File:Driver Resists Arrest After Refusing to Identify Himself During Traffic Stop.webm

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file (WebM audio/video file, VP9/Opus, length 11 min 15 s, 1,920 × 1,080 pixels, 1.8 Mbps overall, file size: 144.97 MB)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary

[edit]
Description
English: Redding, California — On September 12, 2024, 38-year-old Fredrick “Rick” Phillips, was stopped by an officer with the Redding Police Department (RPD), on Bechelli Lane for a speeding violation. Phillips refused to identify himself as required by law for a traffic violation. Phillips was advised by the officer that he was being placed under arrest. Phillips became combative and refused to follow orders given by the officer. During the struggle, Phillips made several attempts to put his vehicle into drive. Phillips was ultimately taken into custody with the assistance of two citizens. RPD said that before being booked into the Shasta County Jail, Phillips was transported to a local hospital where he was cleared by a medical doctor. RPD said that misinformation around the arrest as well as allegations of excessive force the officer that spread online alleged that Phillips had been struck 10 times by the officer. RPD said the body cam footage shows that these allegations are inaccurate.
Date
Source YouTube: Driver Resists Arrest After Refusing to Identify Himself During Traffic Stop – View/save archived versions on archive.org and archive.today
Author RPD

Licensing

[edit]
Public domain
This work was created by a government unit (including state, county, city, and municipal government agencies) that derives its powers from the laws of the State of California and is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Government Code § 6250 et seq.). It is a public record that was not created by an agency which state law has allowed to claim copyright, and is therefore in the public domain in the United States.
Records subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act

Pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code § 6250 et seq.) "Public records" include "any writing containing information relating to the conduct of the public’s business prepared, owned, used, or retained by any state or local agency regardless of physical form or characteristics." (Cal. Gov't. Code § 6252(e).) notes that "[a]ll public records are subject to disclosure unless the Public Records Act expressly provides otherwise." County of Santa Clara v. CFAC California Government Code § 6254 lists categories of documents not subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. In addition, computer software is not considered a public record, while data and statistics collected (whether collected knowingly or unknowingly) by a government authority whose powers derive from the laws of California are public records (such as license plate reader images) pursuant to EFF & ACLU of Southern California v. Los Angeles Police Department & Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and are not exempt from disclosure and are public records.

Although the act only covers “writing,” the Act, pursuant to Government Code § 6252(g), states: “Writing” means any handwriting, typewriting, printing, photostating, photographing, photocopying, transmitting by electronic mail or facsimile, and every other means of recording upon any tangible thing any form of communication or representation, including letters, words, pictures, sounds, or symbols, or combinations thereof, and any record thereby created, regardless of the manner in which the record has been stored.

Agencies permitted to claim copyright

California's Constitution and its statutes do not permit any agency to claim copyright for "public records" unless authorized to do so by law. The following agencies are permitted to claim copyright and any works of these agencies should be assumed to be copyrighted outside of the United States without clear evidence to the contrary:

County of Santa Clara v. CFAC held that the State of California, or any government entity which derives its power from the State, cannot enforce a copyright in any record subject to the Public Records Act in the absence of another state statute giving it the authority to do so. This applies even if there is a copyright notice, so long as the State of California or one of its agencies (other than those listed above) is indicated as the copyright holder.

Note: Works that are considered "public records" but were not created by a state or municipal government agency may be copyrighted by their author; the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution prevents state law from overriding the author's right to copyright protection that is granted by federal law. For example, a state agency may post images online of the final appearance of a building under construction; while the images may have to be released by such agency since they are public records, their creator (eg. architecture/construction firm) retains copyright rights to these images unless the contract with the agency says otherwise. See: Government-in-the-Sunshine Manual: To what extent does federal law preempt state law regarding public inspection of records?.

Copyrightable Works by the State in the United States: Works published by agencies that are permitted to claim copyright per state law should be tagged with {{PD-US-GovEdict}} instead of this template due to the reasons listed on that template.

Disclaimer: The information provided, especially the list of agencies permitted to claim copyright, may not be complete. Wikimedia Commons makes no guarantee of the adequacy or validity of this information in this template (see disclaimer).

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current01:26, 20 September 202411 min 15 s, 1,920 × 1,080 (144.97 MB)Illegitimate Barrister (talk | contribs)Imported media from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1l9_lelGw2c

The following page uses this file:

Transcode status

Update transcode status
Format Bitrate Download Status Encode time
VP9 1080P 3.67 Mbps Completed 02:22, 20 September 2024 55 min 46 s
VP9 720P 2.04 Mbps Completed 01:59, 20 September 2024 32 min 50 s
VP9 480P 1.07 Mbps Completed 01:48, 20 September 2024 21 min 33 s
VP9 360P 692 kbps Completed 01:43, 20 September 2024 16 min 42 s
VP9 240P 393 kbps Completed 01:45, 20 September 2024 19 min 34 s
WebM 360P 1.07 Mbps Completed 01:34, 20 September 2024 8 min 9 s
Streaming 144p (MJPEG) 1 Mbps Completed 01:27, 20 September 2024 54 s
Stereo (Opus) 87 kbps Completed 01:32, 20 September 2024 14 s
Stereo (MP3) 128 kbps Completed 01:32, 20 September 2024 23 s

Metadata