahlen zu können, wieviele QIs sie doch gesammelt hätten. Dass der Wert des QI-Systems damit grundsätzlich in den Keller geht, das begreifen die meisten nicht. --Hubertl (talk) 08:53, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- danke für dein Feedback. Nachdem ich die 360° Grad Aufnahme lediglich mit einem 24mm gemacht habe, ist der Mittelkreis zu gross um ihn mit dem vorhandenen Boden zu kaschieren. Deshalb habe ich als zusätzliche Information die Aussenaufnahme des Hauses eingebaut. Ich sah dies auch als Zusatzinformation.
- ich bleibe jedoch an dieser Art von Bilder und möchte es verbessern und dann werde ich auch die Beschreibung des Zusandekommens mitgeben. Bezüglich dem QI- Niveau hast du recht, da hatte ich mit anderen auch schon Diskussionen darüber. Liebe Grüsse Fred --Böhringer (talk) 09:06, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- lb Fred, es sollte keineswegs auch nur irgendeine Kritik an deinen Bildern sein, im Geegenteil, gerade solche Leistungen spornen andere Leute an. Ich bin halt der Meinung, dass möglichst große Offenheit - was natürlich auch die Weitergabe des eigenen Wissens betrifft - allen nützt. Ich empfinde es als ungemein erfrischend, wenn etwas mehr Kreativität seinen Platz bekommt. Auch wenn Commons sich mehr dem Dokumentarischen verpflichtet sieht, wie man an den Beurteilungen oft sieht. Wenns künstlerisch wird, dann sind plötzlich die Bedenkenträger zuhauf vorhanden. Natürlich, wenn wirklich beides stimmt, dass braucht man nicht mehr darüber reden.
- ich bleibe jedoch an dieser Art von Bilder und möchte es verbessern und dann werde ich auch die Beschreibung des Zusandekommens mitgeben. Bezüglich dem QI- Niveau hast du recht, da hatte ich mit anderen auch schon Diskussionen darüber. Liebe Grüsse Fred --Böhringer (talk) 09:06, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- danke für dein Feedback. Nachdem ich die 360° Grad Aufnahme lediglich mit einem 24mm gemacht habe, ist der Mittelkreis zu gross um ihn mit dem vorhandenen Boden zu kaschieren. Deshalb habe ich als zusätzliche Information die Aussenaufnahme des Hauses eingebaut. Ich sah dies auch als Zusatzinformation.
- ne, Kritik ist immer gut, das vertrage ich schon. Ja, mit der Kreativität haben so mache ein Problem. Das ist mir aber egal, ich denke auch das dies nur etwas frische Wind reinbringt. :-) --Böhringer (talk) 11:07, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- Mit dem Objektiv und dem Standortproblem habe ich den Grund vermutet, (das mit dem Teppich), denn ich hab mich schon gewundert. Dein Blick fürs Wesentliche hätte üblicherweise meinen Einwand unnötig gemacht. Ich habe nur gesehen, dass du dein 14mm-Glas an diesem Tag dabeihattest. Aber offenbar scheint die Verzerrung damit ein Panorama in dieser Enge erschwert zu haben. Hattest du einen Panokopf dabei oder ging das frisch-locker aus der Hüfte?--Hubertl (talk) 09:29, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- oh, du bist sehr aufmerksam, hast du die 14mm Bilder gesehen! Es ist in der Tat so, dass ich mit dem neuen Objektiv die Panoramaaufnahmen noch üben muss. Bisherige Resultate ergaben kein zufriedenstellendes Ergebnis. Und frei Hand ginge auch mit 24mm nicht. Ja ich hatte einen Panoramakopf. --Böhringer (talk) 11:07, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- Nachsatz: Um dieses Problem (Teppich) zu umgehen, hätte man eigentlich mit einem Zusatzbild nach unten (mit vorgehaltener Hand, ohne Störung durch Stativbeine) eine sinnvolle, nahtfreie Montages in PS (oder Gimp) zustandegebracht? Nur als Idee, denn man kann ja selbst in so eine Situation kommen. Ich werde es jedenfalls berücksichtigen, wenn ich mal sowas mache und ich mich noch daran erinnere.--Hubertl (talk) 09:42, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- das Zusatzbild wäre bei der Grösse vom Durchmesser so nicht gegangen, da hätte ich die Kamera an eine Stange binden müssen.
- im übrigen hate es keines dieser Bilder (es gibt noch mehr davon) unter die ersten 500 Bilder zum Tag des Denkmals geschafft, obwohl mE. hier das Thema Illusion doch gut gepasst hätte. Sieht man einmal mehr, dass diese Art von Fotografie ev. nicht versanden wird. --Böhringer (talk) 12:16, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- Verwendest du eigenlich Hugin zum Stitchen?
- Im Falle deines Bildes war es so, dass ich es erst richtig verstanden habe, als ich es ganz öffnete, erst dann konnte ich im Bild selbst stöbern, ich musste sogar (huch, da steht ja ein Fernseher!). Ich habe oft das Gefühl, dass sich manche gar nicht die Mühe machen, die Bilder ganz aufzumachen. Bei einigen weiß ich, dass sie nicht einmal einen Bildschirm abseits des Notebooks haben. Ich glaube, es ist hier wie mit dem Verständnis und der Akzeptanz abstrakter Kunst zu Beginn des 20. Jhdts. Noch heute sind viele der Meinung, dass Abstraktionen nichts anderes sind als das Unvermögen, sich dem Thema naturalistisch zu nähern. Wenn man aber zB Picasso kennt und seine frühen Arbeiten, weiß man ganz genau, dass er das sehr wohl beherrschte. Und zwar perfekt. Man darf aber auch nicht glauben, dass man in der Fotografie mit Photoshop alleine und ein paar Farbverschiebungen bereits etwas Neues, Kreatives zustandebringt. Da muss die Grundlage schon passen. Ein Zwischenschritt war die unselige, aus meiner eingeschränkten Sicht vor allem von den Russen und Ukrainern (afaik) angewandte HDR-Technik, die bei mir jedesmal Augenkrebs verursacht hat. Wobei es aber anders gehen kann, ohne dass man merkt, dass es ein HDR-Bild ist (welches unbedingt seine Berechtigung hat, wenn man sich Dillifs Bilder anschaut). Auch bei diesem Motiv hätte ich ohne HDR keine Chance gehabt, denn ich stand völlig im Dunklen. Ein Hochfahren der Tiefen hätte nur Extrem-Farbrauschen verursacht. Aber, das ist etwas völlig anderes als diese creativen Elemente deiner Perspektivenarbeiten. --Hubertl (talk) 14:38, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- normalerweise macht das PtGui aber dieses Bild glaube ich mit Photoshop-Element12 gemacht zu haben. Ja HDR ist auch so ein Thema wo ich noch am Lernen bin. lgFred --Böhringer (talk) 16:15, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Oberes Belvedere Wien, Panorama Variante.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oberes Belvedere Wien, Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 14:06, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Das freut mich übrigens ganz besonders, denn wir haben uns ja an diesem Tag getroffen, wenn ich mich richtig erinnere!--Hubertl (talk) 14:43, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- So ist es. Wenn ich zu euch nach Wien komme nutze ich die Zeit zum Fotografieren voll aus. Nur letztes Jahr bin ich mit meiner Frau noch shoppen gegangen. Hier die letztjährigen Wienbilder: Category:Photos by Böhringer, 2013 Wien
New user template
[edit]Hello.
I've created a new template to describe yourself : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:User_info2
I've use it on my user page.
Regards. --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:43, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Photo use
[edit]Hi! I plan to use the photo of the Aeshna cyanea in a "backyard safari" book, as an example of metamorphosis. Thank you for using CC license on that photo. When I came to your user page I found that you have many great photos. Good work! Many thanks for sharing them. Grüẞen aus Ohio, Amerika. Mein Deutsch nicht sehr gute ist. :-) Mikeatnip (talk) 16:22, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi ; new level 4 for you ?--Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 15:18, 11 December 2014 (UTC) *User PH-4*
- -)) ja, meinst du? Es gibt einge Bilder von mir, die dieses Level schon verdienen. Liebe Grüsse --Böhringer (talk) 08:45, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schleinlöcher 12 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Happy holidays! 2015!
[edit]* * * Happy Holidays 2015 ! * * * | ||
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:50, 24 December 2014 (UTC) |
File:StadtTheaterKornhaus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
AndreasPraefcke (talk) 11:55, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:A14 Rheintalautobahn.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:A14 Rheintalautobahn.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Alte Batzenalpe 2014 Interior 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Copyright status: File:Raupe des Buchsbaumzünsler, Cydalima perspectalis 36.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Raupe des Buchsbaumzünsler, Cydalima perspectalis 36.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Please check this file because it does not appear to be correctly named. Did you intend to upload a photo? Green Giant (talk) 23:44, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
I have uploaded an alternative crop and would appreciate if you could indicate a preference, or that you have no strong preference. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 12:05, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:NH Hoteles Rho 2.JPG
- File:NH Hoteles Rho 3.JPG
- File:NH Hoteles Rho 4.JPG
- File:NH Hoteles Rho 5.JPG
- File:NH Hoteles Rho 6.JPG
- File:NH Hoteles Rho 7.JPG
Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 18:34, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Frühlings-Knotenblume, Leucojum vernum Böhringer.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Karrenseilbahn Bergstation-Restaurant Dornbirn 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Badehaus am Kaiserstrand, Lochau.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Karrenseilbahn Bergstation-Restaurant Dornbirn 1.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Karrenseilbahn Bergstation-Restaurant Dornbirn 1.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |