Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 29 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Olympus_μ_mju_II_2.jpg

[edit]

@Spurzem: As mentioned before, any brighter and you bring in overexposed sections, in light of this it may be possible to stack different exposures for each colour, but this would alter the image exponentially and I would have to renominate it. --多多123 09:30, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Too low DOF. With a little use of compressed air, you could have gotten the old beauty cleaner. The areas that are too dark can probably be avoided in a studio shot with a simple lightener cardboard, but in any case with a modified lighting setup. --Smial 10:18, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Smial: "Too low DOF." This can be fixed by focus stacking. "you could have gotten the old beauty cleaner." This can be fixed easily. "simple lightener cardboard" I'm not sure what this is, I use LED lights. --多多123 13:32, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment DOF: you don't need focus stacking File:Sony NEX 5 body IMGP1368 smial wp.JPG. Dust: in the image it is not fixed. I evaluate according to what I see here, not according to what could possibly still be done by whomsoever. Cardboard: e.g. File:Pfeffermuehlen Setup S7301813.jpg or a fill in flash via bouncer (e.g. File:R0026485 TT blitzreflektor.jpg). LEDs: They are clearly visible in the reflections. Use a diffusor. There are lots of inexpensive methods to get convenient lighting, see e.g. en:Infinity cove, or en:Reflector (photography). --Smial 14:53, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info Withdrawing to renominate, most issues have been addressed; however, I would like to remain within QIC rules as I have changed the file from the original and many factors have been changed dramatically. --多多123 22:58, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Jakubhal 04:41, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mercedes-AMG_G_63_(2018)_Motorworld_Munich_1X7A0054.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Mercedes-AMG G 63 at Motorworld Munich.--Alexander-93 08:46, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 11:29, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Looks like The horizon is littered. Probably need a rotation. --Kirill Borisenko 13:10, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Please have a look at the facade of the building. The parking lot is on a slight slope.--Alexander-93 15:36, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. --Palauenc05 09:07, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Me too. -- Ikan Kekek 21:37, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 19:23, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Valdovu_by_Augustas_Didzgalvis.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Palace of the Grand Dukes of Lithuania in Vilnius, Lithuania. (by BigHead) -- Pofka 17:21, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
    The photo is barely 2 Mpix, please upload a larger version. --C messier 18:33, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality - picture is slightly over 2 MP, so good enough --Grunpfnul 09:09, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
     Oppose For easy to photograph subjects we can ask for more than 2 Mpix, and anyway, it appears to be really downscaled. Please discuss. --C messier 13:24, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose per C messier. There is no EXIF data, though. So we do not know which camera was used. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:59, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose low resolution, overprocessed, moiré pattern. --Smial 10:51, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 07:49, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

File:House_Novaya_Basmannaya_Str_10_Moscow_2023-06-18_5013.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination House, Novaya Basmannaya Str 10, Moscow --Mike1979 Russia 08:50, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 09:58, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
     Oppose top crop too tight --Charlesjsharp 08:49, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
    Changed to discuss --Grunpfnul 18:32, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support. Very good image despite the tight crop above -- Spurzem 11:41, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Spurzem. --Sebring12Hrs 08:54, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support per Spurzem. -- Ikan Kekek 21:44, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 19:24, 28 September 2023 (UTC)