Comment I taking the liberty of fixing the scope for you: needed the scientific name and a link to the containing Category or gallery. --El Grafo (talk) 06:48, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not getting a flowing video here - just a series of still images, hopping from one to the next. Sorry to say it but it looks like a poorly made .GIF.--Peulle (talk) 13:50, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Info "Valued images are less about perfect technical quality and more about your ingenuity in finding good and valuable subjects which matter, and about the useability of the information on the image page." See here : Commons:Valued image value"Does "most valuable" imply the best technical quality?" This animation is not a video. These images are deliberately slowed down to show the animal's crawling motion that a video does not allow to detail. Notice that "video do not fall within the remit of the valued image project."--BluesyPete (talk)
Does not comply with the 6 criteria of VI, in particular No. 3: "..., it is not a valid ground of opposition that it would be easy to create a better one. Commons, not the best that can be conceived of ".
Does not provide evidence that a GIF would be of better quality given the purpose of "decomposing the movement" of the mammal.BluesyPete (talk)
.jpg){kind=link}