Commons:Valued image candidates/Saint Ursula polyptich - Vittore Carpaccio

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Saint Ursula polyptich - Vittore Carpaccio

promoted to Valued image set: The Life of St. Ursula cycle by Vittore Carpaccio
Images
Description

The Cycle of "Life of Saint Ursula" by Vittore Carpaccio

Nominated by M0tty (talk) on 2011-05-22 15:36 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued set of images on Wikimedia Commons within the scope:
The Life of St. Ursula cycle by Vittore Carpaccio
Review
(criteria)
 Comment Very interesting and reasonable set. You omited one painting, there are 9 of them. This one should be added no matter that it is not taken by you. As for the name of the scope, I think that this would be better: The Life of St. Ursula cycle by Vittore Carpaccio. Here information about the cycle and the order of the paintings. --MrPanyGoff 19:28, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Arg ! I had forgotten this photo ! I downloaded my version and I added it to this series. I corrected the scope. --M0tty (talk) 11:52, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I tend to support but there is one more regulation - All images in a set are expected to be geocoded too if possible. Camera location should be placed in each of them.--MrPanyGoff 06:36, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The Template Galleria dell'Accademia di bell'Arti is geocoded. It's not sufficient ? Best whishes --M0tty (talk) 09:45, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, this can be accepted but with the Location template you need just one click while with The Template Galleria dell'Accademia there are 3 or 4 clicks. OK, if you don't want to make more efforts I'm going to do it.--MrPanyGoff 08:35, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I added the geocoded template. --M0tty (talk) 11:41, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Support - Good set which represents all paintings of this cycle all of them well described and geocoded.--MrPanyGoff 22:47, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:16, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]