Template talk:ESO
Versione italiana/Italian version
[edit]È da correggere "collagamento" con "collegamento"./"collagamento" has to be substituted with the correct word "collegamento". -- Gi87 (talk) 16:19, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
ESO Creative Commons licensing update notification
[edit]Hi everyone ! The European Southern Observatory has updated their copyright notice. ESO images and videos are now licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This template must be updated too ! Sincerely, --Neptunia (talk) 23:37, 3 November 2014 (UTC) {{Edit request}} See above. The text on the referenced web page states, "...the images, videos, and music distributed on the public ESO website, along with the texts of press releases, announcements, pictures of the week, blog posts and captions, are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, and may on a non-exclusive basis be reproduced without fee provided the credit is clear and visible." Please update. A loose noose (talk) 00:16, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Picture, not photograph
[edit]"Photograph" should be replaced with "picture" in all languages, as not every image under this license is a photograph (e. g. File:Artist's impression of the planet orbiting Proxima Centauri.jpg). -jem- (talk) 09:01, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Hmm Jude Lucius (talk) 09:31, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Hw is dat possible Jude Lucius (talk) 09:32, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- The requested edit (above) should correct this. A loose noose (talk) 00:17, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
add image for clarity
[edit]File:European Southern Observatory (ESO) logo.svg--Sergkarman (talk) 06:21, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
_logo.svg){kind=link}
Done. Sealle (talk) 11:15, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
CC-BY-3.0 vs. CC-BY-4.0
[edit]The used licence changed from CC-BY-3.0 to CC-BY-4.0. Since a CC licence can not be revoked once the image is licenced under it, the images should be dual-licenced.
@Denniss: Has there been ever done something about this? I saw that eg. VISTA infrared mosaic of the central Milky Way.jpg has the CC-BY-3.0 template added to it. Was that done for every image or just a few?
Seen from the other side:Shouldn't there be something like {{ESO - CC-BY-3.0}} for old files that includes both licences?
--D-Kuru (talk) 19:34, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
