Commons:Valued image candidates/Great pondhawk (Erythemis vesiculosa) male with Band-winged dragonlet (Erythrodiplax umbrata) female Tr.JPG/Archive of previous reviews

•  Oppose Image not geolocated. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 15:06, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Done My error. Charles (talk) 23:56, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Ok for geolocation. You must choose a scope; not two. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 15:15, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
  • I think you are may be wrong, but I will await for another opinion before changing my scope. Charles (talk) 16:38, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support The case has already presented. There is no rule which prohibits putting two categories in the scope. But it is recommended to put a single. It is possible to submit the image for two different scopes. In the present case the image is very interesting and justify the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

    I disagree, the rules are clear : Commons:Valued_image_scope#Concurrent_and_overlapping_scopes

    There can be no more than one VI for each distinct scope. An image cannot be nominated with several different scopes within the same nomination. However there is no objection to a single image being nominated several times, each time for some distinct scope.

    --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:20, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

    • I still think William is wrong. This is not several different scopes within the same nomination. The scope is unique, valuable and clear exactly as it is. The second link is valuable. Charles (talk) 12:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Result: 0 support, 0 oppose =>
undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 19 November 2015 (UTC)