English subtitles for clip: File:6-11-15- White House Press Briefing.webm
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
1 00:00:01,568 --> 00:00:03,336 Mr. Earnest: Good afternoon, everybody. 2 00:00:03,336 --> 00:00:05,170 It's nice to see you all. 3 00:00:05,171 --> 00:00:06,272 I do not have any announcements to make at the 4 00:00:06,272 --> 00:00:08,108 top, Jim, so we can go straight to questions, if 5 00:00:08,108 --> 00:00:09,242 you'd like to start. 6 00:00:09,242 --> 00:00:10,477 The Press: Thank you, Josh. 7 00:00:10,477 --> 00:00:12,479 I'd like to ask you about trade. 8 00:00:12,479 --> 00:00:17,517 You said that it's an ugly process but it can yield a 9 00:00:17,517 --> 00:00:19,185 good result. 10 00:00:19,185 --> 00:00:21,788 I'm wondering if you still think that today. 11 00:00:21,788 --> 00:00:23,556 Mr. Earnest: Hope springs eternal. 12 00:00:23,556 --> 00:00:27,193 The Press: This Medicare offset in the trade 13 00:00:27,193 --> 00:00:29,429 adjustment assistance component of the bill seems 14 00:00:29,429 --> 00:00:32,766 to be a major sticking point that Boehner and Ryan have 15 00:00:32,766 --> 00:00:38,405 attempted to fix, that Leader Pelosi today said 16 00:00:38,405 --> 00:00:41,074 that had been fixed. 17 00:00:41,074 --> 00:00:44,943 However, that still seems to be a sticking point. 18 00:00:44,944 --> 00:00:48,381 Secretary of Labor Tom Perez sent a letter today 19 00:00:48,381 --> 00:00:50,383 supporting that TAA package. 20 00:00:50,383 --> 00:00:53,853 Does the President that Democrats simply don't want 21 00:00:53,853 --> 00:00:57,757 to vote for, even temporarily, for something 22 00:00:57,757 --> 00:00:59,893 that would cut Medicare? 23 00:00:59,893 --> 00:01:02,061 Or does he think they want to use this to keep that 24 00:01:02,061 --> 00:01:04,030 fast track for a period? 25 00:01:04,030 --> 00:01:06,065 Mr. Earnest: Well, Jim, I'd refer you to those 26 00:01:06,065 --> 00:01:08,468 congressional Democrats to determine their motive. 27 00:01:08,468 --> 00:01:10,570 But there are two things that I think are 28 00:01:10,570 --> 00:01:14,339 worth clarifying. 29 00:01:14,340 --> 00:01:18,778 And the first is, as a strictly legislative 30 00:01:18,778 --> 00:01:21,948 procedural matter, it's my understanding that the vote 31 00:01:21,948 --> 00:01:26,386 is structured in such a way that anyone who supports -- 32 00:01:26,386 --> 00:01:28,955 who essentially votes for the trade adjustment 33 00:01:28,955 --> 00:01:31,423 assistance package on the floor of the House, when it 34 00:01:31,424 --> 00:01:34,027 comes up for a vote tomorrow, will not have to 35 00:01:34,027 --> 00:01:37,430 vote for that Medicare offset. 36 00:01:37,430 --> 00:01:39,432 Based on the way that they've structured it, 37 00:01:39,432 --> 00:01:41,434 there's a -- you guys know more about this than I do -- 38 00:01:41,434 --> 00:01:43,402 but there is a rule that has been put in place that, if 39 00:01:43,403 --> 00:01:48,041 passed, would prevent any member of Congress -- and I 40 00:01:48,041 --> 00:01:50,410 think it's Democrats who are most concerned about this -- 41 00:01:50,410 --> 00:01:52,744 from having to vote for the Medicare offset. 42 00:01:52,745 --> 00:01:56,382 And I think that is what led Leader Pelosi to conclude 43 00:01:56,382 --> 00:02:01,187 that this particular concern that she has raised had been 44 00:02:01,187 --> 00:02:02,222 effectively addressed. 45 00:02:02,222 --> 00:02:04,756 And this goes to something that I described yesterday, 46 00:02:04,757 --> 00:02:11,364 which is this is the kind of bipartisan effort that 47 00:02:11,364 --> 00:02:13,333 typically does yield success in the House. 48 00:02:13,333 --> 00:02:16,369 And this is an effort from Democrats and Republicans to 49 00:02:16,369 --> 00:02:18,872 sit down at the table, try to identify common ground, 50 00:02:18,872 --> 00:02:21,875 address mutual concerns, and try to move forward. 51 00:02:21,875 --> 00:02:24,978 And so that's why, as I mentioned earlier, hope does 52 00:02:24,978 --> 00:02:26,279 continue to spring eternal. 53 00:02:26,279 --> 00:02:29,015 Now, there's a second piece to this that's also really 54 00:02:29,015 --> 00:02:31,250 important for people to understand, and this has 55 00:02:31,251 --> 00:02:33,253 gotten lost in the debate a little bit. 56 00:02:35,455 --> 00:02:38,858 Trade adjustment assistance -- the trade adjustment 57 00:02:38,858 --> 00:02:41,661 assistance program that currently exists is 58 00:02:41,661 --> 00:02:43,663 scheduled to expire at the end of the year. 59 00:02:45,798 --> 00:02:47,800 I'm confident that the Speaker of the House, if he 60 00:02:47,800 --> 00:02:50,570 hasn't said so already, would be happy to tell you 61 00:02:50,570 --> 00:02:54,374 that if trade adjustment assistance doesn't pass this 62 00:02:54,374 --> 00:02:58,177 week, it's very unlikely to pass before the end of the year. 63 00:02:58,177 --> 00:03:00,179 And what that means is it means that if you're a 64 00:03:00,179 --> 00:03:02,181 member of Congress and you vote against trade 65 00:03:02,181 --> 00:03:06,452 adjustment assistance this week, you are adding your 66 00:03:06,452 --> 00:03:08,454 name to the death certificate of trade 67 00:03:08,454 --> 00:03:11,558 adjustment assistance -- because it will go away. 68 00:03:11,558 --> 00:03:13,560 And that is a source of significant concern to the 69 00:03:13,560 --> 00:03:15,762 President and, I know, many other Democrats on Capitol 70 00:03:15,762 --> 00:03:19,132 Hill, because we know how critically important trade 71 00:03:19,132 --> 00:03:21,301 adjustment assistance is to middle-class families all 72 00:03:21,301 --> 00:03:23,369 across the country. 73 00:03:23,369 --> 00:03:27,674 This is a program that, over its life, has served 2.2 74 00:03:27,674 --> 00:03:29,642 million American workers. 75 00:03:29,642 --> 00:03:32,845 And the good news, Jim, is that this is not just an 76 00:03:32,845 --> 00:03:35,582 extension of the already existing program; it 77 00:03:35,582 --> 00:03:38,384 represents a significant expansion. 78 00:03:38,384 --> 00:03:41,853 It nearly doubles the cap of money that's allowed to be 79 00:03:41,854 --> 00:03:43,723 spent on these programs. 80 00:03:43,723 --> 00:03:47,193 It makes a large number of American workers eligible 81 00:03:47,193 --> 00:03:49,162 once again for trade adjustment assistance, 82 00:03:49,162 --> 00:03:51,831 including more than 17,000 workers who'd previously had 83 00:03:51,831 --> 00:03:53,899 their application denied over the last 18 months. 84 00:03:53,900 --> 00:03:55,969 They can now have their application reconsidered 85 00:03:55,969 --> 00:03:57,269 for eligibility. 86 00:03:57,270 --> 00:04:00,873 So there are a lot of reasons for Democrats and 87 00:04:00,873 --> 00:04:04,777 Republicans to support trade adjustment assistance when 88 00:04:04,777 --> 00:04:06,779 it's on the floor at the end of the week. 89 00:04:06,779 --> 00:04:09,048 The Press: Now, even as Leader Pelosi said that she 90 00:04:09,048 --> 00:04:12,619 thought that the Medicare issue had been fixed, she 91 00:04:12,619 --> 00:04:16,189 still also raised the concern regarding public 92 00:04:16,189 --> 00:04:18,992 employees not being included in the TAA. 93 00:04:18,992 --> 00:04:20,994 And I'm wondering, are Democrats moving the goal 94 00:04:20,994 --> 00:04:21,861 post here? 95 00:04:21,861 --> 00:04:24,864 Is that a potential problem for you guys? 96 00:04:24,864 --> 00:04:33,039 Mr. Earnest: Well, what we have indicated is that the 97 00:04:33,039 --> 00:04:36,442 last TAA bill that I referred to earlier -- the 98 00:04:36,442 --> 00:04:40,680 one that passed in 2011 -- was supported unanimously 99 00:04:40,680 --> 00:04:43,916 by Democrats. 100 00:04:43,916 --> 00:04:45,385 And it didn't include eligibility, specific 101 00:04:45,385 --> 00:04:48,388 eligibility for public sector workers. 102 00:04:48,388 --> 00:04:49,921 And there were no significant concerns that 103 00:04:49,922 --> 00:04:52,325 were raised at that time. 104 00:04:52,325 --> 00:04:54,426 So the fact is, this piece of legislation is consistent 105 00:04:54,427 --> 00:04:59,399 with that, and it would significantly expand those 106 00:04:59,399 --> 00:05:00,867 workers who are eligible. 107 00:05:00,867 --> 00:05:05,038 It would expand eligibility to those workers that may 108 00:05:05,038 --> 00:05:08,708 have been affected by trade with non-FTA countries, like 109 00:05:08,708 --> 00:05:09,709 India or China. 110 00:05:09,709 --> 00:05:15,048 And again, according to the statistics from the 111 00:05:15,048 --> 00:05:17,917 Department of Labor, that would affect up to 30,000 112 00:05:17,917 --> 00:05:18,950 American workers. 113 00:05:18,951 --> 00:05:23,389 And the fact is that when public sector workers were 114 00:05:23,389 --> 00:05:28,294 eligible between 2009 and 2011, do you know how many 115 00:05:28,294 --> 00:05:31,563 public sector workers actually were certified as 116 00:05:31,564 --> 00:05:35,768 eligible to apply for trade adjustment assistance benefits? 117 00:05:35,768 --> 00:05:36,535 Zero. 118 00:05:36,536 --> 00:05:37,670 None. 119 00:05:37,670 --> 00:05:39,172 Not a single one. 120 00:05:39,172 --> 00:05:42,975 So that is why -- again, when you consider the 121 00:05:42,975 --> 00:05:46,446 opportunity that exists for the United States Congress 122 00:05:46,446 --> 00:05:51,250 to pass legislation that would make up to 30,000 123 00:05:51,250 --> 00:05:53,786 workers, who were affected by trade with non-FTA 124 00:05:53,786 --> 00:05:56,055 countries, eligible for trade adjustment assistance, 125 00:05:56,055 --> 00:06:02,528 and another 17,000 workers who have previously been 126 00:06:02,528 --> 00:06:04,664 denied over the last 18 months, and would have the 127 00:06:04,664 --> 00:06:08,134 opportunity to have their application reconsidered. 128 00:06:08,134 --> 00:06:11,170 The expansion of this trade adjustment assistance that's 129 00:06:11,170 --> 00:06:15,608 included in this bill far outweighs any concerns about 130 00:06:15,608 --> 00:06:18,878 the inclusion of public sector workers, principally 131 00:06:18,878 --> 00:06:21,247 because when public sector workers were included in the 132 00:06:21,247 --> 00:06:23,683 legislation, none of them were deemed eligible. 133 00:06:23,683 --> 00:06:27,653 The Press: So this issue that Ms. Pelosi is raising 134 00:06:27,653 --> 00:06:29,522 is a false argument? 135 00:06:29,522 --> 00:06:30,923 Mr. Earnest: Well, again, I wouldn't say that. 136 00:06:30,923 --> 00:06:35,828 What I would say is we have a very strong case to make 137 00:06:35,828 --> 00:06:38,231 about why Democrats and Republicans should be able 138 00:06:38,231 --> 00:06:41,200 to act in bipartisan fashion to make sure that trade 139 00:06:41,200 --> 00:06:43,202 adjustment assistance doesn't expire. 140 00:06:43,202 --> 00:06:45,204 And, in fact, they can actually be a part of making 141 00:06:45,204 --> 00:06:47,306 sure that these important benefits are expanding. 142 00:06:47,306 --> 00:06:48,907 The Press: Can you tell us a little bit about what the 143 00:06:48,908 --> 00:06:50,510 President has been doing today? 144 00:06:50,510 --> 00:06:55,681 His conversation with the Speaker and the advocacy 145 00:06:55,681 --> 00:07:00,186 that Denis McDonough, Tom Perez and Secretary Lew are 146 00:07:00,186 --> 00:07:02,455 making on the Hill? 147 00:07:02,455 --> 00:07:03,890 Mr. Earnest: Jim, I think you've about covered it. 148 00:07:03,890 --> 00:07:05,157 (laughter) 149 00:07:05,158 --> 00:07:08,561 The fact is, everybody from the President on down, 150 00:07:08,561 --> 00:07:11,830 including many members of his team here at the White 151 00:07:11,831 --> 00:07:14,333 House and his economic team across the administration, 152 00:07:14,333 --> 00:07:17,637 are making an aggressive case to members of Congress 153 00:07:17,637 --> 00:07:21,507 about why they should support this trade package 154 00:07:21,507 --> 00:07:23,810 that is scheduled for a vote in the House of 155 00:07:23,810 --> 00:07:25,812 Representatives over the next couple of days. 156 00:07:25,812 --> 00:07:29,081 And the President did have an opportunity to call 157 00:07:29,081 --> 00:07:31,984 Speaker Boehner today. 158 00:07:31,984 --> 00:07:33,986 I don't have details of that conversation to share with you. 159 00:07:33,986 --> 00:07:35,988 They talked about this particular issue. 160 00:07:35,988 --> 00:07:38,858 And again, I think it is indicative of the kind of 161 00:07:38,858 --> 00:07:41,194 bipartisan cooperation that we know is ultimately 162 00:07:41,194 --> 00:07:44,897 successful to passing meaningful legislation in 163 00:07:44,897 --> 00:07:45,897 the House of Representatives. 164 00:07:45,898 --> 00:07:48,367 And this is the kind of template that we have long 165 00:07:48,367 --> 00:07:50,770 sought and we have long encouraged Republicans who 166 00:07:50,770 --> 00:07:52,772 are in the majority to engage in. 167 00:07:52,772 --> 00:07:54,774 And we're pleased to do our part. 168 00:07:54,774 --> 00:07:56,776 Again, it doesn't mean that a perfect piece of 169 00:07:56,776 --> 00:07:57,777 legislation is going to pass. 170 00:07:57,777 --> 00:07:59,878 But it does mean that Democrats and Republicans 171 00:07:59,879 --> 00:08:02,748 should be able to seize common ground to advance 172 00:08:02,748 --> 00:08:03,748 values that they share. 173 00:08:03,749 --> 00:08:06,152 And in this case, we're talking about trying to 174 00:08:06,152 --> 00:08:09,021 expand economic opportunity for everybody American. 175 00:08:09,021 --> 00:08:11,691 And that should be an area where Democrats and 176 00:08:11,691 --> 00:08:14,460 Republicans can find common ground. 177 00:08:14,460 --> 00:08:16,829 In the past, we often haven't been able to, but 178 00:08:16,829 --> 00:08:19,031 here's a prime opportunity for us to do it entirely 179 00:08:19,031 --> 00:08:22,768 consistent with the kinds of progressive values that the 180 00:08:22,768 --> 00:08:25,104 President has championed throughout his time here at 181 00:08:25,104 --> 00:08:26,671 the White House. 182 00:08:26,672 --> 00:08:27,340 Roberta. 183 00:08:27,340 --> 00:08:28,774 The Press: I want to ask about the Senate. 184 00:08:28,774 --> 00:08:31,777 And I'm wondering, does the White House support Senator 185 00:08:31,777 --> 00:08:34,145 Burr's cyber information-sharing bill? 186 00:08:34,145 --> 00:08:38,083 Mr. Earnest: Well, I haven't seen the details of the 187 00:08:38,083 --> 00:08:39,751 particular bill. 188 00:08:39,751 --> 00:08:44,189 The President put forward his own legislative language 189 00:08:44,190 --> 00:08:49,228 at the beginning of this year that we believe would 190 00:08:49,228 --> 00:08:52,698 make it easier for the federal government to 191 00:08:52,698 --> 00:08:57,036 effectively respond to intrusions when they occur. 192 00:08:57,036 --> 00:08:59,671 It also will allow both government and private 193 00:08:59,672 --> 00:09:03,943 sector websites -- or private sector servers to 194 00:09:03,943 --> 00:09:10,216 better protect their networks from cyber intrusions. 195 00:09:10,216 --> 00:09:12,451 And that's why we have pretty aggressively 196 00:09:12,451 --> 00:09:16,355 advocated congressional passage of that 197 00:09:16,355 --> 00:09:17,356 legislative language. 198 00:09:17,356 --> 00:09:18,824 It shouldn't be controversial. 199 00:09:18,824 --> 00:09:21,026 It certainly isn't partisan in nature. 200 00:09:21,027 --> 00:09:24,430 But it's technical enough that it would make sure that 201 00:09:24,430 --> 00:09:28,233 federal authorities have what they need to try to 202 00:09:28,234 --> 00:09:32,772 protect not just government computer networks but also 203 00:09:32,772 --> 00:09:38,210 taking steps that would help the private sector protect 204 00:09:38,210 --> 00:09:40,413 their networks from cyber intrusions, as well. 205 00:09:40,413 --> 00:09:43,282 The Press: So Senator Burr and some other Republicans 206 00:09:43,282 --> 00:09:44,717 are trying to move some cyber 207 00:09:44,717 --> 00:09:46,452 information-sharing legislation. 208 00:09:46,452 --> 00:09:49,522 And there's been a suggestion that it be 209 00:09:49,522 --> 00:09:51,557 attached to the NDAA. 210 00:09:51,557 --> 00:09:54,026 What does the White House make of that approach? 211 00:09:54,026 --> 00:09:56,362 Mr. Earnest: Well, we take a pretty dim view of that 212 00:09:56,362 --> 00:09:57,896 approach, to be blunt about it. 213 00:09:57,897 --> 00:10:00,566 The fact is we want the Senate to pass cybersecurity 214 00:10:00,566 --> 00:10:03,035 legislation, not play games with it. 215 00:10:03,035 --> 00:10:05,036 And the suggestion that they're going to attach it 216 00:10:05,037 --> 00:10:07,273 to a piece of legislation that the President has 217 00:10:07,273 --> 00:10:10,109 already indicated he opposed is an indication that 218 00:10:10,109 --> 00:10:12,111 they're interested -- more interested in playing 219 00:10:12,111 --> 00:10:14,880 politics than they are in actually making sure that we 220 00:10:14,880 --> 00:10:17,883 have all the tools we need to protect the American 221 00:10:17,883 --> 00:10:22,855 people from cyber hacks, either emanating inside the 222 00:10:22,855 --> 00:10:25,057 United States or, more commonly, abroad. 223 00:10:25,057 --> 00:10:27,159 The Press: But the White House -- correct me if I'm 224 00:10:27,159 --> 00:10:29,762 wrong -- but the White House seems to regularly issue 225 00:10:29,762 --> 00:10:32,832 veto threats for the NDAA. 226 00:10:32,832 --> 00:10:36,702 But when it comes down to it, the President signs 227 00:10:36,702 --> 00:10:41,007 these large defense spending bills, authorization bills. 228 00:10:41,007 --> 00:10:44,343 So how serious is the White House this time around about 229 00:10:44,343 --> 00:10:46,779 this veto threat for the NDAA? 230 00:10:46,779 --> 00:10:47,813 Mr. Earnest: Very serious. 231 00:10:47,813 --> 00:10:53,652 And I would -- we're obviously talking about some 232 00:10:53,652 --> 00:10:55,721 weighty policy matters when we're talking about the 233 00:10:55,721 --> 00:10:58,124 National Defense Authorization Act. 234 00:10:58,124 --> 00:11:01,227 And the President has in the past expressed serious 235 00:11:01,227 --> 00:11:04,329 concerns with some of the things that members of 236 00:11:04,330 --> 00:11:07,066 Congress have sought to add to this legislation. 237 00:11:07,066 --> 00:11:14,473 But the concerns that the President has are serious. 238 00:11:14,473 --> 00:11:19,277 And we have seen so far in the House that there are 239 00:11:19,278 --> 00:11:21,313 enough votes in the House of Representatives to sustain a 240 00:11:21,313 --> 00:11:22,314 presidential veto. 241 00:11:22,314 --> 00:11:25,885 And I think that's an indication that the 242 00:11:25,885 --> 00:11:27,953 President's veto threat should be taken quite seriously. 243 00:11:30,189 --> 00:11:31,189 Jim. 244 00:11:31,190 --> 00:11:33,626 The Press: Josh, on the Hill today, Lieutenant Colonel 245 00:11:33,626 --> 00:11:37,496 Jason Amerine testified that chaos and friction within 246 00:11:37,496 --> 00:11:40,900 the Obama administration between the FBI and the DOD 247 00:11:40,900 --> 00:11:43,702 led to a failure to gain the release of at least five 248 00:11:43,702 --> 00:11:47,373 civilian hostages, including Warren Weinstein and an 249 00:11:47,373 --> 00:11:50,042 American, Caitlin Coleman, and the child she gave birth 250 00:11:50,042 --> 00:11:52,478 to in captivity of the Taliban. 251 00:11:52,478 --> 00:11:56,748 His direct quote was, "Our nation lacks an organization 252 00:11:56,749 --> 00:11:59,118 that can synchronize the efforts of all our 253 00:11:59,118 --> 00:12:02,054 government agencies to get our hostages home." 254 00:12:02,054 --> 00:12:03,389 Is that true? 255 00:12:03,389 --> 00:12:04,790 Mr. Earnest: Well, Jim, what I would say, first of all, 256 00:12:04,790 --> 00:12:08,861 is that the President has talked extensively about the 257 00:12:08,861 --> 00:12:12,598 great lengths that the U.S. 258 00:12:12,598 --> 00:12:15,935 government has gone to try to secure the safe return of 259 00:12:15,935 --> 00:12:18,871 American hostages being held overseas. 260 00:12:18,871 --> 00:12:22,942 The President has on a number of occasions ordered 261 00:12:22,942 --> 00:12:27,046 special operators to go into dangerous places, including 262 00:12:27,046 --> 00:12:30,583 into Syria, to try to secure the release of 263 00:12:30,583 --> 00:12:31,750 U.S. hostages. 264 00:12:31,750 --> 00:12:35,154 The President has also ordered similar raids in Yemen. 265 00:12:35,154 --> 00:12:38,390 And I think that is an indication that the 266 00:12:38,390 --> 00:12:42,561 President is willing to take some big risks. 267 00:12:42,561 --> 00:12:44,697 And our men and women in uniform are willing to put 268 00:12:44,697 --> 00:12:48,501 themselves in harm's way to try to secure the safe 269 00:12:48,501 --> 00:12:50,336 return of American hostages. 270 00:12:50,336 --> 00:12:52,705 I think that is a pretty clear demonstration of this 271 00:12:52,705 --> 00:12:54,673 President and this administration's and this 272 00:12:54,673 --> 00:12:56,675 country's commitment to securing the release of 273 00:12:56,675 --> 00:12:58,810 American hostages. 274 00:12:58,811 --> 00:13:03,048 Now, what I will also say is that I can't talk about 275 00:13:03,048 --> 00:13:08,487 individual cases from up here, either of previous -- 276 00:13:08,487 --> 00:13:10,723 I'm not going to talk about any individual cases. 277 00:13:10,723 --> 00:13:13,925 But what the President has acknowledged, and what his 278 00:13:13,926 --> 00:13:18,030 team is diligently working on, is a review of the 279 00:13:18,030 --> 00:13:21,266 process that the administration carries out 280 00:13:21,267 --> 00:13:25,304 for handling these cases and communicating with the 281 00:13:25,304 --> 00:13:27,706 families of those who are being held hostage. 282 00:13:27,706 --> 00:13:29,708 And there are a number of proposals that have 283 00:13:29,708 --> 00:13:30,709 been circulated. 284 00:13:30,709 --> 00:13:32,744 I would anticipate that we would have some more details 285 00:13:32,745 --> 00:13:38,050 soon as it relates to some policy changes that we 286 00:13:38,050 --> 00:13:41,252 believe would make our government even more 287 00:13:41,253 --> 00:13:46,192 effective in leveraging all of our assets to try to 288 00:13:46,192 --> 00:13:48,194 secure the return of American hostages. 289 00:13:48,194 --> 00:13:50,195 The Press: But it does sound as though you're not 290 00:13:50,196 --> 00:13:52,298 disagreeing that there are some problems about 291 00:13:52,298 --> 00:13:56,368 communication between the FBI, the DOD, when these 292 00:13:56,368 --> 00:13:57,870 things happen. 293 00:13:57,870 --> 00:13:59,838 Mr. Earnest: I think what we have acknowledged is that 294 00:13:59,838 --> 00:14:02,040 there are some reforms that we could put in place that 295 00:14:02,041 --> 00:14:05,444 would better integrate the elements of the federal 296 00:14:05,444 --> 00:14:07,445 government that are working so hard to secure the 297 00:14:07,446 --> 00:14:09,782 release of American hostages. 298 00:14:09,782 --> 00:14:11,850 The Press: On another subject, if I could. 299 00:14:11,850 --> 00:14:22,928 ABC News has been reporting that the administration, 300 00:14:22,928 --> 00:14:25,064 according to one person -- a U.S. 301 00:14:25,064 --> 00:14:27,967 official -- are familiar with the OPM hack. 302 00:14:27,967 --> 00:14:30,936 Says the hack itself is far deeper and far more 303 00:14:30,936 --> 00:14:33,405 problematic than administration officials 304 00:14:33,405 --> 00:14:34,839 have been admitting. 305 00:14:34,840 --> 00:14:39,411 That there is, in fact, an effort by the White House to 306 00:14:39,411 --> 00:14:43,949 tell other agencies not to release full information to 307 00:14:43,949 --> 00:14:48,087 reporters about the extent of this hack. 308 00:14:48,087 --> 00:14:53,092 Is this hack more deep and more wide than what the 309 00:14:53,092 --> 00:14:54,660 administration has told us? 310 00:14:54,660 --> 00:14:58,063 Mr. Earnest: Jim, what I can tell you is that the precise 311 00:14:58,063 --> 00:15:00,933 scope of this particular intrusion is one that 312 00:15:00,933 --> 00:15:03,902 continues to be under investigation by the FBI and 313 00:15:03,902 --> 00:15:09,908 other technical experts that have the knowledge necessary 314 00:15:09,908 --> 00:15:14,213 to try to figure out what exactly has occurred. 315 00:15:14,213 --> 00:15:18,784 And I think we have been clear since this news broke 316 00:15:18,784 --> 00:15:21,120 that this is a matter that we take very seriously. 317 00:15:21,120 --> 00:15:24,590 And we do -- we are concerned that this could -- 318 00:15:24,590 --> 00:15:30,663 again, based on an early review of what's transpired, 319 00:15:30,663 --> 00:15:34,433 could potentially have affected more than 4 million 320 00:15:34,433 --> 00:15:37,069 federal employees. 321 00:15:37,069 --> 00:15:40,339 We've also been blunt about the fact that we know that 322 00:15:40,339 --> 00:15:43,309 the Office of Personnel Management maintains 323 00:15:43,309 --> 00:15:45,978 sensitive data and sensitive information about 324 00:15:45,978 --> 00:15:47,945 federal employees. 325 00:15:47,946 --> 00:15:52,751 Again, the precise scope of how much and what type of 326 00:15:52,751 --> 00:15:56,422 data has been exfiltrated is something that, again, 327 00:15:56,422 --> 00:16:00,592 continues to be investigated by the FBI and other 328 00:16:00,592 --> 00:16:01,627 technical experts. 329 00:16:01,627 --> 00:16:08,132 But we have already begun the process of contacting 330 00:16:08,133 --> 00:16:12,104 those that we thus far believe could potentially 331 00:16:12,104 --> 00:16:14,773 have been affected in a serious way. 332 00:16:14,773 --> 00:16:17,476 And if additional notifications are necessary, 333 00:16:17,476 --> 00:16:20,379 that's something that we will -- that responsibility 334 00:16:20,379 --> 00:16:21,547 is one that we take seriously. 335 00:16:21,547 --> 00:16:24,149 As additional notifications are necessary, we'll make them. 336 00:16:24,149 --> 00:16:26,852 The Press: But do we have the whole story now about 337 00:16:26,852 --> 00:16:28,620 what the White House does know? 338 00:16:28,620 --> 00:16:31,357 Or are you holding back information about the extent 339 00:16:31,357 --> 00:16:32,458 of this hack? 340 00:16:32,458 --> 00:16:34,526 In fact, we're being told that it's much more than 341 00:16:34,526 --> 00:16:35,593 4 million people. 342 00:16:35,594 --> 00:16:37,029 Mr. Earnest: Well, Jim, the thing that we have been 343 00:16:37,029 --> 00:16:39,465 clear about is that there are certain elements of the 344 00:16:39,465 --> 00:16:41,500 investigation that we are reluctant to talk about 345 00:16:41,500 --> 00:16:44,737 publicly because the disclosure of some pieces of 346 00:16:44,737 --> 00:16:47,639 information could inhibit the ongoing investigation. 347 00:16:47,639 --> 00:16:50,609 And that's been true -- that's limited our ability 348 00:16:50,609 --> 00:16:51,510 to talk about other cyber 349 00:16:51,510 --> 00:16:53,412 intrusions when they've occurred. 350 00:16:53,412 --> 00:16:56,849 So this is a hallmark of these kinds of investigations. 351 00:16:56,849 --> 00:16:58,851 Frankly, I think it's a hallmark of a lot of 352 00:16:58,851 --> 00:17:01,920 criminal investigations that even don't involve crimes 353 00:17:01,920 --> 00:17:03,921 committed in cyberspace. 354 00:17:06,692 --> 00:17:08,926 But what is also true is there's also a reluctance to 355 00:17:08,926 --> 00:17:11,763 talk in a lot of detail while the investigation 356 00:17:11,763 --> 00:17:13,464 is ongoing. 357 00:17:13,464 --> 00:17:15,934 And I certainly wouldn't want to say something that 358 00:17:15,934 --> 00:17:20,873 would be contradicted by our investigators once they've 359 00:17:20,873 --> 00:17:22,875 obtained additional information. 360 00:17:22,875 --> 00:17:27,780 So I think we certainly are being cautious in terms of 361 00:17:27,780 --> 00:17:29,782 what information we are communicating, but we have 362 00:17:29,782 --> 00:17:32,684 also been pretty direct about living up to our 363 00:17:32,684 --> 00:17:35,154 commitment to make sure that we're communicating directly 364 00:17:35,154 --> 00:17:38,490 with those that need to be notified about a potential 365 00:17:38,490 --> 00:17:41,160 breach of their sensitive data. 366 00:17:41,160 --> 00:17:43,695 And this is walking a fine line; I would acknowledge 367 00:17:43,695 --> 00:17:45,264 that as well. 368 00:17:45,264 --> 00:17:47,265 But if there's an opportunity for us to share 369 00:17:47,266 --> 00:17:49,268 additional information about this ongoing investigation 370 00:17:49,268 --> 00:17:53,105 in the future, then we will try to do that given the 371 00:17:53,105 --> 00:17:55,941 limitations that I've just described. 372 00:17:55,941 --> 00:17:56,675 Kristen. 373 00:17:56,675 --> 00:17:57,776 The Press: Josh, thanks. 374 00:17:57,776 --> 00:17:59,778 We learned today that General Dempsey told 375 00:17:59,778 --> 00:18:04,149 reporters that the administration is open to 376 00:18:04,149 --> 00:18:06,552 opening up more bases in Iraq. 377 00:18:06,552 --> 00:18:08,219 Is that the President's thinking -- is that 378 00:18:08,220 --> 00:18:09,955 consistent with the President's thinking? 379 00:18:09,955 --> 00:18:12,558 And are there any immediate or specific plans to do that 380 00:18:12,558 --> 00:18:14,159 beyond what we learned yesterday? 381 00:18:14,159 --> 00:18:15,727 Mr. Earnest: There are no immediate or specific plans 382 00:18:15,727 --> 00:18:16,962 to do that. 383 00:18:16,962 --> 00:18:20,098 As my colleagues in the Pentagon will tell you, that 384 00:18:20,098 --> 00:18:24,636 they devote significant time and energy and resources to 385 00:18:24,636 --> 00:18:26,437 contingency planning. 386 00:18:26,438 --> 00:18:29,041 And the President relies on his military advisors in 387 00:18:29,041 --> 00:18:32,144 particular to spend a lot of time thinking ahead about 388 00:18:32,144 --> 00:18:35,747 what could lie ahead in the future. 389 00:18:35,747 --> 00:18:37,850 But as I mentioned earlier, there is no immediate plan 390 00:18:37,850 --> 00:18:38,917 to do this. 391 00:18:38,917 --> 00:18:41,687 What I will say, though, is that if a kind of 392 00:18:41,687 --> 00:18:45,224 recommendation like this did come from the President's 393 00:18:45,224 --> 00:18:47,559 national security team and from his military advisors 394 00:18:47,559 --> 00:18:52,664 in particular, it would be a recommendation that is made 395 00:18:52,664 --> 00:18:55,601 -- it would be a recommendation that reflects 396 00:18:58,136 --> 00:19:02,341 that the ongoing training efforts have been useful. 397 00:19:02,341 --> 00:19:05,244 That the reason that we would consider expanding the 398 00:19:05,244 --> 00:19:08,880 training operation, and the advise-and-assist operation 399 00:19:08,881 --> 00:19:13,385 that's underway, would be because it's been an 400 00:19:13,385 --> 00:19:15,854 effective element of our strategy. 401 00:19:15,854 --> 00:19:18,724 Now, it doesn't necessarily mean, however, that it would 402 00:19:18,724 --> 00:19:21,059 require the additional deployment of American 403 00:19:21,059 --> 00:19:22,494 military personnel. 404 00:19:22,494 --> 00:19:23,896 The Press: But it could include the deployment of 405 00:19:23,896 --> 00:19:24,696 American military personnel. 406 00:19:24,696 --> 00:19:25,863 Mr. Earnest: Well, but it might not. 407 00:19:25,864 --> 00:19:27,666 So again, this is all very hypothetical. 408 00:19:27,666 --> 00:19:29,467 But it might not. 409 00:19:29,468 --> 00:19:30,969 This is all very hypothetical because this is 410 00:19:30,969 --> 00:19:33,705 not a recommendation that the President's military 411 00:19:33,705 --> 00:19:35,706 advisors have offered. 412 00:19:35,707 --> 00:19:39,678 And so we'll have to see. 413 00:19:39,678 --> 00:19:41,313 The Press: The point speaks to a concern -- and we 414 00:19:41,313 --> 00:19:43,682 talked about this yesterday among two of the President's 415 00:19:43,682 --> 00:19:46,084 Democratic colleagues -- that we are seeing 416 00:19:46,084 --> 00:19:48,620 increasingly more troops, more U.S. 417 00:19:48,620 --> 00:19:51,523 forces going to Iraq. 418 00:19:51,523 --> 00:19:52,957 Representative Charlie Rangel said -- and I'm 419 00:19:52,958 --> 00:19:56,228 quoting him -- "This is exactly how Vietnam started." 420 00:19:56,228 --> 00:19:59,197 Your response to that broader concern that this 421 00:19:59,197 --> 00:20:00,998 is, in fact, mission creep? 422 00:20:00,999 --> 00:20:02,868 Mr. Earnest: Well, Kristen, as I think I tried to point 423 00:20:02,868 --> 00:20:07,906 out, if a decision were made to open an additional 424 00:20:07,906 --> 00:20:13,245 facility to offer training and advice and assistance to 425 00:20:13,245 --> 00:20:15,447 fighters fighting under the command and control of the 426 00:20:15,447 --> 00:20:18,483 Iraqi central government, that would be a very clear 427 00:20:18,483 --> 00:20:21,520 indication that previous efforts -- or currently 428 00:20:21,520 --> 00:20:26,858 ongoing efforts to do that -- have been useful. 429 00:20:26,858 --> 00:20:31,530 And it would -- rather than being evidence of mission 430 00:20:31,530 --> 00:20:36,535 creep, it would be evidence of some progress in the 431 00:20:36,535 --> 00:20:40,973 ongoing mission to support the Iraqis as they take the 432 00:20:40,973 --> 00:20:45,077 fight to ISIL on the ground in their own country. 433 00:20:45,077 --> 00:20:49,715 What also is undeniable are the numbers. 434 00:20:49,715 --> 00:20:51,716 You'll recall that when the President took office in 435 00:20:51,717 --> 00:20:55,988 2009, there were about 150,000 U.S. 436 00:20:55,988 --> 00:21:00,759 military personnel in Iraq in a combat role. 437 00:21:00,759 --> 00:21:06,365 The current situation is that there are about 3,500 U.S. 438 00:21:06,365 --> 00:21:12,638 military personnel in Iraq not in a combat role -- in a 439 00:21:12,638 --> 00:21:15,907 variety of roles that includes military advisors, 440 00:21:15,907 --> 00:21:18,577 force protection, intelligence officers, those 441 00:21:18,577 --> 00:21:22,447 who are staffing joint operations centers, and others. 442 00:21:22,447 --> 00:21:24,081 The Press: Isn't that, to some extent, semantics to 443 00:21:24,082 --> 00:21:25,984 say that they're not in a combat role? 444 00:21:25,984 --> 00:21:26,418 I mean, again -- 445 00:21:26,418 --> 00:21:27,519 Mr. Earnest: It's not. 446 00:21:27,519 --> 00:21:29,221 The Press: Charlie Rangel says, if you don't think 447 00:21:29,221 --> 00:21:31,356 you're putting them in harm's way, you're not 448 00:21:31,356 --> 00:21:32,824 living in the real world. 449 00:21:32,824 --> 00:21:35,527 And they are going into a very dangerous situation. 450 00:21:35,527 --> 00:21:39,031 Mr. Earnest: It is very clear what the President has 451 00:21:39,031 --> 00:21:42,434 asked them to do and what their commanders have asked 452 00:21:42,434 --> 00:21:43,769 them to do. 453 00:21:43,769 --> 00:21:49,107 And the President does not, and has not, put currently 454 00:21:49,107 --> 00:21:54,680 deployed military personnel in Iraq to go and directly 455 00:21:54,680 --> 00:21:56,515 engage the ISIL enemy. 456 00:21:56,515 --> 00:21:59,051 They are there to support the Iraqi people to do for 457 00:21:59,051 --> 00:22:04,755 them what they must do for themselves -- or to support 458 00:22:04,756 --> 00:22:07,159 them in what they must do for themselves. 459 00:22:07,159 --> 00:22:11,430 And that is to support Iraqis, who are under the 460 00:22:11,430 --> 00:22:13,865 command and control of the Iraqi central government, as 461 00:22:13,865 --> 00:22:16,234 they take the fight on the ground to ISIL in their 462 00:22:16,234 --> 00:22:17,235 own country. 463 00:22:17,235 --> 00:22:19,236 The United States and our coalition partners have 464 00:22:19,237 --> 00:22:21,907 deployed military personnel to support them in that effort. 465 00:22:21,907 --> 00:22:24,643 And that means, in some cases, doing training; in 466 00:22:24,643 --> 00:22:26,912 some cases offering advice and assistance; in some 467 00:22:26,912 --> 00:22:29,281 cases providing military equipment; in some cases 468 00:22:29,281 --> 00:22:31,383 staffing a joint operations center. 469 00:22:31,383 --> 00:22:33,385 But ultimately, this will be the responsibility of the 470 00:22:33,385 --> 00:22:35,520 Iraqi people, and it's something that they must do 471 00:22:35,520 --> 00:22:36,187 for themselves. 472 00:22:36,188 --> 00:22:37,289 The Press: And just to close the loop, Josh. 473 00:22:37,289 --> 00:22:39,725 Is there any timeline by which the President will sit 474 00:22:39,725 --> 00:22:43,495 down and decide whether or not to open up another base? 475 00:22:43,495 --> 00:22:47,064 Mr. Earnest: Again, Kristen, the President will be 476 00:22:47,065 --> 00:22:50,502 relying on the advice of his national security team, 477 00:22:50,502 --> 00:22:52,504 including senior members of the Pentagon. 478 00:22:52,504 --> 00:22:54,505 And this is not something that they have recommended, 479 00:22:54,506 --> 00:22:56,508 and I think that's something that even General Dempsey said. 480 00:22:56,508 --> 00:23:02,814 So I think it's important to understand the context in 481 00:23:02,814 --> 00:23:04,783 which General Dempsey made those comments and to 482 00:23:04,783 --> 00:23:06,784 understand the role that he has, which is to spend a lot 483 00:23:06,785 --> 00:23:08,987 of time thinking ahead and doing contingency planning. 484 00:23:08,987 --> 00:23:14,126 And I think that's pretty clear from the comments that 485 00:23:14,126 --> 00:23:15,127 he shared today. 486 00:23:15,127 --> 00:23:17,129 The Press: Just one on the trade deal, Josh. 487 00:23:17,129 --> 00:23:19,030 There is some concern among lawmakers that the trade 488 00:23:19,030 --> 00:23:22,501 deal could impact, could in some ways threaten 489 00:23:22,501 --> 00:23:23,668 food safety. 490 00:23:23,668 --> 00:23:25,736 Is the President confident that that won't happen? 491 00:23:25,737 --> 00:23:27,706 Can he assure Americans that that won't happen? 492 00:23:27,706 --> 00:23:28,840 Mr. Earnest: Yes. 493 00:23:28,840 --> 00:23:31,208 He can assure Americans that that will not happen. 494 00:23:31,209 --> 00:23:33,345 Principally -- there are a variety of reasons. 495 00:23:33,345 --> 00:23:35,347 I know that The Washington Post has taken a look at 496 00:23:35,347 --> 00:23:39,017 this and has been pretty harshly critical of the 497 00:23:39,017 --> 00:23:41,019 arguments that have been made by some who've raised 498 00:23:41,019 --> 00:23:43,021 this concern because it just didn't stand up to 499 00:23:43,021 --> 00:23:44,022 any scrutiny. 500 00:23:44,022 --> 00:23:46,024 The fact of the matter is the reason that we engage in 501 00:23:46,024 --> 00:23:47,993 these kinds of trade agreements is because we 502 00:23:47,993 --> 00:23:48,994 want to raise standards. 503 00:23:48,994 --> 00:23:55,332 And that's exactly what this trade agreement would do, 504 00:23:55,333 --> 00:23:59,604 even when it comes to food safety. 505 00:23:59,604 --> 00:24:00,038 Cheryl. 506 00:24:00,038 --> 00:24:02,073 The Press: Thanks, Josh. 507 00:24:02,073 --> 00:24:04,776 My favorite subject -- today on Capitol Hill, Speaker 508 00:24:04,776 --> 00:24:07,279 Boehner was asked about the spending bills and the 509 00:24:07,279 --> 00:24:09,781 possibility of budget negotiations. 510 00:24:09,781 --> 00:24:12,884 And he again said he was open to that, but said the 511 00:24:12,884 --> 00:24:16,855 White House needs to go first, needs to initiate those. 512 00:24:16,855 --> 00:24:20,091 Would you be open to doing that? 513 00:24:20,091 --> 00:24:24,662 Mr. Earnest: Well, Cheryl, as you know, in the wisdom 514 00:24:24,663 --> 00:24:27,999 of our forefathers, it meant that they wrote the 515 00:24:27,999 --> 00:24:30,468 Constitution of the United States to give the power of 516 00:24:30,468 --> 00:24:32,804 the purse to the United States Congress. 517 00:24:32,804 --> 00:24:36,408 It means that Congress, individuals who decide to 518 00:24:36,408 --> 00:24:40,544 run for Congress are signing up for the responsibility of 519 00:24:40,545 --> 00:24:42,480 doing what I would acknowledge is difficult 520 00:24:42,480 --> 00:24:44,516 work, which is making very difficult, critically 521 00:24:44,516 --> 00:24:47,819 important decisions about our priorities, and about 522 00:24:47,819 --> 00:24:52,924 how the resources of the American people are properly 523 00:24:52,924 --> 00:24:57,295 used to advance the interest of our country and all of 524 00:24:57,295 --> 00:24:58,897 our citizens. 525 00:24:58,897 --> 00:25:05,736 And what we have been clear about is that Congress 526 00:25:05,737 --> 00:25:11,810 identified a pretty effective process for 527 00:25:11,810 --> 00:25:15,447 resolving differences and trying to come to agreement 528 00:25:15,447 --> 00:25:20,017 on some of these difficult issues when Senator Patty 529 00:25:20,018 --> 00:25:22,988 Murray and Congressman Paul Ryan sat down at the 530 00:25:22,988 --> 00:25:25,957 negotiating table and hammered out an agreement. 531 00:25:25,957 --> 00:25:31,563 And they did that to build a bipartisan agreement that 532 00:25:31,563 --> 00:25:33,565 both Democrats and Republicans in both houses 533 00:25:33,565 --> 00:25:35,901 of Congress could support. 534 00:25:35,901 --> 00:25:38,069 And the White House was, of course, involved 535 00:25:38,069 --> 00:25:39,070 in that process. 536 00:25:39,070 --> 00:25:41,072 We were aware of what was going on. 537 00:25:41,072 --> 00:25:43,073 We, in some cases, offered some technical assistance 538 00:25:43,074 --> 00:25:45,043 about helping them understand what impact 539 00:25:45,043 --> 00:25:49,246 certain budgetary decisions would have. 540 00:25:49,247 --> 00:25:51,249 But ultimately, this is something that Congress 541 00:25:51,249 --> 00:25:52,884 must resolve. 542 00:25:52,884 --> 00:25:56,655 What I will also say, though, is that the 543 00:25:56,655 --> 00:25:58,423 President put forward a budget. 544 00:25:58,423 --> 00:26:00,425 The President has actually been very clear about what 545 00:26:00,425 --> 00:26:03,294 direction he thinks that we should go. 546 00:26:03,295 --> 00:26:07,265 It's a common-sense, fiscally responsible plan 547 00:26:07,265 --> 00:26:09,801 that puts the interests of middle-class families first, 548 00:26:09,801 --> 00:26:12,270 and makes expanding economic opportunity for every 549 00:26:12,270 --> 00:26:15,674 American the top priority. 550 00:26:15,674 --> 00:26:19,110 So we believe that there's a clear template for how this 551 00:26:19,110 --> 00:26:20,611 can get resolved. 552 00:26:20,612 --> 00:26:22,814 We have been clear, and we've demonstrated a 553 00:26:22,814 --> 00:26:26,418 willingness to play a supportive role 554 00:26:26,418 --> 00:26:28,053 in those conversations. 555 00:26:28,053 --> 00:26:30,055 And the President has actually put forward 556 00:26:30,055 --> 00:26:33,024 already, months ago, a specific template for the 557 00:26:33,024 --> 00:26:35,827 direction that he believes those conversations should go. 558 00:26:35,827 --> 00:26:40,198 Now it's time for Congress to step up and do their job. 559 00:26:40,198 --> 00:26:41,199 Hopefully they will. 560 00:26:41,199 --> 00:26:42,233 Olivier. 561 00:26:42,233 --> 00:26:43,301 The Press: A couple for you, Josh. 562 00:26:43,301 --> 00:26:46,204 You said that everybody from the President on down is 563 00:26:46,204 --> 00:26:47,405 making calls on trade. 564 00:26:47,405 --> 00:26:49,407 Does that include the Vice President? 565 00:26:49,407 --> 00:26:51,408 Mr. Earnest: I would check with the Vice President's 566 00:26:51,409 --> 00:26:52,410 office about that. 567 00:26:52,410 --> 00:26:53,345 I don't know whether or not he's making calls today. 568 00:26:53,345 --> 00:26:58,149 The Press: And in your back and forth with Kristen, you 569 00:26:58,149 --> 00:27:03,388 suggested that this hypothetical future opening 570 00:27:03,388 --> 00:27:08,525 of other facilities in Iraq would be a sign of progress. 571 00:27:08,526 --> 00:27:09,561 Did I hear that correctly? 572 00:27:09,561 --> 00:27:12,330 Mr. Earnest: Well, the point that I'm trying to make, 573 00:27:12,330 --> 00:27:14,532 Olivier, I think what I described is -- I described 574 00:27:14,532 --> 00:27:15,533 it as useful. 575 00:27:15,533 --> 00:27:20,538 And the reason is simply this: that if -- if, again, 576 00:27:20,538 --> 00:27:23,641 hypothetically -- the President were to make a 577 00:27:23,641 --> 00:27:25,643 decision at the recommendation of his 578 00:27:25,643 --> 00:27:27,812 national security team to open up an additional 579 00:27:27,812 --> 00:27:31,049 facility in Iraq where training, advising and 580 00:27:31,049 --> 00:27:35,120 assisting could occur, he would only do that if 581 00:27:35,120 --> 00:27:39,390 already open facilities where training, advising and 582 00:27:39,391 --> 00:27:45,497 assisting of Iraqi fighters is occurring was useful. 583 00:27:45,497 --> 00:27:48,967 And so the point is, it was an effort -- I was 584 00:27:48,967 --> 00:27:51,236 anticipating Kristen's question -- this question 585 00:27:51,236 --> 00:27:53,238 about mission creep, which I think is a legitimate 586 00:27:53,238 --> 00:27:54,239 one to raise. 587 00:27:54,239 --> 00:27:56,574 I think the point is that if an additional base were 588 00:27:56,574 --> 00:27:57,942 opened at the recommendation of the President's national 589 00:27:57,942 --> 00:28:00,545 security team, it would be entirely consistent and, 590 00:28:00,545 --> 00:28:04,482 frankly, even an endorsement of the strategy moving forward. 591 00:28:04,482 --> 00:28:08,319 But again, at this point, that is a theoretical, 592 00:28:08,319 --> 00:28:09,320 hypothetical exercise. 593 00:28:09,320 --> 00:28:11,389 The Press: I recognize the difference between a sign of 594 00:28:11,389 --> 00:28:12,389 progress and useful. 595 00:28:12,390 --> 00:28:14,392 I recognize there's a distinction there. 596 00:28:14,392 --> 00:28:18,229 On the mission creep issue, you don't have to give me a 597 00:28:18,229 --> 00:28:20,231 number, but does the President have a number in 598 00:28:20,231 --> 00:28:23,268 mind of troops above which he's not willing to go? 599 00:28:23,268 --> 00:28:26,504 You've at least said he's not going to send 150,000 600 00:28:26,504 --> 00:28:27,504 American troops back. 601 00:28:27,505 --> 00:28:29,507 So is there some number below that where he would 602 00:28:29,507 --> 00:28:32,444 say, no, forget it -- this is just not worth doing? 603 00:28:32,444 --> 00:28:35,447 Mr. Earnest: Not one that I'm aware of. 604 00:28:35,447 --> 00:28:39,716 But I think the context for this debate is important, 605 00:28:39,717 --> 00:28:41,719 and you just laid it out, which is that there is a 606 00:28:41,719 --> 00:28:44,055 significant difference between 150,000 troops in a 607 00:28:44,055 --> 00:28:46,658 combat role and 3,500 U.S. 608 00:28:46,658 --> 00:28:50,160 troops in roles not in a combat role -- in a variety 609 00:28:50,161 --> 00:28:51,629 of other roles. 610 00:28:51,629 --> 00:28:54,466 That is not in any way to downplay the kind of risk 611 00:28:54,466 --> 00:28:57,668 that these military servicemembers are assuming 612 00:28:57,669 --> 00:28:59,270 on behalf of our nation. 613 00:28:59,270 --> 00:29:01,272 I certainly don't take that lightly. 614 00:29:01,272 --> 00:29:02,040 I can guarantee you that the President of the United 615 00:29:02,040 --> 00:29:04,676 States does not take that lightly. 616 00:29:04,676 --> 00:29:07,912 But the way that the President makes decisions 617 00:29:07,912 --> 00:29:15,253 about the number of military personnel that are necessary 618 00:29:15,253 --> 00:29:21,693 in Iraq are not driven by an arbitrary consideration of 619 00:29:21,693 --> 00:29:27,465 round numbers, but rather are driven by the number of 620 00:29:30,001 --> 00:29:34,072 military personnel required to carry out what the 621 00:29:34,072 --> 00:29:36,073 President has ordered. 622 00:29:36,074 --> 00:29:39,377 So in this most recent case of expanding our training, 623 00:29:39,377 --> 00:29:45,149 advising and assisting mission to Taqaddum Air 624 00:29:45,150 --> 00:29:51,055 Base, the military planners put together essentially the 625 00:29:51,055 --> 00:29:53,458 scope of what the operation, that mission would look like 626 00:29:53,458 --> 00:29:54,826 at that air base. 627 00:29:54,826 --> 00:29:57,295 And then they put forward what they believe was the 628 00:29:57,295 --> 00:30:00,999 necessary number of military personnel that would allow 629 00:30:00,999 --> 00:30:04,802 that operation to be -- or that mission to be 630 00:30:04,802 --> 00:30:06,704 successfully executed. 631 00:30:06,704 --> 00:30:13,544 And it also factored in the number of support personnel, 632 00:30:13,545 --> 00:30:15,547 the number of security personnel and others that 633 00:30:15,547 --> 00:30:16,881 would be required there. 634 00:30:16,881 --> 00:30:19,717 And that number is a little over 400 that would need to 635 00:30:19,717 --> 00:30:20,718 be at the base. 636 00:30:20,718 --> 00:30:22,854 And that's ultimately the way these decisions are made. 637 00:30:22,854 --> 00:30:25,356 So it's not driven by the numbers on the front end. 638 00:30:25,356 --> 00:30:27,859 It rather is a consideration of the policy recommendation 639 00:30:27,859 --> 00:30:30,061 that's been put forward by the national security team, 640 00:30:30,061 --> 00:30:33,063 and then the consideration about the number of military 641 00:30:33,064 --> 00:30:36,367 personnel that would be required to successfully and 642 00:30:36,367 --> 00:30:39,571 as safely as possible complete that mission. 643 00:30:39,571 --> 00:30:41,139 Jim. 644 00:30:41,139 --> 00:30:43,675 The Press: Josh, just to follow up on that, when you 645 00:30:43,675 --> 00:30:47,078 talk about opening up a base at Taqaddum or the prospect 646 00:30:47,078 --> 00:30:51,081 of opening up further bases around Iraq, these would be 647 00:30:51,082 --> 00:30:52,717 Iraqi bases, would they not? 648 00:30:52,717 --> 00:30:54,485 These would not be U.S. bases. 649 00:30:54,485 --> 00:30:57,621 Mr. Earnest: Yes, these are bases that are in Iraq. 650 00:30:57,622 --> 00:31:01,259 And we do not envision the establishment of a military 651 00:31:01,259 --> 00:31:02,660 base in Iraq at this point. 652 00:31:02,660 --> 00:31:04,662 The Press: Right, because legally that would not be 653 00:31:04,662 --> 00:31:05,663 possible, correct? 654 00:31:05,663 --> 00:31:06,931 You don't have a status of forces agreement. 655 00:31:06,931 --> 00:31:10,969 You don't have the legal architecture in place to 656 00:31:10,969 --> 00:31:13,438 open up U.S. bases in Iraq. 657 00:31:13,438 --> 00:31:15,473 So you're basically using their space? 658 00:31:15,473 --> 00:31:17,475 Or -- Mr. Earnest: I would acknowledge that I'm not 659 00:31:17,475 --> 00:31:20,278 familiar with the legal requirements of these kinds 660 00:31:20,278 --> 00:31:21,946 of agreements. 661 00:31:21,946 --> 00:31:24,148 But again, to answer your question as precisely as I 662 00:31:24,148 --> 00:31:29,419 can, yes, these are Iraqi facilities where U.S. 663 00:31:29,420 --> 00:31:35,159 military personnel would go to carry out a train, advise 664 00:31:35,159 --> 00:31:36,194 and assist mission. 665 00:31:36,194 --> 00:31:40,632 And there are five of those bases where that mission is 666 00:31:40,632 --> 00:31:42,767 taking place right now, inside of Iraq. 667 00:31:42,767 --> 00:31:45,637 The Press: Because when the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs 668 00:31:45,637 --> 00:31:48,505 was talking about the prospect of opening up bases 669 00:31:48,506 --> 00:31:51,376 around Iraq, I suppose that some Americans may be 670 00:31:51,376 --> 00:31:53,244 confused as to what he was talking about, because 671 00:31:53,244 --> 00:31:54,445 you're not talking about opening up U.S. 672 00:31:54,445 --> 00:31:56,347 military bases. 673 00:31:56,347 --> 00:31:57,715 Mr. Earnest: That's correct. 674 00:31:57,715 --> 00:31:59,716 I didn't see the exact transcript of his remarks. 675 00:31:59,717 --> 00:32:02,520 It may be that he meant opening up those bases to U.S. 676 00:32:02,520 --> 00:32:04,555 military personnel where this training, advising and 677 00:32:04,555 --> 00:32:06,291 assisting operation could be carried out. 678 00:32:06,291 --> 00:32:07,859 The Press: But you're not talking about getting in the 679 00:32:07,859 --> 00:32:09,827 business of opening up U.S. 680 00:32:09,827 --> 00:32:10,628 military bases. 681 00:32:10,628 --> 00:32:11,162 Mr. Earnest: That's not something 682 00:32:11,162 --> 00:32:12,297 that's been contemplated. 683 00:32:12,297 --> 00:32:14,599 The Press: And I wanted to ask you about the Affordable 684 00:32:14,599 --> 00:32:16,000 Care Act. 685 00:32:16,000 --> 00:32:17,368 I know the President has an interview today with the 686 00:32:17,368 --> 00:32:19,203 program, Extra. 687 00:32:19,203 --> 00:32:22,407 And he's also been making some remarks -- he made some 688 00:32:22,407 --> 00:32:25,009 remarks yesterday in his speech and talked about this 689 00:32:25,009 --> 00:32:29,180 during the news conference in Germany. 690 00:32:29,180 --> 00:32:34,419 And I was just curious, are you trying to communicate to 691 00:32:34,419 --> 00:32:38,356 the Supreme Court justices about what's at risk if the 692 00:32:38,356 --> 00:32:42,960 Affordable Care Act is gutted in King vs. Burwell? 693 00:32:42,960 --> 00:32:44,829 It just almost feels like you jumped into campaign 694 00:32:44,829 --> 00:32:46,831 mode all of a sudden on Obamacare. 695 00:32:46,831 --> 00:32:49,833 And so I'm just curious, are you trying to reach to the 696 00:32:49,834 --> 00:32:52,203 justices there with some of this? 697 00:32:52,203 --> 00:32:53,471 Mr. Earnest: No. 698 00:32:53,471 --> 00:32:54,972 And I think there are a couple of reasons for that. 699 00:32:54,972 --> 00:32:57,775 The first is, the President has, I think on a number of 700 00:32:57,775 --> 00:32:59,177 occasions, even in the context of some of his 701 00:32:59,177 --> 00:33:02,112 recent remarks, acknowledged that the decision in the 702 00:33:02,113 --> 00:33:05,249 King v. Burwell case will be a decision that's made by a 703 00:33:05,249 --> 00:33:07,952 separate but equal branch of government. 704 00:33:07,952 --> 00:33:12,457 Those are the nine justices of the Supreme Court. 705 00:33:12,457 --> 00:33:16,094 I'm certainly no Supreme Court watcher or expert, but 706 00:33:16,094 --> 00:33:17,395 my understanding about the way that these things 707 00:33:17,395 --> 00:33:21,199 typically go is that the opinions are typically 708 00:33:21,199 --> 00:33:24,969 written a number of days in advance of their 709 00:33:24,969 --> 00:33:26,404 eventual release. 710 00:33:26,404 --> 00:33:30,074 So I think it's -- again, I say this not based on my own 711 00:33:30,074 --> 00:33:32,410 personal knowledge, but based on the advice that 712 00:33:32,410 --> 00:33:35,380 I've received that, in all likelihood, the decision in 713 00:33:35,380 --> 00:33:38,816 this case has already been reached and written, and the 714 00:33:38,816 --> 00:33:40,818 Supreme Court is merely waiting for the day that 715 00:33:40,818 --> 00:33:43,287 they choose to announce the decision that they have made. 716 00:33:43,287 --> 00:33:45,289 The Press: And so why is there such a focus on 717 00:33:45,289 --> 00:33:46,357 defending the program? 718 00:33:46,357 --> 00:33:47,392 It's five years old now. 719 00:33:47,392 --> 00:33:48,393 It's up and running. 720 00:33:48,393 --> 00:33:52,130 Mr. Earnest: Well, I think the President views this as 721 00:33:52,130 --> 00:33:57,602 a significant element -- or a significant achievement of 722 00:33:57,602 --> 00:33:59,003 his presidency. 723 00:33:59,003 --> 00:34:03,541 And it has had an impact on millions of Americans. 724 00:34:03,541 --> 00:34:07,311 And I'm not just referring to the 16 million Americans 725 00:34:07,311 --> 00:34:09,913 who received health care after the Affordable Care 726 00:34:09,914 --> 00:34:13,484 Act took effect; I'm actually referring also to 727 00:34:13,484 --> 00:34:16,654 the millions of other Americans across the country 728 00:34:16,654 --> 00:34:18,656 who benefit from the consumer protections that 729 00:34:18,656 --> 00:34:19,824 are included in the law. 730 00:34:19,824 --> 00:34:21,793 That includes every single woman who has health 731 00:34:21,793 --> 00:34:23,795 insurance in the United States; they no longer have 732 00:34:23,795 --> 00:34:25,930 to be worried about being charged more just because 733 00:34:25,929 --> 00:34:26,931 they're a woman. 734 00:34:26,931 --> 00:34:28,933 I'm talking about every American in the United 735 00:34:28,933 --> 00:34:31,201 States that has a so-called preexisting condition; they 736 00:34:31,202 --> 00:34:33,504 never again have to be worried about being 737 00:34:33,504 --> 00:34:35,505 discriminated against because they have a 738 00:34:35,505 --> 00:34:36,507 preexisting condition. 739 00:34:36,507 --> 00:34:38,509 I'm talking about every single American who 740 00:34:38,509 --> 00:34:40,511 previously worried about hitting their lifetime cap 741 00:34:40,511 --> 00:34:42,846 because the Affordable Care Act -- an insurance company 742 00:34:42,847 --> 00:34:44,849 can no longer say that they're going to stop paying 743 00:34:44,849 --> 00:34:46,851 your benefits because you've been too sick. 744 00:34:46,851 --> 00:34:51,456 And I think reminding people of that progress and those 745 00:34:51,456 --> 00:34:53,925 important benefits is something that the President 746 00:34:53,925 --> 00:34:54,826 feels strongly about. 747 00:34:54,826 --> 00:34:59,363 And even if there are no more Supreme Court cases 748 00:34:59,363 --> 00:35:02,567 between now and January of 2017, I would anticipate 749 00:35:02,567 --> 00:35:04,969 you'll hear the President make that case at least one 750 00:35:04,969 --> 00:35:05,536 more time. 751 00:35:05,536 --> 00:35:10,842 The Press: And finally, Senator Lindsey Graham told 752 00:35:10,842 --> 00:35:13,544 CNN that he's considering the idea of a rotating First 753 00:35:13,544 --> 00:35:15,779 Lady should he become President. 754 00:35:15,780 --> 00:35:17,515 (laughter) 755 00:35:17,515 --> 00:35:20,518 And I'm not going to ask you to weigh in on that idea -- 756 00:35:20,518 --> 00:35:25,056 unless you would like to -- but to get at that question, 757 00:35:25,056 --> 00:35:27,658 I'm just kind of curious what it would be like at the 758 00:35:27,658 --> 00:35:29,660 White House without a First Lady. 759 00:35:29,660 --> 00:35:33,964 And would you be able to do everything that a White 760 00:35:33,965 --> 00:35:36,234 House does without a First Lady? 761 00:35:36,234 --> 00:35:40,238 She's a huge -- the current First Lady has a very large 762 00:35:40,238 --> 00:35:44,008 ceremonial role and policy role at this White House. 763 00:35:44,008 --> 00:35:45,576 Mr. Earnest: Well, I think that's what occurs to me, 764 00:35:45,576 --> 00:35:48,012 Jim, is it's hard to -- at least it's hard to imagine 765 00:35:48,012 --> 00:35:50,848 this White House without this First Lady. 766 00:35:50,848 --> 00:35:54,886 She obviously has played such an important role not 767 00:35:54,886 --> 00:35:57,755 just in carrying out the ceremonial aspects of her 768 00:35:57,755 --> 00:36:01,392 job, but also in advocating for the kinds of things that 769 00:36:01,392 --> 00:36:03,794 she and the President believe should be 770 00:36:03,794 --> 00:36:04,795 national priorities. 771 00:36:04,795 --> 00:36:07,298 And these are things about making sure that our kids 772 00:36:07,298 --> 00:36:10,634 get off to a healthy start in life, and making sure 773 00:36:10,635 --> 00:36:13,871 that our military families have felt the full weight of 774 00:36:13,871 --> 00:36:16,641 support and gratitude that the American people have for 775 00:36:16,641 --> 00:36:20,144 the sacrifices that they have made for our country. 776 00:36:20,144 --> 00:36:27,785 So it's hard for me to imagine both a Graham White 777 00:36:27,785 --> 00:36:30,687 House and what a Graham White House would be without 778 00:36:30,688 --> 00:36:31,689 a First Lady. 779 00:36:31,689 --> 00:36:34,591 But I would obviously defer to the Senator to describe 780 00:36:34,592 --> 00:36:36,494 what that would be. 781 00:36:36,494 --> 00:36:37,895 Chris. 782 00:36:37,895 --> 00:36:39,096 The Press: Thanks, Josh. 783 00:36:39,096 --> 00:36:41,933 Among the opponents of the Trans-Pacific Partnership 784 00:36:41,933 --> 00:36:47,004 are LGBT advocates who say the deal improperly opens up 785 00:36:47,004 --> 00:36:48,339 trade for countries that criminalize being LGBT. 786 00:36:48,339 --> 00:36:52,410 In Malaysia, LGBT people can be imprisoned for 20 years 787 00:36:52,410 --> 00:36:53,009 or more. 788 00:36:53,010 --> 00:36:56,013 In Brunei, the country recently enacted Sharia law 789 00:36:56,013 --> 00:36:58,215 which calls for death by stoning. 790 00:36:58,215 --> 00:37:02,453 In an op-ed today in the Advocate, long-time LGBT 791 00:37:02,453 --> 00:37:06,657 rights activist Lee Jones and Pride at Work Director 792 00:37:06,657 --> 00:37:09,327 Jerame Davis said signing this deal will send a 793 00:37:09,327 --> 00:37:12,263 message to the world that you can abuse, imprison and 794 00:37:12,263 --> 00:37:15,066 kill LGBT people and still have preferential access to 795 00:37:15,066 --> 00:37:16,133 coveted U.S. markets. 796 00:37:16,133 --> 00:37:17,268 What's your response to that? 797 00:37:17,268 --> 00:37:19,937 Mr. Earnest: Chris, I think the response that I would 798 00:37:19,937 --> 00:37:21,939 share with you is that we, obviously -- and the 799 00:37:21,939 --> 00:37:26,042 President has spoken publicly about the concerns 800 00:37:26,043 --> 00:37:29,714 that we have in terms of the way that other countries 801 00:37:29,714 --> 00:37:32,250 discriminate against people because of who they love. 802 00:37:32,250 --> 00:37:34,652 And in some cases, these people aren't just 803 00:37:34,652 --> 00:37:38,122 discriminated against, they are subjected to terrible 804 00:37:38,122 --> 00:37:39,991 acts of violence. 805 00:37:39,991 --> 00:37:44,996 And the President has used his moral authority to speak 806 00:37:44,996 --> 00:37:47,832 out against this rather aggressively. 807 00:37:47,832 --> 00:37:50,468 And in some cases, we know that there are countries 808 00:37:50,468 --> 00:37:54,437 where these kinds of conditions are in place. 809 00:37:54,438 --> 00:37:56,440 And I think in the mind of the President, the question 810 00:37:56,440 --> 00:37:59,944 simply is, what are we going to do about it? 811 00:37:59,944 --> 00:38:04,281 And there are some who legitimately advocate that 812 00:38:04,281 --> 00:38:06,283 we should try to isolate those countries and we 813 00:38:06,283 --> 00:38:08,285 should not talk to them, and we should not do any 814 00:38:08,285 --> 00:38:10,287 business with them, and we should not engage them 815 00:38:10,287 --> 00:38:11,756 because of those practices. 816 00:38:11,756 --> 00:38:14,524 The President merely has a different approach, which is 817 00:38:14,525 --> 00:38:19,664 that the more successful we can be in engaging them both 818 00:38:19,664 --> 00:38:22,667 economically and culturally, and politically, and 819 00:38:22,667 --> 00:38:25,603 diplomatically, and militarily, in some cases 820 00:38:25,603 --> 00:38:29,073 the more effective we can be in advocating for the kinds 821 00:38:29,073 --> 00:38:31,142 of values that we prioritize in this country, and 822 00:38:31,142 --> 00:38:33,144 certainly the kinds of values the President has 823 00:38:33,144 --> 00:38:35,513 championed while sitting in the Oval Office. 824 00:38:35,513 --> 00:38:38,249 And I think that principle would apply in this case, 825 00:38:38,249 --> 00:38:39,250 as well. 826 00:38:39,250 --> 00:38:41,252 The Press: If you're so confident that opening up 827 00:38:41,252 --> 00:38:44,455 this deal could lead to improvement on the LGBT 828 00:38:44,455 --> 00:38:47,758 rights issues in these countries, why do you think 829 00:38:47,758 --> 00:38:49,894 these advocates are so steadfast against it? 830 00:38:49,894 --> 00:38:51,895 Mr. Earnest: Well, Chris, I think the argument that I'm 831 00:38:51,896 --> 00:38:58,002 making is that I'm confident that doing nothing is not 832 00:38:58,002 --> 00:39:00,705 the most effective way for us to press our case. 833 00:39:00,705 --> 00:39:03,307 And that's the argument that I'm making. 834 00:39:03,307 --> 00:39:04,642 And that, frankly, is the 835 00:39:04,642 --> 00:39:06,644 approach that some are advocating. 836 00:39:06,644 --> 00:39:08,611 And again, I'm not going to question their motives. 837 00:39:08,612 --> 00:39:11,248 I know that they share the President's view about these 838 00:39:11,248 --> 00:39:14,185 kinds of cherished values and ensuring that people 839 00:39:14,185 --> 00:39:16,187 shouldn't be discriminated against or subjected to 840 00:39:16,187 --> 00:39:18,189 violence just because of who they love. 841 00:39:18,189 --> 00:39:24,095 But the President's approach to trying to pressure other 842 00:39:24,095 --> 00:39:26,964 countries to live up to the kinds of values that we hold 843 00:39:26,964 --> 00:39:29,299 dear in this country is that we can do that more 844 00:39:29,300 --> 00:39:31,802 effectively by engaging them. 845 00:39:31,802 --> 00:39:32,470 Major. 846 00:39:32,470 --> 00:39:39,176 The Press: Josh, on TPP and TAA, the House Republicans 847 00:39:39,176 --> 00:39:42,779 say they made several changes, which we've just 848 00:39:42,780 --> 00:39:47,818 gone over, in consultation with Leader Pelosi, and that 849 00:39:47,818 --> 00:39:52,423 what is needed now is for Leader Pelosi to endorse 850 00:39:52,423 --> 00:39:56,560 those changes, be a public advocate on behalf of both 851 00:39:56,560 --> 00:40:01,932 TAA and TPA, and a stronger signal from this White House 852 00:40:01,932 --> 00:40:04,535 that all underlying issues have been dealt with and 853 00:40:04,535 --> 00:40:07,671 this is something that should go forward as is and 854 00:40:07,671 --> 00:40:09,439 Pelosi should lead that charge. 855 00:40:09,440 --> 00:40:11,575 Are you prepared to do that? 856 00:40:11,575 --> 00:40:15,078 They have a very good relationship, historically, 857 00:40:15,079 --> 00:40:17,681 the President and Minority Leader Pelosi. 858 00:40:17,681 --> 00:40:20,117 Mr. Earnest: Well, I'll say a couple things about that. 859 00:40:20,117 --> 00:40:22,319 One of the foundations of that relationship is an 860 00:40:22,319 --> 00:40:26,624 acknowledgement that Leader Pelosi is going to vote her 861 00:40:26,624 --> 00:40:28,625 conscience and do what she thinks is right, and she 862 00:40:28,626 --> 00:40:31,061 knows the President is going to do the same thing. 863 00:40:31,061 --> 00:40:33,731 And I think what has been a hallmark of that 864 00:40:33,731 --> 00:40:36,066 relationship is that their values and their vision for 865 00:40:36,066 --> 00:40:39,837 the country are so often, on a wide range of issues, very 866 00:40:39,837 --> 00:40:41,839 closely shared. 867 00:40:45,142 --> 00:40:49,446 And I will also say -- so I guess the point is that 868 00:40:49,446 --> 00:40:53,750 Speaker Boehner is welcome to make that case, but he 869 00:40:53,751 --> 00:40:55,753 should do that directly to Leader Pelosi. 870 00:40:55,753 --> 00:40:57,755 And based on the kinds of conversations that is 871 00:40:57,755 --> 00:40:59,757 apparent that they've had over the last few days, it 872 00:40:59,757 --> 00:41:01,759 sounds like that's what he's doing. 873 00:41:01,759 --> 00:41:03,761 When it comes to the President, we have -- I 874 00:41:03,761 --> 00:41:06,630 think as is evident from the list of engagements that Jim 875 00:41:06,630 --> 00:41:08,265 ran through -- 876 00:41:08,265 --> 00:41:09,165 The Press: They're going on right now. 877 00:41:09,166 --> 00:41:10,467 Mr. Earnest: Yes, they're going on right now. 878 00:41:10,467 --> 00:41:13,237 So you've got the Chief of Staff of the White House 879 00:41:13,237 --> 00:41:16,574 along with members of the Cabinet who are up on 880 00:41:16,574 --> 00:41:17,775 Capitol Hill. 881 00:41:17,775 --> 00:41:20,277 The President had a conversation with 882 00:41:20,277 --> 00:41:21,278 Speaker Boehner. 883 00:41:21,278 --> 00:41:23,314 I'm confident that is not the only telephone call that 884 00:41:23,314 --> 00:41:26,549 the President will have with a member of Congress today. 885 00:41:26,550 --> 00:41:30,154 So we will make our case to Democrats about -- 886 00:41:30,154 --> 00:41:32,556 principally to Democrats, but not exclusively to 887 00:41:32,556 --> 00:41:35,659 Democrats -- about why we believe this is the right 888 00:41:35,659 --> 00:41:39,663 approach, consistent with the President's effort to 889 00:41:39,663 --> 00:41:41,832 champion economic opportunity for 890 00:41:41,832 --> 00:41:42,833 middle-class families. 891 00:41:42,833 --> 00:41:46,136 The Press: How comfortable are you and is the President 892 00:41:46,136 --> 00:41:49,907 with Leader Pelosi withholding her public 893 00:41:49,907 --> 00:41:52,776 position on this until tomorrow on the House floor? 894 00:41:52,776 --> 00:41:57,481 Would not it be more helpful to what you just outlined, 895 00:41:57,481 --> 00:42:01,619 the cause of this advocacy, to have Leader Pelosi -- if, 896 00:42:01,619 --> 00:42:04,622 in fact, she's going to say yes -- say so now? 897 00:42:04,622 --> 00:42:06,656 Mr. Earnest: Well, it is entirely within her rights to -- 898 00:42:06,657 --> 00:42:07,892 The Press: I do acknowledge that. 899 00:42:07,892 --> 00:42:09,627 That's not the question. 900 00:42:09,627 --> 00:42:13,596 Would it be helpful to you if what her conscience tells 901 00:42:13,597 --> 00:42:17,001 her were more clear to those in her caucus and in the 902 00:42:17,001 --> 00:42:17,735 White House? 903 00:42:17,735 --> 00:42:19,803 Mr. Earnest: Well, I'll just say as -- again, Major, it 904 00:42:19,803 --> 00:42:21,739 is entirely within her right to decide when she's ready 905 00:42:21,739 --> 00:42:24,341 to make public her position on these issues. 906 00:42:24,341 --> 00:42:28,712 And the President and everyone here at the White 907 00:42:28,712 --> 00:42:32,316 House welcomes the support of everybody that we can get. 908 00:42:32,316 --> 00:42:35,519 And that's any Republicans we can go to support this, 909 00:42:35,519 --> 00:42:37,787 as many Democrats as we can get to support this, up to 910 00:42:37,788 --> 00:42:40,491 and including the Democratic Leader. 911 00:42:40,491 --> 00:42:43,794 The Press: General Odierno said this morning that the 912 00:42:43,794 --> 00:42:46,763 battle against ISIS is a three-, five-, seven-, to 913 00:42:46,764 --> 00:42:49,366 10-year project. 914 00:42:49,366 --> 00:42:53,604 Is that a timeline the President believes in or the 915 00:42:53,604 --> 00:42:56,073 country should be prepared for? 916 00:42:56,073 --> 00:42:57,441 Mr. Earnest: Well, I haven't seen -- I think the 917 00:42:57,441 --> 00:42:59,542 President has been as clear about this as he possibly 918 00:42:59,543 --> 00:43:01,912 can based on his own assessment of the situation, 919 00:43:01,912 --> 00:43:04,114 which is that this is not a short-term proposition. 920 00:43:04,114 --> 00:43:06,383 It will require a long-term commitment. 921 00:43:06,383 --> 00:43:07,250 The Press: But I've never heard someone who is as 922 00:43:07,251 --> 00:43:09,186 close to this as the Army Chief of Staff quite 923 00:43:09,186 --> 00:43:11,555 obviously is -- he's not the only one who's close to it, 924 00:43:11,555 --> 00:43:14,959 but he's pretty close to it -- be that specific about 925 00:43:14,959 --> 00:43:18,294 the kind of timeline he believes this country ought 926 00:43:18,295 --> 00:43:19,797 to prepare itself for. 927 00:43:19,797 --> 00:43:21,832 I'm just curious if the President thinks that's 928 00:43:21,832 --> 00:43:24,268 within the ballpark; that's something the country ought 929 00:43:24,268 --> 00:43:25,369 to brace for. 930 00:43:25,369 --> 00:43:27,504 Mr. Earnest: And General Odierno obviously has spent 931 00:43:27,504 --> 00:43:32,942 not time -- not just time in his current role, but he's 932 00:43:32,943 --> 00:43:35,813 also spent a lot of time on the ground in Iraq, in the 933 00:43:35,813 --> 00:43:39,283 previous campaign in Iraq. 934 00:43:39,283 --> 00:43:41,285 And so he is somebody that brings 935 00:43:41,285 --> 00:43:42,553 significant knowledge. 936 00:43:42,553 --> 00:43:44,555 So I obviously wouldn't be in a position to contradict him. 937 00:43:44,555 --> 00:43:48,424 But I think the best way that I can describe to you 938 00:43:48,425 --> 00:43:50,427 the President's view of the situation is to point you to 939 00:43:50,427 --> 00:43:53,430 what he said about it, which is that he does not believe 940 00:43:53,430 --> 00:43:55,566 -- or he thinks it's important for the American 941 00:43:55,566 --> 00:43:57,301 people to understand that this is not a short-term 942 00:43:57,301 --> 00:43:59,370 proposition and it will require a long-term 943 00:43:59,370 --> 00:44:00,837 commitment on the part of the United States and our 944 00:44:00,838 --> 00:44:02,406 coalition partners. 945 00:44:02,406 --> 00:44:03,841 But the President has been just as clear about the fact 946 00:44:03,841 --> 00:44:09,013 that he does not envision a scenario where it is in the 947 00:44:09,013 --> 00:44:11,015 best interest of our country to engage in another 948 00:44:11,015 --> 00:44:13,017 large-scale ground operation -- ground combat operation 949 00:44:13,017 --> 00:44:14,018 inside of Iraq. 950 00:44:14,018 --> 00:44:15,986 The Press: So without endorsing it specifically, 951 00:44:15,986 --> 00:44:17,988 you're not going to disagree with General Odierno? 952 00:44:17,988 --> 00:44:19,990 Mr. Earnest: General Odierno, again, based on his 953 00:44:19,990 --> 00:44:23,794 own personal experience and expertise, has a lot of 954 00:44:23,794 --> 00:44:25,496 credibility when talking about these issues. 955 00:44:25,496 --> 00:44:28,065 But the best way I can describe to you the 956 00:44:28,065 --> 00:44:30,067 President's position is what he said. 957 00:44:30,067 --> 00:44:32,069 The Press: General Odierno also said that this cannot 958 00:44:32,069 --> 00:44:35,572 be solved, the ISIS problem and the Iraq problem, until 959 00:44:35,572 --> 00:44:40,210 political reconciliation in the country takes hold, and 960 00:44:40,210 --> 00:44:42,479 that nothing really the Americans can do is going to 961 00:44:42,479 --> 00:44:46,116 solve that problem unless the Iraqis are prepared and 962 00:44:46,116 --> 00:44:50,387 willing to solve it themselves. 963 00:44:50,387 --> 00:44:52,356 I presume you agree with that. 964 00:44:52,356 --> 00:44:56,026 And I wonder if you consider that problem bigger than 965 00:44:56,026 --> 00:44:57,027 ISIS itself. 966 00:44:57,027 --> 00:45:01,732 Because General Odierno said one of the reasons ISIS 967 00:45:01,732 --> 00:45:04,435 exists is because of so many decisions made by the Maliki 968 00:45:04,435 --> 00:45:07,137 government and the inability of Iraq to pull itself 969 00:45:07,137 --> 00:45:09,106 together after the United States left. 970 00:45:09,106 --> 00:45:10,841 So what's the bigger problem here? 971 00:45:10,841 --> 00:45:15,679 Mr. Earnest: Well, I think the point -- again, I think 972 00:45:15,679 --> 00:45:18,415 you were probably faithful in your paraphrasing 973 00:45:18,415 --> 00:45:19,716 of his comments. 974 00:45:19,716 --> 00:45:22,352 I have confidence in that. 975 00:45:22,352 --> 00:45:24,555 It seems to me the point that he's making and I think 976 00:45:24,555 --> 00:45:28,591 illustrating pretty clearly is it is impossible to 977 00:45:28,592 --> 00:45:33,297 separate the failed political leadership and 978 00:45:33,297 --> 00:45:37,301 divisive governing strategy of Prime Minister Maliki 979 00:45:37,301 --> 00:45:38,936 from the growth of ISIL. 980 00:45:38,936 --> 00:45:44,541 And these are two problems that are interrelated. 981 00:45:44,541 --> 00:45:48,879 And we have identified -- and this is something that 982 00:45:48,879 --> 00:45:51,415 shaped our involvement in this matter 983 00:45:51,415 --> 00:45:52,416 from the beginning. 984 00:45:52,416 --> 00:45:56,153 You'll recall that when ISIL made their rapid, stark 985 00:45:56,153 --> 00:46:01,491 advance across the desert from Syria into Iraq, there 986 00:46:01,492 --> 00:46:03,494 were many who were suggesting that the 987 00:46:03,494 --> 00:46:06,663 President should be aggressively engaged in the 988 00:46:06,663 --> 00:46:08,999 effort to try to prevent that, to try to blunt that 989 00:46:08,999 --> 00:46:12,269 advance, and urged an aggressive commitment of 990 00:46:12,269 --> 00:46:13,971 resources to do that. 991 00:46:13,971 --> 00:46:18,008 And the President was very limited in doing that for a 992 00:46:18,008 --> 00:46:19,009 couple of reasons. 993 00:46:19,009 --> 00:46:21,011 He did prioritize the protection of military 994 00:46:21,011 --> 00:46:23,013 personnel in Iraq, and so we did take steps to ensure 995 00:46:23,013 --> 00:46:24,915 their safety. 996 00:46:24,915 --> 00:46:27,084 But the President also said I'm not willing to make a 997 00:46:27,084 --> 00:46:29,886 more significant commitment in Iraq until it's clear 998 00:46:29,887 --> 00:46:33,123 that the Iraqi central government is willing to 999 00:46:33,123 --> 00:46:36,126 commit to govern that country in an inclusive way. 1000 00:46:36,126 --> 00:46:39,062 And that's why we have been gratified to see Prime 1001 00:46:39,062 --> 00:46:41,365 Minister Abadi, at least in the first 10 months or so 1002 00:46:41,365 --> 00:46:43,834 that he's been in office, live up to the kind of 1003 00:46:43,834 --> 00:46:47,037 commitment that he made on the front end to unify Iraq, 1004 00:46:47,037 --> 00:46:49,740 to face down the threat from ISIL. 1005 00:46:49,740 --> 00:46:51,741 He has committed to governing the country in a 1006 00:46:51,742 --> 00:46:53,443 multi-sectarian way. 1007 00:46:53,443 --> 00:46:56,847 That's clear from the way that his cabinet has been 1008 00:46:56,847 --> 00:46:59,783 assembled and the way that they have governed the country. 1009 00:46:59,783 --> 00:47:02,152 It's been clear from the way that he has attempted to 1010 00:47:02,152 --> 00:47:06,223 build a multi-sectarian force to take on ISIL. 1011 00:47:06,223 --> 00:47:09,026 So he's living up to those early promises. 1012 00:47:09,026 --> 00:47:13,663 Now, what's also true is you demonstrate your commitment 1013 00:47:13,664 --> 00:47:16,300 to these kinds of principles not just in the matter of 1014 00:47:16,300 --> 00:47:19,770 weeks or months, but over a sustained period of time. 1015 00:47:19,770 --> 00:47:21,905 So we're going to continue to watch closely the 1016 00:47:21,905 --> 00:47:24,174 commitment of the Iraqi central government to 1017 00:47:24,174 --> 00:47:25,842 unifying the country. 1018 00:47:25,842 --> 00:47:32,216 But there is no doubt that an inclusive central 1019 00:47:32,216 --> 00:47:37,421 government in Baghdad is integral to their ability to 1020 00:47:37,421 --> 00:47:38,955 deal with the ISIL problem. 1021 00:47:38,956 --> 00:47:40,357 There is no denying that fact. 1022 00:47:40,357 --> 00:47:43,227 And that's why the administration is going to 1023 00:47:43,227 --> 00:47:47,998 continue to be supportive of steps that the Iraqi 1024 00:47:47,998 --> 00:47:51,268 government takes to try to unify that country. 1025 00:47:51,268 --> 00:47:52,970 The Press: Last question. 1026 00:47:52,970 --> 00:47:55,973 The new plan yesterday, or the retooled plan envisions 1027 00:47:55,973 --> 00:48:00,644 trying to tighten the border of Syria and Turkey to 1028 00:48:00,644 --> 00:48:03,479 prevent the flow of -- or at least slow the flow of 1029 00:48:03,480 --> 00:48:05,415 foreign fighters. 1030 00:48:05,415 --> 00:48:08,418 There are many who are familiar with that situation 1031 00:48:08,418 --> 00:48:11,388 who believe the Erdogan government has given the U.S. 1032 00:48:11,388 --> 00:48:14,156 almost no assistance, has turned a blind eye to this 1033 00:48:14,157 --> 00:48:18,128 entire issue, people who are very close to it. 1034 00:48:18,128 --> 00:48:19,930 There was obviously a parliamentary election that 1035 00:48:19,930 --> 00:48:21,832 was a setback for the Erdogan government earlier 1036 00:48:21,832 --> 00:48:23,066 this week. 1037 00:48:23,066 --> 00:48:24,468 There's talk about a coalition government. 1038 00:48:24,468 --> 00:48:26,569 In general, does this administration believe that 1039 00:48:26,570 --> 00:48:30,073 election result will make Erdogan more or less 1040 00:48:30,073 --> 00:48:33,477 compliant as this new phase of trying to stop foreign 1041 00:48:33,477 --> 00:48:35,112 fighters begins? 1042 00:48:35,112 --> 00:48:36,680 Mr. Earnest: Well, I think we'll see, Major. 1043 00:48:36,680 --> 00:48:39,283 And I think the President took this on pretty directly 1044 00:48:39,283 --> 00:48:42,185 in the news conference that he did in Germany on Monday, 1045 00:48:42,185 --> 00:48:45,221 where he indicated that there's more that we would 1046 00:48:45,222 --> 00:48:48,959 like to see Turkey do to coordinate with our broader 1047 00:48:48,959 --> 00:48:50,794 international coalition to shut down the flow of 1048 00:48:50,794 --> 00:48:55,165 foreign fighters to ISIL and to Syria. 1049 00:48:55,165 --> 00:48:56,767 The Press: By more, you mean something. 1050 00:48:56,767 --> 00:49:01,171 Mr. Earnest: Well, there are steps that Turkey has taken 1051 00:49:01,171 --> 00:49:02,739 to demonstrate their willingness to be 1052 00:49:02,739 --> 00:49:04,808 constructive here, but there is a lot more that we 1053 00:49:04,808 --> 00:49:07,311 believe they can and should do. 1054 00:49:07,311 --> 00:49:07,911 Kevin. 1055 00:49:07,911 --> 00:49:08,779 The Press: Josh, thanks. 1056 00:49:08,779 --> 00:49:10,447 I want to kind of follow up on something Major was 1057 00:49:10,447 --> 00:49:14,685 talking about, and refer you to another military leader 1058 00:49:14,685 --> 00:49:16,987 who obviously is intimately aware of what's been 1059 00:49:16,987 --> 00:49:19,356 happening on the ground vis-à-vis the battle with ISIS. 1060 00:49:19,356 --> 00:49:22,025 General Michael Flynn who was on with Neil Cavuto 1061 00:49:22,025 --> 00:49:23,860 yesterday, said some pretty interesting things. 1062 00:49:23,860 --> 00:49:27,064 Among them, he was asked if he thought ISIS was winning 1063 00:49:27,064 --> 00:49:29,866 and he said, "Yes, I think ISIS is achieving the 1064 00:49:29,866 --> 00:49:31,868 objectives they have set out to achieve. 1065 00:49:31,868 --> 00:49:35,005 I think they feel probably very emboldened, they feel 1066 00:49:35,005 --> 00:49:36,973 pretty good." 1067 00:49:36,973 --> 00:49:39,241 I'm just curious, when you hear something like that 1068 00:49:39,242 --> 00:49:41,578 from someone who is so intimately aware of what's 1069 00:49:41,578 --> 00:49:45,148 happening there in Iraq, how do you absorb that? 1070 00:49:45,148 --> 00:49:46,383 Do you dismiss it outright? 1071 00:49:46,383 --> 00:49:48,752 Or do you simply take information like that and 1072 00:49:48,752 --> 00:49:50,754 say, well, that's somewhat of a reflection of 1073 00:49:50,754 --> 00:49:51,755 what's happening. 1074 00:49:51,755 --> 00:49:53,757 Mr. Earnest: Well, Kevin, I think that we've been very 1075 00:49:53,757 --> 00:49:55,759 blunt about what our assessment is of the 1076 00:49:55,759 --> 00:49:57,094 situation on the ground there. 1077 00:49:57,094 --> 00:49:59,262 And specifically, there have been areas where we've made 1078 00:49:59,262 --> 00:50:02,933 some important progress, and that includes retaking the 1079 00:50:02,933 --> 00:50:05,736 Anbar town of Baghdadi to retaking -- driving ISIL out 1080 00:50:05,736 --> 00:50:10,006 of Tikrit. 1081 00:50:10,006 --> 00:50:12,375 Even thinking back to last summer, there was a rapid 1082 00:50:12,376 --> 00:50:15,112 advance of ISIL fighters across the desert in Iraq 1083 00:50:15,112 --> 00:50:17,114 where they appeared to be encroaching on Erbil, and 1084 00:50:17,114 --> 00:50:19,216 that was an offensive that was blunted. 1085 00:50:19,216 --> 00:50:22,652 And principally by working with Kurdish security forces 1086 00:50:22,652 --> 00:50:25,188 and being backed by coalition military airpower, 1087 00:50:25,188 --> 00:50:27,424 they haven't just blunted that offensive but they've 1088 00:50:27,424 --> 00:50:29,759 started to roll back many of those gains. 1089 00:50:29,760 --> 00:50:33,029 So at the same time, we've also been pretty forthright 1090 00:50:33,029 --> 00:50:35,599 in acknowledging that there have been areas where we and 1091 00:50:35,599 --> 00:50:38,468 the Iraqis have sustained setbacks, and Ramadi is the 1092 00:50:38,468 --> 00:50:40,537 best example of that. 1093 00:50:40,537 --> 00:50:42,538 But that is the nature of any kind of military 1094 00:50:42,539 --> 00:50:44,841 conflict and it's certainly been the nature of this 1095 00:50:44,841 --> 00:50:46,042 conflict as well. 1096 00:50:46,042 --> 00:50:50,247 And what the President has directed his national 1097 00:50:50,247 --> 00:50:52,281 security team to focus on is to make sure that we have a 1098 00:50:52,282 --> 00:50:55,819 strategy that reflects that environment on the ground. 1099 00:50:55,819 --> 00:51:00,724 And that's why you saw this announcement yesterday about 1100 00:51:00,724 --> 00:51:05,996 the decision to open up an additional Iraqi base in 1101 00:51:05,996 --> 00:51:11,401 Anbar Province where American military personnel 1102 00:51:11,401 --> 00:51:15,071 would go about carrying out a mission to train, advise 1103 00:51:15,071 --> 00:51:17,040 and assist Iraqi fighters. 1104 00:51:17,040 --> 00:51:21,511 And that's what they're prepared to do, and that's 1105 00:51:21,511 --> 00:51:23,747 consistent with our assessment of what's 1106 00:51:23,747 --> 00:51:26,515 happening on the ground and consistent with the kinds of 1107 00:51:26,516 --> 00:51:29,152 strategic choices the President believes are most 1108 00:51:29,152 --> 00:51:30,420 likely to yield success. 1109 00:51:30,420 --> 00:51:32,756 The Press: I've heard you use the expression "train" 1110 00:51:32,756 --> 00:51:34,758 primarily, although today, you say, "train, 1111 00:51:34,758 --> 00:51:35,759 advise and assist." 1112 00:51:35,759 --> 00:51:38,595 The Pentagon, for the most part, has simply been saying 1113 00:51:38,595 --> 00:51:39,895 they are there to advise. 1114 00:51:39,896 --> 00:51:43,433 Is there any space between the two descriptions, or is 1115 00:51:43,433 --> 00:51:46,403 it all one fell swoop of a description of what they'll 1116 00:51:46,403 --> 00:51:49,406 be doing on the 450 additional U.S. personnel? 1117 00:51:49,406 --> 00:51:53,543 Mr. Earnest: Well, Kevin, what I can say is that the 1118 00:51:53,543 --> 00:51:57,047 mission that the President authorized is a mission to 1119 00:51:57,047 --> 00:52:01,885 train, advise and assist those forces that are 1120 00:52:01,885 --> 00:52:03,787 fighting under the command and control of the Iraqi 1121 00:52:03,787 --> 00:52:05,288 central government. 1122 00:52:05,288 --> 00:52:08,425 And that means both members of the Iraqi security 1123 00:52:08,425 --> 00:52:12,429 forces; it also means those Sunni tribal fighters that 1124 00:52:12,429 --> 00:52:15,532 had been recruited into the fight to fight under the 1125 00:52:15,532 --> 00:52:17,534 command and control of the Iraqi central government. 1126 00:52:17,534 --> 00:52:19,536 And that's what their mission is. 1127 00:52:19,536 --> 00:52:21,538 And that's the way that it's been described by both the 1128 00:52:21,538 --> 00:52:23,607 Pentagon and the White House and the State Department, 1129 00:52:23,607 --> 00:52:24,608 for that matter. 1130 00:52:24,608 --> 00:52:27,043 And it's consistent with what we have broadly said 1131 00:52:27,043 --> 00:52:29,045 about the commitment of the United States and our 1132 00:52:29,045 --> 00:52:31,114 coalition partners to support the efforts of the 1133 00:52:31,114 --> 00:52:34,284 Iraqis to take the fight on the ground to ISIL in their 1134 00:52:34,284 --> 00:52:35,285 own country. 1135 00:52:35,285 --> 00:52:37,821 The Press: Lastly, I'd like to ask you about the idea of 1136 00:52:37,821 --> 00:52:41,558 using grants, essentially to help diversity some 1137 00:52:41,558 --> 00:52:42,559 affluent areas. 1138 00:52:42,559 --> 00:52:43,660 I was reading about that today. 1139 00:52:43,660 --> 00:52:45,895 Can you tell me what the President's position is on 1140 00:52:45,896 --> 00:52:49,065 that and why that seems like a good idea to sort of give 1141 00:52:49,065 --> 00:52:51,701 communities, if nothing else, an opportunity to 1142 00:52:51,701 --> 00:52:52,602 advance and move up? 1143 00:52:52,602 --> 00:52:53,670 Mr. Earnest: Are you talking about the U.N. 1144 00:52:53,670 --> 00:52:54,504 Stabilization Fund? 1145 00:52:54,504 --> 00:52:55,372 The Press: Yes. 1146 00:52:55,372 --> 00:52:57,908 Mr. Earnest: The idea here is essentially that there is 1147 00:52:57,908 --> 00:53:00,610 more support that we need to offer those Iraqi 1148 00:53:00,610 --> 00:53:05,115 communities that have driven out ISIL and that if we want 1149 00:53:05,115 --> 00:53:07,783 to make sure that we can prevent ISIL from 1150 00:53:07,784 --> 00:53:09,786 encroaching on those cities, we don't need to just be 1151 00:53:09,786 --> 00:53:13,189 able to provide security to those cities or those towns 1152 00:53:13,189 --> 00:53:15,325 -- we do -- we also need to make sure that we're 1153 00:53:15,325 --> 00:53:18,495 building up the capacity of local governance structures 1154 00:53:18,495 --> 00:53:20,830 to govern those areas. 1155 00:53:20,830 --> 00:53:24,401 And again, our strategy is predicated on this idea that 1156 00:53:24,401 --> 00:53:28,504 we want to build up the capacity of Iraqis to do for 1157 00:53:28,505 --> 00:53:32,108 themselves what we will not do for them, and that is to 1158 00:53:32,108 --> 00:53:35,312 govern and provide security for the communities and 1159 00:53:35,312 --> 00:53:36,580 their country. 1160 00:53:36,580 --> 00:53:39,249 The Press: Lastly, when you say "we want to help them 1161 00:53:39,249 --> 00:53:42,519 win their fight for their country" and others argue 1162 00:53:42,519 --> 00:53:46,323 sometimes, well, you're not in it to win it -- is that a 1163 00:53:46,323 --> 00:53:48,725 frustration for the White House when you hear that? 1164 00:53:48,725 --> 00:53:51,761 Because it seems to me you're trying to help them, 1165 00:53:51,761 --> 00:53:53,763 but you're not trying to win it yourself. 1166 00:53:53,763 --> 00:53:54,764 Is that what you're telling me? 1167 00:53:54,764 --> 00:53:56,733 Mr. Earnest: What I'm telling you, Kevin, is that 1168 00:53:56,733 --> 00:53:59,502 the fight against ISIL is one that the Iraqi people 1169 00:53:59,502 --> 00:54:01,204 must do for themselves. 1170 00:54:01,204 --> 00:54:04,007 They can do that with the strong support of the United 1171 00:54:04,007 --> 00:54:06,009 States and our coalition partners, and there are a 1172 00:54:06,009 --> 00:54:08,011 variety of ways that we can support them, whether it's 1173 00:54:08,011 --> 00:54:11,081 with military coalition airstrikes, or offering 1174 00:54:11,081 --> 00:54:14,718 training, advising, and assisting of Iraqi fighters 1175 00:54:14,718 --> 00:54:17,020 that are operating under the Iraqi central government. 1176 00:54:17,020 --> 00:54:20,090 It also is engaging in an effort to shut down the flow 1177 00:54:20,090 --> 00:54:24,227 of foreign fighters that are filling the ranks of ISIL. 1178 00:54:24,227 --> 00:54:27,196 It also is undertaking efforts with our coalition 1179 00:54:27,197 --> 00:54:29,966 partners to try to shut down ISIL's efforts to finance 1180 00:54:29,966 --> 00:54:30,967 their operations. 1181 00:54:30,967 --> 00:54:33,703 All of those are things that will eventually benefit the 1182 00:54:33,703 --> 00:54:37,407 Iraqis as they fight a war that they must fight 1183 00:54:37,407 --> 00:54:39,976 for themselves. 1184 00:54:39,976 --> 00:54:40,710 Angela. 1185 00:54:40,710 --> 00:54:42,012 The Press: Thanks, Josh. 1186 00:54:42,012 --> 00:54:45,715 The President obviously had some sharp words to say 1187 00:54:45,715 --> 00:54:48,451 about Greece in his press conference on Monday. 1188 00:54:48,451 --> 00:54:49,586 And today, U.N. 1189 00:54:49,586 --> 00:54:51,187 President Donald Tusk seems to have finally reached a 1190 00:54:51,187 --> 00:54:54,691 tipping point on Greece -- his very, very harsh words. 1191 00:54:54,691 --> 00:54:57,593 And the IMF negotiating team left Brussels with no deal. 1192 00:54:57,594 --> 00:55:00,196 Are we likely to hear any more from the President 1193 00:55:00,196 --> 00:55:01,364 on Greece? 1194 00:55:01,364 --> 00:55:03,166 Is there anything he's doing behind the scenes? 1195 00:55:03,166 --> 00:55:05,735 And what does he see as his role in that crisis? 1196 00:55:05,735 --> 00:55:07,537 Mr. Earnest: Angela, I don't anticipate that you'll 1197 00:55:07,537 --> 00:55:09,906 necessarily see the President weigh in on this 1198 00:55:09,906 --> 00:55:11,674 again -- although, it's certainly possible that one 1199 00:55:11,675 --> 00:55:13,376 of you could ask him. 1200 00:55:13,376 --> 00:55:17,514 But our view -- and it's a view that we have pretty 1201 00:55:17,514 --> 00:55:22,218 consistently articulated -- is that we want all sides to 1202 00:55:22,218 --> 00:55:25,422 continue to focus on finding pragmatic solutions that 1203 00:55:25,422 --> 00:55:28,558 will allow Greece to chart a path to recovery. 1204 00:55:28,558 --> 00:55:33,163 Now, that also means that Greece must pursue some of 1205 00:55:33,163 --> 00:55:34,330 the kinds of structural reforms that they've 1206 00:55:34,330 --> 00:55:37,333 committed to. 1207 00:55:37,333 --> 00:55:40,103 And this is part of the -- this is the essence of the 1208 00:55:40,103 --> 00:55:43,873 negotiation that's ongoing right now between Greece and 1209 00:55:43,873 --> 00:55:46,009 their creditors. 1210 00:55:46,009 --> 00:55:48,712 And the role of the United States -- and this is 1211 00:55:48,712 --> 00:55:54,818 something that Secretary Lew has been leading on the part 1212 00:55:54,818 --> 00:55:59,122 of the United States -- is to encourage all sides to 1213 00:55:59,122 --> 00:56:05,462 come to an agreement in order to prevent some kind 1214 00:56:05,462 --> 00:56:08,431 of broader default that would destabilize the global 1215 00:56:08,431 --> 00:56:11,034 economy and have a possible negative impact on the 1216 00:56:11,034 --> 00:56:12,702 U.S. economy. 1217 00:56:12,702 --> 00:56:15,972 So Secretary Lew, over the last couple of weeks, has 1218 00:56:15,972 --> 00:56:19,342 met with his G7 finance minister counterparts to 1219 00:56:19,342 --> 00:56:21,544 discuss this issue; Secretary Lew had the 1220 00:56:21,544 --> 00:56:24,881 opportunity to talk to Prime Minister Tsipras of Greece 1221 00:56:24,881 --> 00:56:27,484 about some of these issues. 1222 00:56:27,484 --> 00:56:30,286 But that essentially is our view of the situation. 1223 00:56:30,286 --> 00:56:32,689 The Press: On a lighter question, the President 1224 00:56:32,689 --> 00:56:35,325 taped an interview earlier today with -- I get this 1225 00:56:35,325 --> 00:56:37,192 right -- Extra TV. 1226 00:56:37,193 --> 00:56:38,862 It airs at apparently 2:07 a.m. 1227 00:56:38,862 --> 00:56:41,531 Eastern time tonight, tomorrow morning. 1228 00:56:41,531 --> 00:56:43,366 Just curious, how does this fit into the 1229 00:56:43,366 --> 00:56:44,968 communications strategy? 1230 00:56:44,968 --> 00:56:47,504 Who is the President trying to reach by doing that kind 1231 00:56:47,504 --> 00:56:48,304 of show? 1232 00:56:48,304 --> 00:56:48,972 (laughter) 1233 00:56:48,972 --> 00:56:49,706 Mr. Earnest: Insomniacs. 1234 00:56:49,706 --> 00:56:51,508 (laughter) 1235 00:56:51,508 --> 00:56:53,109 The Press: You said it. 1236 00:56:53,109 --> 00:56:56,479 Mr. Earnest: The fact is that this is part of our 1237 00:56:56,479 --> 00:57:00,415 sustained effort to try to use a variety of channels to 1238 00:57:00,416 --> 00:57:02,919 communicate with the American public. 1239 00:57:02,919 --> 00:57:06,022 And there's an opportunity -- I would encourage you to 1240 00:57:06,022 --> 00:57:07,490 take a look at the interview. 1241 00:57:07,490 --> 00:57:09,491 Maybe there's a way for you to get it from a different 1242 00:57:09,492 --> 00:57:12,228 market so you don't have to stay up until 2:07 a.m. 1243 00:57:12,228 --> 00:57:15,064 here in East Coast. 1244 00:57:15,064 --> 00:57:17,066 But this is something -- this is an opportunity for 1245 00:57:17,066 --> 00:57:19,067 the President to deliver a message about just how 1246 00:57:19,068 --> 00:57:21,070 valuable the Affordable Care Act has been not just to the 1247 00:57:21,070 --> 00:57:24,140 16 million Americans who got health care after the 1248 00:57:24,140 --> 00:57:26,142 Affordable Care Act, but from the millions, hundreds 1249 00:57:26,142 --> 00:57:29,412 of millions of Americans who have benefitted from the 1250 00:57:29,412 --> 00:57:31,413 critically important consumer protections that 1251 00:57:31,414 --> 00:57:33,416 were included in the Affordable Care Act. 1252 00:57:33,416 --> 00:57:35,418 And that's everything from ensuring that women can't be 1253 00:57:35,418 --> 00:57:37,420 charged more for their health insurance just 1254 00:57:37,420 --> 00:57:38,421 because they're a woman. 1255 00:57:38,421 --> 00:57:40,423 You can't be discriminated against because you have a 1256 00:57:40,423 --> 00:57:41,424 preexisting condition. 1257 00:57:41,424 --> 00:57:43,793 And you no longer have to be worried about hitting your 1258 00:57:43,793 --> 00:57:46,196 lifetime limit that would essentially result in the 1259 00:57:46,196 --> 00:57:48,298 insurance company kicking you off your insurance 1260 00:57:48,298 --> 00:57:50,232 because you got really sick. 1261 00:57:50,233 --> 00:57:51,234 April. 1262 00:57:51,234 --> 00:57:53,236 The Press: Josh, I want to ask you about a question and 1263 00:57:53,236 --> 00:57:56,471 the White House response to the GOP threatening to 1264 00:57:56,472 --> 00:57:59,475 withhold $700 million in funding for the State 1265 00:57:59,475 --> 00:58:02,645 Department because they feel that information is not 1266 00:58:02,645 --> 00:58:05,448 being given quick enough and effectively enough in 1267 00:58:05,448 --> 00:58:08,585 reference to Hillary Clinton's documentation. 1268 00:58:08,585 --> 00:58:10,420 Mr. Earnest: April, I think what it does is it just 1269 00:58:10,420 --> 00:58:12,155 calls into question the sincerity of those 1270 00:58:12,155 --> 00:58:14,624 Republicans who are advocating for additional 1271 00:58:14,624 --> 00:58:15,725 security at U.S. 1272 00:58:15,725 --> 00:58:17,727 diplomatic facilities around the world. 1273 00:58:17,727 --> 00:58:19,962 The fact is if they believe that's a priority, then you 1274 00:58:19,963 --> 00:58:24,033 would think that they would want to ensure that those 1275 00:58:24,033 --> 00:58:26,069 security operations and those security measures are 1276 00:58:26,069 --> 00:58:29,239 properly and fully funded. 1277 00:58:29,239 --> 00:58:31,474 I'm no budgetary expert, but it seems hard for me to 1278 00:58:31,474 --> 00:58:34,143 believe that taking that big of a chunk out of the State 1279 00:58:34,143 --> 00:58:36,746 Department's budget is not going to have an impact on 1280 00:58:36,746 --> 00:58:38,615 the safety and security at U.S. 1281 00:58:38,615 --> 00:58:40,582 diplomatic facilities around the globe. 1282 00:58:40,583 --> 00:58:42,719 After all, the only reason that they claim that they've 1283 00:58:42,719 --> 00:58:44,921 engaged in this debate -- I've suggested that politics 1284 00:58:44,921 --> 00:58:49,725 are chiefly to blame -- they claim that they care about 1285 00:58:49,726 --> 00:58:53,596 making security for our diplomats a priority. 1286 00:58:53,596 --> 00:58:55,598 But if they actually cared about that they wouldn't be 1287 00:58:55,598 --> 00:58:57,600 threatening to withhold funding for security 1288 00:58:57,600 --> 00:58:58,835 for our diplomats. 1289 00:58:58,835 --> 00:59:00,169 So anyway, I guess that's my reaction. 1290 00:59:00,169 --> 00:59:03,673 The Press: Thank you for your reaction. 1291 00:59:03,673 --> 00:59:05,841 Seven hundred million dollars is a lot of money. 1292 00:59:05,842 --> 00:59:07,110 You say safety and security. 1293 00:59:07,110 --> 00:59:10,113 Specifically, would it really -- would it actually 1294 00:59:10,113 --> 00:59:13,316 take security officers away from embassies, away from 1295 00:59:13,316 --> 00:59:14,917 diplomats and things of that nature? 1296 00:59:14,918 --> 00:59:17,020 Mr. Earnest: I'm not sure of the precise budgetary impact. 1297 00:59:17,020 --> 00:59:18,888 I think what I've said is that -- what I was trying to 1298 00:59:18,888 --> 00:59:20,890 convey is it's hard to imagine it wouldn't have 1299 00:59:20,890 --> 00:59:23,459 some kind of impact on the efforts to provide security 1300 00:59:23,459 --> 00:59:25,495 at diplomatic installations around the world. 1301 00:59:25,495 --> 00:59:26,663 But for those kinds of details, I'd refer you to 1302 00:59:26,663 --> 00:59:27,463 the State Department. 1303 00:59:27,463 --> 00:59:28,865 The Press: Thanks, Josh. 1304 00:59:28,865 --> 00:59:30,633 Mr. Earnest: Bill Press, I'll give you the last one. 1305 00:59:30,633 --> 00:59:32,669 The Press: I'll take a couple of quick ones. 1306 00:59:32,669 --> 00:59:35,337 First, who are the top three leading candidates for the 1307 00:59:35,338 --> 00:59:36,472 new Librarian of Congress? 1308 00:59:36,472 --> 00:59:37,907 (laughter) 1309 00:59:37,907 --> 00:59:39,909 Mr. Earnest: That's a good question. 1310 00:59:39,909 --> 00:59:40,843 I don't have any personnel announcements to make at 1311 00:59:40,843 --> 00:59:43,379 this time. 1312 00:59:43,379 --> 00:59:50,319 But maybe that's something -- well, I was going to 1313 00:59:50,320 --> 00:59:51,621 suggest that might be something you could check 1314 00:59:51,621 --> 00:59:52,889 out later. 1315 00:59:52,889 --> 00:59:54,424 The Press: Ooooh -- 1316 00:59:54,424 --> 00:59:55,525 Mr. Earnest: See, I tried to 1317 00:59:55,525 --> 00:59:59,295 stop, and you guys were all goading me. 1318 00:59:59,295 --> 01:00:02,899 (laughter) 1319 01:00:02,899 --> 01:00:03,499 The Press: You were looking forward to that. 1320 01:00:03,499 --> 01:00:03,966 (laughter) 1321 01:00:03,967 --> 01:00:04,834 Mr. Earnest: Yes, well, it just came to me. 1322 01:00:04,834 --> 01:00:07,203 (laughter) 1323 01:00:07,203 --> 01:00:08,538 The Press: Let's go back to the trade for a second. 1324 01:00:08,538 --> 01:00:12,408 The Democratic members that I've talked to say that the 1325 01:00:12,408 --> 01:00:15,912 vote on Medicare is not as simple as you described it 1326 01:00:15,912 --> 01:00:17,513 at the top of the briefing. 1327 01:00:17,513 --> 01:00:21,817 Yes, there's a process by which once they vote to cut 1328 01:00:21,818 --> 01:00:24,253 Medicare, then there's a process by which their vote 1329 01:00:24,253 --> 01:00:25,254 won't really count. 1330 01:00:25,254 --> 01:00:28,424 So that leaves them in the position of going to voters 1331 01:00:28,424 --> 01:00:32,161 next year and saying, yes, I voted to cut Medicare, but I 1332 01:00:32,161 --> 01:00:34,163 was promised that vote wouldn't count. 1333 01:00:34,163 --> 01:00:36,232 Is that a fair place to put Democrats? 1334 01:00:36,232 --> 01:00:38,835 Mr. Earnest: That's not a fair description of what 1335 01:00:38,835 --> 01:00:40,570 exactly would happen on the floor. 1336 01:00:40,570 --> 01:00:43,373 And I am, by no means, a legislative expert, but I 1337 01:00:43,373 --> 01:00:45,241 asked this direct question to somebody who is a 1338 01:00:45,241 --> 01:00:47,310 legislative expert on our staff. 1339 01:00:47,310 --> 01:00:49,779 And what they were able to confirm to me is, based on 1340 01:00:49,779 --> 01:00:52,448 the way the rule is structured -- I'm looking at 1341 01:00:52,448 --> 01:00:54,917 some self-described legislative experts down 1342 01:00:54,917 --> 01:00:58,921 here -- the way that the rule is structured, that it 1343 01:00:58,921 --> 01:01:02,125 would not force Democrats to take a vote that could 1344 01:01:02,125 --> 01:01:05,895 legitimately be described as cutting Medicare. 1345 01:01:05,895 --> 01:01:07,964 The Press: That's not what these Democratic members, 1346 01:01:07,964 --> 01:01:09,766 who are experts, told me. 1347 01:01:09,766 --> 01:01:11,467 Mr. Earnest: Well, I'll say that this is actually the 1348 01:01:11,467 --> 01:01:12,835 nature of a number of the conversations that we're 1349 01:01:12,835 --> 01:01:14,670 having with members of Congress on Capitol Hill to 1350 01:01:14,670 --> 01:01:17,340 make sure that they actually understand the way that this 1351 01:01:17,340 --> 01:01:20,043 rule works, and the way that they understand how their 1352 01:01:20,043 --> 01:01:21,344 vote can be described. 1353 01:01:21,344 --> 01:01:22,945 They have strongly held views on this. 1354 01:01:22,945 --> 01:01:24,781 That's certainly understandable. 1355 01:01:24,781 --> 01:01:28,317 That's why -- because of the aggressive advocacy of 1356 01:01:28,317 --> 01:01:31,087 Leader Pelosi and because of the reasonableness, frankly, 1357 01:01:31,087 --> 01:01:34,390 of Speaker Boehner in this instance, that they went to 1358 01:01:34,390 --> 01:01:38,194 great lengths to address this particular concern. 1359 01:01:38,194 --> 01:01:40,196 The Press: And one with strong views on that, 1360 01:01:40,196 --> 01:01:42,799 Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro, told members, "If you vote 1361 01:01:42,799 --> 01:01:46,002 for this you could lose your job. 1362 01:01:46,002 --> 01:01:46,636 Period. 1363 01:01:46,636 --> 01:01:47,537 End of story." 1364 01:01:47,537 --> 01:01:48,671 Is she wrong? 1365 01:01:48,671 --> 01:01:50,106 Mr. Earnest: What the President has said is that 1366 01:01:50,106 --> 01:01:51,974 members of Congress should be more concerned about the 1367 01:01:51,974 --> 01:01:54,143 jobs of Americans than their own jobs. 1368 01:01:54,143 --> 01:01:58,081 And that's exactly why the President has sought to 1369 01:01:58,081 --> 01:02:00,149 advance this trade legislation, because he 1370 01:02:00,149 --> 01:02:02,151 believes it is clearly in the best interest of 1371 01:02:02,151 --> 01:02:04,720 middle-class families and middle-class workers. 1372 01:02:04,720 --> 01:02:06,988 And that's particularly true when we're talking about 1373 01:02:06,989 --> 01:02:09,192 trade adjustment assistance legislation. 1374 01:02:09,192 --> 01:02:11,761 As I mentioned earlier, those members of Congress 1375 01:02:11,761 --> 01:02:15,364 who vote against this trade adjustment assistance bill 1376 01:02:15,364 --> 01:02:18,000 are adding their name to the death certificate for trade 1377 01:02:18,000 --> 01:02:19,202 adjustment assistance. 1378 01:02:19,202 --> 01:02:21,204 Trade adjustment assistance will expire at the end of 1379 01:02:21,204 --> 01:02:23,773 the year, and Speaker Boehner has made clear -- 1380 01:02:23,773 --> 01:02:26,943 again, he has made clear, and I think for good reason 1381 01:02:26,943 --> 01:02:29,312 -- most Republicans don't support trade adjustment 1382 01:02:29,312 --> 01:02:32,080 assistance -- he's made clear that this is the best 1383 01:02:32,081 --> 01:02:34,517 chance that Democrats will have, probably the only 1384 01:02:34,517 --> 01:02:37,419 chance Democrats will have, to renew this critically 1385 01:02:37,420 --> 01:02:39,789 important piece of legislation before it expires. 1386 01:02:39,789 --> 01:02:42,291 And that's the nature of the conversations that are 1387 01:02:42,291 --> 01:02:44,293 ongoing at the White House here today. 1388 01:02:44,293 --> 01:02:45,294 All right? 1389 01:02:45,294 --> 01:02:46,261 Thanks, everybody.