File:A 'sanad' (contract) document issued by Guru Gobind Singh's court to a local Brahmin of what is today Madhya Pradesh, circa late-1706 or 1707 (part 2 of 4).jpg
![File:A 'sanad' (contract) document issued by Guru Gobind Singh's court to a local Brahmin of what is today Madhya Pradesh, circa late-1706 or 1707 (part 2 of 4).jpg](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c0/A_%27sanad%27_%28contract%29_document_issued_by_Guru_Gobind_Singh%27s_court_to_a_local_Brahmin_of_what_is_today_Madhya_Pradesh%2C_circa_late-1706_or_1707_%28part_2_of_4%29.jpg/772px-A_%27sanad%27_%28contract%29_document_issued_by_Guru_Gobind_Singh%27s_court_to_a_local_Brahmin_of_what_is_today_Madhya_Pradesh%2C_circa_late-1706_or_1707_%28part_2_of_4%29.jpg?20240413031601)
Original file (791 × 614 pixels, file size: 483 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionA 'sanad' (contract) document issued by Guru Gobind Singh's court to a local Brahmin of what is today Madhya Pradesh, circa late-1706 or 1707 (part 2 of 4).jpg |
English: A 'sanad' ("contract") issued by Guru Gobind Singh. It was "rediscovered" by mainstream academia early in the year 2000 in Handiya tehsil, Harda district, Madhya Pradesh the possession of a Brahmin family, being held by a certain Gokul Bhatt, who claimed the 'sanad' had been bestowed upon his ancestor, Bongar Bhatt, by the tenth Guru. It was said to have been issued by Guru Gobind Singh as he was travelling southward in late-1706 C.E. to meet with the Mughal Emperor, Aurangzeb (1618–1707 C.E.). In 2006, the Archaeology Department (of Madhya Pradesh?) authenticated the document as being genuine. Further information (from: [1]):
Further reading: 'The Sikh Zafar-namah of Guru Gobind Singh: A Discursive Blade in the Heart of the Mughal Empire' by Louis E. Fenech (page 3 onward). These images are screen-grabs taken from a news report video published on YouTube. That video can be viewed here: [2] Dating: circa late-1706 or 1707 Author: Guru Gobind Singh and his entourage News articles/videos that cover the manuscript: [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10] |
Date | circa late-1706 or 1707 |
Source | [11] |
Author | Guru Gobind Singh and his entourage/retinue/durbar (court) |
Licensing
[edit]
This is a faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional, public domain work of art. The work of art itself is in the public domain for the following reason:
The official position taken by the Wikimedia Foundation is that "faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are public domain". This photographic reproduction is therefore also considered to be in the public domain in the United States. In other jurisdictions, re-use of this content may be restricted; see Reuse of PD-Art photographs for details. {{PD-Art}} template without license parameter: please specify why the underlying work is public domain in both the source country and the United States
(Usage: {{PD-Art|1=|deathyear=''year of author's death''|country=''source country''}}, where parameter 1= can be PD-old-auto, PD-old-auto-expired, PD-old-auto-1996, PD-old-100 or similar. See Commons:Multi-license copyright tags for more information.) |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 03:16, 13 April 2024 | ![]() | 791 × 614 (483 KB) | MaplesyrupSushi (talk | contribs) | Uploaded a work by Guru Gobind Singh and his entourage/retinue/durbar (court) from [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3oSCxIKsY50] with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Pixel composition | RGB |
---|---|
Orientation | Normal |