Template talk:SimplSVG
Don't want to be too nitpicky, but a native speaker of English would probably not abbreviate "Simple" to "Simpl"... AnonMoos (talk) 10:48, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Isn't it an abbreviation of "simplified" or “simplify”, or even usefully ambiguous? —Unbitwise (talk) 23:04, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
- I rather thought like Unbitwise guesses. Thank you AnonMoos, you may find lots of things like that due to my poor English. Hopefully you understand anyway, and it does not hurt you too much. sarang♥사랑 13:27, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Examples how the template can display
[edit]While the categorization is always the same, with the parameter vstyle (abbr. "vs") the number of lines is influenced:
- max. information: vs=<nowiki/>: 3 lines
- less information: vs=fl: 2 lines, smaller tool icon
- least information: vs=none: 1 line, no tool information
With " ", "S", "M" or "H" as parameter (number 5 to 8) the text is designed, with "Z" suppressed.
The code of the template decides which one is the default layout.
Standard layout
[edit]without vs=
parameter
Previous version had been created with Inkscape (100 bytes) now 1% of previous size
with parameter vs=
but empty
reduced text without vs=
parameter
Previous version had been created with Adobe Illustrator (100 bytes) y now 1% of previous size
reduced text with empty vs=
Large layout
[edit]vs=nowiki
Previous version had been created with Sodipodi-Inkscape (100 bytes) now 1% of previous size
with reduced text:
Previous version had been created with CorelDRAW (100 bytes) y now 1% of previous size
Smaller layout
[edit]vs=fl
Previous version had been created with Adobe Illustrator (100 bytes) y now 1% of previous size
with reduced text:
Previous version had been created with Inkscape (100 bytes) y now 1% of previous size
Mini layout
[edit]vs=none
Currently the default layout is set to "Mini" (without any text).
Clarify description
[edit]"or {{ Image generation | 9 = + | 10 = S | other parameters as described below }}
"
What means that?? The parameters are nowhere described. Furthermore, is this template replaced by the "Image generation"? This is for sure an extraordinary template, but more extra ordinary is to have several templates of the same!? (@Sarang: ) Greetings ↔ User: Perhelion 15:32, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Ok, I see now this parameters implement this template in the other template. Had anyone recognized this per description? ↔ User: Perhelion 15:37, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, I am still absent (in New Zealand), but I happened to see this posting.
- I confess, the "9=+|10=S" are a violation of {{Igen}} that it can be used even to set the {{SimplSVG}}; may be I am the only one doing that, but there are also not so many users working with either of these two templates...
- @Perhelion: , do you think a description would be useful? Most people don't read them at all! But I can care of it when I am back. Greetings -- sarang♥사랑 08:30, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Hallo @Sarang: , ich habe leider den triftigen Eindruck die Vorlage ist hier zum Sterben abgelegt. Den Parameter für die %-Darstellungen findet man nur mit Mühe hier (wenn man weiß dass es diesen geben muss "vs"), dies gehört (auch mit Bsp-Code) auf die Docu-Seite. Auch scheint mir die Implementierung in das "other_fields" zu fehlen (SVG section). Die Implementierung in Imgen funzt ja auch noch(?) nicht wirklich. Daher die Frage: Ist die Vorlage nun obsolet? -- User: Perhelion 14:02, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- Ich bin nicht so sehr glücklich über diese Vorlage, weil sie nicht in das Konzept der anderen Vorlagen passt; zwar habe ich sie so halbwegs passend gemacht um sie integrieren zu können, was ja so leidlich tut, aber eben nur mit Klimmzug und für andere wohl undurchschaubar.
- Ich habe sie vor langer Zeit erstellt um für Interessierte eine Sammlung von SVG-Vereinfachungen anzulegen - sortiert nach Vereinfachungsgrad und mit einiger Beschreibung. Sie ist über 3000mal eingebunden - von obsolet keine Spur. In letzter Zeit binde ich sie fast nur mehr mit Igen ein, vor allem wegen der feineren Kategorisierung.
- SimplSVG kann als Unterfunktion von Igen verwendet werden und ist daher dort beschrieben, andersrum wird Igen hier nur marginal erwähnt, wie auch alle SVG created with ... templates nur kurz auf die Möglichkeiten hinweisen die es mit Igen gibt - zB neuerdings die Aufhübschung mit den Topics.
- Ist deine Frage damit beantwortet? Gruss -- sarang♥사랑 16:27, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
user=
[edit]If I inferred correctly, this parameter specifies a person who made changes to the image. The {{Retouched picture}} uses editor=
for the same purpose. I suggest to switch the name to editor
in this (and possibly other) templates for consistency – of course, leaving user
as its alias. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:53, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you @Incnis Mrsi: it is a very good idea to simplify its usage that way - but it is not so easy. When any of the parameters of Retouched picture is used in Image generation, the Retouched picture is inserted; by that reason, the parameter "editor" is not free for that purpose (the same restriction exists for the parameters "editoff", "orig", "origoff", "r" and "R").
- I am not at all happy with the different development that now the same object is referenced with either "editor" (one template), "by" (often), "user" (most times) and more parameters and aliases.
- Of course it could be done for SimplSVG and all the other "Created with"-templates; but that would cause just a more difficult inconsistency with Image generation; I suggest to use not the different templates but only Image generation, where the usage of "user=" can be simplified by the alias "u=" and the more powerful "U=". -- sarang♥사랑 16:00, 25 November 2017 (UTC)