File:NLC404-01J002789-28561 江西高等法院公報 1928年2期.pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,431 × 2,031 pixels, file size: 2.36 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 110 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary

[edit]
江西高等法院公報   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
江西高等法院公報處
image of artwork listed in title parameter on this page
Title
江西高等法院公報
Volume 1928年2期
Publisher
江西高等法院公報處[發行者]
Description

公文類
命令
司法部命令
任命(計七件)
令各省高等法院發外交部咨送已廢各約清單及臨時辦法各一份仰飭屬一體遵照由
令各省高等法院奉國民政府令檢發政軍警各機關工作人員研究黨義暫行條例仰即飭屬一體遵照由
本院命令
委令(計十件)
訓令
令各屬奉司法部令發審理煙案簡易程序轉發知照由
令各屬奉司法部令發修正禁煙條例轉發知照由
令各屬奉省政府令抄發法官懲戒條例轉令知照由
令各屬奉司法部令發內地外國教會租用土地房屋暫行章程轉令知照由
令各屬奉省政府令發縣長辦理盜匪案件考績暫行條例轉令查照由
令各屬奉司法部令發刑法施行日期原提案書轉令知照由
令各屬奉司法部令發司法機關依印花稅暫行條例科罰及執行規則轉令知照由

批兼理司法峽江縣縣長呈送十十一月訴訟月報表由
批南城縣司法委員呈送九十月各項調查表判決書由
批都昌縣司法委員呈送十一月訴訟月報表由
批兼理司法靖安縣長呈送十六年十二月訴訟月報表冊由
法規類
章制
國民政府公布者
黨員背誓罪條例
修正國民政府禁煙條例
法官懲戒暫行條例
縣長辦理盜匪案件考績暫行條例
處理逆產條例
中華民國與各外國舊約已廢新約未訂前適用之臨時辦法
司法部公布者
訴訟狀紙規則
司法部印紙規則
審理煙案簡易程序
內地外國教會租用土地房屋暫行章程
司法機關依印花稅暫行條例科罰及執行規則
其他機關公布者
政軍警各機關工作人員研究黨義暫行條例
解釋法令文件
最高法院解釋法令文
審判
解釋縣司法公署司法委員兼有審判檢察兩種職權刑案判決未確定者原告訴人能否准其上訴由(附湖北高等法院首席檢察官代電十七年二月二十五日解字第三十一號)
民事
解釋離婚應否參照現行規律又現行律關於定婚及主婚權之規定應否適用由(附安徽高等法院請解釋電十七年二月二十八日解字第三三號)
解釋對於婦女運動決議案女子有財產承繼權由(附福建高等法院原函十七年解字第四八號)
解釋關於服內婚姻事件由(附湖南高等法院請解釋函十七年四月十一日解字第五九號)
刑事
解釋黨員背誓條例第四條規定是否包括刑律第三百八十六條及三百九十二條之罪由(附司法部轉丹徒地審廳代電原函十六年解字第二號)
解釋刑律補充條例廢止後和姦和誘應否科罪及將女子許人作妾後被誘其生母有無告訴權由(附廣西高等法院一分院請解釋原函十七年四月三日解字五六號)
解釋北京政府之赦令應否適用由(附浙江高等法院首席檢察官請解釋呈十七年解字第五四號)
特種刑事
解釋特種刑事案件對於適用懲治土豪劣紳條例發生疑問由(附浙江紹興縣律師協會請解釋原電十六年解字第一號)
解釋特種刑事臨時法院未成立以前已經判決尚未確定應否認為有效由(附湖北高等法院首席檢察官請解釋原電十七年解字第六八號)
最高法院判例
民事(計六十二件)
刑事(計十八件)
判詞類
民事訴訟案件
民事判決
傅紹泉與趙友蘭因貨款涉訟控告案(十六年控字第一二號)
王意興與饒清澄因水利涉訟控告案(十六年控字第一八號)
葉炳煌等因寺產涉訟控告案(十七年控字第七九號)
於學達等因湖界涉訟上告案(十七年上字第三○號)
民事決定
王英武等因州地涉訟抗告案(十七年抗字第一號)
陶蔡氏等因贖出涉訟抗告案(十七年抗字第二號)
李亢宗等因遺產涉訟抗告案(十七年抗字第一二號)
刑事訴訟案件
刑事判決
舒惠淮因傷害控告案(十七年控字第一六六號)
蔣得勝因殺人覆判案(十七年覆字第二九號)
檢察文件類
意見書
江西高等法院檢察官對於本院刑庭諮詢李熊氏因上高縣政府受理李文杰傷害延不進行聲請移轉管轄一案意見書
江西高等法院檢察官對於本院刑庭諮詢黃連廷因誣告案聲請指定或移轉管轄一案意見書
江西高等法院檢察官對於餘干縣司法委員呈送覆判江體泉殺人一案意見書
別錄類
報告
訴訟報告
江西高等法院民事訴訟案件月報表(十七年六月份)
江西高等法院刑事訴訟案件月報表(十七年六月份)
江西高等法院檢察處刑事訴訟案件月報表(十七年六月份)
監獄報告
第二監獄呈報外役囚犯乘間脫逃請予分別處分並乞通緝由
九江地方法院院長呈覆調查外役囚犯脫逃情形由
第二監獄呈覆遵令辦理囚犯李得榮脫逃案分別處懲各員由
撰述
司法部向五中全會建議撤廢特種法庭案全文

Language Chinese
Publication date 1928~[?]
Source
institution QS:P195,Q732353
(民國時期文獻 民國期刊)
館藏信息
InfoField
573.05

Licensing

[edit]
This image is in the public domain because it is a mere mechanical scan or photocopy of a public domain original, or – from the available evidence – is so similar to such a scan or photocopy that no copyright protection can be expected to arise. The original itself is in the public domain for the following reason:
Public domain
This image is now in the public domain in China because its term of copyright has expired.

According to copyright laws of the People's Republic of China (with legal jurisdiction in the mainland only, excluding Hong Kong and Macao), amended November 11, 2020, Works of legal persons or organizations without legal personality, or service works, or audiovisual works, enter the public domain 50 years after they were first published, or if unpublished 50 years from creation. For photography works of natural persons whose copyright protection period expires before June 1, 2021 belong to the public domain. All other works of natural persons enter the public domain 50 years after the death of the creator.
According to copyright laws of Republic of China (currently with jurisdiction in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen, Matsu, etc.), all photographs and cinematographic works, and all works whose copyright holder is a juristic person, enter the public domain 50 years after they were first published, or if unpublished 50 years from creation, and all other applicable works enter the public domain 50 years after the death of the creator.

Important note: Works of foreign (non-U.S.) origin must be out of copyright or freely licensed in both their home country and the United States in order to be accepted on Commons. Works of Chinese origin that have entered the public domain in the U.S. due to certain circumstances (such as publication in noncompliance with U.S. copyright formalities) may have had their U.S. copyright restored under the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA) if the work was under copyright in its country of origin on the date that the URAA took effect in that country. (For the People's Republic of China, the URAA took effect on January 1, 1996. For the Republic of China (ROC), the URAA took effect on January 1, 2002.[1])
To uploader: Please provide where the image was first published and who created it or held its copyright.

You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States.

čeština  Deutsch  English  português  română  slovenščina  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  македонски  русский  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文  +/−



This tag is designed for use where there may be a need to assert that any enhancements (eg brightness, contrast, colour-matching, sharpening) are in themselves insufficiently creative to generate a new copyright. It can be used where it is unknown whether any enhancements have been made, as well as when the enhancements are clear but insufficient. For known raw unenhanced scans you can use an appropriate {{PD-old}} tag instead. For usage, see Commons:When to use the PD-scan tag.


Note: This tag applies to scans and photocopies only. For photographs of public domain originals taken from afar, {{PD-Art}} may be applicable. See Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current16:46, 23 August 2022Thumbnail for version as of 16:46, 23 August 20221,431 × 2,031, 110 pages (2.36 MB)PencakeBot (talk | contribs)Upload 江西高等法院公報 1928年2期 (10/26) by 江西高等法院公報處 (batch task; nlc:data_404,01J002789,28561; 民國期刊.8; 江西高等法院公報)

Metadata