English subtitles for clip: File:2-25-14- White House Press Briefing.webm

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
1
00:00:03,461 --> 00:00:08,061
Mr. Carney: I don't have any
specific announcements to make,

2
00:00:08,061 --> 00:00:10,261
but I can -- as you know, the
President

3
00:00:10,261 --> 00:00:14,494
met with Speaker of the House
John Boehner here earlier.

4
00:00:14,494 --> 00:00:16,126
They had a good and
constructive meeting

5
00:00:16,126 --> 00:00:18,160
of about an hour where they
discussed

6
00:00:18,161 --> 00:00:19,161
a range of issues.

7
00:00:19,994 --> 00:00:23,494
You also saw I think a
readout of a conversation

8
00:00:23,494 --> 00:00:27,061
the President had earlier
with President Karzai of

9
00:00:27,061 --> 00:00:32,094
Afghanistan, which I don't
have a duration on that

10
00:00:32,094 --> 00:00:34,695
call, but it was a fairly
substantive call,

11
00:00:34,695 --> 00:00:36,027
as described in the readout.

12
00:00:36,761 --> 00:00:38,961
Beyond that, I have no
other announcements.

13
00:00:38,961 --> 00:00:39,961
So I'll go to
Jim Kuhnhenn.

14
00:00:40,761 --> 00:00:41,761
The Press: Thanks, Jay.

15
00:00:41,761 --> 00:00:43,861
So I wanted to ask
you about

16
00:00:43,861 --> 00:00:45,794
those two conversations.

17
00:00:45,795 --> 00:00:48,695
With Karzai, he hasn't
spoken

18
00:00:48,695 --> 00:00:51,795
to him since June, I believe.

19
00:00:51,795 --> 00:00:55,961
Should we read some kind
of significance to the

20
00:00:55,961 --> 00:00:58,728
call coming at this
particular time?

21
00:00:58,728 --> 00:01:01,494
And given that the
discussion centered

22
00:01:01,494 --> 00:01:06,661
a little bit on giving some
space for signing of the

23
00:01:06,661 --> 00:01:10,461
BSA after the elections,
is there a tipping point

24
00:01:10,461 --> 00:01:12,795
where it becomes
impossible

25
00:01:12,795 --> 00:01:15,895
to make any kind of commitment
about U.S.

26
00:01:15,895 --> 00:01:17,461
troops on the ground?

27
00:01:18,695 --> 00:01:19,695
Mr. Carney: On the
first part of your

28
00:01:19,695 --> 00:01:21,494
question, the
answer is yes.

29
00:01:21,494 --> 00:01:25,027
The President called
President Karzai

30
00:01:25,027 --> 00:01:28,695
today in order to discuss
preparations for

31
00:01:28,695 --> 00:01:31,026
Afghanistan's upcoming
elections,

32
00:01:31,027 --> 00:01:33,861
the Afghan-led peace and
reconciliation efforts,

33
00:01:33,861 --> 00:01:37,994
and specifically, the bilateral
security agreement.

34
00:01:37,994 --> 00:01:41,528
And as you know, we have
been calling

35
00:01:41,528 --> 00:01:46,861
on the Afghan government to
complete that process,

36
00:01:46,861 --> 00:01:50,795
to sign that agreement, which
was negotiated in good faith,

37
00:01:50,795 --> 00:01:52,194
and to do so promptly.

38
00:01:53,628 --> 00:01:55,561
President Obama told
President Karzai

39
00:01:55,561 --> 00:01:57,994
that because he has
demonstrated --

40
00:01:57,994 --> 00:02:00,094
he, being President Karzai --
that it is unlikely that

41
00:02:00,094 --> 00:02:02,494
he will sign the BSA, the
United States

42
00:02:02,494 --> 00:02:06,294
is moving forward with
additional contingency planning.

43
00:02:06,294 --> 00:02:08,428
So in terms of the timing
of the call,

44
00:02:08,428 --> 00:02:11,294
I think you can look at it
in that context.

45
00:02:12,261 --> 00:02:16,027
When it comes to the
potential

46
00:02:16,027 --> 00:02:22,861
for a post-2014 troop presence,
two things are happening.

47
00:02:22,861 --> 00:02:24,761
One, as we made clear
would be the case, the

48
00:02:24,761 --> 00:02:30,894
President has tasked the
Pentagon with preparing

49
00:02:30,895 --> 00:02:33,328
for the contingency that
there

50
00:02:33,328 --> 00:02:38,761
will be no troops in Afghanistan beyond 2014.

51
00:02:38,761 --> 00:02:43,094
But we are also remaining
open to the possibility

52
00:02:43,094 --> 00:02:48,293
of a post-2014 troop presence
should a bilateral

53
00:02:48,294 --> 00:02:50,661
security agreement be
signed -- or the bilateral

54
00:02:50,661 --> 00:02:53,728
security agreement be
signed later in the year.

55
00:02:54,628 --> 00:02:56,361
But the longer we go
without a BSA --

56
00:02:56,361 --> 00:02:59,094
and we've been making this clear
-- the more challenging

57
00:02:59,094 --> 00:03:01,094
it will be to plan and
to execute

58
00:03:01,094 --> 00:03:03,361
any U.S. mission.

59
00:03:03,361 --> 00:03:06,428
Furthermore, the longer
we go without a signed BSA

60
00:03:06,428 --> 00:03:10,928
the more likely it will
be that any post-2014

61
00:03:10,928 --> 00:03:14,895
U.S. mission will be smaller
in scale and ambition.

62
00:03:14,895 --> 00:03:19,061
So I don't have a specific
point

63
00:03:19,061 --> 00:03:22,795
to identify for you, except to
say that the further

64
00:03:22,795 --> 00:03:27,528
we go without a signed BSA, any
contemplative post-2014

65
00:03:27,528 --> 00:03:29,960
mission would be
necessarily limited

66
00:03:29,961 --> 00:03:33,328
in scale and ambition because
of the requirements

67
00:03:33,328 --> 00:03:35,828
of planning for that
troop presence.

68
00:03:36,261 --> 00:03:37,361
The Press: Did the
President provide

69
00:03:37,361 --> 00:03:40,628
any kind of timeframe to
Karzai as to when --

70
00:03:41,127 --> 00:03:42,194
Mr. Carney: He provided
the timeframe

71
00:03:42,194 --> 00:03:43,861
I just read out to you, which is --

72
00:03:43,861 --> 00:03:46,494
The Press: Any specific
time when by -- need

73
00:03:46,494 --> 00:03:49,628
something by the spring,
need something by the fall

74
00:03:49,628 --> 00:03:51,827
-- and that would result
in what difference?

75
00:03:51,994 --> 00:03:53,828
Mr. Carney: I think
-- or I know that the

76
00:03:53,828 --> 00:03:56,194
President was very
explicit about what we've

77
00:03:56,194 --> 00:03:58,994
just read out, which
is that the fact that

78
00:03:58,994 --> 00:04:00,728
President Karzai has
indicated that

79
00:04:00,728 --> 00:04:05,261
it is unlikely he will sign
the BSA means that if he

80
00:04:05,261 --> 00:04:08,628
doesn't sign it, it is
at least possible that

81
00:04:08,628 --> 00:04:11,994
a successor Afghan
government might sign it,

82
00:04:11,994 --> 00:04:13,728
but that pushes us
later into the year.

83
00:04:13,728 --> 00:04:17,594
And the longer we go
without a signed BSA,

84
00:04:17,594 --> 00:04:23,760
by necessity, the more narrow
in size and ambition

85
00:04:23,761 --> 00:04:28,695
the mission for a post-2014
force would be.

86
00:04:28,728 --> 00:04:32,428
So this is about
essentially planning

87
00:04:32,428 --> 00:04:34,061
for a post-2014 mission.

88
00:04:34,061 --> 00:04:37,394
And there are a lot of
complexities involved

89
00:04:37,394 --> 00:04:42,428
in asking the Defense
Department to plan

90
00:04:42,428 --> 00:04:44,828
for a zero option -- that is
a full withdrawal, in

91
00:04:44,828 --> 00:04:46,494
keeping with the
President's promise to end

92
00:04:46,494 --> 00:04:49,895
the war in Afghanistan by
the end of 2014, and he

93
00:04:49,895 --> 00:04:50,960
will keep that promise --
and then,

94
00:04:50,961 --> 00:04:54,127
also to plan for a contingency

95
00:04:54,127 --> 00:04:59,695
of a post-2014 smaller troop presence.

96
00:04:59,695 --> 00:05:05,661
And in the President's
view, it is necessary

97
00:05:05,661 --> 00:05:12,528
to plan for that force
against the clock here,

98
00:05:12,528 --> 00:05:16,795
in the sense that the longer
we go without a BSA the

99
00:05:16,795 --> 00:05:18,795
smaller in scale and
ambition the mission would

100
00:05:18,795 --> 00:05:19,194
have to be.

101
00:05:19,761 --> 00:05:20,994
The Press: In a
conversation with the

102
00:05:20,994 --> 00:05:24,461
Speaker, it's been since
December of 2012

103
00:05:24,461 --> 00:05:27,461
that they had a face-to-face
alone session.

104
00:05:27,461 --> 00:05:30,461
Why has it taken so long?

105
00:05:30,461 --> 00:05:33,061
I mean, this is the leader
of the congressional

106
00:05:33,061 --> 00:05:33,828
opposition; he is the
President

107
00:05:33,828 --> 00:05:34,828
of the United States.

108
00:05:35,328 --> 00:05:36,561
Mr. Carney: Well, I'd
say a couple of things,

109
00:05:36,561 --> 00:05:38,428
Jim.

110
00:05:38,428 --> 00:05:43,761
The President has
conversations with leaders

111
00:05:43,761 --> 00:05:47,261
of Congress, not all of
which

112
00:05:47,261 --> 00:05:49,394
are read out to the press -- one.

113
00:05:49,394 --> 00:05:54,895
Two, today's meeting was
good and constructive.

114
00:05:54,895 --> 00:06:01,161
It covered a range of
issues and it was,

115
00:06:01,661 --> 00:06:04,695
in the President's view, a
useful conversation.

116
00:06:04,695 --> 00:06:09,528
Three, I think you recall
the Speaker of the House

117
00:06:09,528 --> 00:06:11,695
as reported having said
that he would not ever

118
00:06:11,695 --> 00:06:12,695
negotiate with the

119
00:06:12,695 --> 00:06:13,861
President of the United States again.

120
00:06:13,861 --> 00:06:18,795
So the point is that the
President's position

121
00:06:18,795 --> 00:06:20,594
on these issues and his
communication with

122
00:06:20,594 --> 00:06:23,194
Congress I think
has been robust.

123
00:06:23,194 --> 00:06:28,328
And we're looking for ways
to move an agenda forward

124
00:06:28,328 --> 00:06:31,861
that expands opportunity
and rewards hard work

125
00:06:31,861 --> 00:06:34,161
and responsibility for
the American people.

126
00:06:34,161 --> 00:06:36,928
We are looking for a
partner in Congress

127
00:06:36,928 --> 00:06:38,761
to advance part
of that agenda.

128
00:06:38,761 --> 00:06:42,628
But the President won't
stand still just because

129
00:06:42,628 --> 00:06:44,695
Congress is standing
still, if Congress decides

130
00:06:44,695 --> 00:06:47,561
or if Republicans decide
not to take action.

131
00:06:47,561 --> 00:06:50,727
So that's been our
explicit approach this

132
00:06:50,728 --> 00:06:52,861
year, and that's the
approach the President has

133
00:06:52,861 --> 00:06:54,194
been taking thus far and
will take

134
00:06:54,194 --> 00:06:55,194
for the rest of the year.

135
00:06:55,561 --> 00:06:56,661
The Press: Any
softening on point three

136
00:06:56,661 --> 00:06:58,895
that he won't negotiate
with the President?

137
00:06:58,895 --> 00:06:59,895
Mr. Carney: Again, I
think it was a good

138
00:06:59,895 --> 00:07:01,628
and constructive meeting.

139
00:07:01,628 --> 00:07:05,193
I'm not going to read out
any more detail beyond

140
00:07:05,194 --> 00:07:09,594
sort of the general topic
areas that included the

141
00:07:09,594 --> 00:07:13,861
ACA, Afghanistan,
appropriations,

142
00:07:13,861 --> 00:07:19,260
manufacturing, trade, the
drought in California,

143
00:07:19,261 --> 00:07:21,094
wildfire suppression --
which we talked about

144
00:07:21,094 --> 00:07:23,528
yesterday -- other issues,
infrastructure

145
00:07:23,528 --> 00:07:25,628
and highway funding.

146
00:07:25,628 --> 00:07:26,828
But that's just
a partial list.

147
00:07:26,828 --> 00:07:30,695
So I think we're talking
about a range of topics

148
00:07:30,695 --> 00:07:33,127
that reflect the things
that we in Washington are

149
00:07:33,127 --> 00:07:37,061
working on both here at
the White House

150
00:07:37,061 --> 00:07:38,460
and in the administration, and
hopefully

151
00:07:38,461 --> 00:07:42,728
and potentially in Congress as well.

152
00:07:42,728 --> 00:07:43,728
Jeff.

153
00:07:45,194 --> 00:07:47,094
The Press: Following up
on that meeting as well,

154
00:07:47,094 --> 00:07:48,728
the Speaker's office
mentioned that trade

155
00:07:48,728 --> 00:07:50,895
was one of the issues
that they discussed.

156
00:07:50,895 --> 00:07:53,561
Speaker Boehner has said
before that it's up to the

157
00:07:53,561 --> 00:07:55,727
President to work on
getting his own party

158
00:07:55,728 --> 00:07:57,161
behind supporting Trade
Promotion Authority.

159
00:07:57,161 --> 00:07:58,994
Did the President make any
commitments about that

160
00:07:58,994 --> 00:08:00,795
or did they discuss strategy
for doing

161
00:08:00,795 --> 00:08:01,461
that in their meeting?

162
00:08:01,928 --> 00:08:04,428
Mr. Carney: Trade was
one of the many topics

163
00:08:04,428 --> 00:08:05,628
that were discussed.

164
00:08:05,628 --> 00:08:06,895
I don't have a
further readout

165
00:08:06,895 --> 00:08:07,960
on the conversation.

166
00:08:07,961 --> 00:08:09,594
I wouldn't expect a more
detailed readout

167
00:08:09,594 --> 00:08:10,461
on the conversation.

168
00:08:10,461 --> 00:08:13,661
The President's views on
why it is good for the

169
00:08:13,661 --> 00:08:16,127
American economy and good
for American workers

170
00:08:16,127 --> 00:08:21,294
to negotiate trade agreements
that expand American

171
00:08:21,294 --> 00:08:24,561
exports are well known.

172
00:08:24,561 --> 00:08:26,193
And he has expressed them,
I have expressed them,

173
00:08:26,194 --> 00:08:28,928
others have expressed
them, and he has made

174
00:08:28,928 --> 00:08:32,061
clear that moving forward
on those trade

175
00:08:32,061 --> 00:08:35,027
agreements is a priority for him.

176
00:08:35,027 --> 00:08:36,861
It is also the case
that this is an ongoing

177
00:08:36,861 --> 00:08:39,193
conversation that we're
having with members

178
00:08:39,193 --> 00:08:40,394
of Congress in both parties.

179
00:08:40,394 --> 00:08:46,828
The difference of opinion
that exists in both

180
00:08:46,828 --> 00:08:49,761
parties on these issues
is not something that

181
00:08:49,761 --> 00:08:51,461
suddenly sprang
up in 2014.

182
00:08:51,461 --> 00:08:56,361
These are issues that have
long fostered different

183
00:08:56,361 --> 00:08:57,361
views, and that's
something

184
00:08:57,361 --> 00:08:58,361
we take into account.

185
00:08:58,361 --> 00:09:00,628
But we believe very
strongly, as the President

186
00:09:00,628 --> 00:09:05,994
said just last week
in Mexico, that having

187
00:09:05,994 --> 00:09:09,528
agreements that expand
trade and, in particular,

188
00:09:09,528 --> 00:09:11,528
when we are talking about
the Pacific region, the

189
00:09:13,394 --> 00:09:17,994
fastest-growing emerging
economies in the world,

190
00:09:17,994 --> 00:09:20,294
opening those markets to
American goods is good for

191
00:09:20,294 --> 00:09:22,828
the economy, and doing
so in a way that

192
00:09:22,828 --> 00:09:25,161
protects American workers and
protects the environment

193
00:09:25,161 --> 00:09:27,560
is good for the United
States and the world.

194
00:09:27,561 --> 00:09:30,428
So that's why we're
continuing to negotiate

195
00:09:30,428 --> 00:09:32,594
agreements, and we will
work with Congress

196
00:09:32,594 --> 00:09:36,094
to try to bring those
agreements into effect.

197
00:09:36,994 --> 00:09:38,194
The Press: You
referenced the Speaker's

198
00:09:38,194 --> 00:09:40,261
comments about not
negotiating with the

199
00:09:40,261 --> 00:09:42,328
President, but isn't it
also the President's job

200
00:09:42,328 --> 00:09:44,093
to build that relationship
and

201
00:09:44,094 --> 00:09:45,594
to create meetings like --

202
00:09:46,127 --> 00:09:46,527
Mr. Carney:
Absolutely, and he has.

203
00:09:46,528 --> 00:09:48,227
Again, you are under --

204
00:09:48,528 --> 00:09:49,261
The Press: But wouldn't
you agree that a

205
00:09:49,261 --> 00:09:51,728
year is a long time not to have
a one-on-one meeting with

206
00:09:51,728 --> 00:09:52,328
the Speaker of the House?

207
00:09:52,761 --> 00:09:53,560
Mr. Carney: I would
simply say that

208
00:09:53,561 --> 00:09:55,928
we do not read out every
conversation and meeting

209
00:09:55,928 --> 00:09:57,361
that the President has
with members of Congress.

210
00:09:57,761 --> 00:10:00,194
The Press: Are you
implying with that there

211
00:10:00,194 --> 00:10:01,161
have been other
one-on-ones?

212
00:10:01,361 --> 00:10:01,895
Mr. Carney: I would
simply say that we do not

213
00:10:01,895 --> 00:10:03,895
read out every
conversation and meeting

214
00:10:03,895 --> 00:10:05,227
that the President, the
Vice President,

215
00:10:05,227 --> 00:10:07,093
or other senior members of the
White House

216
00:10:07,094 --> 00:10:07,795
has with Congress.

217
00:10:08,594 --> 00:10:09,728
The Press: Let me ask
you one other question.

218
00:10:09,728 --> 00:10:12,627
Reuters reported yesterday
that Iran signed

219
00:10:12,628 --> 00:10:15,895
a deal to sell Iraq arms and
ammunition

220
00:10:15,895 --> 00:10:17,928
worth $195 million.

221
00:10:17,928 --> 00:10:21,861
Has Iran informed the
United States about that?

222
00:10:21,861 --> 00:10:23,227
And does the White House
have a problem

223
00:10:23,227 --> 00:10:25,294
with that contract?

224
00:10:25,561 --> 00:10:28,861
Mr. Carney: We raised
our concerns about this

225
00:10:28,861 --> 00:10:31,461
matter at the highest
levels with the government

226
00:10:31,461 --> 00:10:35,061
of Iraq and reiterated
that any transfer or sale

227
00:10:35,061 --> 00:10:38,361
of arms from Iran is in
direct violation

228
00:10:38,361 --> 00:10:41,093
of the United Nations Security
Council resolutions.

229
00:10:41,094 --> 00:10:43,461
The government of Iraq
assured us that it would

230
00:10:43,461 --> 00:10:44,695
look into the matter.

231
00:10:44,695 --> 00:10:46,828
Today, we have seen the
press release issued

232
00:10:46,828 --> 00:10:49,528
by the Iraqi Ministry of
Defense denying that any

233
00:10:49,528 --> 00:10:50,928
contracts for military
equipment

234
00:10:50,928 --> 00:10:52,728
were signed with Iran.

235
00:10:52,728 --> 00:10:55,627
We will follow up with the
government

236
00:10:55,628 --> 00:10:57,161
of Iraq on that matter.

237
00:10:57,161 --> 00:10:58,161
Jim.

238
00:10:58,461 --> 00:11:00,027
The Press: Getting back
to the President's meeting

239
00:11:00,027 --> 00:11:02,061
with the Speaker, it's
been reported and I think

240
00:11:02,061 --> 00:11:03,561
it's a general feeling
here in Washington

241
00:11:03,561 --> 00:11:05,061
that the Speaker has
been standing

242
00:11:05,061 --> 00:11:06,428
up to conservative groups,
whether

243
00:11:06,428 --> 00:11:08,328
it be on the budget or the
debt ceiling.

244
00:11:08,328 --> 00:11:11,494
Did the President thank
the Speaker for that when

245
00:11:11,494 --> 00:11:13,994
they met for sticking
his neck out for him?

246
00:11:14,828 --> 00:11:16,494
Mr. Carney: I don't
have a more detailed

247
00:11:16,494 --> 00:11:17,594
readout for you, Jim.

248
00:11:17,594 --> 00:11:18,728
I can tell you that
the President has noted

249
00:11:18,728 --> 00:11:22,627
generally, as have I and
others, that despite the

250
00:11:22,628 --> 00:11:24,127
differences that exist
in Washington,

251
00:11:24,127 --> 00:11:26,928
we have managed to move forward
when it comes to the

252
00:11:26,928 --> 00:11:29,194
budget agreement and the
regular order established

253
00:11:29,194 --> 00:11:31,961
by it, first negotiated
by Senator Murray

254
00:11:31,961 --> 00:11:38,461
and Chairman Ryan, and then
passed, and then followed

255
00:11:38,461 --> 00:11:40,027
through on with the
funding

256
00:11:40,027 --> 00:11:41,695
bill that was passed.

257
00:11:41,695 --> 00:11:43,261
That's a positive
development.

258
00:11:43,261 --> 00:11:48,261
The fact that Republicans
decided not to put the

259
00:11:48,261 --> 00:11:50,428
full faith and credit of
the United States

260
00:11:50,428 --> 00:11:53,227
to the test again with the
brinksmanship over the

261
00:11:53,227 --> 00:11:56,593
necessity of paying the
bills that Congress racks

262
00:11:56,594 --> 00:11:57,828
up, that was a good thing.

263
00:11:57,828 --> 00:12:01,026
And that's good
for the economy.

264
00:12:01,027 --> 00:12:02,027
It's good for
the middle class.

265
00:12:02,027 --> 00:12:05,061
It's not about winners and
losers here in Washington.

266
00:12:05,061 --> 00:12:10,027
It's simply a fact that
when the opposite approach

267
00:12:10,027 --> 00:12:11,761
has been taken in the
past it's done harm

268
00:12:11,761 --> 00:12:13,661
to the American people,
harm to job creation.

269
00:12:13,661 --> 00:12:14,661
So those are positives.

270
00:12:14,661 --> 00:12:16,928
I just don't -- again, I'm
not going to get into 20

271
00:12:16,928 --> 00:12:18,561
questions about, was this
said, and was that asked.

272
00:12:19,428 --> 00:12:21,795
The Press: You would
hope that perhaps

273
00:12:21,795 --> 00:12:24,294
a breakthrough has been
made in this relationship

274
00:12:24,294 --> 00:12:26,494
between the President
and the Speaker, and that

275
00:12:26,494 --> 00:12:28,661
perhaps more meetings like
this might take place that

276
00:12:28,661 --> 00:12:29,661
could be made public.

277
00:12:29,661 --> 00:12:30,828
Mr. Carney: I think
it's a press misconception

278
00:12:30,828 --> 00:12:33,060
that success or failure
of legislation in Congress

279
00:12:33,061 --> 00:12:35,328
depends on the
relationship between

280
00:12:35,328 --> 00:12:37,661
a President and a Speaker,
or a President and

281
00:12:37,661 --> 00:12:39,161
a leader in Congress.

282
00:12:39,161 --> 00:12:41,527
The President's
relationship with the

283
00:12:41,528 --> 00:12:42,661
Speaker, as the Speaker
has said

284
00:12:42,661 --> 00:12:46,493
and the President has said, has
always been solid.

285
00:12:46,494 --> 00:12:50,761
And the problem we've
had in the past here

286
00:12:50,761 --> 00:12:56,493
in Washington has been often
the dictation

287
00:12:56,494 --> 00:12:59,328
that has been provided by a
segment of the House Republican

288
00:12:59,328 --> 00:13:02,461
Congress over what the
House of Representatives

289
00:13:02,461 --> 00:13:04,795
would or would not do.

290
00:13:04,795 --> 00:13:06,527
And that hasn't
necessarily been a

291
00:13:06,528 --> 00:13:09,828
reflection of what the
Speaker would hope

292
00:13:09,828 --> 00:13:11,461
for in a perfect world, but what
he is able

293
00:13:11,461 --> 00:13:14,928
to get his conference to do.

294
00:13:14,928 --> 00:13:21,628
So again -- and I think
going back to the broader

295
00:13:21,628 --> 00:13:23,127
implication from Jeff's
question and some

296
00:13:23,127 --> 00:13:26,127
of the other questions, you saw
last year coming

297
00:13:26,127 --> 00:13:29,993
out of the 2012 elections, the
President and his team

298
00:13:29,994 --> 00:13:32,394
very aggressively engage
with Congress, including

299
00:13:32,394 --> 00:13:34,528
Republicans in Congress,
in an effort

300
00:13:34,528 --> 00:13:37,494
to try to move forward on some
of the issues that have

301
00:13:37,494 --> 00:13:41,695
divided Washington, most
especially the possibility

302
00:13:41,695 --> 00:13:44,361
of a broader budget
agreement that would

303
00:13:47,161 --> 00:13:49,227
require compromise from
both sides but would move

304
00:13:49,227 --> 00:13:52,728
the country forward
by making necessary

305
00:13:52,728 --> 00:13:54,895
investments and reducing
the deficit

306
00:13:54,895 --> 00:13:56,928
and debt for the medium and long term.

307
00:13:56,928 --> 00:14:00,394
The President put forward
a good-faith offer that

308
00:14:00,394 --> 00:14:02,461
everyone on both
sides recognized

309
00:14:02,461 --> 00:14:06,094
as a compromise, and despite
all the meetings

310
00:14:06,094 --> 00:14:09,194
and dinners and coffees and
engagements, we could not

311
00:14:09,194 --> 00:14:11,961
get a similar counteroffer
from the Republicans.

312
00:14:11,961 --> 00:14:18,261
So we're going to continue
to engage with Congress,

313
00:14:18,261 --> 00:14:20,761
with Republicans, in an
effort to see where we can

314
00:14:20,761 --> 00:14:22,394
find common ground to move
the ball forward

315
00:14:22,394 --> 00:14:23,795
for the American people.

316
00:14:23,795 --> 00:14:25,895
Where Congress refuses
to act,

317
00:14:25,895 --> 00:14:30,661
the President is going to use
every authority available to him

318
00:14:30,661 --> 00:14:33,328
to advance an agenda that
expands opportunity

319
00:14:33,328 --> 00:14:34,328
and rewards hard work.

320
00:14:34,895 --> 00:14:36,261
The Press: And I just
want to get back

321
00:14:36,261 --> 00:14:39,795
to the President's call to
President Karzai.

322
00:14:39,795 --> 00:14:42,861
It is a fact that if
this bilateral security

323
00:14:42,861 --> 00:14:44,027
agreement is not signed
that there

324
00:14:44,027 --> 00:14:45,194
will be no troops?

325
00:14:45,328 --> 00:14:46,328
Mr. Carney:
Yes, correct.

326
00:14:46,328 --> 00:14:47,761
The Press: By December
31st, they'll all be gone?

327
00:14:47,761 --> 00:14:48,761
Mr. Carney: Absolutely.

328
00:14:49,828 --> 00:14:50,828
The Press: No
wavering on that?

329
00:14:51,027 --> 00:14:52,127
Mr. Carney: Absent a
BSA,

330
00:14:52,127 --> 00:14:54,460
there will not be any U.S.

331
00:14:54,461 --> 00:14:55,695
troops on the ground
beyond

332
00:14:55,695 --> 00:14:56,428
the end of the year.

333
00:14:56,795 --> 00:14:57,828
The Press: And did
the President --

334
00:14:57,828 --> 00:15:00,795
his instructions to the
Defense Secretary

335
00:15:00,795 --> 00:15:03,294
to initiate contingency planning,

336
00:15:03,294 --> 00:15:04,328
that started today?

337
00:15:04,761 --> 00:15:05,928
Mr. Carney:
No, no, no --

338
00:15:06,261 --> 00:15:07,227
The Press: -- or had
that already

339
00:15:07,227 --> 00:15:07,928
been looked at previously?

340
00:15:08,094 --> 00:15:08,994
Mr. Carney: What we had
been saying for some time

341
00:15:08,994 --> 00:15:12,461
now is that we wanted to
see the BSA signed;

342
00:15:12,461 --> 00:15:16,494
that it was negotiated in good
faith by both sides;

343
00:15:16,494 --> 00:15:19,961
it was endorsed by the loya
jirga in Afghanistan;

344
00:15:19,961 --> 00:15:21,294
the end-of-the-year deadline
was one

345
00:15:21,294 --> 00:15:23,828
that was agreed to by both sides.

346
00:15:23,828 --> 00:15:26,026
Afghanistan failed to
-- the Afghan government

347
00:15:26,027 --> 00:15:28,027
failed to meet
that deadline.

348
00:15:28,027 --> 00:15:31,594
And we have been pressing
in the early part of this

349
00:15:31,594 --> 00:15:35,027
year for President Karzai
to take action so that

350
00:15:35,027 --> 00:15:37,261
that BSA can be completed.

351
00:15:37,261 --> 00:15:39,428
He has indicated that he's
not likely to sign the

352
00:15:39,428 --> 00:15:43,127
BSA, and so we have to
reevaluate where we are.

353
00:15:43,628 --> 00:15:46,027
As we've been saying since
the beginning of the year,

354
00:15:46,027 --> 00:15:49,695
the longer we wait
the more likely the

355
00:15:49,695 --> 00:15:52,895
possibility is that we end
up a zero option with no

356
00:15:52,895 --> 00:15:55,093
troops at all beyond 2014
because

357
00:15:55,094 --> 00:15:59,094
we cannot and will not have U.S.

358
00:15:59,094 --> 00:16:00,928
troops on the ground
without a signed BSA.

359
00:16:00,928 --> 00:16:03,795
The Press: A former
Guantanamo detainee has

360
00:16:03,795 --> 00:16:05,328
been arrested in Britain
on suspicion

361
00:16:05,328 --> 00:16:08,961
of terror offenses in Syria.

362
00:16:08,961 --> 00:16:10,528
When you see these
incidences pop

363
00:16:10,528 --> 00:16:12,461
up does it give the White House
any pause

364
00:16:12,461 --> 00:16:14,127
on a policy for closing Guantanamo?

365
00:16:15,194 --> 00:16:16,795
Mr. Carney: I haven't
seen that specific report.

366
00:16:16,795 --> 00:16:18,560
What I can tell you is
that there is a thorough

367
00:16:18,561 --> 00:16:21,828
review process on every
individual,

368
00:16:21,828 --> 00:16:24,361
every detainee who's being
considered for transfer

369
00:16:24,361 --> 00:16:30,328
that takes all of these issues into account.

370
00:16:30,594 --> 00:16:31,594
Margaret.

371
00:16:33,194 --> 00:16:35,461
The Press: Did
the President,

372
00:16:35,461 --> 00:16:40,461
in his instructions to the
Pentagon, give them

373
00:16:40,461 --> 00:16:43,328
a timeline to provide
him with a zero option?

374
00:16:43,328 --> 00:16:45,928
I know it's been under
discussion for a while,

375
00:16:45,928 --> 00:16:48,528
but now he's saying, do
this;

376
00:16:48,528 --> 00:16:49,695
tell me how it would work.

377
00:16:49,695 --> 00:16:51,628
When do you expect to get
that from them,

378
00:16:51,628 --> 00:16:54,227
even if you don't need to use it
until August or September?

379
00:16:54,394 --> 00:16:57,428
And I also wanted to ask
you, when the President

380
00:16:57,428 --> 00:17:01,294
and Speaker Boehner spoke
about Afghanistan,

381
00:17:01,294 --> 00:17:05,227
as the readout reflects, can you
give us some

382
00:17:05,227 --> 00:17:07,628
kind of a sense about whether
Boehner will support

383
00:17:07,627 --> 00:17:09,261
Obama on this BSA thing?

384
00:17:09,261 --> 00:17:12,795
It seems to me like you
see a lot of calls from

385
00:17:12,795 --> 00:17:14,928
Republican leadership or
committee leadership,

386
00:17:14,928 --> 00:17:17,227
like the President really needs
to get onboard

387
00:17:17,227 --> 00:17:18,528
and get serious about the BSA.

388
00:17:18,528 --> 00:17:21,060
But it seems like from the
White House's perspective,

389
00:17:21,060 --> 00:17:23,293
you guys are saying, look,
we're doing this;

390
00:17:23,294 --> 00:17:25,528
it's the Afghan government
that's not signing it.

391
00:17:25,528 --> 00:17:28,294
Did the President and the
Speaker sort of get square

392
00:17:28,294 --> 00:17:31,094
on that, or are you still
concerned that you have

393
00:17:31,094 --> 00:17:32,761
political undercurrents on
the Republican side

394
00:17:32,761 --> 00:17:35,261
that are hurting you in your
posture on Afghanistan?

395
00:17:36,127 --> 00:17:37,561
Mr. Carney: Let me take
a crack

396
00:17:37,561 --> 00:17:40,194
at the second part there.

397
00:17:40,194 --> 00:17:44,061
It's inconceivable, I
think, to us that leaders

398
00:17:44,061 --> 00:17:48,226
in Congress would
allow for a U.S.

399
00:17:48,227 --> 00:17:51,194
troop presence without a
signed bilateral security

400
00:17:51,194 --> 00:17:54,961
agreement in Afghanistan.

401
00:17:54,961 --> 00:17:58,227
It is a simple fact that
the bilateral security

402
00:17:58,227 --> 00:18:00,728
agreement was negotiated
over a prolonged period of

403
00:18:00,728 --> 00:18:03,361
time in good faith.

404
00:18:03,361 --> 00:18:05,328
The agreement was reached.

405
00:18:05,328 --> 00:18:08,094
It was endorsed by the
representatives

406
00:18:08,094 --> 00:18:10,127
of the Afghan people.

407
00:18:10,127 --> 00:18:13,027
It is not subject
to renegotiation.

408
00:18:13,027 --> 00:18:14,628
I'm not sure I've heard
members of Congress

409
00:18:14,628 --> 00:18:15,660
suggest that it should be.

410
00:18:16,961 --> 00:18:20,261
What I think has been
amply demonstrated is that

411
00:18:20,261 --> 00:18:24,461
we've been pressing
very hard for the Karzai

412
00:18:24,461 --> 00:18:27,961
government to complete
the process by signing the

413
00:18:27,961 --> 00:18:28,961
BSA.

414
00:18:28,961 --> 00:18:31,394
Since it is now unlikely,
it has been indicated that

415
00:18:31,394 --> 00:18:33,461
it is unlikely by
President Karzai that he

416
00:18:33,461 --> 00:18:36,561
will sign it, the
President made clear in

417
00:18:36,561 --> 00:18:43,093
his call today that we
are preparing for the

418
00:18:43,094 --> 00:18:47,094
possibility of no troops
in Afghanistan beyond the

419
00:18:47,094 --> 00:18:52,628
end of the year, and that
any -- we are open to the

420
00:18:52,628 --> 00:18:55,860
signing of a bilateral
security agreement later

421
00:18:55,861 --> 00:18:59,194
in the year, but the
longer it takes to get

422
00:18:59,194 --> 00:19:01,795
there, by necessity
because of the planning,

423
00:19:01,795 --> 00:19:06,494
the smaller the mission
will be beyond 2014 both

424
00:19:06,494 --> 00:19:07,794
in size and ambition.

425
00:19:08,661 --> 00:19:10,928
And the mission, in any
case, as you know -- to

426
00:19:10,928 --> 00:19:13,194
clarify since I haven't
said it today --

427
00:19:13,194 --> 00:19:18,061
will be focused solely on
counterterrorism and the

428
00:19:18,061 --> 00:19:20,794
training and support of
Afghan security forces.

429
00:19:20,795 --> 00:19:26,461
The war ends this year,
at the end of this year,

430
00:19:26,461 --> 00:19:29,695
regardless, as the
President and NATO decided

431
00:19:29,695 --> 00:19:30,695
some time ago.

432
00:19:30,961 --> 00:19:32,528
The Press: But did
the President ask Speaker

433
00:19:32,528 --> 00:19:38,194
Boehner, hey, can you
please support me on this

434
00:19:38,194 --> 00:19:41,226
BSA stuff rather than have
Republican members

435
00:19:41,227 --> 00:19:45,394
in your caucus making it sound
like I'm not pushing hard

436
00:19:45,394 --> 00:19:46,528
enough to get
the BSA signed?

437
00:19:46,528 --> 00:19:48,027
Did this come up as a part
of their conversations?

438
00:19:48,194 --> 00:19:49,328
Mr. Carney: I don't
have a more detailed

439
00:19:49,328 --> 00:19:50,661
readout to provide to you.

440
00:19:50,661 --> 00:19:57,294
What I can tell you is
that that was a subject

441
00:19:57,294 --> 00:20:00,695
of -- a conversation that
included

442
00:20:00,695 --> 00:20:02,160
many subjects and that --

443
00:20:02,928 --> 00:20:03,928
The Press:
Afghanistan or --

444
00:20:04,528 --> 00:20:05,528
Mr. Carney:
Afghanistan.

445
00:20:05,528 --> 00:20:07,661
And I think -- the BSA
is part of Afghanistan --

446
00:20:07,661 --> 00:20:10,127
that is certainly the
focus at this time.

447
00:20:10,127 --> 00:20:13,161
The President had, just
prior to meeting with

448
00:20:13,161 --> 00:20:14,895
Speaker Boehner, had
spoken with President

449
00:20:14,895 --> 00:20:19,561
Karzai, so this was
certainly a fresh

450
00:20:19,561 --> 00:20:23,261
development to discuss
with the Speaker.

451
00:20:23,261 --> 00:20:26,261
But I'm not -- maybe
I'm missing something.

452
00:20:26,261 --> 00:20:32,226
I'm not aware of to any
great degree the critique

453
00:20:35,994 --> 00:20:39,428
about pushing for the
signing of the BSA because

454
00:20:39,428 --> 00:20:42,127
I think we have been quite
aggressive in doing that.

455
00:20:43,061 --> 00:20:45,494
The Press: And on the
question of -- I know you

456
00:20:45,494 --> 00:20:47,428
don't have more to read
out than what's in the

457
00:20:47,428 --> 00:20:51,895
readout, but is the
Pentagon going to present

458
00:20:51,895 --> 00:20:53,094
now the President with a
plan that they have not

459
00:20:53,094 --> 00:20:54,361
yet presented him with,
which is, this is how zero

460
00:20:54,361 --> 00:20:55,194
option would work?

461
00:20:55,194 --> 00:20:56,994
And when do you expect
him to get that plan?

462
00:20:57,194 --> 00:20:58,293
Mr. Carney: Look, I
think that the answer

463
00:20:58,294 --> 00:21:00,161
to that question is I don't
have a specific

464
00:21:00,161 --> 00:21:00,795
date for you.

465
00:21:00,795 --> 00:21:06,294
The fact is it has always
been envisioned

466
00:21:06,294 --> 00:21:07,294
by the U.S.

467
00:21:07,294 --> 00:21:11,561
and our NATO allies that
we would draw down to zero

468
00:21:11,561 --> 00:21:12,593
by the end of this year.

469
00:21:12,594 --> 00:21:19,761
The prospect of a force
beyond 2014 has always

470
00:21:19,761 --> 00:21:27,094
been a goal, a policy goal
dependent

471
00:21:27,094 --> 00:21:29,795
upon a BSA being signed.

472
00:21:29,795 --> 00:21:35,961
And what I think the
conversation today and the

473
00:21:35,961 --> 00:21:37,661
message conveyed today by
the President

474
00:21:37,661 --> 00:21:41,561
to President Karzai was about is
the acknowledgement that

475
00:21:41,561 --> 00:21:44,360
President Karzai, despite
our efforts, has indicated

476
00:21:44,361 --> 00:21:48,328
he is unlikely to sign the
BSA, and the consequences

477
00:21:48,328 --> 00:21:51,928
of that in terms of
planning going forward on,

478
00:21:51,928 --> 00:21:54,561
with each passing day,
more realistically, on the

479
00:21:54,561 --> 00:21:59,328
prospect of a full
withdrawal, and the

480
00:21:59,328 --> 00:22:02,194
acknowledgment that we're
making today and the

481
00:22:02,194 --> 00:22:03,728
President made to
President Karzai that we

482
00:22:03,728 --> 00:22:06,728
would be open to the BSA
being signed later in the

483
00:22:06,728 --> 00:22:11,661
year, but that as time
passes, by necessity

484
00:22:11,661 --> 00:22:14,528
because of the
complexities of planning

485
00:22:14,528 --> 00:22:16,261
withdrawal -- and it's not
just troops, we're talking

486
00:22:16,261 --> 00:22:20,127
about equipment and
closing of bases -- that

487
00:22:20,127 --> 00:22:23,661
the mission beyond 2014
should a BSA be signed

488
00:22:23,661 --> 00:22:26,528
would, by necessity, if it
happens late in the year,

489
00:22:26,528 --> 00:22:28,227
be smaller in
scale and ambition.

490
00:22:28,227 --> 00:22:29,895
Does that make sense?

491
00:22:29,895 --> 00:22:30,895
Jon.

492
00:22:31,328 --> 00:22:33,360
The Press: On the
meeting with Speaker

493
00:22:33,361 --> 00:22:35,928
Boehner, in the readout
that the Speaker's office

494
00:22:35,928 --> 00:22:38,828
provided is a long,
long list of topics --

495
00:22:38,828 --> 00:22:41,961
droughts, floods, fires,
Afghanistan --

496
00:22:41,961 --> 00:22:44,895
no mention of long-term budget,
entitlements, tax reform.

497
00:22:44,895 --> 00:22:48,360
So what I'm wondering,
given that and given the

498
00:22:48,361 --> 00:22:51,728
fact that the entitlement
reforms were taken out of

499
00:22:51,728 --> 00:22:54,027
the President's budget, or
are going to be taken out

500
00:22:54,027 --> 00:22:56,194
of the President's budget,
could we now put the last

501
00:22:56,194 --> 00:22:59,695
nail in the coffin of the
idea of a grand bargain?

502
00:23:00,628 --> 00:23:02,127
Mr. Carney: I'd
say two things.

503
00:23:02,127 --> 00:23:05,328
First of all, the list
that I've seen from the

504
00:23:05,328 --> 00:23:08,961
Speaker's office and the
one that I've provided

505
00:23:08,961 --> 00:23:11,294
more or less off the cuff
just now I don't think

506
00:23:11,294 --> 00:23:14,528
represents a complete --

507
00:23:15,361 --> 00:23:16,428
The Press: But they
weren't bangings

508
00:23:16,428 --> 00:23:18,294
out a grand bargain,
is that right?

509
00:23:19,127 --> 00:23:20,728
Mr. Carney: Well, I
don't think we suggested

510
00:23:20,728 --> 00:23:22,928
that they were or that
that was even possible

511
00:23:22,928 --> 00:23:24,795
in the time that they met.

512
00:23:24,795 --> 00:23:29,394
What remains absolutely
the case is that the

513
00:23:29,394 --> 00:23:36,161
President is ready and
willing to negotiate a

514
00:23:36,161 --> 00:23:39,795
balanced deficit reduction
deal, long-term deficit

515
00:23:39,795 --> 00:23:44,928
reduction deal, if
Republicans are willing

516
00:23:44,928 --> 00:23:49,027
to meet him halfway and
are willing

517
00:23:49,027 --> 00:23:50,961
to commit to balance.

518
00:23:50,961 --> 00:23:54,027
That's what the inclusion
of so-called chained

519
00:23:54,027 --> 00:23:56,194
CPI in his budget last
year was about.

520
00:23:56,194 --> 00:23:59,795
It was the exception to
the rule, when it comes

521
00:23:59,795 --> 00:24:02,361
to the presentation by
Presidents of their

522
00:24:02,361 --> 00:24:05,027
budgets, in that it
included not a priority

523
00:24:05,027 --> 00:24:08,394
for him, but a priority
for Republicans, because

524
00:24:08,394 --> 00:24:13,461
that was an effort to make
clear in the presentation

525
00:24:13,461 --> 00:24:15,261
of his budget that the
offer he had made to the

526
00:24:15,261 --> 00:24:17,795
Speaker of the House in
negotiations at the end

527
00:24:17,795 --> 00:24:20,194
of the previous year was
still on the table and

528
00:24:20,194 --> 00:24:21,328
that it was a good-faith
offer,

529
00:24:21,328 --> 00:24:24,528
and that he believed, based on
those negotiations, there was

530
00:24:24,528 --> 00:24:26,428
the possibility that
Republicans might be

531
00:24:26,428 --> 00:24:31,194
willing to meet him
halfway in achieving that

532
00:24:31,194 --> 00:24:33,795
grand bargain, if you
will, or even a mid-sized

533
00:24:33,795 --> 00:24:37,094
bargain that was based
on a balanced approach to

534
00:24:37,094 --> 00:24:38,795
dealing with our deficit
challenge -- an approach

535
00:24:38,795 --> 00:24:41,594
that allowed us, because
of the balance, to make

536
00:24:41,594 --> 00:24:44,961
sure that we weren't
achieving that deficit

537
00:24:44,961 --> 00:24:48,528
reduction solely on the
backs of the middle class,

538
00:24:48,528 --> 00:24:52,094
that we are asking
everybody to participate,

539
00:24:52,094 --> 00:24:54,661
and that we would be able
to make the necessary

540
00:24:54,661 --> 00:24:59,428
investments in our economy
in innovation and job

541
00:24:59,428 --> 00:25:01,628
creation that would secure
the foundation

542
00:25:01,628 --> 00:25:02,628
for growth in the future.

543
00:25:03,094 --> 00:25:05,161
So that's a long way of
saying the offer, as I

544
00:25:05,161 --> 00:25:08,795
said last week, is on the
table, but we have not,

545
00:25:08,795 --> 00:25:12,361
despite our, I think,
persistent efforts last

546
00:25:12,361 --> 00:25:15,294
year -- all the meetings
and coffees and dinners

547
00:25:15,294 --> 00:25:18,695
and the like to try to
test the theory that

548
00:25:18,695 --> 00:25:20,961
Republicans were willing
to have discussions about

549
00:25:20,961 --> 00:25:25,027
this -- despite those
efforts producing nothing

550
00:25:25,027 --> 00:25:26,027
out of the Republicans.

551
00:25:26,027 --> 00:25:29,294
The Press: So whoever's
fault it is,

552
00:25:29,294 --> 00:25:33,428
has the President come to terms
with the likelihood, maybe

553
00:25:33,428 --> 00:25:37,695
even certainty, that he
will leave office having

554
00:25:37,695 --> 00:25:40,994
been unable to achieve an
agreement that will even

555
00:25:40,994 --> 00:25:44,093
address the long-term
challenges facing Social

556
00:25:44,094 --> 00:25:45,094
Security and Medicare?

557
00:25:45,094 --> 00:25:47,294
That is just something
that he will have left and

558
00:25:47,294 --> 00:25:50,895
left the problem for his
successors to deal with?

559
00:25:50,994 --> 00:25:53,360
Mr. Carney: The
President has nearly three

560
00:25:53,361 --> 00:25:54,561
years remaining
in his term.

561
00:25:54,561 --> 00:25:57,528
And he believes that
there's enormous

562
00:25:57,528 --> 00:26:01,961
opportunity for progress
in a range of areas with

563
00:26:01,961 --> 00:26:03,761
Congress and through
the use

564
00:26:03,761 --> 00:26:04,795
of his executive authority.

565
00:26:04,795 --> 00:26:09,728
And he would not say that
there's no chance of that

566
00:26:09,728 --> 00:26:15,027
effort being rewarded with
success, but it requires a

567
00:26:15,027 --> 00:26:20,294
willingness by Republicans
to compromise, to agree to

568
00:26:20,294 --> 00:26:22,695
the basic principle that
if we're going to tackle

569
00:26:22,695 --> 00:26:25,494
our longer-term deficit
and debt challenges, that

570
00:26:25,494 --> 00:26:26,860
we have to do it
in a balanced way.

571
00:26:26,861 --> 00:26:31,227
And you've seen kind of
the schizophrenia among

572
00:26:31,227 --> 00:26:34,795
Republicans on this issue
where they criticize the

573
00:26:34,795 --> 00:26:39,561
President for taking CPI
out when they refuse to

574
00:26:39,561 --> 00:26:44,561
deal in good faith
on a compromise --

575
00:26:44,561 --> 00:26:48,928
a negotiation built around
compromise last year when

576
00:26:48,928 --> 00:26:50,428
the President explicitly
made clear

577
00:26:50,428 --> 00:26:52,628
it was on the table and put it
in his budget.

578
00:26:52,628 --> 00:26:59,461
You see it where they try
to hammer Democrats over

579
00:26:59,461 --> 00:27:01,661
savings and entitlements
that have been in the

580
00:27:01,661 --> 00:27:03,795
Republican budget for
three straight years.

581
00:27:05,828 --> 00:27:08,695
I think it doesn't reflect
well on their seriousness

582
00:27:08,695 --> 00:27:12,428
when it comes to trying
to reach a compromise

583
00:27:12,428 --> 00:27:15,094
bipartisan long-term
deficit reduction plan.

584
00:27:15,094 --> 00:27:18,127
I would also say that the
President remains hopeful

585
00:27:18,127 --> 00:27:21,027
that that can be achieved
during his time in office.

586
00:27:21,027 --> 00:27:25,227
He will, regardless, based
on projections and based

587
00:27:25,227 --> 00:27:27,161
on where we are now, have
presided

588
00:27:27,161 --> 00:27:30,227
over the steepest deficit
reduction since World War II.

589
00:27:30,227 --> 00:27:34,528
He will have presided over
deficit reduction that

590
00:27:34,528 --> 00:27:37,928
brings in the next 10-year
window, based on our

591
00:27:37,928 --> 00:27:40,994
projections, the
deficit-to-GDP below

592
00:27:40,994 --> 00:27:43,695
2 percent, which is
significantly lower than

593
00:27:43,695 --> 00:27:47,194
the projections under
the much celebrated

594
00:27:47,194 --> 00:27:50,261
Simpson-Bowles goal.

595
00:27:50,261 --> 00:27:51,961
And he will have done
that having inherited the

596
00:27:51,961 --> 00:27:53,961
largest deficits in
history when he took

597
00:27:53,961 --> 00:27:55,394
office in January of 2009.

598
00:27:56,594 --> 00:27:58,561
The Press: And then
quickly on Afghanistan.

599
00:27:58,561 --> 00:28:00,428
Obviously, this is a
big deal --

600
00:28:00,428 --> 00:28:03,394
I mean, the frustration of not
being able to get the BSA

601
00:28:03,394 --> 00:28:06,061
signed; enormous
consequences if the United

602
00:28:06,061 --> 00:28:07,895
States has to pull out
every last troop

603
00:28:07,895 --> 00:28:09,161
at the end of the year.

604
00:28:09,161 --> 00:28:12,061
And yet, the President
hasn't had a conversation

605
00:28:12,061 --> 00:28:16,561
with President Karzai
since July until today.

606
00:28:16,561 --> 00:28:18,360
I mean, why that
level of detachment?

607
00:28:18,361 --> 00:28:20,828
With the stakes so high,
why did the President

608
00:28:20,828 --> 00:28:24,461
go so long without picking up
the phone and talking

609
00:28:24,461 --> 00:28:27,294
to Karzai and personally
urging him

610
00:28:27,294 --> 00:28:28,294
to sign this agreement?

611
00:28:28,428 --> 00:28:30,761
Mr. Carney: Jon, I
think it's a preposterous

612
00:28:30,761 --> 00:28:34,293
suggestion that when you
have prolonged negotiation

613
00:28:34,294 --> 00:28:36,394
with the Afghan government
that produces the

614
00:28:36,394 --> 00:28:38,394
Bilateral Security
Agreement, you have the

615
00:28:38,394 --> 00:28:40,061
commitment through the
loya jirga

616
00:28:40,061 --> 00:28:43,394
of the Afghan people to support
it, you have a deadline set

617
00:28:43,394 --> 00:28:44,394
by both the U.S.

618
00:28:44,394 --> 00:28:45,994
and Afghan government that
it should be signed

619
00:28:45,994 --> 00:28:48,127
by the end of the year, and
you have all of the

620
00:28:48,127 --> 00:28:51,194
interlocutors that
we have on the U.S.

621
00:28:51,194 --> 00:28:53,127
side engaging with
the Afghan government,

622
00:28:53,127 --> 00:28:54,928
including with the
President on a regular

623
00:28:54,928 --> 00:28:59,261
basis, that the message
that it needs to be signed

624
00:28:59,261 --> 00:29:02,561
was not abundantly clear
to President Karzai.

625
00:29:02,561 --> 00:29:05,860
The decision of President
Karzai to indicate that it

626
00:29:05,861 --> 00:29:09,361
is unlikely that he'll
sign the BSA that his

627
00:29:09,361 --> 00:29:11,928
government negotiated is
obviously his decision,

628
00:29:11,928 --> 00:29:14,895
but it's not because we
haven't made clear

629
00:29:14,895 --> 00:29:15,895
that it ought to be signed.

630
00:29:17,127 --> 00:29:20,628
The Press: I mean,
what do you make -- again,

631
00:29:20,628 --> 00:29:21,628
you've got many -- you've
got

632
00:29:21,628 --> 00:29:23,293
the Secretary of State, you've
got many people

633
00:29:23,294 --> 00:29:24,294
raising this issue.

634
00:29:24,294 --> 00:29:25,528
But this is the President
of the United States.

635
00:29:25,528 --> 00:29:28,261
This is a high-stakes
situation.

636
00:29:28,261 --> 00:29:30,994
And he decided obviously
it was important

637
00:29:30,994 --> 00:29:32,093
to make the call today.

638
00:29:32,094 --> 00:29:34,428
I'm just wondering why
not as the deadline

639
00:29:34,428 --> 00:29:36,127
approached, or as
the deadline passed?

640
00:29:36,127 --> 00:29:37,161
I mean, why --

641
00:29:37,161 --> 00:29:39,528
Mr. Carney: Jon, I just
think that it has been

642
00:29:39,528 --> 00:29:40,961
communicated directly
and indirectly --

643
00:29:41,795 --> 00:29:43,528
The Press: But not by
the President himself.

644
00:29:43,528 --> 00:29:44,661
You know how --

645
00:29:45,494 --> 00:29:47,194
Mr. Carney: Well, no,
the President has stood

646
00:29:47,194 --> 00:29:49,194
up and said it
publicly many times.

647
00:29:49,194 --> 00:29:49,528
I think it's sort of a
preposterous notion that

648
00:29:49,528 --> 00:29:51,928
somehow President Karzai
until today didn't know

649
00:29:51,928 --> 00:29:56,261
that it was absolutely our
view that he ought to sign

650
00:29:56,261 --> 00:29:58,094
the BSA quickly.

651
00:29:58,094 --> 00:29:58,828
Steve.

652
00:29:58,828 --> 00:30:00,428
The Press: Does the
White House have any

653
00:30:00,428 --> 00:30:02,994
assurances or reason to
believe that some

654
00:30:02,994 --> 00:30:05,994
or all of the Presidential
candidates in Afghanistan

655
00:30:05,994 --> 00:30:07,360
would sign the BSA
if they were elected?

656
00:30:07,628 --> 00:30:09,628
Mr. Carney: I don't
think we would,

657
00:30:12,994 --> 00:30:16,794
given the experience we've had,
predict with any great

658
00:30:16,795 --> 00:30:18,261
certainty what
might happen.

659
00:30:18,261 --> 00:30:20,994
I would note that those
who cover these issues

660
00:30:20,994 --> 00:30:25,428
have reported that
candidates have suggested

661
00:30:25,428 --> 00:30:26,428
they support it.

662
00:30:26,428 --> 00:30:31,861
But we will obviously
wait to see what happens.

663
00:30:31,861 --> 00:30:34,561
And mindful of the fact
that the longer

664
00:30:34,561 --> 00:30:37,895
we go without a signed BSA the
more likely a zero option

665
00:30:37,895 --> 00:30:43,895
becomes, and the more --
even if a BSA is signed,

666
00:30:46,127 --> 00:30:48,594
the smaller the mission
will have to be,

667
00:30:48,594 --> 00:30:50,628
by necessity, in
scale and ambition.

668
00:30:50,628 --> 00:30:52,494
And by necessity, I mean
in the President's

669
00:30:52,494 --> 00:30:59,127
view when it comes to the
planning involved and the

670
00:30:59,127 --> 00:31:01,661
safety and security of our
troops,

671
00:31:01,661 --> 00:31:06,361
that we have to have a sort of
sliding scale as the year

672
00:31:06,361 --> 00:31:09,594
progresses when it comes
to what that post-2014

673
00:31:09,594 --> 00:31:11,928
mission would look like
in terms

674
00:31:11,928 --> 00:31:12,928
of size and ambition.

675
00:31:12,928 --> 00:31:13,928
Peter.

676
00:31:14,294 --> 00:31:16,561
The Press: Jay, if
I can, Jan Brewer is

677
00:31:16,561 --> 00:31:18,226
expected by the end of
this week to weigh

678
00:31:18,227 --> 00:31:21,227
in on a controversial measure
in her state, SB 1062.

679
00:31:21,227 --> 00:31:22,294
We asked you about this
yesterday

680
00:31:22,294 --> 00:31:24,461
and you didn't have an official
statement then,

681
00:31:24,461 --> 00:31:27,828
but this would allow businesses
to refuse service to gays and

682
00:31:27,828 --> 00:31:30,328
lesbians because of
religious beliefs.

683
00:31:30,328 --> 00:31:33,027
And we've now heard from
the NFL, Apple,

684
00:31:33,027 --> 00:31:34,328
both senators from that state.

685
00:31:34,328 --> 00:31:36,328
Does the President have
any thoughts on this?

686
00:31:37,094 --> 00:31:38,094
Mr. Carney: Well, my
suggestion

687
00:31:38,094 --> 00:31:41,594
yesterday that it sounded like a
pretty intolerant proposed law

688
00:31:41,594 --> 00:31:43,161
I think reflects our views.

689
00:31:43,161 --> 00:31:44,994
As a practice, we don't
generally weigh

690
00:31:44,994 --> 00:31:48,226
in on every piece of legislation
under consideration

691
00:31:48,227 --> 00:31:49,227
in the states.

692
00:31:49,227 --> 00:31:50,728
But I think the
President's position

693
00:31:50,728 --> 00:31:54,494
on equality for LGBT
Americans and opportunity

694
00:31:54,494 --> 00:31:57,093
for all is very well known
and he believes that all

695
00:31:57,094 --> 00:31:59,394
of us, regardless of
sexual orientation

696
00:31:59,394 --> 00:32:02,061
or gender identity, should be
treated fairly

697
00:32:02,061 --> 00:32:05,261
and equally with dignity and respect.

698
00:32:05,261 --> 00:32:09,226
And that view would govern
our disposition

699
00:32:09,227 --> 00:32:11,895
toward a state law under
consideration.

700
00:32:12,194 --> 00:32:13,528
The Press: When Jan
Brewer was in Washington,

701
00:32:13,528 --> 00:32:14,994
the President didn't have
any exchange

702
00:32:14,994 --> 00:32:16,160
with her on this topic?

703
00:32:16,494 --> 00:32:17,561
Mr. Carney: Not
that I'm aware of.

704
00:32:17,928 --> 00:32:18,928
The Press: President
Clinton right now

705
00:32:18,928 --> 00:32:19,994
is campaigning in the state
of Kentucky

706
00:32:19,994 --> 00:32:22,494
for Alison Lumdergan Grimes.

707
00:32:22,494 --> 00:32:26,226
I'm curious if the
President has plans or has

708
00:32:26,227 --> 00:32:29,127
spoken to her about plans
to come out to Kentucky on

709
00:32:29,127 --> 00:32:30,127
her behalf as well.

710
00:32:30,861 --> 00:32:32,127
Mr. Carney: I don't
have any scheduling

711
00:32:32,127 --> 00:32:33,628
announcements to make
involving the President.

712
00:32:34,361 --> 00:32:36,127
The Press: In terms of
your schedule, later today

713
00:32:36,127 --> 00:32:37,628
the President has
two OFA events.

714
00:32:37,628 --> 00:32:40,127
The DNC is the only major
political entity that has

715
00:32:40,127 --> 00:32:43,428
not outraised its
Republican counterparts.

716
00:32:43,428 --> 00:32:44,728
Some Democrats have been
critical,

717
00:32:44,728 --> 00:32:48,161
complaining that the OFA is
diverting funds away

718
00:32:48,161 --> 00:32:49,861
from the DNC.

719
00:32:49,861 --> 00:32:52,127
Because you speak on
behalf of the President

720
00:32:52,127 --> 00:32:53,328
and it's his schedule,
any

721
00:32:53,328 --> 00:32:54,328
thoughts on that complaint?

722
00:32:55,094 --> 00:32:56,428
Mr. Carney: I think you
can expect, as you've seen

723
00:32:56,428 --> 00:32:59,361
already, the President
to be very engaged

724
00:32:59,361 --> 00:33:02,294
in an effort to support
Democratic candidates in

725
00:33:02,294 --> 00:33:04,795
the Democratic Party
through the course of this

726
00:33:04,795 --> 00:33:06,961
year, and I think that
will be seen

727
00:33:06,961 --> 00:33:09,261
in the schedule as it
is unveiled.

728
00:33:10,394 --> 00:33:11,428
The Press: Jay,
following on what

729
00:33:11,428 --> 00:33:14,161
you told Peter about the Arizona
law, you said you don't

730
00:33:14,161 --> 00:33:15,361
weigh in on
every state law.

731
00:33:15,361 --> 00:33:18,061
Why then is the Attorney
General telling state

732
00:33:18,061 --> 00:33:20,428
attorneys general today,
you do not have to defend

733
00:33:20,428 --> 00:33:23,394
laws banning same-sex

734
00:33:23,394 --> 00:33:25,194
marriage in individual states.

735
00:33:25,194 --> 00:33:27,928
If those laws are onerous,
discriminatory, you don't

736
00:33:27,928 --> 00:33:30,361
like them, why don't you
work to overturn them?

737
00:33:30,361 --> 00:33:32,194
Why is the Attorney
General telling other

738
00:33:32,194 --> 00:33:33,994
attorneys general,
don't defend the law?

739
00:33:34,928 --> 00:33:35,928
Mr. Carney:
Well, two things.

740
00:33:35,928 --> 00:33:37,594
The Attorney General was
clear that any decision

741
00:33:37,594 --> 00:33:40,628
not to defend individual
laws must be "exceedingly

742
00:33:40,628 --> 00:33:43,226
rare," in his quotes,
and be based

743
00:33:43,227 --> 00:33:45,127
on "firm constitutional grounds".

744
00:33:45,528 --> 00:33:50,628
As you know -- and I think
this goes to the first

745
00:33:50,628 --> 00:33:53,961
part of your question --
prior to the Supreme Court

746
00:33:53,961 --> 00:33:56,494
on DOMA, the President
determined that

747
00:33:56,494 --> 00:33:59,428
Section 3 of DOMA is
unconstitutional and that

748
00:33:59,428 --> 00:34:03,294
his administration would
no longer defend equal

749
00:34:03,294 --> 00:34:06,895
protection challenges
against it in the courts.

750
00:34:06,895 --> 00:34:10,094
So the Attorney
General's views --

751
00:34:10,460 --> 00:34:12,293
The Press: So can't
individual states decide

752
00:34:12,293 --> 00:34:13,393
whether they think
it's

753
00:34:13,393 --> 00:34:14,393
constitutional or unconstitutional?

754
00:34:15,094 --> 00:34:18,261
Mr. Carney: I'm not
aware that -- while I'm

755
00:34:18,261 --> 00:34:20,960
not a lawyer, but I'm not
sure that states decide

756
00:34:20,960 --> 00:34:21,960
what's constitutional.

757
00:34:21,960 --> 00:34:22,960
The Press: Can I ask
you about health care?

758
00:34:22,960 --> 00:34:25,928
Secretary Sebelius was on
HuffPost Live today, was

759
00:34:25,928 --> 00:34:28,261
asked about the original
goal of 7 million new

760
00:34:28,261 --> 00:34:30,895
enrollees by the end of
March, would you still hit

761
00:34:30,895 --> 00:34:33,293
that, and she said,
"Certainly hope so."

762
00:34:33,293 --> 00:34:36,194
So I wonder -- she
wouldn't give

763
00:34:36,194 --> 00:34:37,194
a specific number.

764
00:34:37,194 --> 00:34:39,293
But she said I hope
we hit that target.

765
00:34:39,293 --> 00:34:42,060
Is 7 million still the
goal, or the 5 million,

766
00:34:42,061 --> 00:34:44,561
6 million goal that the
Vice President said?

767
00:34:45,494 --> 00:34:46,728
Mr. Carney: I'd say
a couple of things, Ed.

768
00:34:46,728 --> 00:34:50,027
I think what Secretary
Sebelius was reflecting

769
00:34:50,027 --> 00:34:53,428
is that we don't have a
specific numerical

770
00:34:53,428 --> 00:34:54,627
goal in the sense that --

771
00:34:54,895 --> 00:34:55,895
The Press: You
did months ago.

772
00:34:55,895 --> 00:34:56,895
Mr. Carney: Well, I'm
happy

773
00:34:56,895 --> 00:34:58,194
to go through

774
00:34:58,194 --> 00:34:59,895
that again, but the --

775
00:34:59,895 --> 00:35:00,895
The Press: And
you put out a --

776
00:35:00,895 --> 00:35:01,895
Mr. Carney: Hold on, hold
on, Ed, let me get through

777
00:35:01,895 --> 00:35:02,895
my sentence.

778
00:35:02,895 --> 00:35:05,194
That there's not a
specific number that we

779
00:35:05,194 --> 00:35:06,895
hit and suddenly it's a
success,

780
00:35:06,895 --> 00:35:10,561
and below that by one or five or
20 and it doesn't work.

781
00:35:10,561 --> 00:35:14,895
The important factors
here are that there's

782
00:35:14,895 --> 00:35:17,328
a substantial number of
people,

783
00:35:17,328 --> 00:35:19,861
in the millions, who enroll.

784
00:35:19,861 --> 00:35:24,728
We are very confident
we will reach that goal.

785
00:35:24,728 --> 00:35:26,928
Also important is that
there's a good mix

786
00:35:26,928 --> 00:35:31,361
demographically who have
enrolled, and we believe

787
00:35:31,361 --> 00:35:33,728
based on the data we've
seen thus far, and based

788
00:35:33,728 --> 00:35:35,795
on the experience that
Massachusetts had, the

789
00:35:35,795 --> 00:35:39,394
closest thing to a model
and precursor to the

790
00:35:39,394 --> 00:35:41,861
Affordable Care Act at a
state level, that we will

791
00:35:41,861 --> 00:35:45,227
achieve that necessary
demographic mix for the

792
00:35:45,227 --> 00:35:46,461
exchanges to
work effectively.

793
00:35:46,461 --> 00:35:51,493
When it comes to the 7
million target that CBO

794
00:35:51,494 --> 00:35:53,394
simply said was what they
believed based on their

795
00:35:53,394 --> 00:35:56,961
analysis we would reach,
and that it's true other

796
00:35:56,961 --> 00:35:58,993
administration officials
then said we hoped

797
00:35:58,994 --> 00:36:00,428
we would achieve that,
I think what

798
00:36:00,428 --> 00:36:03,694
the Vice President said reflects
our basic view

799
00:36:03,695 --> 00:36:08,194
that we're going to get a lot of
folks

800
00:36:08,194 --> 00:36:09,895
by the March 31st deadline.

801
00:36:10,127 --> 00:36:12,094
You won't hear me or the
Secretary or anybody else

802
00:36:12,094 --> 00:36:13,695
say it's going to be
this number

803
00:36:13,695 --> 00:36:14,795
or over that number.

804
00:36:14,795 --> 00:36:18,795
We're confident that the
website has been working

805
00:36:18,795 --> 00:36:21,094
effectively for the vast
majority of the American

806
00:36:21,094 --> 00:36:23,261
people who want to avail
themselves of it in order

807
00:36:23,261 --> 00:36:29,461
to purchase insurance,
and that the numbers

808
00:36:29,461 --> 00:36:33,428
that we've seen put us on
track,

809
00:36:33,428 --> 00:36:38,694
as long as we do our jobs well,
to achieve the goal

810
00:36:38,695 --> 00:36:40,928
of a substantial number in the
millions of Americans.

811
00:36:41,661 --> 00:36:43,628
The Press: Last one:
CMS had a report from the

812
00:36:43,628 --> 00:36:45,828
administration in the last
few days about the impact

813
00:36:45,828 --> 00:36:48,294
on small businesses of the
health care law, and they

814
00:36:48,294 --> 00:36:50,227
pointed out that the
impact on large companies

815
00:36:50,227 --> 00:36:52,694
will be negligible, there
will not be a huge impact.

816
00:36:52,695 --> 00:36:55,027
But on small businesses,
they said nearly

817
00:36:55,027 --> 00:36:57,394
two-thirds of them will
pay more for coverage.

818
00:36:57,394 --> 00:36:59,227
Since this is the
administration saying

819
00:36:59,227 --> 00:37:00,728
this, is that
not concerning?

820
00:37:01,628 --> 00:37:03,461
Mr. Carney: Well, of
course, the truth about

821
00:37:03,461 --> 00:37:06,993
what the CMS evaluated was
one provision

822
00:37:06,994 --> 00:37:10,061
or one of three -- they looked
at three provisions within

823
00:37:10,061 --> 00:37:12,061
the law, just
three, not the rest.

824
00:37:12,061 --> 00:37:14,027
And only one of them has
a measurable

825
00:37:14,027 --> 00:37:15,161
impact on premiums.

826
00:37:15,161 --> 00:37:16,661
So they didn't look at the
whole impact

827
00:37:16,661 --> 00:37:18,695
of the law and on the one
provision,

828
00:37:18,695 --> 00:37:26,161
they showed the result that you just mentioned.

829
00:37:26,161 --> 00:37:28,628
But this is another
Republicans cherry-picking

830
00:37:28,628 --> 00:37:29,828
data to tell half the
story

831
00:37:29,828 --> 00:37:31,194
about the Affordable Care Act.

832
00:37:31,895 --> 00:37:32,428
The Press: But it's
an administration report.

833
00:37:32,428 --> 00:37:32,627
Why wouldn't they
look at the whole law?

834
00:37:33,294 --> 00:37:34,094
Mr. Carney: Well,
I think

835
00:37:34,094 --> 00:37:36,261
it was an administration report
requested and now

836
00:37:36,261 --> 00:37:38,194
highlighted by
Republicans, again

837
00:37:38,194 --> 00:37:39,361
narrowly looking at one
provision,

838
00:37:39,361 --> 00:37:44,661
which was the requirement that
insurance companies no longer,

839
00:37:44,661 --> 00:37:47,728
in terms of setting their
premiums, advantage

840
00:37:47,728 --> 00:37:50,628
seniors over young
people and the like.

841
00:37:50,628 --> 00:37:55,828
So the fact is the net
impact, we believe,

842
00:37:55,828 --> 00:37:56,828
will be positive.

843
00:37:56,828 --> 00:37:58,294
And the report itself
clearly states several

844
00:37:58,294 --> 00:38:01,493
times that its results are
incomplete and overstated,

845
00:38:01,494 --> 00:38:03,194
only looks at the impact
of certain parts

846
00:38:03,194 --> 00:38:04,628
of the law, not the
law as a whole.

847
00:38:04,928 --> 00:38:07,060
Other studies that did
look at the impact

848
00:38:07,061 --> 00:38:09,961
of the law as a whole found that
the impact on premiums

849
00:38:09,961 --> 00:38:12,428
would be minimal and the
benefits to employers

850
00:38:12,428 --> 00:38:14,261
and to workers would be
significant -- here are

851
00:38:14,261 --> 00:38:17,161
some examples of
provisions in the ACA that

852
00:38:17,161 --> 00:38:19,261
help to lower costs.

853
00:38:19,261 --> 00:38:20,761
In other words, I mean,
the point is they looked

854
00:38:20,761 --> 00:38:24,194
at one thing that in
isolation would have

855
00:38:24,194 --> 00:38:27,761
the effect of raising premiums
for some individuals

856
00:38:27,761 --> 00:38:29,161
without looking at all the
other aspects

857
00:38:29,161 --> 00:38:32,528
of the law that would actually
produce a downward effect

858
00:38:32,528 --> 00:38:35,227
on premiums -- tax credits
for small businesses,

859
00:38:35,227 --> 00:38:37,493
the medical loss ratio, rate
review, more purchasing

860
00:38:37,494 --> 00:38:39,761
power, more competition
between insurers -- all of

861
00:38:39,761 --> 00:38:43,127
those elements of the law
have the opposite effect.

862
00:38:43,127 --> 00:38:45,328
So again, when looked at
in whole,

863
00:38:45,328 --> 00:38:47,594
which is how we tend to do it,
as opposed to those who want

864
00:38:47,594 --> 00:38:52,061
to repeal the law or sabotage
it or undermine it --

865
00:38:52,061 --> 00:38:55,828
looked at a whole, we
believe the impact on

866
00:38:55,828 --> 00:38:58,094
premiums would be minimal
and the benefits to

867
00:38:58,094 --> 00:39:00,461
employers would be and
will be significant.

868
00:39:01,561 --> 00:39:04,461
The Press: You just
told Ed that the ACA was

869
00:39:04,461 --> 00:39:06,660
achieving a good
demographic mix, which

870
00:39:06,661 --> 00:39:09,161
runs counter to everything
we've heard -- skewing

871
00:39:09,161 --> 00:39:10,461
older, we understand.

872
00:39:10,461 --> 00:39:12,993
And you've got people out
there pushing very hard to

873
00:39:12,994 --> 00:39:14,795
get younger people
in is because they're

874
00:39:14,795 --> 00:39:15,795
underrepresented.

875
00:39:16,094 --> 00:39:17,094
Mr. Carney: Well,
actually that's a

876
00:39:17,094 --> 00:39:19,561
misrepresentation
of the facts so far.

877
00:39:19,561 --> 00:39:21,394
Where we are in terms
of -- based on the data

878
00:39:21,394 --> 00:39:24,560
that's come out in terms
of young Americans, young

879
00:39:24,561 --> 00:39:26,828
people signing up for ACA,
is consistent with where

880
00:39:26,828 --> 00:39:28,795
Massachusetts was, A.

881
00:39:28,795 --> 00:39:32,328
B, consistent with where
Massachusetts was, young

882
00:39:32,328 --> 00:39:35,194
people tend to be late
signers-up,

883
00:39:35,194 --> 00:39:36,761
they tend to come at this very late.

884
00:39:36,761 --> 00:39:39,361
And hence, as we
telegraphed way

885
00:39:39,361 --> 00:39:41,161
in advance, there is an
enormous effort

886
00:39:41,161 --> 00:39:45,294
aimed at reaching young people
to make sure they are aware

887
00:39:45,294 --> 00:39:46,661
of all the options
available to them,

888
00:39:46,661 --> 00:39:49,761
make sure they are aware of the
wisdom of having health

889
00:39:49,761 --> 00:39:52,227
insurance and aware of
the fact that they're not

890
00:39:52,227 --> 00:39:55,294
invincible just because
they sometimes feel like

891
00:39:55,294 --> 00:39:58,161
they are because they're
young and they don't have

892
00:39:58,161 --> 00:40:00,594
the aches and pains that
you and I have some days.

893
00:40:00,594 --> 00:40:03,361
They're going to need
health insurance and some

894
00:40:03,361 --> 00:40:05,094
of them will need
it right away.

895
00:40:05,094 --> 00:40:06,594
So that campaign
is underway.

896
00:40:06,594 --> 00:40:09,628
But we feel, based on the
data that we've seen and

897
00:40:09,628 --> 00:40:12,094
has been released, that we
are on track

898
00:40:12,094 --> 00:40:13,795
to have the demographic mix
that we need.

899
00:40:14,294 --> 00:40:15,461
The Press: That means
you don't have it yet.

900
00:40:15,994 --> 00:40:16,994
Mr. Carney: Well, no.

901
00:40:16,994 --> 00:40:18,728
It's February and the
deadline is March 31st.

902
00:40:18,728 --> 00:40:19,728
The Press: Young people
are all going

903
00:40:19,728 --> 00:40:20,728
to sign up later?

904
00:40:20,728 --> 00:40:26,061
Mr. Carney: I think
that it is -- I can say

905
00:40:26,061 --> 00:40:29,494
with great confidence,
based on an enormous body

906
00:40:29,494 --> 00:40:32,695
of evidence when it comes
to deadlines of this

907
00:40:32,695 --> 00:40:35,461
nature and open enrollment
periods for a general

908
00:40:35,461 --> 00:40:39,895
population, that people
tend to sign up in surges

909
00:40:39,895 --> 00:40:43,194
towards the end of open
enrollment periods.

910
00:40:43,194 --> 00:40:44,194
That's just a fact.

911
00:40:44,194 --> 00:40:45,361
We saw that at the
end of December.

912
00:40:45,361 --> 00:40:47,428
And young people in
particular are more prone

913
00:40:47,428 --> 00:40:49,027
to wait until
the last minute.

914
00:40:49,027 --> 00:40:51,394
I think you don't have to
be a sociologist

915
00:40:51,394 --> 00:40:52,394
to know that.

916
00:40:52,394 --> 00:40:53,394
You just have
to be a parent.

917
00:40:53,394 --> 00:40:56,961
The Press: Chairman
Camp either has or is

918
00:40:56,961 --> 00:41:02,461
about to release his tax
program, which, as we've

919
00:41:02,461 --> 00:41:05,493
heard, two brackets, 10
and 25 percent,

920
00:41:05,494 --> 00:41:08,895
with a 10 percent surtax
on large earners.

921
00:41:08,895 --> 00:41:11,027
Is this something that the
White House has seen,

922
00:41:11,027 --> 00:41:13,127
is interested in,
could get behind?

923
00:41:14,161 --> 00:41:16,227
Mr. Carney: Well, we
haven't seen the proposal.

924
00:41:16,227 --> 00:41:18,828
We've certainly seen a
couple of news articles

925
00:41:18,828 --> 00:41:20,661
about it or
reports about it.

926
00:41:20,661 --> 00:41:21,961
So I don't have a comment
on something

927
00:41:21,961 --> 00:41:22,961
we haven't seen.

928
00:41:22,961 --> 00:41:24,861
But what I can say is that
the President has been

929
00:41:24,861 --> 00:41:26,728
clear about
his principles.

930
00:41:26,728 --> 00:41:28,094
He fought to keep taxes
low

931
00:41:28,094 --> 00:41:29,628
for 98 percent of Americans.

932
00:41:29,628 --> 00:41:32,761
He fought and succeeded in
making permanent a tax cut

933
00:41:32,761 --> 00:41:35,094
for middle-class
Americans.

934
00:41:35,094 --> 00:41:39,728
He fought and succeeded to
return marginal rates for

935
00:41:39,728 --> 00:41:41,461
millionaires and
billionaires back to what

936
00:41:41,461 --> 00:41:44,660
they were under President
Clinton, and he succeeded

937
00:41:44,661 --> 00:41:45,661
in doing that.

938
00:41:45,661 --> 00:41:48,594
He laid out a corporate
tax reform plan that would

939
00:41:48,594 --> 00:41:50,594
close loopholes to make
our businesses more

940
00:41:50,594 --> 00:41:52,628
competitive and use
savings through the

941
00:41:52,628 --> 00:41:54,761
process of closing
loopholes to modernize our

942
00:41:54,761 --> 00:41:58,661
infrastructure and invest
in what we need to grow.

943
00:41:58,661 --> 00:42:01,361
He will continue to take
steps to promote economic

944
00:42:01,361 --> 00:42:03,294
security for the middle
class and opportunity for

945
00:42:03,294 --> 00:42:04,294
all.

946
00:42:04,294 --> 00:42:05,294
That's the
President's approach.

947
00:42:05,294 --> 00:42:07,728
I don't have a response
to a tax proposal

948
00:42:07,728 --> 00:42:08,728
that we haven't seen.

949
00:42:08,728 --> 00:42:09,728
Alexis.

950
00:42:09,728 --> 00:42:10,728
The Press: Jay, last
year the President was

951
00:42:10,728 --> 00:42:16,127
sensitive publicly to
Speaker Boehner's --

952
00:42:16,127 --> 00:42:19,328
I guess, the pressure on
him

953
00:42:19,328 --> 00:42:21,661
if the two of them met publicly
or were seen publicly.

954
00:42:21,661 --> 00:42:23,895
The President actually
even joked about it and he

955
00:42:23,895 --> 00:42:25,861
wanted to give the
Speaker some running room

956
00:42:25,861 --> 00:42:27,594
especially on
immigration reform.

957
00:42:27,594 --> 00:42:30,227
The fact that the two of
them met today,

958
00:42:30,227 --> 00:42:33,094
does it signal that the
President believes the Speaker

959
00:42:33,094 --> 00:42:36,194
is in a stronger place to work
together on legislation,

960
00:42:36,194 --> 00:42:38,594
or that immigration reform
is going to have

961
00:42:38,594 --> 00:42:40,094
to wait for a new Congress?

962
00:42:40,461 --> 00:42:46,493
Mr. Carney: I would
say, Alexis, that the

963
00:42:46,494 --> 00:42:49,461
President asked for the
meeting with the Speaker

964
00:42:49,461 --> 00:42:51,060
and was glad to have the
meeting with the Speaker.

965
00:42:51,061 --> 00:42:52,461
It was a good and
constructive meeting in

966
00:42:52,461 --> 00:42:54,828
which they discussed a
range of topics,

967
00:42:54,828 --> 00:43:00,628
focused on those areas where
here in Washington we either

968
00:43:00,628 --> 00:43:04,094
need to take action or
where we should take

969
00:43:04,094 --> 00:43:06,895
action in order to expand
opportunity

970
00:43:06,895 --> 00:43:10,027
and reward hard work for
middle-class Americans.

971
00:43:10,027 --> 00:43:13,194
I don't think the more
nuanced analysis

972
00:43:13,194 --> 00:43:14,194
of that played into the meeting.

973
00:43:14,194 --> 00:43:15,428
It was just a meeting.

974
00:43:15,428 --> 00:43:20,294
And I think there is --
going to my response

975
00:43:20,294 --> 00:43:24,795
to a question earlier, whether
it's the Speaker

976
00:43:24,795 --> 00:43:29,094
or another Republican leader,
there has not been a lack

977
00:43:29,094 --> 00:43:32,928
of conversations and
meetings between the

978
00:43:32,928 --> 00:43:35,394
President and Republican
leaders, or senior members

979
00:43:35,394 --> 00:43:38,895
of the President's team
and Republican leaders

980
00:43:38,895 --> 00:43:44,194
that is the cause for
our failure to achieve

981
00:43:44,194 --> 00:43:45,194
everything we need
to achieve

982
00:43:45,194 --> 00:43:46,194
here in Washington.

983
00:43:46,194 --> 00:43:49,027
I think as many of you
in this room have amply

984
00:43:49,027 --> 00:43:51,594
documented in your
reporting, there has been

985
00:43:51,594 --> 00:43:59,194
enormous resistance to
compromise, largely driven

986
00:43:59,194 --> 00:44:02,795
by one faction of one
House -- of one party in

987
00:44:02,795 --> 00:44:03,861
one House of Congress.

988
00:44:03,861 --> 00:44:06,428
But even when it comes
to the so-called grand

989
00:44:06,428 --> 00:44:08,728
bargain that Jon was
asking about earlier, the

990
00:44:08,728 --> 00:44:12,394
President -- we spend a
lot of time meeting with

991
00:44:12,394 --> 00:44:14,660
Republican senators -- so
not even in the House, but

992
00:44:14,661 --> 00:44:19,928
Republican senators --
that we and you had hoped

993
00:44:19,928 --> 00:44:24,227
would be open to taking a
compromise approach, and

994
00:44:24,227 --> 00:44:26,560
all those efforts resulted

995
00:44:26,561 --> 00:44:28,594
in not a single proposal from Republicans.

996
00:44:28,628 --> 00:44:32,494
So the President's
good-faith proposal

997
00:44:32,494 --> 00:44:35,994
remains on the table
on that broader issue.

998
00:44:35,994 --> 00:44:38,194
And meanwhile, we're just
going to continue to work

999
00:44:38,194 --> 00:44:39,761
with Congress to get the
things done that we can

1000
00:44:39,761 --> 00:44:40,761
get done.

1001
00:44:40,761 --> 00:44:43,895
And when Congress won't,
or where the President has

1002
00:44:43,895 --> 00:44:48,761
unique powers or authority
to advance an agenda using

1003
00:44:48,761 --> 00:44:50,194
his pen or his phone,
he's going to do that.

1004
00:44:51,294 --> 00:44:52,828
The Press: Can I just
follow up and ask you,

1005
00:44:52,828 --> 00:44:54,461
in all seriousness, when you
say it was just

1006
00:44:54,461 --> 00:44:57,928
a meeting but you also say it
was a very useful conversation,

1007
00:44:57,928 --> 00:45:01,094
what was particularly
useful about

1008
00:45:01,094 --> 00:45:03,094
the two of them meeting face to face?

1009
00:45:03,361 --> 00:45:09,194
Mr. Carney: Alexis,
I would simply

1010
00:45:09,194 --> 00:45:10,227
say two things.

1011
00:45:10,227 --> 00:45:13,828
As I noted earlier, we
don't read out every

1012
00:45:13,828 --> 00:45:17,061
meeting and conversation
that the President has.

1013
00:45:17,061 --> 00:45:19,895
And two, this particular
meeting was

1014
00:45:19,895 --> 00:45:22,961
good and constructive and it, as
I think both sides have

1015
00:45:22,961 --> 00:45:24,660
said, covered a
range of topics.

1016
00:45:25,695 --> 00:45:27,027
The Press: Were there
other people

1017
00:45:27,027 --> 00:45:28,094
in the meeting?

1018
00:45:28,094 --> 00:45:30,061
Who else was
in the meeting?

1019
00:45:30,061 --> 00:45:31,061
Where did they
get together?

1020
00:45:31,061 --> 00:45:32,528
Mr. Carney: I believe
Katie Beirne Fallon,

1021
00:45:32,528 --> 00:45:34,461
our Legislative Affairs
Director,

1022
00:45:34,461 --> 00:45:35,461
was in the meeting.

1023
00:45:35,461 --> 00:45:36,993
I'm not sure if
anybody else was.

1024
00:45:36,994 --> 00:45:38,728
But we'll get
that for you.

1025
00:45:38,728 --> 00:45:39,728
The Press: In the Oval?

1026
00:45:39,728 --> 00:45:40,728
Mr. Carney:
In the Oval, yes.

1027
00:45:42,027 --> 00:45:43,027
The Press: Jay,
a couple questions.

1028
00:45:43,027 --> 00:45:45,361
On demographics for young
people, I just wanted to

1029
00:45:45,361 --> 00:45:46,361
get a sense.

1030
00:45:46,361 --> 00:45:48,428
So right now, according to
the most recent stats, I

1031
00:45:48,428 --> 00:45:50,861
think we stand around 27
percent of the enrollees.

1032
00:45:50,861 --> 00:45:52,261
General experts have
talked about needing

1033
00:45:52,261 --> 00:45:54,294
40 percent of enrollees
to be young people.

1034
00:45:54,294 --> 00:45:55,594
Could you just
define success?

1035
00:45:56,361 --> 00:45:58,127
Mr. Carney: No, I think
that the general experts

1036
00:45:58,127 --> 00:45:59,928
have said that 40
percent of people

1037
00:45:59,928 --> 00:46:01,461
who are uninsured are
young people.

1038
00:46:01,461 --> 00:46:03,828
That's a little different
from what you would need

1039
00:46:03,828 --> 00:46:06,027
for the exchanges to have
the demographic

1040
00:46:06,027 --> 00:46:08,261
mix that's necessary for them to
function effectively.

1041
00:46:08,261 --> 00:46:10,861
So if you look at the
Massachusetts experience,

1042
00:46:10,861 --> 00:46:13,194
the fact that 27 percent,
as you identify,

1043
00:46:13,194 --> 00:46:15,394
is roughly where we are
now, that is entirely

1044
00:46:15,394 --> 00:46:18,727
consistent with where
Massachusetts was.

1045
00:46:18,728 --> 00:46:19,728
And we remain --

1046
00:46:19,728 --> 00:46:22,027
The Press: At the end
of the process or at this

1047
00:46:22,027 --> 00:46:23,027
point in the process?

1048
00:46:23,461 --> 00:46:24,694
Mr. Carney: At this
point in the process.

1049
00:46:24,695 --> 00:46:28,661
And we remain hopeful and
optimistic that, not least

1050
00:46:28,661 --> 00:46:30,361
because of the efforts
that are being undertaken

1051
00:46:30,361 --> 00:46:33,294
to reach out to folks
around the country,

1052
00:46:33,294 --> 00:46:38,060
that come March 31st, we will
have a demographic mix

1053
00:46:38,061 --> 00:46:41,494
that will meet the
criteria necessary

1054
00:46:41,494 --> 00:46:42,594
to have effective exchanges.

1055
00:46:42,594 --> 00:46:44,594
The Press: And then
on wildfires, I was just

1056
00:46:44,594 --> 00:46:46,328
wondering, given that
you have a new budgetary

1057
00:46:46,328 --> 00:46:48,194
proposal and that came up
at the meeting

1058
00:46:48,194 --> 00:46:51,127
with the Speaker, can you
describe to what extent

1059
00:46:51,127 --> 00:46:53,027
he seemed open to that proposal,
which obviously would

1060
00:46:53,027 --> 00:46:54,027
require action
by Congress?

1061
00:46:54,494 --> 00:46:56,428
Mr. Carney: I wouldn't
characterize on behalf of

1062
00:46:56,428 --> 00:46:57,528
the Speaker his views.

1063
00:46:57,528 --> 00:47:01,194
I would simply concur that
it came up in the meeting.

1064
00:47:01,194 --> 00:47:05,795
I laid out in some detail
yesterday in the briefing

1065
00:47:05,795 --> 00:47:10,561
what the President's
approach is, essentially

1066
00:47:10,561 --> 00:47:16,528
acknowledging that these
severe wildfires create

1067
00:47:16,528 --> 00:47:19,895
extraordinary emergencies
and that we have been

1068
00:47:19,895 --> 00:47:22,594
in funding suppression
efforts --

1069
00:47:22,594 --> 00:47:27,661
basically stealing from one fund
in order to deal

1070
00:47:27,661 --> 00:47:30,294
with suppression -- and
therefore leaving us short

1071
00:47:30,294 --> 00:47:31,294
in a fund that is meant

1072
00:47:31,294 --> 00:47:33,560
to provide mitigation efforts.

1073
00:47:33,561 --> 00:47:36,294
So because of that, the
President is taking the

1074
00:47:36,294 --> 00:47:37,895
approach that
he is taking.

1075
00:47:37,895 --> 00:47:39,928
Yes, Peter.

1076
00:47:39,928 --> 00:47:41,161
The Press: Back on
Afghanistan

1077
00:47:41,161 --> 00:47:42,795
and the call today.

1078
00:47:42,795 --> 00:47:46,494
To what extent was it
timed to allow Defense

1079
00:47:46,494 --> 00:47:49,795
Secretary Hagel to put the
zero option more fully on

1080
00:47:49,795 --> 00:47:53,328
the table when he meets
with his fellow NATO

1081
00:47:53,328 --> 00:47:54,361
colleagues in Brussels?

1082
00:47:55,494 --> 00:47:56,561
Mr. Carney: Well,
I think part of that

1083
00:47:56,561 --> 00:47:59,828
sentence reflects
the timing.

1084
00:47:59,828 --> 00:48:03,528
One of the reasons for the
call earlier this week

1085
00:48:03,528 --> 00:48:05,694
is because Secretary Hagel
will be participating

1086
00:48:05,695 --> 00:48:08,428
in the NATO Defense
Ministerial later this

1087
00:48:08,428 --> 00:48:13,227
week, and obviously
planning for a potential

1088
00:48:13,227 --> 00:48:16,728
post-2014 force is
something that

1089
00:48:16,728 --> 00:48:20,328
will be on the agenda at that
NATO Defense Ministerial.

1090
00:48:20,328 --> 00:48:23,294
So that relates
to the timing.

1091
00:48:23,294 --> 00:48:30,361
Again, the prospect of no
troops beyond the end of

1092
00:48:30,361 --> 00:48:36,094
this year has been on the
table in the sense that

1093
00:48:36,094 --> 00:48:39,294
for these past weeks
President Karzai

1094
00:48:39,294 --> 00:48:41,828
has been indicating that he's
unlikely to sign the BSA,

1095
00:48:41,828 --> 00:48:45,861
and absent a signed BSA,
we cannot

1096
00:48:45,861 --> 00:48:47,060
and will not have U.S.

1097
00:48:47,061 --> 00:48:49,728
or NATO troops in
Afghanistan and the longer

1098
00:48:49,728 --> 00:48:55,494
we go without the BSA
being signed the more real

1099
00:48:55,494 --> 00:48:56,795
that prospect becomes.

1100
00:48:56,795 --> 00:49:00,461
The planning for that
contingency is underway,

1101
00:49:00,461 --> 00:49:04,794
and I think that was
one of the messages

1102
00:49:04,795 --> 00:49:07,561
the President sought to convey
today to President Karzai.

1103
00:49:07,861 --> 00:49:09,161
The Press: Did he also
send him a message

1104
00:49:09,161 --> 00:49:10,528
about U.S. aid,

1105
00:49:10,528 --> 00:49:11,861
the future of U.S.

1106
00:49:11,861 --> 00:49:15,627
aid being contingent on
signing a BSA, as some in

1107
00:49:15,628 --> 00:49:16,761
Congress have demanded?

1108
00:49:17,261 --> 00:49:19,628
Mr. Carney: We gave a
fairly strong readout

1109
00:49:19,628 --> 00:49:21,027
and full readout of the call.

1110
00:49:21,027 --> 00:49:25,528
I think that we have made
clear that our commitment

1111
00:49:25,528 --> 00:49:30,328
to Afghanistan separate
from a potential troop

1112
00:49:30,328 --> 00:49:33,728
presence beyond 2014 is
in our national security

1113
00:49:33,728 --> 00:49:37,895
interests and continues.

1114
00:49:37,895 --> 00:49:42,394
So I don't have anything
further

1115
00:49:42,394 --> 00:49:49,261
as it relates to non-military
aid or funding that isn't

1116
00:49:49,261 --> 00:49:50,728
related to a military presence.

1117
00:49:51,227 --> 00:49:52,227
Jon-Christopher.

1118
00:49:52,361 --> 00:49:54,861
The Press: Jay, what
is the White House anxiety

1119
00:49:54,861 --> 00:49:56,627
level when it comes to the
next move

1120
00:49:56,628 --> 00:49:59,094
that President Putin may take
regarding Ukraine?

1121
00:50:00,928 --> 00:50:02,528
Mr. Carney:
Jon-Christopher, our views

1122
00:50:02,528 --> 00:50:07,394
on this remain what they
have been, which is that

1123
00:50:07,394 --> 00:50:14,026
we strongly believe that
it is in both Russia's and

1124
00:50:14,027 --> 00:50:18,227
Europe's interest that
there be a de-escalation

1125
00:50:18,227 --> 00:50:22,428
of violence in Ukraine;
that there be stability

1126
00:50:22,428 --> 00:50:26,795
restored in Ukraine; that
there be steps taken

1127
00:50:26,795 --> 00:50:30,194
to establish a unity
government, a multiparty

1128
00:50:30,194 --> 00:50:34,494
government, a technocratic
government that reflects

1129
00:50:34,494 --> 00:50:37,294
all sectors of Ukrainian
society; and that there

1130
00:50:37,294 --> 00:50:40,493
be early elections, which
would allow the country

1131
00:50:40,494 --> 00:50:44,094
to have a government that
broadly reflects

1132
00:50:44,094 --> 00:50:45,361
the will of the Ukrainian people.

1133
00:50:45,361 --> 00:50:46,828
In the meantime,
obviously, decisions need

1134
00:50:46,828 --> 00:50:51,928
to be made to ensure that
the economic piece

1135
00:50:51,928 --> 00:50:54,361
of that stability is achieved.

1136
00:50:54,361 --> 00:50:58,294
And we are, as I said
yesterday, working with

1137
00:50:58,294 --> 00:51:03,394
our partners and allies to
look at ways that we could

1138
00:51:03,394 --> 00:51:07,761
complement a potential IMF
effort along those lines.

1139
00:51:08,127 --> 00:51:11,227
When it comes to Russia,
as I said, we don't view

1140
00:51:11,227 --> 00:51:14,328
this as a binary
proposition.

1141
00:51:14,328 --> 00:51:18,294
The fact is Ukrainians
have expressed very

1142
00:51:18,294 --> 00:51:19,993
clearly over the past
weeks and months

1143
00:51:19,994 --> 00:51:26,328
that they desire greater
integration with Europe.

1144
00:51:26,328 --> 00:51:30,227
And if that is what they
desire, no other entity

1145
00:51:30,227 --> 00:51:33,895
should deny them that
opportunity -- no state or

1146
00:51:33,895 --> 00:51:36,661
other entity should deny
them that opportunity.

1147
00:51:36,661 --> 00:51:42,728
But it is not a
contradiction to say that

1148
00:51:42,728 --> 00:51:45,027
Ukraine can achieve that
further integration with

1149
00:51:45,027 --> 00:51:48,628
Europe that the Ukrainian
people desire while still

1150
00:51:48,628 --> 00:51:52,961
maintaining close,
historic and cultural and

1151
00:51:52,961 --> 00:51:55,593
economic ties to Russia.

1152
00:51:55,594 --> 00:51:59,795
We believe both are
possible and both reflect

1153
00:51:59,795 --> 00:52:02,628
Ukraine's history and the
desires today

1154
00:52:02,628 --> 00:52:03,695
of Ukraine's people.

1155
00:52:04,127 --> 00:52:05,394
The Press: Jay, as you
know --

1156
00:52:05,394 --> 00:52:08,761
you've spent a lot of time in
this region -- the Ukrainian

1157
00:52:08,761 --> 00:52:11,761
people are not solidified on
exactly which

1158
00:52:11,761 --> 00:52:12,828
way they want to go.

1159
00:52:12,828 --> 00:52:16,361
So where does the
White House --

1160
00:52:16,361 --> 00:52:18,461
Mr. Carney: Well,
I'm not sure --

1161
00:52:18,461 --> 00:52:20,361
The Press: There's the
East and there's

1162
00:52:20,361 --> 00:52:21,428
the West concept.

1163
00:52:21,561 --> 00:52:22,061
Mr. Carney: Sure.

1164
00:52:22,061 --> 00:52:22,928
I would say a
couple of things.

1165
00:52:22,928 --> 00:52:26,394
One, we strongly believe,
and believe that Europe

1166
00:52:26,394 --> 00:52:31,227
and Ukraine and Russia do
or ought

1167
00:52:31,227 --> 00:52:37,261
to share the view that Ukraine's
independence and

1168
00:52:37,261 --> 00:52:39,795
territorial integrity
and unity

1169
00:52:39,795 --> 00:52:42,261
needs to be preserved.

1170
00:52:42,261 --> 00:52:44,994
I would note that in
the actions taken

1171
00:52:44,994 --> 00:52:49,728
by parliament in the
last several days, the

1172
00:52:49,728 --> 00:52:53,661
substantial majorities
have included votes from

1173
00:52:53,661 --> 00:52:57,094
parliamentarians of
President Yanukovych's

1174
00:52:57,094 --> 00:52:58,227
party.

1175
00:52:58,227 --> 00:53:00,694
And that's not an
insignificant development.

1176
00:53:01,361 --> 00:53:05,328
So what is important going
forward is that Ukraine

1177
00:53:05,328 --> 00:53:06,861
take steps both in
the establishment

1178
00:53:06,861 --> 00:53:09,661
of a technocratic unity
government and then

1179
00:53:09,661 --> 00:53:13,628
through the process of
free and fair elections

1180
00:53:13,628 --> 00:53:17,061
that ensure that the
government of Ukraine in

1181
00:53:17,061 --> 00:53:19,994
the future reflects the
will of all the Ukrainian

1182
00:53:19,994 --> 00:53:23,928
people and allows for the
voices of all the people

1183
00:53:23,928 --> 00:53:25,694
of Ukraine to be heard.

1184
00:53:25,695 --> 00:53:27,361
Jessica.

1185
00:53:27,361 --> 00:53:30,661
The Press: The State
Department has confirmed

1186
00:53:30,661 --> 00:53:33,027
that the United States has
expelled three Venezuelan

1187
00:53:33,027 --> 00:53:35,027
diplomats to the
embassy here.

1188
00:53:35,027 --> 00:53:37,861
President Maduro says he
plans to nominate a new

1189
00:53:37,861 --> 00:53:40,627
ambassador to Washington
and improve the American

1190
00:53:40,628 --> 00:53:41,961
perception of him.

1191
00:53:41,961 --> 00:53:44,127
Does the White House
welcome that, especially

1192
00:53:44,127 --> 00:53:45,728
given the enormous oil
trade relationship?

1193
00:53:45,728 --> 00:53:48,194
And of course, with all
the protests there,

1194
00:53:48,194 --> 00:53:48,828
does the U.S.

1195
00:53:48,828 --> 00:53:50,728
want the relationship
diplomatically?

1196
00:53:51,795 --> 00:53:53,194
Mr. Carney: Well, I
appreciate the question.

1197
00:53:53,194 --> 00:53:54,194
I'd say a couple
of things.

1198
00:53:54,194 --> 00:53:56,328
One, the United States did
declare three Venezuelan

1199
00:53:56,328 --> 00:54:00,027
diplomats PNG
yesterday evening.

1200
00:54:00,027 --> 00:54:02,428
That was a
reciprocal move.

1201
00:54:02,428 --> 00:54:03,694
This action was taken,
as I said, based on

1202
00:54:03,695 --> 00:54:07,761
reciprocity for the
February 17 expulsion of

1203
00:54:07,761 --> 00:54:08,828
three U.S.

1204
00:54:08,828 --> 00:54:10,828
consular officials
from Venezuela.

1205
00:54:12,261 --> 00:54:14,261
On the broader matter,
I would simply say that

1206
00:54:14,261 --> 00:54:17,561
President Maduro needs to
focus on addressing the

1207
00:54:17,561 --> 00:54:20,461
legitimate grievances
of the Venezuelan people

1208
00:54:20,461 --> 00:54:23,660
through meaningful
dialogue with them,

1209
00:54:23,661 --> 00:54:25,661
not through dialogue with
the United States.

1210
00:54:25,661 --> 00:54:27,861
Despite what the
Venezuelan government

1211
00:54:27,861 --> 00:54:29,795
would like to lead people
to believe,

1212
00:54:29,795 --> 00:54:32,061
this is not a U.S.-Venezuela issue.

1213
00:54:32,061 --> 00:54:35,127
It is an issue between
Venezuela and its people.

1214
00:54:35,127 --> 00:54:36,928
We've been clear all
along that the future

1215
00:54:36,928 --> 00:54:38,928
of Venezuela is for the
Venezuelan

1216
00:54:38,928 --> 00:54:39,895
people to decide.

1217
00:54:39,895 --> 00:54:41,328
And we have indicated our
readiness

1218
00:54:41,328 --> 00:54:43,761
to develop a more constructive
relationship with

1219
00:54:43,761 --> 00:54:44,861
Venezuela.

1220
00:54:44,861 --> 00:54:47,328
As we said many months
ago,

1221
00:54:47,328 --> 00:54:49,928
that could include an exchange of ambassadors.

1222
00:54:49,928 --> 00:54:52,394
Venezuela, however, needs
to show seriousness

1223
00:54:52,394 --> 00:54:55,694
for us to be able to
move forward.

1224
00:54:55,695 --> 00:54:57,394
Recent actions, including
expelling

1225
00:54:57,394 --> 00:55:00,060
three of our diplomats, continue
to make that difficult.

1226
00:55:00,094 --> 00:55:02,528
So I think the issues
right now for the

1227
00:55:02,528 --> 00:55:06,928
Venezuelan government have
to do with establishing

1228
00:55:06,928 --> 00:55:08,594
a dialogue with the
Venezuelan people.

1229
00:55:08,594 --> 00:55:10,227
This is not a
U.S.-Venezuelan issue.

1230
00:55:10,994 --> 00:55:11,994
I'll do that last one.

1231
00:55:11,994 --> 00:55:12,994
Dan, did you have any?

1232
00:55:13,461 --> 00:55:14,461
The Press:
Yes, on Iran.

1233
00:55:14,461 --> 00:55:16,928
I just wanted to ask you
about a couple statements

1234
00:55:16,928 --> 00:55:18,528
by Netanyahu before the
Merkel visit

1235
00:55:18,528 --> 00:55:20,394
and during the Merkel visit.

1236
00:55:20,394 --> 00:55:22,794
Before it, he said --
again, he said this before

1237
00:55:22,795 --> 00:55:24,761
that he believes Iran
has set out

1238
00:55:24,761 --> 00:55:27,027
to become a threshold power with

1239
00:55:27,027 --> 00:55:28,661
continuing enrichment capabilities.

1240
00:55:28,661 --> 00:55:34,194
And today I believe he
said that he's spoken

1241
00:55:34,194 --> 00:55:37,061
to -- all Middle East leaders
he's spoken to agree that

1242
00:55:37,061 --> 00:55:38,994
it was a mistake to go
on the course that the

1243
00:55:38,994 --> 00:55:39,961
P5-plus-1 have gone on.

1244
00:55:39,961 --> 00:55:40,761
Does the U.S.

1245
00:55:40,761 --> 00:55:43,628
disagree with that, that
Middle East leaders think

1246
00:55:43,628 --> 00:55:44,728
it was a mistake?

1247
00:55:44,728 --> 00:55:48,061
Has there been any headway
in some of the concerns

1248
00:55:48,061 --> 00:55:49,394
that the Gulf and Saudis
have,

1249
00:55:49,394 --> 00:55:50,493
with the Saudi Arabia trip coming up?

1250
00:55:51,494 --> 00:55:53,461
Mr. Carney: I hadn't
taken a survey

1251
00:55:53,461 --> 00:55:56,593
of Middle East opinion or the
opinion

1252
00:55:56,594 --> 00:55:58,461
of all Middle Eastern leaders.

1253
00:55:58,461 --> 00:56:04,093
I would say that, first,
the Joint Plan of Action

1254
00:56:04,094 --> 00:56:05,394
is an interim agreement
reached

1255
00:56:05,394 --> 00:56:11,361
by the P5-plus-1 that commits
Iran to freeze or roll back

1256
00:56:14,194 --> 00:56:18,294
aspects of its program
that allows

1257
00:56:18,294 --> 00:56:23,761
over a six-month period for the
negotiations towards

1258
00:56:23,761 --> 00:56:27,695
a comprehensive solution
to take place.

1259
00:56:27,695 --> 00:56:31,294
Getting that comprehensive
solution will surely

1260
00:56:31,294 --> 00:56:35,694
be difficult and it is far
from a guarantee,

1261
00:56:35,695 --> 00:56:38,928
but is absolutely the right
thing to do,

1262
00:56:38,928 --> 00:56:43,461
especially given the commitments
Iran had to make as part of the

1263
00:56:43,461 --> 00:56:46,361
Joint Plan of Action to
test whether or not Iran

1264
00:56:46,361 --> 00:56:50,294
is now ready to get right
with the international

1265
00:56:50,294 --> 00:56:52,394
community, comply with the
United Nations Security

1266
00:56:52,394 --> 00:56:56,627
Council resolutions,
and take steps to,

1267
00:56:56,628 --> 00:56:59,094
in a transparent and verifiable
way,

1268
00:56:59,094 --> 00:57:01,795
make clear to the world that it
is not pursuing

1269
00:57:01,795 --> 00:57:03,795
a nuclear weapon.

1270
00:57:03,795 --> 00:57:06,661
Our bottom-line proposal,
our position

1271
00:57:06,661 --> 00:57:09,795
is that Iran cannot have --
cannot acquire a nuclear weapon.

1272
00:57:09,795 --> 00:57:15,127
So the best way to achieve
that for the long term is

1273
00:57:15,127 --> 00:57:17,394
for Iran itself to
give up the effort.

1274
00:57:20,061 --> 00:57:24,428
But the President takes
no options off the table.

1275
00:57:24,428 --> 00:57:27,694
He simply believes that
given the commitments that

1276
00:57:27,695 --> 00:57:30,928
Iran has made and the
enforcement mechanisms and

1277
00:57:30,928 --> 00:57:33,361
verification mechanisms in
place that

1278
00:57:33,361 --> 00:57:36,161
we need to test whether or not a
comprehensive

1279
00:57:36,161 --> 00:57:37,161
solution is possible.

1280
00:57:37,161 --> 00:57:40,494
Because obviously
achieving

1281
00:57:40,494 --> 00:57:45,027
a nuclear-weapon-free
Iran through diplomatic

1282
00:57:45,027 --> 00:57:48,428
agreement that is
verifiable and transparent

1283
00:57:48,428 --> 00:57:55,761
is a far better outcome
than alternatives.

1284
00:57:55,761 --> 00:57:57,661
Thanks, all