File:Developing-Bayesian-adaptive-methods-for-estimating-sensitivity-thresholds-(d′)-in-Yes-No-and-Video3.ogv
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Size of this JPG preview of this OGG file: 800 × 563 pixels. Other resolutions: 320 × 225 pixels | 640 × 450 pixels | 1,024 × 720 pixels | 1,254 × 882 pixels.
Original file (Ogg Theora video file, length 20 s, 1,254 × 882 pixels, 566 kbps, file size: 1.35 MB)
File information
Structured data
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionDeveloping-Bayesian-adaptive-methods-for-estimating-sensitivity-thresholds-(d′)-in-Yes-No-and-Video3.ogv |
English: The qYNR method applied in rated detection. The upper panels present the true and estimated psychometric functions (left), the trial sequence (middle), and calculation of the pre-trial stimulus selection algorithm (right). The lower panels represent sensitivity and decision parameter estimates, via the 2-d marginal pdfs defined over (1) sensitivity parameters (threshold and steepness), and (2) decision criteria: the strict criterion, and the z-score difference between the strict and lax criteria. In the upper left panel, the true empirical psychometric functions (Yes and No; blue) are presented with updating qYNR estimates (red). In the trial sequence, the signal contrast selected for each trial is represented by the dot's position on the ordinate, and the trial's outcome (Yes, No, and Not Sure responses) is represented by dot's color (red, blue, and green). The shaded regions represent the 65% (dark red) and 95% (lighter red) confidence intervals for sensitivity threshold estimates, as a function of trial number. |
||
Date | |||
Source | Movie 3 from Lesmes L, Lu Z, Baek J, Tran N, Dosher B, Albright T (2015). "Developing Bayesian adaptive methods for estimating sensitivity thresholds (d′) in Yes-No and forced-choice tasks". Frontiers in Psychology. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01070. PMC: 4523789. | ||
Author | Lesmes L, Lu Z, Baek J, Tran N, Dosher B, Albright T | ||
Permission (Reusing this file) |
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
|
||
Provenance InfoField |
|
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 03:45, 23 August 2015 | 20 s, 1,254 × 882 (1.35 MB) | Open Access Media Importer Bot (talk | contribs) | Automatically uploaded media file from Open Access source. Please report problems or suggestions here. |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
Transcode status
Update transcode statusMetadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Author | Lesmes L, Lu Z, Baek J, Tran N, Dosher B, Albright T |
---|---|
Usage terms | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Image title | The qYNR method applied in rated detection. The upper panels present the true and estimated psychometric functions (left), the trial sequence (middle), and calculation of the pre-trial stimulus selection algorithm (right). The lower panels represent sensitivity and decision parameter estimates, via the 2-d marginal pdfs defined over (1) sensitivity parameters (threshold and steepness), and (2) decision criteria: the strict criterion, and the z-score difference between the strict and lax criteria. In the upper left panel, the true empirical psychometric functions (Yes and No; blue) are presented with updating qYNR estimates (red). In the trial sequence, the signal contrast selected for each trial is represented by the dot's position on the ordinate, and the trial's outcome (Yes, No, and Not Sure responses) is represented by dot's color (red, blue, and green). The shaded regions represent the 65% (dark red) and 95% (lighter red) confidence intervals for sensitivity threshold estimates, as a function of trial number. |
Software used | Xiph.Org libtheora 1.1 20090822 (Thusnelda) |
Date and time of digitizing | 2015-08-04 |