File:Performance assessment of the deep learning technologies in grading glaucoma severity.pdf
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Size of this JPG preview of this PDF file: 463 × 599 pixels. Other resolutions: 185 × 240 pixels | 371 × 480 pixels | 593 × 768 pixels | 1,275 × 1,650 pixels.
Original file (1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 345 KB, MIME type: application/pdf, 12 pages)
File information
Structured data
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionPerformance assessment of the deep learning technologies in grading glaucoma severity.pdf |
English: Objective: To validate and compare the performance of eight available deep learning architectures in grading the severity of glaucoma based on color fundus images. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively collected a dataset of 5978 fundus images and their glaucoma severities were annotated by the consensus of two experienced ophthalmologists. We preprocessed the images to generate global and local regions of interest (ROIs), namely the global field-of-view images and the local disc region images. We then divided the generated images into three independent sub-groups for training, validation, and testing purposes. With the datasets, eight convolutional neural networks (CNNs) (i.e., VGG16, VGG19, ResNet, DenseNet, InceptionV3, InceptionResNet, Xception, and NASNetMobile) were trained separately to grade glaucoma severity, and validated quantitatively using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the quadratic kappa score. Results: The CNNs, except VGG16 and VGG19, achieved average kappa scores of 80.36% and 78.22% when trained from scratch on global and local ROIs, and 85.29% and 82.72% when fine-tuned using the pre-trained weights, respectively. VGG16 and VGG19 achieved reasonable accuracy when trained from scratch, but they failed when using pre-trained weights for global and local ROIs. Among these CNNs, the DenseNet had the highest classification accuracy (i.e., 75.50%) based on pre-trained weights when using global ROIs, as compared to 65.50% when using local ROIs. Conclusion: The experiments demonstrated the feasibility of the deep learning technology in grading glaucoma severity. In particular, global field-of-view images contain relatively richer information that may be critical for glaucoma assessment, suggesting that we should use the entire field-of-view of a fundus image for training a deep learning network. |
Date | |
Source | Content available at arXiv.org (Dedicated link) (archive.org link) |
Author | Yi Zhen, Lei Wang, Han Liu, Jian Zhang, Jiantao Pu |
Licensing
[edit]This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
This media file is uncategorized.
Please help improve this media file by adding it to one or more categories, so it may be associated with related media files (how?), and so that it can be more easily found.
Please notify the uploader with {{subst:Please link images|File:Performance assessment of the deep learning technologies in grading glaucoma severity.pdf}} ~~~~ |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 17:32, 8 November 2018 | 1,275 × 1,650, 12 pages (345 KB) | Acagastya (talk | contribs) | User created page with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Short title | |
---|---|
Image title | |
Author | |
Software used | [[w:|]] |
Conversion program | Foxit Reader PDF Printer Version 7.1.0.112 |
Encrypted | no |
Page size | 612 x 792 pts (letter) |
Version of PDF format | 1.7 |