Commons:Valued image candidates/Viešbutis l'auberge Pakruojis Traktierius (1).jpg

Viešbutis l'auberge Pakruojis Traktierius (1).jpg

declined

Image
Nominated by	--Pierre André (talk) 11:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC) on 2017-01-16 11:48 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Historic picture of Manor Pakruojis Lithuania
Used in	Global usage Global usage
Review (criteria)	Oppose - Postcard? Hand-colored historic photo of the manor? Either way, it's surely valuable and historically important. But is it truly the most useful indication of what the manor looks like, nowadays? For that, File:2010 04 28Pakruojodvaras11.JPG looks best in scope for the front facade, and File:Pakruojo dvaras.jpg for the back facade. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:18, 17 January 2017 (UTC)  CommentI have shoot this photo on a small painting that was placed on a piece of furniture of the vestibule at the entrance of the restaurant. It was taken again on the official site of the manor Official Website. I bring the accuracy Historic picture --Pierre André (talk) 17:16, 17 January 2017 (UTC)  Comment - OK, well it's low-quality (pixellated) and unrestored. How do you all feel about that? Let's please have some other opinions. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:39, 18 January 2017 (UTC) * Comment Attached the original photo without retouching, taken on the furniture: --Pierre André (talk) 14:08, 18 January 2017 (UTC) I've changed the status to "discussed", so that the discussion is not cut off prematurely. Thanks for showing that you edited the original photo somewhat. You eliminated the background and brightened the photo. However, you did not eliminate the creases or smudges. How does everyone feel about that? Does anyone other than the two of us have any opinion? My feeling is that I'm unsure how valuable the photo is without more restoration. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:48, 18 January 2017 (UTC) Can I please have another opinion? Is this unrestored image valuable, or is the damage to it too disturbing? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:24, 20 January 2017 (UTC) Result: 0 support, 1 oppose => declined. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:03, 23 January 2017 (UTC)