File:Marcin Rotkiewicz ESC2017.webm
Original file (WebM audio/video file, VP8/Vorbis, length 25 min 13 s, 1,920 × 1,080 pixels, 1.39 Mbps overall, file size: 250.65 MB)
Captions
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionMarcin Rotkiewicz ESC2017.webm |
English: Rational thinking vs. moral disgust: Why the discussion about GMOs is so hard and the scientific evidence is unable to convince the public"
Marcin Rotkiewicz European Skeptics Congress www.ecso.org Marcin Rotkiewicz (born 1972) - journalist with more than 20 years experience of science journalism; working for Polityka, the most influential newsweekly in Poland; scientific interests: biotechnology, evolutionary psychology, human evolution, neuroscience, nuclear energy. Knight Science Journalism Fellow at Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2008/09. "Rational thinking vs. moral disgust: Why the discussion about GMOs is so hard and the scientific evidence is unable to convince the public" Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) - mostly genetically engineered plants - have met with huge public opposition over the past twenty years. Many people around the world (especially in Europe) believe that GMOs are very dangerous for the environment and for human health. This is in spite of overwhelming scientific evidence (thousands of studies, publications and reports) that GMOs are safe to eat, and that they bring environmental benefits by making agriculture more sustainable. Why is there such inconsistency between what the scientific community tells about GMOs, and what the public thinks? In 80s and 90s of the XX century, American activist Jeremy Rifkin launched a very aggressive campaign against GMOs. He persuaded Greenpeace to join his war. And then together with other environmental organizations and sellers of organic products they started one of the most successful propaganda campaigns ever. This campaign uses intuitively appealing negative representations of GMOs. For example Greenpeace used “Fish-tomato” graphics showing a tomato with fins, or, with fish-eyes staring at people from a plate. By tapping into intuitions and emotions, such representations become easy to accept. They capture people attention, they are easily processed and remembered and thus stand a greater chance of being transmitted and becoming popular. Even if they are false. That is why it is so hard to fight the fear of GMOs with rational arguments and scientific evidence |
Date | |
Source | YouTube: Marcin Rotkiewicz - ESC 2017 – View/save archived versions on archive.org and archive.today |
Author | ESC European Skeptics Congress |
Licensing
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/09/YouTube_full-color_icon_%282017%29.svg/80px-YouTube_full-color_icon_%282017%29.svg.png)
![w:en:Creative Commons](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/CC_some_rights_reserved.svg/90px-CC_some_rights_reserved.svg.png)
![attribution](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/11/Cc-by_new_white.svg/24px-Cc-by_new_white.svg.png)
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
![]() |
This file, which was originally posted to YouTube: ESC 2017 - Marcin Rotkiewicz: "Rational thinking vs. moral disgust:, was reviewed on 14 February 2020 by the automatic software YouTubeReviewBot, which confirmed that this video was available there under the stated Creative Commons license on that date. This file should not be deleted if the license has changed in the meantime. The Creative Commons license is irrevocable.
The bot only checks for the license, human review is still required to check if the video is a derivative work, has freedom of panorama related issues and other copyright problems that might be present in the video. Visit licensing for more information. If you are a license reviewer, you can review this file by manually appending |
![]() |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 17:28, 6 November 2017 | 25 min 13 s, 1,920 × 1,080 (250.65 MB) | Nederlandse Leeuw (talk | contribs) | Imported media from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcVzk9xGMs0 |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
Transcode status
Update transcode statusFile usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on en.wikipedia.org
- Usage on pl.wikipedia.org
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Software used | Lavf57.25.100 |
---|