Commons:Valued image candidates/Veronica Lake still 2.jpg/Archive of previous reviews

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  •  Comment Must connect the scope to the category or gallery that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I thought that the image would be the best portrait for a Wikipedia article, similar to this, and the photographer and the exact date are unknown. Would "Veronica Lake – studio portrait photo, circa 1952" be a suitable scope?

Scope changed from Veronica Lake to Veronica Lake – studio portrait photo, circa 1952 --Thi (talk) 11:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

Result: 0 support, 0 oppose =>
undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]