Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 29 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Lüneburg_Johann-Sebastian-Bach-Platz_1_002_2024_04_02.jpg

[edit]

Top of the tower improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 06:05, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but still not QI imo.  Oppose Also the lower right part is partly out of focus/blurred. Unfortunately, I don't think this image is reparable. Regards--ArildV 06:26, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Milseburg 13:58, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Serranias_de_Toro_Toro.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Mountainous ranges at Toro Toro National Park, located between the departments of Potosí and Cochabamba - Bolivia -- Alberto Espinoza 16:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Gorgeous photograph. --Golden 22:33, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Motif is georgeos, but technical quality is low: Unsharp, less detail, partly overexposed sky, WB off. --Milseburg 13:59, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Milseburg. However, I can't explain the inferior quality. Per EXIF data it was taken with a good camera at ISO 100 but it looks like from a cheap camera at high ISO, with significant noise and NR artifacts. Probably it was saved with maximum JPG compression or something. --Plozessor 08:16, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The high subject contrast has exceeded the capabilities of the camera sensor and post-processing has increased the image noise in critical areas. --Smial 09:59, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others.--Peulle 10:42, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --C messier 19:51, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Castillo_Trausnitz,_Landshut,_Alemania,_2024-03-31,_DD_03.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Trausnitz Castle, Landshut, Germany --Poco a poco 07:46, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 13:05, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Beautiful composition, sharp enough for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 13:33, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
  • preliminary  Oppose: slightly rotated CW. Will support, once it's fixed. Detail is fine for me. --MB-one 14:34, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
    •  Support for what it's worth, I'm satified. --MB-one 12:11, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Very blurry.--Peulle 07:35, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Nothing sharp (looks like camera shake). --Plozessor 10:32, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Motion blur --Jakubhal 10:34, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment New version uploaded, over the bar IMHO now. Can you please @Sebring12Hrs, Peulle, MB-one, Plozessor, and Jakubhal: have a look? Poco a poco 18:13, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Sorry, you sharpened the blurred picture, now there's grain in the blurry edges but it's still as blurred as before. --Plozessor 18:18, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
  • And there is chroma noise now. I think it's not fixable. --Sebring12Hrs 19:42, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Yeah, it's still a no. Still blurry and now also overprocessed. Honestly, I would have expected that an excellent photographer like Poco should see that this shot hasn't succeeded.--Peulle 10:41, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Regarding the resolution the first version was sharp enough for an A4 size printout. The rework is overprocessed. --Smial 09:52, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --C messier 19:53, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Thai_Soup_and_Wonton.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Thai Soup and Wonton. --RockyMasum 15:34, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Kritzolina 08:13, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I oppose, not much is sharp and crop isnt good. Should go Focus stacking in any case. --PetarM 09:52, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Way too small DoF for the purpose, and would need perspective correction (which is not possible because of the crop). --Plozessor 09:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The colors look quite nice, but the noise, perspective and composition don't work at all. --Smial 09:28, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --C messier 19:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

File:PARQUE_ESTADUAL_DO_JALAPÃO-_CORÁLIA_ELIAS-_(20).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination By User:CORÁLIA ELIAS --Rodrigo.Argenton 04:52, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Lvova 20:41, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose What is the subject of this image? The genus should be known at least, including an appropriate description and category. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:27, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Robert, picture itself is good but description is insufficient. --Plozessor 09:04, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I can't judge the color reproduction, but the image noise is unnecessarily high and too much detail is lost as a result. --Smial 09:22, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --C messier 19:50, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Acueducto,_Segovia,_España,_2024-06-14,_DD_15.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Acueducto, Segovia, España, 2024-06-14 (by Poco a poco) --Sebring12Hrs 08:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Please discuss. I don't find all those insect-spots or unsharp birds okay for QI. --Milseburg 14:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Yes, those are swallows, I believe. The long exposure may not have been the right choice for this shot, as it also affects the people.--Peulle 07:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Better now. Some are left, but I stop opposing. --Milseburg (talk) 13:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
  • I removed a bunch more of them. Poco a poco 19:00, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good Quality, but photograph of identifiable people {{Personality rights}} --F. Riedelio 06:01, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 19:55, 28 September 2024 (UTC)