File:Technoculture-on-EuroScientist -9 Sabina Lonelli.webm

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file(WebM audio/video file, VP9/Opus, length 10 min 51 s, 1,920 × 1,080 pixels, 2.87 Mbps overall, file size: 222.85 MB)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary

[edit]
Description
English: Sabina Leonelli is professor of philosophy and history of science at the university of Exeter in the UK, where she co-directs the center for the study of the life sciences. She is an expert of the #OpenScience movement, the topic of this interview for EuroScientist, recorded in Los Angeles, California, shortly before the COVID-19 pandemic broke out.

0:34 Sabina gives an overview of the progress the Open Science Movement has made since our last interview, over a year prior (late 2018).

0:56 Recently, we have seen the most activity in Open Access publishing, especially due to the #PlanS.

1:43 Sabina mentioned Wiley and Springer Nature, as examples of publishers that are responding to Plan S and setting up "transformative agreements" to transition from the current situation to a situation where everything is freely accessible to the readers.

2:45 Sabina talks about the FAIR Data Principles: Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable.

3:13 How is the Open Science movement changing research assessment?

3:34 "Making your data available and FAIR, actually requires a lot of extra work."

4:00 Data managing is not a detail in your research, it affects the entire research design.

4:28 In order to change research assessment, we need to change how research performing institutions and research funders shift the ways in which they think about research excellence.

4:43 Implementing Open Science requires that we abandon quantitative metrics (in research assessment.)

5:33 Ghent University in Belgium is mentioned as an example of an institution that has revised its guidelines for the advancement of the career of the professors by including Open Science criteria.

7:00 The #ESOF2020 conference is mentioned. This interview was recorded before the COVID-19 pandemic forced the organization to postpone the event to September 2020.

7:14 What is a platform where researchers can engage in a conversation about Open Science, keep up to date, and feel involved? Sabina mentions: - Open Science on the website of the European Commission: https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/ - Open Science Monitor (tool of the European Commission): https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/strategy/goals-research-and-innovation-policy/open-science/open-science-monitor_en - OpenAire: https://www.openaire.eu

8:20 Is the Open Science movement something that started in Europe?

9:23 Open Science is something that deserves political support.

9:35 Europe has played a leading role in promoting Open Science.

9:42 Recently the #UnitedNations have committed to Open Science by implementing it into its UN 2030 Agenda.

10:03 Sabina talks about South America and how Open Science has had a very long history there, especially in terms of publishing.
Date
Source YouTube: Technoculture-on-EuroScientist #9 Sabina Lonelli – View/save archived versions on archive.org and archive.today
Author Federica Bressan

Licensing

[edit]
This video, screenshot or audio excerpt was originally uploaded on YouTube under a CC license.
Their website states: "YouTube allows users to mark their videos with a Creative Commons CC BY license."
To the uploader: You must provide a link (URL) to the original file and the authorship information if available.
w:en:Creative Commons
attribution
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license.
Attribution: Federica Bressan
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
This file, which was originally posted to an external website, has not yet been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer to confirm that the above license is valid. See Category:License review needed for further instructions.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current11:28, 15 November 202310 min 51 s, 1,920 × 1,080 (222.85 MB)Vysotsky (talk | contribs)Imported media from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQGDbyFYUhI

The following page uses this file:

Transcode status

Update transcode status
Format Bitrate Download Status Encode time
VP9 1080P 3.24 Mbps Completed 11:59, 15 November 2023 30 min 49 s
Streaming 1080p (VP9) 3.14 Mbps Completed 11:45, 15 November 2023 16 min 46 s
VP9 720P 1.7 Mbps Completed 11:42, 15 November 2023 14 min 4 s
Streaming 720p (VP9) 1.61 Mbps Completed 11:38, 15 November 2023 10 min 12 s
VP9 480P 895 kbps Completed 11:44, 15 November 2023 10 min 29 s
Streaming 480p (VP9) 805 kbps Completed 11:43, 15 November 2023 10 min 21 s
VP9 360P 502 kbps Completed 11:34, 15 November 2023 5 min 11 s
Streaming 360p (VP9) 413 kbps Completed 11:35, 15 November 2023 6 min 50 s
VP9 240P 299 kbps Completed 11:34, 15 November 2023 5 min 53 s
Streaming 240p (VP9) 211 kbps Completed 11:33, 15 November 2023 5 min 1 s
WebM 360P 801 kbps Completed 11:33, 15 November 2023 4 min 31 s
Streaming 144p (MJPEG) 1 Mbps Completed 11:29, 15 November 2023 44 s
Stereo (Opus) 87 kbps Completed 11:34, 15 November 2023 12 s
Stereo (MP3) 128 kbps Completed 11:34, 15 November 2023 12 s

Metadata