Commons:Valued image candidates/Oviposition among ichneumon wasps/Archive of previous reviews

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  •  Info I think this set of images is an excellent example of a valued image set. I also think the image set as a whole is significantly more valuable than the composite poster, which is actually both a COM:FP and a WP:FP. However, a concern was raised that the composite had a resolution lower than the individual images. That very much underlines my point with a VIS. With a VIS other Wikimedia editors have the option to arrange the images in a manner and resolution which fits the needs of their content. This should not be seen as a criticism of the composite image though as this is ready-to-use and suitable in most contexts. -- Slaunger 19:49, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Currently fails criterion 6 since the images are not geocoded. I hope this can be fixed! -- MichaelMaggs 19:17, 2 May 2008 (UTC) Now done. --MichaelMaggs 07:58, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Too much emphasis on geocoding that may reveal personal information about the photographer of late! Adam Cuerden 01:09, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The photographer has made no such claim, and in fact has now provided the info on his talk page as 48.064927, 11.577154. Once the images have been updated this set can be accepted (I may do it myself later). --MichaelMaggs 06:40, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 2 support =>
(Test) promoted. -- Slaunger 05:17, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]