English subtitles for clip: File:12-19-11- White House Press Briefing.webm

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
1
00:00:00,333 --> 00:00:01,400
Mr. Carney:
Good afternoon,
ladies and gentlemen.

2
00:00:01,400 --> 00:00:02,400
Thank you for your patience.

3
00:00:02,400 --> 00:00:04,433
Thanks for being here
for your daily briefing.

4
00:00:04,433 --> 00:00:08,065
I don't have any announcements,
so let's go straight

5
00:00:08,066 --> 00:00:09,500
to questions.

6
00:00:09,500 --> 00:00:10,700
Mr. Feller.

7
00:00:10,700 --> 00:00:11,433
The Press:
Thanks, Jay.

8
00:00:11,433 --> 00:00:14,934
I wanted to ask you about North
Korea and then move to the

9
00:00:14,934 --> 00:00:16,032
payroll tax.

10
00:00:16,033 --> 00:00:18,834
Is the President concerned at
all about the security of the

11
00:00:18,834 --> 00:00:21,734
nuclear arsenal in North Korea?

12
00:00:21,734 --> 00:00:26,367
And more broadly, does he see
this as a time of optimism or a

13
00:00:26,367 --> 00:00:29,767
time of concern?

14
00:00:29,767 --> 00:00:33,233
Mr. Carney:
Ben, the United States is
closely monitoring events in the

15
00:00:33,233 --> 00:00:36,500
aftermath of Kim
Jong-il's death.

16
00:00:36,500 --> 00:00:39,066
Our focus is on coordinating
closely with our allies

17
00:00:39,066 --> 00:00:41,033
and partners.

18
00:00:41,033 --> 00:00:43,467
We have reaffirmed our
unwavering commitment to the

19
00:00:43,467 --> 00:00:45,766
stability of the Korean
Peninsula and the security of

20
00:00:45,767 --> 00:00:49,734
our allies, South
Korea and Japan.

21
00:00:49,734 --> 00:00:52,367
The President, as you know,
has had a very close working

22
00:00:52,367 --> 00:00:54,400
relationship with President
Lee and spoke to him

23
00:00:54,400 --> 00:00:55,699
late last night.

24
00:00:55,700 --> 00:00:57,133
In addition to
that communication,

25
00:00:57,133 --> 00:00:59,367
Secretary Clinton,
Secretary Panetta,

26
00:00:59,367 --> 00:01:02,266
National Security
Advisor Tom Donilon,

27
00:01:02,266 --> 00:01:04,700
they have all spoken to their
counterparts in the Korean

28
00:01:04,700 --> 00:01:06,367
government, as have
our team on the ground,

29
00:01:06,367 --> 00:01:09,500
including our ambassador and
the head of U.S. Forces Korea.

30
00:01:09,500 --> 00:01:12,000
Secretary Clinton is meeting
today with the Japanese foreign

31
00:01:12,000 --> 00:01:15,033
minister, and we have also
consulted closely with a wide

32
00:01:15,033 --> 00:01:17,266
range of our
Japanese colleagues.

33
00:01:17,266 --> 00:01:20,834
In addition, we are in
touch with Russia and China,

34
00:01:20,834 --> 00:01:23,800
the two other members of
the six-party talks beyond

35
00:01:23,800 --> 00:01:24,800
North Korea.

36
00:01:24,800 --> 00:01:26,533
And President Obama has
been regularly briefed on

37
00:01:26,533 --> 00:01:27,600
the situation.

38
00:01:27,600 --> 00:01:34,500
As for the situation,
we're monitoring it.

39
00:01:34,500 --> 00:01:39,133
The succession that is in
place has been in place for a

40
00:01:39,133 --> 00:01:42,600
considerable period of time
now, and we're just closely

41
00:01:42,600 --> 00:01:43,866
monitoring the situation.

42
00:01:43,867 --> 00:01:48,734
The Press:
So as to concerns about their
nuclear stability right now?

43
00:01:48,734 --> 00:01:51,899
Mr. Carney:
I don't think we have any
additional concerns beyond the

44
00:01:51,900 --> 00:02:00,233
ones that we have long had
with North Korea's approach to

45
00:02:00,233 --> 00:02:01,233
nuclear issues.

46
00:02:01,233 --> 00:02:06,200
And we will continue to
press them to meet their

47
00:02:06,200 --> 00:02:07,800
international obligations.

48
00:02:07,800 --> 00:02:14,834
But I -- we have no new concerns
as a result of this event.

49
00:02:14,834 --> 00:02:17,300
The Press:
And based on what you're
hearing so far, I mean,

50
00:02:17,300 --> 00:02:21,867
clearly there is a transition
now -- is this a time --

51
00:02:21,867 --> 00:02:24,166
is this an opening from the
White House perspective for

52
00:02:24,166 --> 00:02:24,734
better days?

53
00:02:24,734 --> 00:02:27,066
Mr. Carney:
I think it's much too
early to make any kind of

54
00:02:27,066 --> 00:02:28,066
judgment like that.

55
00:02:28,066 --> 00:02:31,800
This is a period where North
Korea is in a period of

56
00:02:31,800 --> 00:02:36,567
national mourning.

57
00:02:36,567 --> 00:02:39,266
And we hope that the new North
Korean leadership will take the

58
00:02:39,266 --> 00:02:40,867
steps necessary
to support peace,

59
00:02:40,867 --> 00:02:44,299
prosperity and a better future
for the North Korean people,

60
00:02:44,300 --> 00:02:46,867
including, as I say,
acting on its commitment

61
00:02:46,867 --> 00:02:49,466
to denuclearization.

62
00:02:49,467 --> 00:02:50,467
The Press:
Okay, thank you.

63
00:02:50,467 --> 00:02:54,433
On the payroll tax, was the
White House ever given any

64
00:02:54,433 --> 00:03:00,466
assurance from the House that
this is something that it

65
00:03:00,467 --> 00:03:01,233
would support?

66
00:03:01,233 --> 00:03:02,900
When the President came
out and spoke on Saturday,

67
00:03:02,900 --> 00:03:07,533
did he think this was,
in essence, a done deal?

68
00:03:07,533 --> 00:03:12,466
Mr. Carney:
As you know, Ben, the President
worked closely with Senate

69
00:03:12,467 --> 00:03:16,834
leadership as it negotiated --
Senate Democratic leadership,

70
00:03:16,834 --> 00:03:19,567
with Senator Reid and others
-- negotiated with Republican

71
00:03:19,567 --> 00:03:24,433
leadership on a compromise
that won an overwhelming

72
00:03:24,433 --> 00:03:30,867
bipartisan support -- won
overwhelming bipartisan support

73
00:03:30,867 --> 00:03:34,767
in the Senate -- 89 to 10, 90%.

74
00:03:34,767 --> 00:03:42,100
More than 80% of Senate
Republicans voted for it.

75
00:03:42,100 --> 00:03:44,367
I do this sometimes, but I've
been here long enough to say

76
00:03:44,367 --> 00:03:47,899
that it has never been the case
that the Senate votes at 90%,

77
00:03:47,900 --> 00:03:51,533
with overwhelming majorities
from both parties,

78
00:03:51,533 --> 00:03:54,799
without communication with
their counterparts in the House.

79
00:03:54,800 --> 00:03:58,300
And it is certainly not for the
President to be the intermediary

80
00:03:58,300 --> 00:04:00,767
between Republican leaders
in the House and the Senate.

81
00:04:00,767 --> 00:04:03,333
It was certainly
our expectation,

82
00:04:03,333 --> 00:04:06,567
and we certainly had reason to
believe that there was support

83
00:04:06,567 --> 00:04:10,400
in the House for a measure that
would ensure that Americans

84
00:04:10,400 --> 00:04:14,800
didn't have their
taxes go up in 12 days.

85
00:04:14,800 --> 00:04:19,133
Not only did we have reason
to believe that because of the

86
00:04:19,132 --> 00:04:24,767
nature of the negotiations that
were taking place on Capitol

87
00:04:24,767 --> 00:04:28,332
Hill, but, as many
of you have reported,

88
00:04:28,333 --> 00:04:33,767
the Speaker of the House, in
his conference call with House

89
00:04:33,767 --> 00:04:37,467
Republicans, urged them
to support this measure,

90
00:04:37,467 --> 00:04:40,900
said it was a victory and
the right thing to do.

91
00:04:40,900 --> 00:04:43,200
So he was for it before
he was against it.

92
00:04:43,200 --> 00:04:44,767
The Press:
Well, he disputes that.

93
00:04:44,767 --> 00:04:48,567
Mr. Carney:
Well, again, I would cite the
numerous reports from your

94
00:04:48,567 --> 00:04:57,567
colleagues, citing Republicans
who were on the call making the

95
00:04:57,567 --> 00:04:59,500
opposite point.

96
00:04:59,500 --> 00:05:04,600
And again, I think the
broader issue here is,

97
00:05:04,600 --> 00:05:07,800
the President from the beginning
has been for a full-year payroll

98
00:05:07,800 --> 00:05:09,934
tax cut extension and expansion.

99
00:05:09,934 --> 00:05:15,400
It was in the American Jobs Act,
and that was put on the table

100
00:05:15,400 --> 00:05:16,400
back in September.

101
00:05:16,400 --> 00:05:21,734
So this is not -- here we
are, the very end of December,

102
00:05:21,734 --> 00:05:24,799
facing the possibility that
160 million Americans will have

103
00:05:24,800 --> 00:05:29,333
their taxes go up
on January 1st,

104
00:05:29,333 --> 00:05:33,800
and the House refusing to pass
a measure that has overwhelming

105
00:05:33,800 --> 00:05:36,233
bipartisan support from
Republicans as well

106
00:05:36,233 --> 00:05:37,700
as Democrats.

107
00:05:37,700 --> 00:05:40,099
The President was for the --
very supportive of the measure

108
00:05:40,100 --> 00:05:43,867
-- of the approach that was
taken in the Senate that also

109
00:05:43,867 --> 00:05:47,233
would have extended the
payroll tax cut for a year.

110
00:05:47,233 --> 00:05:49,900
He continues to support
a full extension,

111
00:05:49,900 --> 00:05:53,933
as he made clear on Saturday,
of the payroll tax cut.

112
00:05:53,934 --> 00:05:57,600
But Congress needs to act, the
House needs to act -- or else,

113
00:05:57,600 --> 00:06:00,467
Americans are going to
have their taxes go up.

114
00:06:00,467 --> 00:06:08,400
And it is very hard to
understand why a measure passed

115
00:06:08,400 --> 00:06:13,099
the Senate with
nearly 90% support --

116
00:06:13,100 --> 00:06:18,066
all it would take in the House,
if all Democrats or virtually

117
00:06:18,066 --> 00:06:22,933
all Democrats vote for it, is
about 25 or 30 Republicans --

118
00:06:22,934 --> 00:06:27,600
12% of Republican support in the
House for this thing to become

119
00:06:27,600 --> 00:06:32,333
law -- for the House to ensure
that Americans don't have their

120
00:06:32,333 --> 00:06:34,066
taxes go up.

121
00:06:34,066 --> 00:06:36,799
So we call on
Republicans to do that.

122
00:06:36,800 --> 00:06:38,300
The Press:
Last one on this.

123
00:06:38,300 --> 00:06:41,500
You say it's time
for Congress to act.

124
00:06:41,500 --> 00:06:44,567
Speaker Boehner says
that's not going to happen,

125
00:06:44,567 --> 00:06:47,033
the House vote is
going to go down.

126
00:06:47,033 --> 00:06:49,133
Senator Reid says he's not
bringing the Senate back

127
00:06:49,133 --> 00:06:50,700
to renegotiate.

128
00:06:50,700 --> 00:06:52,166
So is this it?

129
00:06:52,166 --> 00:06:53,166
Is this the vote tonight?

130
00:06:53,166 --> 00:06:55,867
Or is there any path to get
this done should this vote go

131
00:06:55,867 --> 00:06:56,500
down tonight?

132
00:06:56,500 --> 00:06:59,033
Mr. Carney:
Well, I don't want to speculate
about what happens after this

133
00:06:59,033 --> 00:07:03,567
because, again, I don't think
this is too much of a long shot

134
00:07:03,567 --> 00:07:11,800
to say that 25 Republicans in
the House might break ranks and

135
00:07:11,800 --> 00:07:14,934
say, you know what, I don't want
to go home and explain to my

136
00:07:14,934 --> 00:07:19,934
constituents why I voted
to raise taxes on them,

137
00:07:19,934 --> 00:07:22,567
on middle-class,
working Americans.

138
00:07:22,567 --> 00:07:28,233
So I think that we remain
hopeful that the House will act,

139
00:07:28,233 --> 00:07:30,934
that House Republicans
will do the right thing,

140
00:07:30,934 --> 00:07:36,734
and support a proposal to extend
this payroll tax cut for two

141
00:07:36,734 --> 00:07:41,099
months and allowing the time
necessary to negotiate a

142
00:07:41,100 --> 00:07:42,900
full-year extension.

143
00:07:42,900 --> 00:07:47,433
Everyone says now that they're
for it, a full-year extension --

144
00:07:47,433 --> 00:07:50,400
this is Republicans having
traveled some distance from

145
00:07:50,400 --> 00:07:53,467
opposing it to now being for it.

146
00:07:53,467 --> 00:07:56,834
So hopefully the House will
do the right thing and

147
00:07:56,834 --> 00:07:59,734
pass this bill.

148
00:07:59,734 --> 00:08:04,599
The Press:
Jay, on North Korea, I know you
said it's early days and you're

149
00:08:04,600 --> 00:08:07,867
formulating an assessment, but
people who follow this closely

150
00:08:07,867 --> 00:08:09,834
say that it's one
of two things --

151
00:08:09,834 --> 00:08:12,767
that either this development
will lead to greater instability

152
00:08:12,767 --> 00:08:14,933
or perhaps it's an opening.

153
00:08:14,934 --> 00:08:17,900
Does the administration lean
toward one view or another

154
00:08:17,900 --> 00:08:19,366
at this stage?

155
00:08:19,367 --> 00:08:25,600
Mr. Carney:
I just think it's much too
early to make that judgment.

156
00:08:25,600 --> 00:08:29,934
North Korea is in a period
of national mourning;

157
00:08:29,934 --> 00:08:32,834
this transition is just now
beginning to take place.

158
00:08:32,833 --> 00:08:40,532
The issue here isn't
about personalities;

159
00:08:40,533 --> 00:08:46,767
it's about the actions
of the government.

160
00:08:46,767 --> 00:08:50,200
You know, we will monitor
the situation closely.

161
00:08:50,200 --> 00:08:57,166
But I think it would be
premature to make assessments

162
00:08:57,166 --> 00:09:01,066
about what this development
would mean in terms of its

163
00:09:01,066 --> 00:09:04,667
effect on six-party
talks or anything else.

164
00:09:04,667 --> 00:09:08,400
The Press:
On another subject, Reuters has
an exclusive out that was put on

165
00:09:08,400 --> 00:09:12,165
the wire last night, detailing
10 months of talks between the

166
00:09:12,166 --> 00:09:14,033
United States and the Taliban.

167
00:09:14,033 --> 00:09:16,533
And I was wondering if you could
bring us up to speed on those

168
00:09:16,533 --> 00:09:20,166
talks -- what is
the aim of them,

169
00:09:20,166 --> 00:09:23,400
what do you expect out of them.

170
00:09:23,400 --> 00:09:24,766
Mr. Carney:
Well, I'd say a
couple of things.

171
00:09:24,767 --> 00:09:26,900
One, we would leave it up
to the Afghan government to

172
00:09:26,900 --> 00:09:30,766
characterize the state of the
talks that they are leading.

173
00:09:30,767 --> 00:09:33,900
As you know, our policy has
been for a long time now and it

174
00:09:33,900 --> 00:09:38,367
remains the case that we
support reconciliation,

175
00:09:38,367 --> 00:09:41,467
Afghan-led
reconciliation process,

176
00:09:41,467 --> 00:09:44,500
that would bring Afghans
together and allow insurgents to

177
00:09:44,500 --> 00:09:46,533
come off the battlefield.

178
00:09:46,533 --> 00:09:49,100
We and the Afghan government
have been clear about the

179
00:09:49,100 --> 00:09:51,333
conditions that
would need to be met:

180
00:09:51,333 --> 00:09:54,600
Insurgents would need to break
from al Qaeda, abandon violence,

181
00:09:54,600 --> 00:09:57,200
and abide by the
Afghan constitution,

182
00:09:57,200 --> 00:10:00,100
including its provisions on the
respect for the rights of all

183
00:10:00,100 --> 00:10:02,900
Afghans, and that includes
obviously women and

184
00:10:02,900 --> 00:10:05,400
ethnic minorities.

185
00:10:05,400 --> 00:10:08,266
So we will continue to support
these Afghan-led efforts.

186
00:10:08,266 --> 00:10:10,333
But I would refer you to
the Afghan government about

187
00:10:10,333 --> 00:10:13,567
specifics about expectations,
if that was the nature of

188
00:10:13,567 --> 00:10:18,400
your question.

189
00:10:18,400 --> 00:10:20,533
Let's see -- Victoria.

190
00:10:20,533 --> 00:10:24,633
The Press:
Why did you come out today
with the executive order on the

191
00:10:24,633 --> 00:10:29,600
initiative on women and girls
and conflict resolution?

192
00:10:29,600 --> 00:10:31,100
Mr. Carney:
Well, I would refer you
to the State Department.

193
00:10:31,100 --> 00:10:33,734
I mean, they're having -- the
Secretary of State is I think

194
00:10:33,734 --> 00:10:36,800
speaking about this issue today.

195
00:10:36,800 --> 00:10:40,400
This has been -- these kinds
of things have a fairly long

196
00:10:40,400 --> 00:10:41,500
planning time.

197
00:10:41,500 --> 00:10:45,033
So I'm not sure I get the
nature of your question.

198
00:10:45,033 --> 00:10:46,967
Why not today, I suppose.

199
00:10:46,967 --> 00:10:50,367
The Press:
Could you talk a little bit more
about why it's so important to

200
00:10:50,367 --> 00:10:54,733
the administration?

201
00:10:54,734 --> 00:11:00,934
Mr. Carney:
I can tell you that -- let
me see what I have here.

202
00:11:00,934 --> 00:11:04,967
The documents that are part of
the executive order released

203
00:11:04,967 --> 00:11:07,699
today for the first-ever
National Action Plan on Women,

204
00:11:07,700 --> 00:11:10,633
Peace, and Security; lay
out the concrete steps the

205
00:11:10,633 --> 00:11:13,066
administration will take to
increase our commitment to

206
00:11:13,066 --> 00:11:15,400
support women as critical
participants in preventing and

207
00:11:15,400 --> 00:11:17,300
resolving conflict.

208
00:11:17,300 --> 00:11:19,934
The documents released today
represent a change in how the

209
00:11:19,934 --> 00:11:21,800
United States will
approach its diplomatic,

210
00:11:21,800 --> 00:11:24,766
military and development-based
support to women in areas of

211
00:11:24,767 --> 00:11:27,467
conflict by ensuring that
women's perspectives and

212
00:11:27,467 --> 00:11:31,033
considerations of gender are
woven into the DNA of how the

213
00:11:31,033 --> 00:11:33,934
United States approaches peace
processes, conflict prevention,

214
00:11:33,934 --> 00:11:37,333
and the protection of
civilians, as well as

215
00:11:37,333 --> 00:11:38,433
humanitarian assistance.

216
00:11:38,433 --> 00:11:44,133
But I think you'll hear
more, if you haven't already,

217
00:11:44,133 --> 00:11:47,033
from the Secretary
of State on this.

218
00:11:47,033 --> 00:11:49,967
Jake.

219
00:11:49,967 --> 00:11:53,266
The Press:
Vice President Biden gave an
interview in which he said the

220
00:11:53,266 --> 00:11:57,467
Taliban, per se,
is not our enemy.

221
00:11:57,467 --> 00:11:58,800
We are fighting the
Taliban right now,

222
00:11:58,800 --> 00:12:00,367
as I know I don't
need to tell you.

223
00:12:00,367 --> 00:12:01,766
Can you explain a
little bit more?

224
00:12:01,767 --> 00:12:02,433
Mr. Carney:
Sure.

225
00:12:02,433 --> 00:12:04,233
The Press:
Does he regret
using that language?

226
00:12:04,233 --> 00:12:05,099
Mr. Carney:
Not at all.

227
00:12:05,100 --> 00:12:07,300
I think it's important -- I know
you've written about this --

228
00:12:07,300 --> 00:12:11,467
to understand what most
Americans I think know,

229
00:12:11,467 --> 00:12:14,066
which is that we didn't
invade Afghanistan,

230
00:12:14,066 --> 00:12:17,567
we did not send U.S. military
personnel into Afghanistan

231
00:12:17,567 --> 00:12:19,000
because the Taliban
were in power.

232
00:12:19,000 --> 00:12:20,800
They had been in power.

233
00:12:20,800 --> 00:12:24,165
We went into Afghanistan because
al Qaeda had launched an attack

234
00:12:24,166 --> 00:12:26,467
against the United
States from Afghanistan.

235
00:12:26,467 --> 00:12:30,766
And what the Vice President
was reflecting is that --

236
00:12:30,767 --> 00:12:33,000
and this is related to the
reconciliation process that I

237
00:12:33,000 --> 00:12:36,500
was just discussing -- is
that the Taliban, per se --

238
00:12:36,500 --> 00:12:39,533
while we are fighting them,
it is not the elimination --

239
00:12:39,533 --> 00:12:41,633
the elimination of the
Taliban is not the issue here.

240
00:12:41,633 --> 00:12:45,233
The objective that the President
laid out when he laid out his

241
00:12:45,233 --> 00:12:49,599
Afghanistan strategy made clear
that the number-one principle

242
00:12:49,600 --> 00:12:51,967
here is to defeat,
dismantle -- or disrupt,

243
00:12:51,967 --> 00:12:54,667
dismantle and ultimately
defeat al Qaeda,

244
00:12:54,667 --> 00:12:57,800
as well as help
stabilize Afghanistan.

245
00:12:57,800 --> 00:12:59,199
And that's what we're doing.

246
00:12:59,200 --> 00:13:02,133
Part of that process is our
support for the Afghan-led

247
00:13:02,133 --> 00:13:05,433
reconciliation talks.

248
00:13:05,433 --> 00:13:07,834
The conditions for
reconciliation for the Taliban

249
00:13:07,834 --> 00:13:10,065
are very clear.

250
00:13:10,066 --> 00:13:17,400
But reconciliation has to be a
part of the long-term process in

251
00:13:17,400 --> 00:13:20,934
Afghanistan if Afghanistan
is going to evolve into a

252
00:13:20,934 --> 00:13:22,733
peaceful country.

253
00:13:22,734 --> 00:13:23,567
The Press:
I understand that.

254
00:13:23,567 --> 00:13:27,433
I just -- obviously there isn't
much of an al Qaeda presence

255
00:13:27,433 --> 00:13:28,934
in Afghanistan.

256
00:13:28,934 --> 00:13:31,132
Leon Panetta, when
he was CIA director,

257
00:13:31,133 --> 00:13:33,533
told me a year or two ago
that there were less --

258
00:13:33,533 --> 00:13:36,934
fewer than 100 al Qaeda
operatives in Afghanistan.

259
00:13:36,934 --> 00:13:44,132
We've been devoting a great
deal of blood and treasure,

260
00:13:44,133 --> 00:13:49,433
focused almost entirely on
defeating Taliban insurgents,

261
00:13:49,433 --> 00:13:50,734
Taliban fighters.

262
00:13:50,734 --> 00:13:53,233
And I understand that ultimately
there's going to have to be some

263
00:13:53,233 --> 00:13:54,699
sort of reconciliation.

264
00:13:54,700 --> 00:13:57,266
I just wonder if the language
was regrettable at all.

265
00:13:57,266 --> 00:14:00,333
Mr. Carney:
Well, it's only regrettable when
taken out of context that I just

266
00:14:00,333 --> 00:14:03,467
explained -- that it's
regrettable to present it out of

267
00:14:03,467 --> 00:14:10,633
context, because it is a
simple fact that we went into

268
00:14:10,633 --> 00:14:13,000
Afghanistan because of the
attack on the United States on

269
00:14:13,000 --> 00:14:15,867
September 11, 2001.

270
00:14:15,867 --> 00:14:19,065
We are there now to
ultimately defeat al Qaeda,

271
00:14:19,066 --> 00:14:22,400
to stabilize Afghanistan -- and
stabilize it in part so that al

272
00:14:22,400 --> 00:14:27,600
Qaeda or other terrorists who
have as their aim attacks on the

273
00:14:27,600 --> 00:14:35,734
United States cannot establish
a foothold in that country.

274
00:14:35,734 --> 00:14:42,900
So what is also completely clear
is that Afghanistan's future has

275
00:14:42,900 --> 00:14:46,967
to include within
it reconciliation.

276
00:14:46,967 --> 00:14:48,967
And that's why we support
the Afghan government-led

277
00:14:48,967 --> 00:14:50,199
effort there.

278
00:14:50,200 --> 00:14:52,800
The Press:
To follow up on North
Korea, if you could.

279
00:14:52,800 --> 00:14:56,900
President Lee has experienced
some criticism in his country

280
00:14:56,900 --> 00:15:01,066
for what is perceived to be a
belligerent attitude towards

281
00:15:01,066 --> 00:15:05,400
North Korea, which some say
has exacerbated tensions.

282
00:15:05,400 --> 00:15:07,834
I'm wondering if you're --
if the White House has a

283
00:15:07,834 --> 00:15:08,834
take on that.

284
00:15:08,834 --> 00:15:12,233
And also, there are
intelligence analysts within the

285
00:15:12,233 --> 00:15:15,467
administration who speculate
that one of the reasons for all

286
00:15:15,467 --> 00:15:20,400
those attacks -- the torpedo
on the South Korean naval vessel

287
00:15:20,400 --> 00:15:22,000
and the shelling
of the island --

288
00:15:22,000 --> 00:15:26,467
are because of the new president
of South -- of North Korea,

289
00:15:26,467 --> 00:15:29,867
rather, joining the military
and trying to earn his stripes.

290
00:15:29,867 --> 00:15:32,165
Is that proven?

291
00:15:32,166 --> 00:15:34,600
Do we have intelligence
about that?

292
00:15:34,600 --> 00:15:36,433
Or is that just speculation?

293
00:15:36,433 --> 00:15:39,500
Mr. Carney:
Well, as you can expect,
I'm not going to discuss

294
00:15:39,500 --> 00:15:43,633
intelligence from here.

295
00:15:43,633 --> 00:15:47,266
And then I would add to that
that it really is premature to

296
00:15:47,266 --> 00:15:51,199
make assessments
of the new leader,

297
00:15:51,200 --> 00:15:53,500
or at least the one who's been
designated by a succession that

298
00:15:53,500 --> 00:15:55,533
was already in the works.

299
00:15:55,533 --> 00:16:01,400
And we will judge North Korea --
the North Korean government as

300
00:16:01,400 --> 00:16:08,033
we always have: by its actions,
and by its actions with regard,

301
00:16:08,033 --> 00:16:11,200
in particular, to
upholding its commitments

302
00:16:11,200 --> 00:16:12,533
regarding denuclearization.

303
00:16:12,533 --> 00:16:14,066
So we'll continue to do that.

304
00:16:14,066 --> 00:16:21,033
I think, stepping back, it does
make sense to give this process

305
00:16:21,033 --> 00:16:26,000
a little bit of time before we
make judgments about the new

306
00:16:26,000 --> 00:16:30,133
leadership or the disposition
of North Korea going forward.

307
00:16:30,133 --> 00:16:31,367
The Press:
What about President Lee?

308
00:16:31,367 --> 00:16:32,400
Do you think that --

309
00:16:32,400 --> 00:16:34,066
Mr. Carney:
Well, President Lee is
a very close ally --

310
00:16:34,066 --> 00:16:35,667
South Korea is a
very close ally,

311
00:16:35,667 --> 00:16:38,066
and this President works
very closely with them;

312
00:16:38,066 --> 00:16:39,467
the rest of the government does.

313
00:16:39,467 --> 00:16:40,867
The Press:
Is there a take that
maybe his attitude,

314
00:16:40,867 --> 00:16:43,533
the way he's treated North Korea
has exacerbated tensions at all?

315
00:16:43,533 --> 00:16:46,467
Mr. Carney:
Not that I've heard here.

316
00:16:46,467 --> 00:16:47,667
Jessica.

317
00:16:47,667 --> 00:16:50,700
The Press:
To try a little bit
on Ben's question --

318
00:16:50,700 --> 00:16:54,300
because House Republicans
have been able to show some

319
00:16:54,300 --> 00:16:56,867
persistent unity on some
of these issues this year,

320
00:16:56,867 --> 00:17:00,632
and they've maintained that they
simply will not pass the Senate

321
00:17:00,633 --> 00:17:02,333
version of this bill.

322
00:17:02,333 --> 00:17:05,165
Last week the President said
Congress should not and cannot

323
00:17:05,165 --> 00:17:08,367
go on vacation before they have
made sure that working families

324
00:17:08,367 --> 00:17:10,966
are not seeing their
taxes go up by $1,000.

325
00:17:10,967 --> 00:17:15,367
So will he urge the Senate to
come back and get this over the

326
00:17:15,367 --> 00:17:19,367
finish line before year's end?

327
00:17:19,367 --> 00:17:26,800
Mr. Carney:
We are urging the House to
follow the Senate's lead and

328
00:17:26,800 --> 00:17:29,233
pass a bill, or an
amendment to a bill,

329
00:17:29,233 --> 00:17:33,300
that has received overwhelming
bipartisan support on this

330
00:17:33,300 --> 00:17:38,533
issue, that will make sure that
Americans' taxes don't go up in

331
00:17:38,533 --> 00:17:43,800
12 days, 8 hours.

332
00:17:43,800 --> 00:17:48,200
It is time for us to step
back and look at what has

333
00:17:48,200 --> 00:17:49,100
transpired here.

334
00:17:49,100 --> 00:17:58,399
We have been in this
situation where the public is,

335
00:17:58,400 --> 00:18:04,633
where the vast majority of
folks in Washington are,

336
00:18:04,633 --> 00:18:10,567
is at variance with a slim
subsection of one party

337
00:18:10,567 --> 00:18:11,867
in one House.

338
00:18:11,867 --> 00:18:13,200
And I think it's
pretty clear, again,

339
00:18:13,200 --> 00:18:16,266
based on the reporting that you
and your colleagues have done,

340
00:18:16,266 --> 00:18:18,800
what transpired here.

341
00:18:18,800 --> 00:18:24,767
And this is, in one way, a very
unique situation compared to

342
00:18:24,767 --> 00:18:27,533
what we've seen transpire this
whole year because the Senate

343
00:18:27,533 --> 00:18:32,934
did pass -- did do what in the
past the House leadership has

344
00:18:32,934 --> 00:18:37,800
asked it to do, which is pass a
bill out with broad bipartisan

345
00:18:37,800 --> 00:18:39,734
support, including broad
Republican support.

346
00:18:39,734 --> 00:18:40,667
Well it is there.

347
00:18:40,667 --> 00:18:43,332
It is ready to be voted
on and passed by the House

348
00:18:43,333 --> 00:18:44,367
of Representatives.

349
00:18:44,367 --> 00:18:50,000
And it is simply perplexing,
I think for all of us,

350
00:18:50,000 --> 00:18:55,066
and I think for a lot of you, to
understand why House Republicans

351
00:18:55,066 --> 00:18:58,600
would not support a
measure that garnered --

352
00:18:58,600 --> 00:19:01,132
I did the calculations
on my iPhone --

353
00:19:01,133 --> 00:19:04,133
83% Republican
support in the Senate.

354
00:19:04,133 --> 00:19:07,734
We have some Senate Republicans
now coming out today saying,

355
00:19:07,734 --> 00:19:11,433
please -- to their
colleagues -- please --

356
00:19:11,433 --> 00:19:13,166
to the House Republicans
-- pass this.

357
00:19:13,166 --> 00:19:15,100
This is crazy not to do this.

358
00:19:15,100 --> 00:19:21,300
It is the obvious thing to do
so that we ensure that Americans

359
00:19:21,300 --> 00:19:23,767
don't have their taxes go up
and we give ourselves the time,

360
00:19:23,767 --> 00:19:28,133
give negotiators the time to
work on a full-year extension,

361
00:19:28,133 --> 00:19:30,433
which is, as the President
said here from this podium on

362
00:19:30,433 --> 00:19:36,100
Saturday, should not cause a
great deal of drama in January

363
00:19:36,100 --> 00:19:37,632
or February when
they work it out.

364
00:19:37,633 --> 00:19:39,300
The Press:
So if a bill to extend
the payroll tax,

365
00:19:39,300 --> 00:19:42,300
either temporary or for
a year, is not passed,

366
00:19:42,300 --> 00:19:45,767
will the President skip his
vacation and stay in town?

367
00:19:45,767 --> 00:19:51,133
Mr. Carney:
The President has made clear
that he wants Congress to get

368
00:19:51,133 --> 00:19:57,533
this done, that he is here now
and will be here as Congress

369
00:19:57,533 --> 00:19:59,867
tries to sort this out,
because it's essential to him;

370
00:19:59,867 --> 00:20:02,734
it is his number-one priority
right now that Americans don't

371
00:20:02,734 --> 00:20:05,000
have -- middle-class Americans
don't have their taxes go up on

372
00:20:05,000 --> 00:20:08,300
January 1st.

373
00:20:08,300 --> 00:20:12,867
We remain hopeful that tonight
enough House Republicans will

374
00:20:12,867 --> 00:20:18,000
not vote in lockstep for a
position that is supported by

375
00:20:18,000 --> 00:20:23,500
almost no one out there, and
will instead pass a payroll tax

376
00:20:23,500 --> 00:20:27,500
cut extension, make clear that
they are committed, as we are,

377
00:20:27,500 --> 00:20:31,934
to a full-year tax cut
for the American people --

378
00:20:31,934 --> 00:20:33,867
a position, which, by the
way, this President has had

379
00:20:33,867 --> 00:20:37,899
consistently, but which
Republicans who are now saying,

380
00:20:37,900 --> 00:20:40,500
oh, we can't possibly kick
the can down the road,

381
00:20:40,500 --> 00:20:46,033
they didn't even support a
full-year extension until a few

382
00:20:46,033 --> 00:20:47,033
weeks ago.

383
00:20:47,033 --> 00:20:51,600
We had numerous senior
Republicans on the Hill who were

384
00:20:51,600 --> 00:20:55,667
dismissing the economic
value of the payroll tax cut,

385
00:20:55,667 --> 00:20:58,533
dismissing the need to do it at
all and making clear that their

386
00:20:58,533 --> 00:20:59,934
support was tepid at best.

387
00:20:59,934 --> 00:21:05,332
So now, fortunately, we've seen
some movement in that direction.

388
00:21:05,333 --> 00:21:06,467
There is support for it.

389
00:21:06,467 --> 00:21:13,967
We expect the Congress to
pass it, the House to pass it.

390
00:21:13,967 --> 00:21:19,500
The alternative is Americans
waking on the 1st of January and

391
00:21:19,500 --> 00:21:22,633
trying to figure out, okay,
how am I going to budget --

392
00:21:22,633 --> 00:21:28,700
how am I going to make ends
meet with $1,000 less this year,

393
00:21:28,700 --> 00:21:32,800
because the House Republicans
refused to vote for something

394
00:21:32,800 --> 00:21:38,567
that 83% of Senate
Republicans supported.

395
00:21:38,567 --> 00:21:39,433
Hope it doesn't come to pass.

396
00:21:39,433 --> 00:21:40,467
Norah.

397
00:21:40,467 --> 00:21:44,000
The Press:
On North Korea, how confident
are you that the transition of

398
00:21:44,000 --> 00:21:49,800
power will go smoothly?

399
00:21:49,800 --> 00:21:57,633
Mr. Carney:
We see no indication
that the succession as --

400
00:21:57,633 --> 00:22:01,867
prior to this event -- the
succession that had been

401
00:22:01,867 --> 00:22:03,399
contemplated, won't take place.

402
00:22:03,400 --> 00:22:04,900
We expect that it will.

403
00:22:04,900 --> 00:22:08,166
We see no indication
that it won't.

404
00:22:08,166 --> 00:22:11,667
But beyond that I don't
really have a comment.

405
00:22:11,667 --> 00:22:15,199
The Press:
Kim Jong-un is 27 years old.

406
00:22:15,200 --> 00:22:20,233
He's been described as
untested, inexperienced,

407
00:22:20,233 --> 00:22:22,533
and with a volatile
personality --

408
00:22:22,533 --> 00:22:25,934
someone who has recently
encouraged the attacks

409
00:22:25,934 --> 00:22:26,734
against the South.

410
00:22:26,734 --> 00:22:30,332
Is that someone that the U.S.
thinks is someone that they feel

411
00:22:30,333 --> 00:22:32,333
confident should be
leading North Korea?

412
00:22:32,333 --> 00:22:35,333
Any concerns?

413
00:22:35,333 --> 00:22:37,333
Mr. Carney:
I appreciate the
question, Norah.

414
00:22:37,333 --> 00:22:42,467
I think that we will
make judgments on the new

415
00:22:42,467 --> 00:22:46,934
leadership's
disposition, if you will,

416
00:22:46,934 --> 00:22:52,100
based on how he and the
government handles itself

417
00:22:52,100 --> 00:22:53,100
going forward.

418
00:22:53,100 --> 00:22:55,399
We have consistently
demonstrated that we are open to

419
00:22:55,400 --> 00:22:58,867
engagement with North Korea, but
we've also made clear that the

420
00:22:58,867 --> 00:23:02,399
North Koreans need to take steps
towards denuclearization that

421
00:23:02,400 --> 00:23:05,333
would demonstrate seriousness
of purpose and a willingness

422
00:23:05,333 --> 00:23:06,333
to negotiate.

423
00:23:06,333 --> 00:23:09,700
And that was our position last
week and it remains our position

424
00:23:09,700 --> 00:23:13,166
this week and going forward.

425
00:23:13,166 --> 00:23:17,233
Demonstrating that willingness
would then open the door to

426
00:23:17,233 --> 00:23:21,300
renewed six-party talks, and
to improved relations with the

427
00:23:21,300 --> 00:23:23,332
United States and with
North Korea's neighbors.

428
00:23:23,333 --> 00:23:26,567
So nothing has changed
in our position.

429
00:23:26,567 --> 00:23:33,200
And we will judge, obviously,
North Korea and its government

430
00:23:33,200 --> 00:23:39,033
based on how they engage on
this issue going forward.

431
00:23:39,033 --> 00:23:41,065
The Press:
Can I just clarify --
"nothing has changed" --

432
00:23:41,066 --> 00:23:44,233
does that mean the U.S. will
go forward with an announcement

433
00:23:44,233 --> 00:23:49,399
about food aid to North Korea?

434
00:23:49,400 --> 00:23:52,667
Mr. Carney:
Well, we have longstanding
concerns about the at-risk

435
00:23:52,667 --> 00:23:55,300
population in North Korea, and
have repeatedly discussed with

436
00:23:55,300 --> 00:23:56,867
the North Koreans the
terms for potential

437
00:23:56,867 --> 00:23:58,800
humanitarian assistance.

438
00:23:58,800 --> 00:24:01,166
As the State Department
has repeatedly made clear,

439
00:24:01,166 --> 00:24:04,332
we require adequate monitoring
provisions to ensure that

440
00:24:04,333 --> 00:24:06,900
assistance that might be
provided is not diverted from

441
00:24:06,900 --> 00:24:09,266
those in genuine need.

442
00:24:09,266 --> 00:24:13,066
No decision will be taken by the
U.S. government with respect to

443
00:24:13,066 --> 00:24:14,967
assistance without
such arrangements.

444
00:24:14,967 --> 00:24:18,400
And again, that was true
last week and it's true

445
00:24:18,400 --> 00:24:19,400
going forward.

446
00:24:19,400 --> 00:24:23,000
So there's no decisions at
this point to provide food aid.

447
00:24:23,000 --> 00:24:28,967
This is about the
precursor to that,

448
00:24:28,967 --> 00:24:32,200
which would be making sure that
such arrangements are in place

449
00:24:32,200 --> 00:24:34,467
that would allow for
adequate monitoring.

450
00:24:34,467 --> 00:24:37,467
The Press:
So it's fair to say that such
a decision might be delayed with

451
00:24:37,467 --> 00:24:39,233
Kim Jong-il's death?

452
00:24:39,233 --> 00:24:40,700
Mr. Carney:
Again, I don't
think that this --

453
00:24:40,700 --> 00:24:50,700
as with all the questions that
I've gotten, we will act --

454
00:24:50,700 --> 00:24:58,400
we will monitor the situation,
we will evaluate behavior and

455
00:24:58,400 --> 00:24:59,300
act accordingly.

456
00:24:59,300 --> 00:25:00,734
But that was always the case.

457
00:25:00,734 --> 00:25:05,934
It's too soon to know what the
next period will look like,

458
00:25:05,934 --> 00:25:10,633
as they are now in a
period of national mourning

459
00:25:10,633 --> 00:25:11,800
and transition.

460
00:25:11,800 --> 00:25:13,332
And we'll just have to see.

461
00:25:13,333 --> 00:25:14,600
The Press:
I just have one
more final question.

462
00:25:14,600 --> 00:25:18,065
Can you confirm that the United
States was on the cusp of a deal

463
00:25:18,066 --> 00:25:19,066
where they would announce --

464
00:25:19,066 --> 00:25:20,066
Mr. Carney:
No.

465
00:25:20,066 --> 00:25:22,567
No, not on the cusp of a deal.

466
00:25:22,567 --> 00:25:26,100
I think that we were
having these discussions,

467
00:25:26,100 --> 00:25:29,000
as we've had in the past, and
there was not an imminent deal

468
00:25:29,000 --> 00:25:30,700
to be announced.

469
00:25:30,700 --> 00:25:33,000
The Press:
There were reports that there
was an imminent deal within

470
00:25:33,000 --> 00:25:36,300
days, to be followed by an
announcement from Pyongyang.

471
00:25:36,300 --> 00:25:39,100
Mr. Carney:
I don't have anything
to announce on that.

472
00:25:39,100 --> 00:25:44,632
I mean, again, this is -- a
decision like that was not going

473
00:25:44,633 --> 00:25:46,633
to be taken and will not be
taken by the United States

474
00:25:46,633 --> 00:25:50,000
government with respect to that
kind of assistance without the

475
00:25:50,000 --> 00:25:52,867
arrangements that I
mentioned being in place.

476
00:25:52,867 --> 00:25:55,433
The Press:
Has our North Korea -- State
Department's North Korea

477
00:25:55,433 --> 00:25:58,900
specialists had any contact with
Pyongyang since the death of

478
00:25:58,900 --> 00:26:00,600
Kim Jong-il was announced?

479
00:26:00,600 --> 00:26:03,033
Mr. Carney:
I don't have any information
with regard to that.

480
00:26:03,033 --> 00:26:04,433
You might check with
the State Department.

481
00:26:04,433 --> 00:26:07,433
The Press:
What do we know
about Kim Jong-un?

482
00:26:07,433 --> 00:26:13,066
Mr. Carney:
I'm not going to get into
assessments right now.

483
00:26:13,066 --> 00:26:19,400
We're focused on
actions, and we are --

484
00:26:19,400 --> 00:26:21,367
certainly appreciate the fact
that they're in a period of

485
00:26:21,367 --> 00:26:23,700
national mourning.

486
00:26:23,700 --> 00:26:26,433
The Press:
You talked about
a time period --

487
00:26:26,433 --> 00:26:28,266
waiting for a time period.

488
00:26:28,266 --> 00:26:33,133
When Kim Il-sung died, it was
several years before Kim Jong-il

489
00:26:33,133 --> 00:26:36,100
really made his presence felt
on the international stage.

490
00:26:36,100 --> 00:26:39,966
Is that the time period you're
talking about for Kim Jong-un?

491
00:26:39,967 --> 00:26:44,367
Mr. Carney:
I don't think we're in a
position to publicly assess

492
00:26:44,367 --> 00:26:45,367
that right now.

493
00:26:45,367 --> 00:26:48,166
I think we just have to see.

494
00:26:48,166 --> 00:26:49,166
The Press:
Thanks, Jay.

495
00:26:49,166 --> 00:26:53,633
Can you at least explain why
it's so imprudent for the

496
00:26:53,633 --> 00:26:55,100
administration to take a
position on whether the death of

497
00:26:55,100 --> 00:26:59,567
Kim Jong-il could lead to more
nuclear proliferation out of

498
00:26:59,567 --> 00:27:00,900
North Korea, or less?

499
00:27:00,900 --> 00:27:03,033
I mean, why -- what's the risk?

500
00:27:03,033 --> 00:27:04,800
Are you afraid of escalation?

501
00:27:04,800 --> 00:27:07,100
Mr. Carney:
What's the risk of
pure speculation?

502
00:27:07,100 --> 00:27:08,766
The Press:
I mean, you have an opinion.

503
00:27:08,767 --> 00:27:10,300
Why not share it at all?

504
00:27:10,300 --> 00:27:12,066
Mr. Carney:
Well, there are opinions
we might have that we don't

505
00:27:12,066 --> 00:27:17,533
necessarily share on matters
of national security or

506
00:27:17,533 --> 00:27:19,466
foreign governments.

507
00:27:19,467 --> 00:27:23,000
I think what I'm trying to make
clear here is that this is a

508
00:27:23,000 --> 00:27:25,967
period of transition, a
period of national mourning,

509
00:27:25,967 --> 00:27:28,900
and our position is
as it has always been,

510
00:27:28,900 --> 00:27:32,834
which is that we will
judge governments --

511
00:27:32,834 --> 00:27:34,133
and this government
is the same --

512
00:27:34,133 --> 00:27:37,300
by their actions going forward.

513
00:27:37,300 --> 00:27:40,200
The Press:
The South Koreans have
increased their level of alert

514
00:27:40,200 --> 00:27:42,233
and readiness.

515
00:27:42,233 --> 00:27:43,867
Is the U.S. looking to
do that with any of their

516
00:27:43,867 --> 00:27:44,867
military bases?

517
00:27:44,867 --> 00:27:46,667
Or is there any chance that
this would have an effect on

518
00:27:46,667 --> 00:27:47,600
the Futenma --

519
00:27:47,600 --> 00:27:48,800
Mr. Carney:
As I understand it, no.

520
00:27:48,800 --> 00:27:54,332
Obviously you can ask for more
detailed information from the

521
00:27:54,333 --> 00:27:55,333
Defense Department.

522
00:27:55,333 --> 00:28:00,100
But I understand that that
is not the case for us.

523
00:28:00,100 --> 00:28:00,766
Julianna.

524
00:28:00,767 --> 00:28:01,500
The Press:
Thanks.

525
00:28:01,500 --> 00:28:03,800
You keep saying that you're
hopeful that enough House

526
00:28:03,800 --> 00:28:07,133
Republicans will support
the Senate measure.

527
00:28:07,133 --> 00:28:10,166
What are you basing
that hope on?

528
00:28:10,166 --> 00:28:14,200
[laughter]

529
00:28:14,200 --> 00:28:17,900
Mr. Carney:
A month ago, Julianna,
there was ample evidence,

530
00:28:17,900 --> 00:28:20,533
publicly stated by
Republican leaders,

531
00:28:20,533 --> 00:28:22,833
that they were
totally opposed to --

532
00:28:22,834 --> 00:28:25,200
or a number of them, influential
ones were opposed to a payroll

533
00:28:25,200 --> 00:28:27,533
tax cut extension.

534
00:28:27,533 --> 00:28:34,332
We are now in a place where
they're so committed to it that,

535
00:28:34,333 --> 00:28:38,433
despite the substantial
efforts to get a one-year deal,

536
00:28:38,433 --> 00:28:43,333
they are saying now that
they can't possibly accept a

537
00:28:43,333 --> 00:28:46,967
bipartisan compromise to extend
it for two months to allow time

538
00:28:46,967 --> 00:28:49,467
for more negotiations for
a full-year extension.

539
00:28:49,467 --> 00:28:56,700
I mean, there's a little bit of
kabuki theater going on here.

540
00:28:56,700 --> 00:29:01,867
We all know how unusual this
situation is that transpired

541
00:29:01,867 --> 00:29:02,867
this weekend.

542
00:29:02,867 --> 00:29:11,367
It is not common
practice, I would say,

543
00:29:11,367 --> 00:29:14,332
for a bill of substance that
doesn't have to do with naming a

544
00:29:14,333 --> 00:29:20,133
post office or commemorative
coins to pass with 90% support

545
00:29:20,133 --> 00:29:25,533
and overwhelming support from
both parties without the wheels

546
00:29:25,533 --> 00:29:29,667
being greased, if you will, in
the other House by the leaders.

547
00:29:29,667 --> 00:29:35,367
And it makes getting things done
on behalf of the American people

548
00:29:35,367 --> 00:29:39,433
pretty difficult when you
have that kind of volatility,

549
00:29:39,433 --> 00:29:44,400
and have that situation where
the things that have broad

550
00:29:44,400 --> 00:29:49,500
bipartisan support, have broad,
broad American public support,

551
00:29:49,500 --> 00:29:53,567
cannot get done because a
sub-faction of one party in one

552
00:29:53,567 --> 00:30:00,467
house basically dictating
the direction of the majority

553
00:30:00,467 --> 00:30:02,000
in that house.

554
00:30:02,000 --> 00:30:03,000
It makes it very difficult.

555
00:30:03,000 --> 00:30:08,900
But we remain hopeful, again,
because they do not represent

556
00:30:08,900 --> 00:30:10,867
even a majority of
the Republican Party.

557
00:30:10,867 --> 00:30:13,767
And so we're talking
here, I think, 25,

558
00:30:13,767 --> 00:30:18,033
30 members of the House
is 12 or 15% of the House

559
00:30:18,033 --> 00:30:19,033
Republican caucus.

560
00:30:19,033 --> 00:30:21,632
That's all we need.

561
00:30:21,633 --> 00:30:24,266
Not the 82% we
got in the Senate,

562
00:30:24,266 --> 00:30:27,667
but 12 or 15% of House
Republicans can vote yes and

563
00:30:27,667 --> 00:30:32,000
ensure that Americans don't have
their taxes go up on January 1.

564
00:30:32,000 --> 00:30:34,867
The Press:
Has the President had any
calls with leadership?

565
00:30:34,867 --> 00:30:39,033
Mr. Carney:
I don't have any calls
to read out at this time.

566
00:30:39,033 --> 00:30:40,000
Kristen, did you have anything?

567
00:30:40,000 --> 00:30:40,433
The Press:
Yes.

568
00:30:40,433 --> 00:30:41,834
Thanks, Jay.

569
00:30:41,834 --> 00:30:44,233
When was the last time the
President did speak with

570
00:30:44,233 --> 00:30:46,166
Speaker Boehner?

571
00:30:46,166 --> 00:30:50,000
Mr. Carney:
I don't have any calls or
conversations to read out to you

572
00:30:50,000 --> 00:30:51,100
at this time.

573
00:30:51,100 --> 00:30:54,199
The Press:
Given that we only have 12 days
left and this is sort of crunch

574
00:30:54,200 --> 00:30:57,533
time, what can we expect to see
from the President later today

575
00:30:57,533 --> 00:30:59,199
and in the coming days?

576
00:30:59,200 --> 00:31:03,667
Mr. Carney:
The President is actively
engaged on this issue.

577
00:31:03,667 --> 00:31:06,899
Again, he has -- you
saw him here on Saturday.

578
00:31:06,900 --> 00:31:13,667
And he worked closely with
Senator Reid and Senate

579
00:31:13,667 --> 00:31:18,600
Democratic leadership on the
efforts to get a one-year deal,

580
00:31:18,600 --> 00:31:24,000
and when that was not achievable
in the timeframe that was before

581
00:31:24,000 --> 00:31:31,100
us, Senators Reid and McConnell
worked out a two-month extension

582
00:31:31,100 --> 00:31:35,033
that won the support of 89
United States senators out of 99

583
00:31:35,033 --> 00:31:37,899
who cast votes.

584
00:31:37,900 --> 00:31:40,600
And the President was very
much involved in that process.

585
00:31:40,600 --> 00:31:44,600
That measure now awaits
consideration by the House

586
00:31:44,600 --> 00:31:45,766
of Representatives.

587
00:31:45,767 --> 00:31:48,734
Tonight, apparently,
there will be a vote.

588
00:31:48,734 --> 00:31:52,000
And it should be passed.

589
00:31:52,000 --> 00:31:54,667
It has overwhelming support.

590
00:31:54,667 --> 00:31:56,399
And it will ensure
that Americans --

591
00:31:56,400 --> 00:31:58,133
working, middle-class
Americans --

592
00:31:58,133 --> 00:32:01,934
do not have their taxes
go up on January 1st.

593
00:32:01,934 --> 00:32:06,300
And it will give negotiators
further time to ensure that we

594
00:32:06,300 --> 00:32:09,600
then extend it for the full
calendar year of 2012 --

595
00:32:09,600 --> 00:32:13,300
the payroll tax cut extension,
as well as the extension of

596
00:32:13,300 --> 00:32:15,834
unemployment
insurance, which has,

597
00:32:15,834 --> 00:32:18,133
as every outside
economist will tell you,

598
00:32:18,133 --> 00:32:19,834
a very positive
impact on the economy.

599
00:32:19,834 --> 00:32:25,667
Because let's not forget here
what the substantive consequence

600
00:32:25,667 --> 00:32:33,132
of a failure to act would mean:
not just $1,000 tax hike for the

601
00:32:33,133 --> 00:32:38,934
average American family, but a
negative impact on the economy.

602
00:32:38,934 --> 00:32:41,200
There are economists out there
who say that if we do not extend

603
00:32:41,200 --> 00:32:43,233
the payroll tax cut, if we
do not extend unemployment

604
00:32:43,233 --> 00:32:44,600
insurance, it increases the
possibility of a recession,

605
00:32:44,600 --> 00:32:51,800
or increases the possibility
of very slow economic growth.

606
00:32:51,800 --> 00:32:55,934
The converse of that is
passing this tax cut,

607
00:32:55,934 --> 00:32:58,100
passing the extension of
unemployment insurance,

608
00:32:58,100 --> 00:33:01,500
will have a positive
impact on economic growth.

609
00:33:01,500 --> 00:33:03,600
And there are
Republicans out there --

610
00:33:03,600 --> 00:33:07,899
and not surprisingly, they're
the ones who have been opposed

611
00:33:07,900 --> 00:33:09,734
or tepid in their
support for this --

612
00:33:09,734 --> 00:33:14,399
who claim, based on no valid
or credible economic evidence,

613
00:33:14,400 --> 00:33:16,467
that these things have had
positive effects on the

614
00:33:16,467 --> 00:33:17,467
economy this year.

615
00:33:17,467 --> 00:33:21,066
There is no credible
economist -- unaffiliated,

616
00:33:21,066 --> 00:33:24,567
nonpartisan economist -- who
would argue to you that payroll

617
00:33:24,567 --> 00:33:29,567
tax cut and unemployment
insurance have not had a

618
00:33:29,567 --> 00:33:33,300
positive impact on growth and a
positive impact on job creation.

619
00:33:33,300 --> 00:33:35,200
And that's why we have to
have them for next year.

620
00:33:35,200 --> 00:33:37,133
The Press:
And, Jay, if you don't want
to read out meetings with the

621
00:33:37,133 --> 00:33:40,100
President, can you say if any
of his top advisors, Pete Rouse,

622
00:33:40,100 --> 00:33:43,734
have been in contact with
leadership on the Hill?

623
00:33:43,734 --> 00:33:48,500
Mr. Carney:
Well, I won't -- setting
aside the individuals,

624
00:33:48,500 --> 00:33:55,000
certainly we are in contact with
Capitol Hill on this matter,

625
00:33:55,000 --> 00:34:04,000
and have been all weekend and
today, and will continue to be.

626
00:34:04,000 --> 00:34:13,033
We will hope, as I said, that
Republicans figure out the right

627
00:34:13,033 --> 00:34:17,766
thing to do here, support
their colleagues in the Senate,

628
00:34:17,766 --> 00:34:19,833
support what the American
people want done,

629
00:34:19,833 --> 00:34:23,533
and make sure that their taxes
don't go up on January 1.

630
00:34:23,533 --> 00:34:24,699
It's pretty simple.

631
00:34:24,699 --> 00:34:26,632
The Press:
And when you say
you've had contact,

632
00:34:26,632 --> 00:34:28,165
that includes Republicans?

633
00:34:28,166 --> 00:34:31,066
Because some officials in
Speaker Boehner's office said

634
00:34:31,065 --> 00:34:33,033
they've heard radio silence.

635
00:34:33,033 --> 00:34:36,500
Mr. Carney:
Well, let me just say, I think
the President himself told you

636
00:34:36,500 --> 00:34:40,600
on Saturday that he had
spoken with Senator McConnell,

637
00:34:40,600 --> 00:34:43,366
thanked him for his efforts
at achieving this bipartisan

638
00:34:43,367 --> 00:34:50,000
compromise on Saturday.

639
00:34:50,000 --> 00:34:51,934
With regard to the
Speaker of the House,

640
00:34:51,934 --> 00:34:56,166
it is not our job to
negotiate between him and

641
00:34:56,166 --> 00:34:59,734
Senate Republicans.

642
00:34:59,734 --> 00:35:04,433
Again, the Senate passed,
with something like 82% Senate

643
00:35:04,433 --> 00:35:09,266
Republican approval --
39 Senate Republicans --

644
00:35:09,266 --> 00:35:12,300
a provision to extend the
payroll tax cut and unemployment

645
00:35:12,300 --> 00:35:16,200
insurance, as well a deal with
some other important issues,

646
00:35:16,200 --> 00:35:19,100
for two months.

647
00:35:19,100 --> 00:35:21,600
The House should follow suit.

648
00:35:21,600 --> 00:35:22,299
Toshi.

649
00:35:22,300 --> 00:35:22,967
The Press:
Thank you, Jay.

650
00:35:22,967 --> 00:35:23,800
Mr. Carney:
Oh, I'm sorry, then Laura.

651
00:35:23,800 --> 00:35:24,934
Toshi then Laura.

652
00:35:24,934 --> 00:35:27,567
The Press:
I have two questions
on North Korea.

653
00:35:27,567 --> 00:35:32,233
So far has the administration
noticed any unusual movement by

654
00:35:32,233 --> 00:35:34,200
North Korean military?

655
00:35:34,200 --> 00:35:36,200
Can you give us an
assessment on that?

656
00:35:36,200 --> 00:35:38,533
Because it's a grave
concern in the region.

657
00:35:38,533 --> 00:35:44,266
And secondly, does the President
have any plan to communicate

658
00:35:44,266 --> 00:35:48,433
with Japanese Prime Minister
Noda as he did with Korean

659
00:35:48,433 --> 00:35:49,967
President Lee?

660
00:35:49,967 --> 00:35:52,667
Mr. Carney:
I don't have any announcements
to make about upcoming

661
00:35:52,667 --> 00:35:55,033
conversations the President
may or may not have.

662
00:35:55,033 --> 00:35:59,033
And with regard to
your first question,

663
00:35:59,033 --> 00:36:04,500
my understanding prior to coming
out here is that we did not see

664
00:36:04,500 --> 00:36:05,900
any evidence of that.

665
00:36:05,900 --> 00:36:11,166
I would refer you to the Defense
Department for more detailed

666
00:36:11,166 --> 00:36:13,300
analysis of that, but
my understanding is the

667
00:36:13,300 --> 00:36:15,767
answer is no.

668
00:36:15,767 --> 00:36:17,000
Laura, then Jackie, then Mark.

669
00:36:17,000 --> 00:36:18,433
The Press:
Thanks.

670
00:36:18,433 --> 00:36:22,767
On the payroll tax cut, Senate
Democrats have indicated that

671
00:36:22,767 --> 00:36:24,466
the House has the
bill before it;

672
00:36:24,467 --> 00:36:27,633
but they can pass it or they
can be responsible for a tax

673
00:36:27,633 --> 00:36:30,100
increase, and they're
not interested in

674
00:36:30,100 --> 00:36:31,232
renegotiating this.

675
00:36:31,233 --> 00:36:32,934
Is that the White
House view as well,

676
00:36:32,934 --> 00:36:35,400
that basically they
should take it or own it,

677
00:36:35,400 --> 00:36:36,767
and that's the end?

678
00:36:36,767 --> 00:36:40,066
Or if they reject it, will it
be time for more negotiations?

679
00:36:40,066 --> 00:36:49,767
Mr. Carney:
Well, if they reject it is
immediately speculating about

680
00:36:49,767 --> 00:36:50,767
the outcome.

681
00:36:50,767 --> 00:36:57,899
I understand that some
statements have been made that

682
00:36:57,900 --> 00:37:02,066
suggest that that is what will
happen, and that's unfortunate.

683
00:37:02,066 --> 00:37:04,899
But I don't want to get ahead of
that process because we really

684
00:37:04,900 --> 00:37:07,934
do believe -- and we've just
heard in the last few hours some

685
00:37:07,934 --> 00:37:10,500
Senate Republicans
reinforce this point --

686
00:37:10,500 --> 00:37:14,200
that it is the right thing
to do to vote "yes" tonight,

687
00:37:14,200 --> 00:37:19,133
following the overwhelmingly
bipartisan support that this

688
00:37:19,133 --> 00:37:21,899
measure received in the Senate,
to ensure that Americans don't

689
00:37:21,900 --> 00:37:23,100
have their taxes go up.

690
00:37:23,100 --> 00:37:25,066
So I don't want to get
ahead of that process.

691
00:37:25,066 --> 00:37:31,000
It is certainly the case that
Senator Reid worked very closely

692
00:37:31,000 --> 00:37:33,500
with Senate McConnell to
work out this compromise.

693
00:37:33,500 --> 00:37:37,533
And before they put forward
the two-month measure,

694
00:37:37,533 --> 00:37:41,834
they worked hard on trying to
get a year tax cut extension,

695
00:37:41,834 --> 00:37:43,667
payroll tax cut
extension, unemployment

696
00:37:43,667 --> 00:37:45,366
insurance extension.

697
00:37:45,367 --> 00:37:47,834
They were not able to
accomplish that at this time,

698
00:37:47,834 --> 00:37:51,433
and felt it was of the utmost
importance that at the very

699
00:37:51,433 --> 00:37:53,800
least we make sure taxes
don't go up on January 1st,

700
00:37:53,800 --> 00:37:55,433
which is the President's
absolute priority.

701
00:37:55,433 --> 00:37:58,166
So they negotiated this
two-month compromise.

702
00:37:58,166 --> 00:38:06,433
It received 89 out of 99
Senate votes, Senate ayes,

703
00:38:06,433 --> 00:38:08,400
and it moved on to the House.

704
00:38:08,400 --> 00:38:13,767
I think it is not
too much to ask,

705
00:38:13,767 --> 00:38:14,966
on behalf of the
American people,

706
00:38:14,967 --> 00:38:20,100
that the House follow suit
-- vote as the Senate did,

707
00:38:20,100 --> 00:38:22,767
in a bipartisan fashion, to
ensure Americans' taxes don't go

708
00:38:22,767 --> 00:38:24,933
up on January 1st.

709
00:38:24,934 --> 00:38:27,367
So I'm not -- again, I'm not
going to get into what happens

710
00:38:27,367 --> 00:38:28,900
if the vote goes down or --

711
00:38:28,900 --> 00:38:29,567
The Press:
Right.

712
00:38:29,567 --> 00:38:33,567
I'm just -- the reason I'm
asking that is because by doing

713
00:38:33,567 --> 00:38:36,433
-- by saying what the Senate
Democrats are saying obviously

714
00:38:36,433 --> 00:38:38,567
puts a certain degree of
pressure on the House,

715
00:38:38,567 --> 00:38:41,700
and if you were to say the same,
that would add to that pressure

716
00:38:41,700 --> 00:38:44,466
on the House that they better
vote for this or they're going

717
00:38:44,467 --> 00:38:45,567
to see taxes go up.

718
00:38:45,567 --> 00:38:47,166
And you're declining
to do that, so --

719
00:38:47,166 --> 00:38:52,900
Mr. Carney:
Well, let's be clear, I'm doing
everything I can to make clear

720
00:38:52,900 --> 00:38:56,867
our view -- that the American
people overwhelmingly support

721
00:38:56,867 --> 00:39:01,166
this; the Senate
overwhelmingly supported it;

722
00:39:01,166 --> 00:39:03,967
it is overwhelmingly
the right thing to do;

723
00:39:03,967 --> 00:39:08,667
and that the American people
would be justifiably angry if

724
00:39:08,667 --> 00:39:11,133
Congress does not -- and in
this case, the House does not --

725
00:39:11,133 --> 00:39:15,033
vote to extend this tax cut.

726
00:39:15,033 --> 00:39:17,900
Because people are
going to wake up and --

727
00:39:17,900 --> 00:39:20,734
will spend the holiday season
trying to figure out how they

728
00:39:20,734 --> 00:39:24,834
will manage their budgets with
$1,000 less in their paychecks

729
00:39:24,834 --> 00:39:35,834
next year, because of this kind
of nonsensical behavior, where

730
00:39:35,834 --> 00:39:38,500
-- it takes compromise
to get things done here.

731
00:39:38,500 --> 00:39:41,934
We are a two-party system
in a divided government.

732
00:39:41,934 --> 00:39:44,100
And something happened on
Saturday in the Senate that has

733
00:39:44,100 --> 00:39:51,600
not happened often in this year:
89 senators voted for something

734
00:39:51,600 --> 00:39:54,967
that was not a post office
or a commemorative coin,

735
00:39:54,967 --> 00:39:58,433
39 of them Republicans.

736
00:39:58,433 --> 00:40:02,100
I think Americans who are
paying attention to this must be

737
00:40:02,100 --> 00:40:05,266
pulling their hair out when they
look at the House now refusing

738
00:40:05,266 --> 00:40:07,600
to do what the Senate did.

739
00:40:07,600 --> 00:40:11,767
The Press:
On a -- perhaps it seems
like a outdated question,

740
00:40:11,767 --> 00:40:15,899
all the way back to Saturday
-- on the issue of the Keystone

741
00:40:15,900 --> 00:40:20,767
provision that's in the Senate
bill and the bill in front of

742
00:40:20,767 --> 00:40:25,866
the House, why did the
administration accept that

743
00:40:25,867 --> 00:40:28,900
language given that
just a few days earlier,

744
00:40:28,900 --> 00:40:32,734
in the SAP on the House bill,
the administration indicated

745
00:40:32,734 --> 00:40:37,734
that it would not --
that it was opposed?

746
00:40:37,734 --> 00:40:40,633
Mr. Carney:
The administration indicated
in its SAP that it would --

747
00:40:40,633 --> 00:40:45,232
the President would
veto a specific bill.

748
00:40:45,233 --> 00:40:50,266
The President spoke in general
about an effort to mandate a

749
00:40:50,266 --> 00:40:56,300
decision -- a "yes" decision as
being something he would reject.

750
00:40:56,300 --> 00:41:01,400
This provision does not
mandate that outcome,

751
00:41:01,400 --> 00:41:03,800
which does not say that it's
-- does not mean it's not

752
00:41:03,800 --> 00:41:10,300
extraneous, that it's not wholly
irrelevant or unrelated to a

753
00:41:10,300 --> 00:41:13,033
payroll tax cut extension or an
unemployment extension or the

754
00:41:13,033 --> 00:41:14,799
SGR doc fix or any of that.

755
00:41:14,800 --> 00:41:19,667
It's a purely political thing
that was inserted by Republicans

756
00:41:19,667 --> 00:41:22,967
into the payroll
tax cut extension.

757
00:41:22,967 --> 00:41:27,233
We accepted it, Senate
Democrats accepted it,

758
00:41:27,233 --> 00:41:30,200
because that is part of
what compromise means.

759
00:41:30,200 --> 00:41:33,466
Sometimes you have to take
things that you don't want.

760
00:41:33,467 --> 00:41:38,266
But let's be clear about
what that provision,

761
00:41:38,266 --> 00:41:42,500
if the House does take the
appropriate action tonight and

762
00:41:42,500 --> 00:41:45,934
it becomes law, what that would
mean and what it would not mean.

763
00:41:45,934 --> 00:41:48,900
The Press:
But that provision that is in
the final Senate bill is the

764
00:41:48,900 --> 00:41:52,667
same provision that was in the
House bill that the statement of

765
00:41:52,667 --> 00:41:54,866
administration
policy suggested --

766
00:41:54,867 --> 00:41:56,367
Mr. Carney:
Right, but the SAP -- the
statement of administration

767
00:41:56,367 --> 00:42:00,500
policy said the President would
veto a bill which had many

768
00:42:00,500 --> 00:42:01,233
components to it; this was one.

769
00:42:01,233 --> 00:42:01,900
The Press:
I understand.

770
00:42:01,900 --> 00:42:02,934
I'm not saying it was a veto --

771
00:42:02,934 --> 00:42:06,400
Mr. Carney:
So there are other things that
could end up in a hypothetical

772
00:42:06,400 --> 00:42:09,967
resolution to this
and that would have --

773
00:42:09,967 --> 00:42:12,700
I mean, going back to that
period of time, which,

774
00:42:12,700 --> 00:42:14,933
as you say, seems like
a long time ago --

775
00:42:14,934 --> 00:42:20,367
it wasn't that any single
element that appeared in another

776
00:42:20,367 --> 00:42:22,900
bill would make that
bill veto-worthy.

777
00:42:22,900 --> 00:42:26,633
It was that that
bill would result,

778
00:42:26,633 --> 00:42:28,966
if it landed on the
President's desk, in a veto.

779
00:42:28,967 --> 00:42:31,500
Well, that bill now is dead
and will not land on the

780
00:42:31,500 --> 00:42:32,567
President's desk.

781
00:42:32,567 --> 00:42:36,066
The Press:
And the last question is, do you
believe that this will lead to a

782
00:42:36,066 --> 00:42:39,265
rejection of the
Keystone project?

783
00:42:39,266 --> 00:42:43,333
Mr. Carney:
I would only point you to the
statement made by the State

784
00:42:43,333 --> 00:42:50,867
Department about what a
60-day review would mean.

785
00:42:50,867 --> 00:42:52,700
The whole reason,
as I understand it,

786
00:42:52,700 --> 00:42:56,799
that more time was needed is
because to properly do the sort

787
00:42:56,800 --> 00:42:59,734
of assessments that need to
be done when you're evaluating

788
00:42:59,734 --> 00:43:02,933
these alternate
routes for a pipeline,

789
00:43:02,934 --> 00:43:04,633
it requires more
time than 60 days.

790
00:43:04,633 --> 00:43:07,265
So it would be very
difficult, as I understand it,

791
00:43:07,266 --> 00:43:11,533
for the State Department to
say that that review had been

792
00:43:11,533 --> 00:43:13,734
responsibly achieved in 60 days.

793
00:43:13,734 --> 00:43:18,834
But I would refer you
to that statement.

794
00:43:18,834 --> 00:43:20,265
Jackie.

795
00:43:20,266 --> 00:43:23,700
The Press:
Yes, Jay, does the White House
have any response to reports out

796
00:43:23,700 --> 00:43:27,299
of Baghdad that just a day after
the last U.S. combat troops

797
00:43:27,300 --> 00:43:32,533
rolled out, the Shiite-dominated
government has issued an arrest

798
00:43:32,533 --> 00:43:38,200
warrant for Vice President Tariq
al-Hashimi for having personal

799
00:43:38,200 --> 00:43:44,866
death squads that had
targeted opponents,

800
00:43:44,867 --> 00:43:48,767
and thus sparked fears of
political and sectarian

801
00:43:48,767 --> 00:43:50,399
fighting there?

802
00:43:50,400 --> 00:43:51,433
Mr. Carney:
I did have something on that.

803
00:43:51,433 --> 00:44:00,066
Hold on one second.

804
00:44:00,066 --> 00:44:00,734
Do you have it?

805
00:44:00,734 --> 00:44:01,900
Sorry -- thanks.

806
00:44:01,900 --> 00:44:08,266
Yes, this did just, as you
know, break -- this just in.

807
00:44:08,266 --> 00:44:11,767
Yes, well, what I can say
is we are monitoring this,

808
00:44:11,767 --> 00:44:14,866
monitoring the reports that an
arrest warrant has been issued

809
00:44:14,867 --> 00:44:19,500
for Vice President Tariq
al-Hashimi in Iraq.

810
00:44:19,500 --> 00:44:22,033
We are talking to all of
the parties and expressed --

811
00:44:22,033 --> 00:44:25,299
have expressed our concern
regarding these developments.

812
00:44:25,300 --> 00:44:27,867
We are urging all sides to
work to resolve differences

813
00:44:27,867 --> 00:44:30,800
peacefully and through dialogue,
in a manner consistent with the

814
00:44:30,800 --> 00:44:34,600
rule of law and the
democratic political process.

815
00:44:34,600 --> 00:44:35,799
Mark.

816
00:44:35,800 --> 00:44:40,433
The Press:
Jay, are you saying that if
the House votes tonight the way

817
00:44:40,433 --> 00:44:43,934
we're told it will, that the
White House is going to give up?

818
00:44:43,934 --> 00:44:45,934
I mean, that's the end of it --
you're going to say, all right,

819
00:44:45,934 --> 00:44:46,700
everybody go home?

820
00:44:46,700 --> 00:44:50,299
Mr. Carney:
I'm not accepting
that outcome --

821
00:44:50,300 --> 00:44:51,166
The Press:
You're going to
keep trying, right?

822
00:44:51,166 --> 00:44:52,600
Mr. Carney:
-- I'm not expecting
that outcome.

823
00:44:52,600 --> 00:44:54,533
The Press:
Yes, but you really
need to, right?

824
00:44:54,533 --> 00:44:58,232
Mr. Carney:
Well, I was told that it was
impossible for the Kansas City

825
00:44:58,233 --> 00:45:02,266
Chiefs to beat the Green Bay
Packers, and look what happened.

826
00:45:02,266 --> 00:45:03,133
The Press:
I think this is more --

827
00:45:03,133 --> 00:45:04,466
Mr. Carney:
You think it's
even more unlikely?

828
00:45:04,467 --> 00:45:08,033
The Press:
I mean, you're saying that if
the House votes tonight that

829
00:45:08,033 --> 00:45:10,400
Americans are going
to wake up angry,

830
00:45:10,400 --> 00:45:12,834
tearing their hair
out on January 1st.

831
00:45:12,834 --> 00:45:15,734
So it sounds like you're
saying, well, we give up.

832
00:45:15,734 --> 00:45:17,033
Mr. Carney:
No, I'm not saying that.

833
00:45:17,033 --> 00:45:23,799
What I am saying is that all
it would take is for 25 or 30

834
00:45:23,800 --> 00:45:28,066
Republicans to do what their
constituents overwhelmingly want

835
00:45:28,066 --> 00:45:32,332
them to do, which is grant this
extension of a payroll tax cut,

836
00:45:32,333 --> 00:45:38,834
to follow the overwhelming
bipartisan majority that was

837
00:45:38,834 --> 00:45:42,100
established in the Senate
in support of this measure,

838
00:45:42,100 --> 00:45:46,500
and allow this bill to reach the
President's desk and to have him

839
00:45:46,500 --> 00:45:47,867
sign it into law.

840
00:45:47,867 --> 00:45:52,734
I do not think that it is
an impossibility that that

841
00:45:52,734 --> 00:45:54,834
will happen.

842
00:45:54,834 --> 00:45:55,834
It may not.

843
00:45:55,834 --> 00:45:58,500
And if it doesn't we will
then address the situation

844
00:45:58,500 --> 00:45:59,567
after that.

845
00:45:59,567 --> 00:46:07,100
But the fact of the matter is --

846
00:46:07,100 --> 00:46:07,933
The Press:
Twelve hours --

847
00:46:07,934 --> 00:46:09,367
Mr. Carney:
-- 12 days, 8 hours --

848
00:46:09,367 --> 00:46:10,133
The Press:
-- 12 days, 8 hours --

849
00:46:10,133 --> 00:46:11,165
Mr. Carney:
-- until taxes go up.

850
00:46:11,166 --> 00:46:12,433
The Press:
It's less than before.

851
00:46:12,433 --> 00:46:14,600
[laughter]

852
00:46:14,600 --> 00:46:15,667
Mr. Carney:
It is less than before.

853
00:46:15,667 --> 00:46:16,633
[laughter]

854
00:46:16,633 --> 00:46:20,700
The march of time.

855
00:46:20,700 --> 00:46:25,866
I mean, Americans expect
Washington to work,

856
00:46:25,867 --> 00:46:28,533
and they expect when
political opponents,

857
00:46:28,533 --> 00:46:32,933
Democrats and Republicans to
come together and work out a

858
00:46:32,934 --> 00:46:36,133
compromise on a substantive
issue, a meaningful issue,

859
00:46:36,133 --> 00:46:39,299
like a payroll tax cut and
extension of unemployment

860
00:46:39,300 --> 00:46:41,400
insurance -- paid
for in both cases --

861
00:46:41,400 --> 00:46:45,567
as well as the other measures
-- provisions of that measure --

862
00:46:45,567 --> 00:46:48,467
that when they work it out --
Senator McConnell and Senator

863
00:46:48,467 --> 00:46:53,166
Reid and 89 senators vote with
them and support that measure --

864
00:46:53,166 --> 00:46:57,166
that most Americans would
probably expect the House to

865
00:46:57,166 --> 00:47:02,834
follow suit; would probably
expect at least 12 or 13% of

866
00:47:02,834 --> 00:47:06,533
House Republicans to follow the
82% of Senate Republicans in

867
00:47:06,533 --> 00:47:08,000
support of this.

868
00:47:08,000 --> 00:47:12,367
They would expect that for all
the reasons that I've spelled

869
00:47:12,367 --> 00:47:19,000
out, including the established
precedent in the way Washington

870
00:47:19,000 --> 00:47:25,633
works, that it is clear that
there was an expectation on the

871
00:47:25,633 --> 00:47:28,600
Hill that there would be
support for this in the House.

872
00:47:28,600 --> 00:47:31,366
It is unlikely I think, based
on your understanding of the

873
00:47:31,367 --> 00:47:34,033
Congress and how it works,
and everybody else here,

874
00:47:34,033 --> 00:47:37,734
that that measure would have
sailed over with huge bipartisan

875
00:47:37,734 --> 00:47:39,866
support in the House if there
hadn't been an expectation that

876
00:47:39,867 --> 00:47:41,467
it would also garner
support in the House.

877
00:47:41,467 --> 00:47:45,400
And then we have the comments
made by the Speaker of the House

878
00:47:45,400 --> 00:47:49,834
and his call with his
conference members.

879
00:47:49,834 --> 00:47:53,866
So hopefully they'll -- reason
will prevail and the vote will

880
00:47:53,867 --> 00:47:58,033
go accordingly.

881
00:47:58,033 --> 00:48:01,734
The Press:
What is it you think
Speaker Boehner is up to?

882
00:48:01,734 --> 00:48:03,200
You've got a
two-month extension.

883
00:48:03,200 --> 00:48:05,866
He wants to give you a year
extension, and you say, oh, no.

884
00:48:05,867 --> 00:48:07,867
Mr. Carney:
No, no, no, Mark.

885
00:48:07,867 --> 00:48:09,100
No, no, no, no, no.

886
00:48:09,100 --> 00:48:09,967
[laughter]

887
00:48:09,967 --> 00:48:10,834
The Press:
That's wrong?

888
00:48:10,834 --> 00:48:12,165
Mr. Carney:
We want a one-year extension.

889
00:48:12,166 --> 00:48:13,367
The President has made clear.

890
00:48:13,367 --> 00:48:17,000
We're only having this debate
-- the only reason why Americans

891
00:48:17,000 --> 00:48:19,900
might not have their taxes go
up on January 1st is because the

892
00:48:19,900 --> 00:48:23,433
President has been pushing
this since September, against,

893
00:48:23,433 --> 00:48:28,767
as you've all seen,
Republican resistance,

894
00:48:28,767 --> 00:48:35,633
and then tepid support, and
then less tepid support --

895
00:48:35,633 --> 00:48:37,466
The Press:
They seem pretty
strong about it today.

896
00:48:37,467 --> 00:48:39,867
Mr. Carney:
Yes, well, it is remarkable
how things change.

897
00:48:39,867 --> 00:48:42,967
But the fact is,
this President --

898
00:48:42,967 --> 00:48:47,633
it was a key element of the
American Jobs Act for a reason,

899
00:48:47,633 --> 00:48:49,299
because every element
of that jobs act,

900
00:48:49,300 --> 00:48:53,000
as I've said many times, was
inserted into it because it

901
00:48:53,000 --> 00:48:57,033
would have positive impact on
growth in the economy and growth

902
00:48:57,033 --> 00:48:59,400
in job creation, and because
they were the kinds of measures

903
00:48:59,400 --> 00:49:02,033
that had traditionally
earned bipartisan support.

904
00:49:02,033 --> 00:49:04,600
I mean, I've got in my
book here the number --

905
00:49:04,600 --> 00:49:08,200
statement after statement after
statement by Republicans back in

906
00:49:08,200 --> 00:49:10,966
2009 that their answer to
what the economy needed,

907
00:49:10,967 --> 00:49:14,200
their answer to what we needed
to grow the economy in that very

908
00:49:14,200 --> 00:49:18,366
difficult economic situation
was a payroll tax cut.

909
00:49:18,367 --> 00:49:19,934
Well, let's do it.

910
00:49:19,934 --> 00:49:20,934
Let's do it.

911
00:49:20,934 --> 00:49:21,934
The President supports it.

912
00:49:21,934 --> 00:49:23,400
The President wants a year deal.

913
00:49:23,400 --> 00:49:24,967
He pushed the year deal.

914
00:49:24,967 --> 00:49:29,133
When that was not achievable
in the timeframe we had,

915
00:49:29,133 --> 00:49:31,966
a bipartisan
compromise was reached;

916
00:49:31,967 --> 00:49:34,867
89 senators voted for it.

917
00:49:34,867 --> 00:49:38,166
We should do that so Americans
don't have their taxes go up.

918
00:49:38,166 --> 00:49:42,000
The Press:
So what is it you think
Speaker Boehner is up to?

919
00:49:42,000 --> 00:49:45,433
Mr. Carney:
I would not -- again, I think
I've made clear that there is an

920
00:49:45,433 --> 00:49:50,834
issue here about what one
subsection of the party

921
00:49:50,834 --> 00:49:52,533
is dictating.

922
00:49:52,533 --> 00:49:56,734
And you've seen from some of the
reporting and statements about,

923
00:49:56,734 --> 00:49:58,799
"don't want to give
President Obama a victory,"

924
00:49:58,800 --> 00:50:02,000
"we don't want to" -- I mean,
it's like they're for tax cuts

925
00:50:02,000 --> 00:50:03,166
unless Obama is for them.

926
00:50:03,166 --> 00:50:08,400
I mean, it's the kind of stuff
that Americans just get very

927
00:50:08,400 --> 00:50:10,333
rightfully angry about.

928
00:50:10,333 --> 00:50:12,934
We should just do this because
it's the right thing to do.

929
00:50:12,934 --> 00:50:13,900
Carrie.

930
00:50:13,900 --> 00:50:17,333
The Press:
Does the White House support
Harry Reid's position that he

931
00:50:17,333 --> 00:50:20,266
will not reopen negotiations?

932
00:50:20,266 --> 00:50:23,100
Mr. Carney:
Look, Harry Reid is
justifiably, I think,

933
00:50:23,100 --> 00:50:26,567
perplexed and frustrated by
the events of the weekend.

934
00:50:26,567 --> 00:50:29,567
He had worked very closely with
Senator McConnell to achieve the

935
00:50:29,567 --> 00:50:31,767
bipartisan compromise that
was reached and voted on

936
00:50:31,767 --> 00:50:35,299
on Saturday.

937
00:50:35,300 --> 00:50:37,667
And his position that the
House ought to pass this is

938
00:50:37,667 --> 00:50:38,834
our position.

939
00:50:38,834 --> 00:50:42,899
The Press:
But does the White House support
that position that this is it?

940
00:50:42,900 --> 00:50:49,233
Mr. Carney:
Look, as I've been saying, I
am not going to predict what

941
00:50:49,233 --> 00:50:53,867
happens if Republicans vote
to raise taxes tonight on the

942
00:50:53,867 --> 00:50:56,500
American people, because I
don't think, in the end --

943
00:50:56,500 --> 00:50:58,333
or I would remain hopeful
that they will not.

944
00:50:58,333 --> 00:51:00,266
So --

945
00:51:00,266 --> 00:51:03,767
The Press:
Is the White House committed
to making sure that this

946
00:51:03,767 --> 00:51:06,667
is resolved?

947
00:51:06,667 --> 00:51:07,734
There is clearly a standoff --

948
00:51:07,734 --> 00:51:09,767
Mr. Carney:
I think the President's
commitment to ensure that

949
00:51:09,767 --> 00:51:12,899
Americans don't have their taxes
go up on January 1st has been

950
00:51:12,900 --> 00:51:14,967
amply demonstrated.

951
00:51:14,967 --> 00:51:19,333
The Press:
So he will do what he has
to do to make sure --

952
00:51:19,333 --> 00:51:23,000
Mr. Carney:
He has done quite a bit to make
sure that Americans don't have

953
00:51:23,000 --> 00:51:25,767
their taxes go up, and he
will continue to do that.

954
00:51:25,767 --> 00:51:28,500
We need a partner in this.

955
00:51:28,500 --> 00:51:39,033
We had a partner in this,
demonstrated by the overwhelming

956
00:51:39,033 --> 00:51:41,500
bipartisan support for the
two-month extension, which,

957
00:51:41,500 --> 00:51:43,734
again, as the President
said on Saturday,

958
00:51:43,734 --> 00:51:47,834
that's not a huge victory, but
it was the right thing to do to

959
00:51:47,834 --> 00:51:51,399
ensure that we then got to a
place where the full extension

960
00:51:51,400 --> 00:51:53,033
could be passed.

961
00:51:53,033 --> 00:51:58,799
Blowing up the process now
is playing politics with the

962
00:51:58,800 --> 00:52:04,233
paychecks of 160
million Americans.

963
00:52:04,233 --> 00:52:06,200
Jake, and then -- yes.

964
00:52:06,200 --> 00:52:07,667
The Press:
Just in terms of
those paychecks,

965
00:52:07,667 --> 00:52:11,633
there is a logistical
question going on here.

966
00:52:11,633 --> 00:52:14,466
I got a letter -- I forwarded it
to you before this briefing so

967
00:52:14,467 --> 00:52:16,333
that you would be prepared
to answer the question --

968
00:52:16,333 --> 00:52:20,166
the National Payroll Reporting
Consortium has expressed.

969
00:52:20,166 --> 00:52:22,200
It wrote a letter to members
of Congress, Democrats,

970
00:52:22,200 --> 00:52:24,399
Republicans -- this is a
nonpartisan group that does not

971
00:52:24,400 --> 00:52:28,633
advocate one way or the other
-- about the legislation.

972
00:52:28,633 --> 00:52:32,633
And they feel that this cannot
be implemented properly.

973
00:52:32,633 --> 00:52:37,100
They said that it would
be fair to -- they told --

974
00:52:37,100 --> 00:52:38,967
the president told them it would
be fair to characterize this

975
00:52:38,967 --> 00:52:40,834
letter saying the two-month
payroll tax holiday cannot be

976
00:52:40,834 --> 00:52:42,734
implemented properly.

977
00:52:42,734 --> 00:52:45,834
He said, "the concern is that
it could create substantial

978
00:52:45,834 --> 00:52:48,232
problems, confusion in costs,
affecting a significant

979
00:52:48,233 --> 00:52:50,200
percentage of U.S.
employers and employees."

980
00:52:50,200 --> 00:52:51,066
It gets tactical.

981
00:52:51,066 --> 00:52:53,734
But the point is, they just
don't think there's enough lead

982
00:52:53,734 --> 00:52:56,200
time to do this, and because
it's only two months and not a

983
00:52:56,200 --> 00:52:58,433
year, that makes it
a lot more difficult.

984
00:52:58,433 --> 00:53:00,700
Mr. Carney:
Well, I appreciate that and
thank you for sending it to me

985
00:53:00,700 --> 00:53:02,567
ahead of time.

986
00:53:02,567 --> 00:53:03,567
Two points.

987
00:53:03,567 --> 00:53:09,033
One, again, because Congress
was so slow to get its work done

988
00:53:09,033 --> 00:53:11,933
last year, this was an issue
when the payroll tax cut was

989
00:53:11,934 --> 00:53:14,433
extended that it was so late
in the year that it had --

990
00:53:14,433 --> 00:53:20,333
it created complications, A,
but those were worked out.

991
00:53:20,333 --> 00:53:23,734
B, this President is committed
to make sure that his

992
00:53:23,734 --> 00:53:26,165
administration -- the
Treasury Department,

993
00:53:26,166 --> 00:53:29,367
his administration -- works with
American businesses to ensure

994
00:53:29,367 --> 00:53:35,367
that this tax cut is extended
for American taxpayers,

995
00:53:35,367 --> 00:53:38,834
wage-earners, people who
get a paycheck, 160 million.

996
00:53:38,834 --> 00:53:41,667
He would far rather ask this
administration to work overtime

997
00:53:41,667 --> 00:53:45,933
during the holidays to make that
happen than ask Americans to

998
00:53:45,934 --> 00:53:49,166
spend the holidays worrying how
are they going to make ends meet

999
00:53:49,166 --> 00:53:52,200
with $1,000 less
in their pockets.

1000
00:53:52,200 --> 00:53:53,200
Thanks, everybody.

1001
00:53:53,200 --> 00:53:56,667
The Press:
Jay, you have a question.

1002
00:53:56,667 --> 00:53:58,033
Mr. Carney:
Oh, I'm sorry, I
did, you're right.

1003
00:53:58,033 --> 00:53:59,133
I apologize.

1004
00:53:59,133 --> 00:54:01,700
I was so eager to go.

1005
00:54:01,700 --> 00:54:02,700
I wasn't, really.

1006
00:54:02,700 --> 00:54:03,667
Yes, sir.

1007
00:54:03,667 --> 00:54:04,232
The Press:
Thank you.

1008
00:54:04,233 --> 00:54:05,200
Two questions.

1009
00:54:05,200 --> 00:54:08,366
[laughter]

1010
00:54:08,367 --> 00:54:10,500
Mr. Carney:
Wise guy.

1011
00:54:10,500 --> 00:54:13,667
The Press:
On North Korea -- last night the
statement that you put out was a

1012
00:54:13,667 --> 00:54:16,400
little vague about -- obviously
things have cleared up since

1013
00:54:16,400 --> 00:54:19,700
then, but can you describe how
the President learned about the

1014
00:54:19,700 --> 00:54:21,332
death of Kim Jong-il?

1015
00:54:21,333 --> 00:54:24,567
Mr. Carney:
The Chief of Staff notified
him at about 10:30 p.m.

1016
00:54:24,567 --> 00:54:28,000
The Press:
And was that based on reports --
news reports from South Korean

1017
00:54:28,000 --> 00:54:29,433
news, or where was that --

1018
00:54:29,433 --> 00:54:33,100
Mr. Carney:
I believe it was established
in news reports that the North

1019
00:54:33,100 --> 00:54:35,467
Koreans had made
that announcement.

1020
00:54:35,467 --> 00:54:38,567
The Press:
And then you've described a
lot about why the President --

1021
00:54:38,567 --> 00:54:41,300
how this is a priority, the
payroll tax cut is a priority.

1022
00:54:41,300 --> 00:54:45,000
Aside from the optics of
not leaving for vacation,

1023
00:54:45,000 --> 00:54:49,900
what is the President doing
here that he can't do in Hawaii?

1024
00:54:49,900 --> 00:54:53,033
Mr. Carney:
Well, it's a fair point that
as we've made clear on other

1025
00:54:53,033 --> 00:54:57,767
occasions, the presidency
travels with the President.

1026
00:54:57,767 --> 00:55:00,834
But he's been in
meetings all day long --

1027
00:55:00,834 --> 00:55:05,433
I've been in some of them -- and
he will continue to work here

1028
00:55:05,433 --> 00:55:09,533
and do -- as well as on other
areas unrelated to this,

1029
00:55:09,533 --> 00:55:11,933
fulfill his duties from
here in the White House,

1030
00:55:11,934 --> 00:55:15,200
and will continue to do that
because he believes this is

1031
00:55:15,200 --> 00:55:17,567
absolutely the
number-one priority,

1032
00:55:17,567 --> 00:55:19,266
that Congress needs
to take action,

1033
00:55:19,266 --> 00:55:21,400
the House needs to vote
accordingly to make sure that

1034
00:55:21,400 --> 00:55:23,667
Americans don't have
their taxes go up.

1035
00:55:23,667 --> 00:55:28,667
And he's working toward that
end and will continue to do so.

1036
00:55:28,667 --> 00:55:31,433
The Press:
And on the meetings, you said
at the beginning when answering

1037
00:55:31,433 --> 00:55:36,400
Ben's question, you said that
he's having conversations with

1038
00:55:36,400 --> 00:55:38,667
Senate Democrat leaders, who
were having conversations with

1039
00:55:38,667 --> 00:55:41,767
Senate Republican leaders, and
it's not the White House's job

1040
00:55:41,767 --> 00:55:45,299
to be an intermediary
between that group and the

1041
00:55:45,300 --> 00:55:46,300
House Republicans.

1042
00:55:46,300 --> 00:55:49,767
Is the White House engaged
with any group beyond the --

1043
00:55:49,767 --> 00:55:55,200
is there direct contact
beyond the Senate Democrats?

1044
00:55:55,200 --> 00:55:57,700
Mr. Carney:
Again, I think the President
told you that he spoke with

1045
00:55:57,700 --> 00:55:59,767
Senator McConnell on Saturday.

1046
00:55:59,767 --> 00:56:03,866
My broader point was, in that
process that led to the vote on

1047
00:56:03,867 --> 00:56:06,967
Saturday in the Senate, the
President was engaged with

1048
00:56:06,967 --> 00:56:13,367
Senate Democratic leadership
in their efforts to work with

1049
00:56:13,367 --> 00:56:18,867
Senator McConnell and Senate
Republicans to find a bipartisan

1050
00:56:18,867 --> 00:56:21,834
compromise and solution.

1051
00:56:21,834 --> 00:56:26,366
His goal remains a full
one-year extension.

1052
00:56:26,367 --> 00:56:29,567
His highest priority is that
Americans don't see their taxes

1053
00:56:29,567 --> 00:56:31,467
go up on January 1st.

1054
00:56:31,467 --> 00:56:33,633
And what, as he made
clear on Saturday,

1055
00:56:33,633 --> 00:56:39,933
what the overwhelming
vote in the Senate,

1056
00:56:39,934 --> 00:56:46,033
bipartisan vote in the Senate,
on that bill made sure would not

1057
00:56:46,033 --> 00:56:48,799
happen is that Americans would
not have their taxes go up if

1058
00:56:48,800 --> 00:56:50,133
the House followed suit.

1059
00:56:50,133 --> 00:56:57,567
And going back to the point
about communicating between

1060
00:56:57,567 --> 00:57:09,300
Republicans, it was certainly
not our expectation that the

1061
00:57:09,300 --> 00:57:14,100
Senate Republicans would have
moved so overwhelmingly in favor

1062
00:57:14,100 --> 00:57:18,600
of a piece of legislation if
they didn't have some reason to

1063
00:57:18,600 --> 00:57:20,500
believe that the House
would follow suit.

1064
00:57:20,500 --> 00:57:22,800
The Press:
But that wasn't
independently verified?

1065
00:57:22,800 --> 00:57:26,166
Mr. Carney:
Again, we have conversations at
multiple levels with folks on

1066
00:57:26,166 --> 00:57:28,500
the Hill, but I'm not going
to get into detailed readouts.

1067
00:57:28,500 --> 00:57:29,500
Thank you.