Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 27 2019
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Boathouse at Lake Stappitz in the Seebach Valley near Mallnitz, High Tauern National Park, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 03:52, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:57, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parish church Saint Mary Magdalene in Grafenbach, Diex, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:20, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 03:22, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parish church Saint Mary Magdalene in Grafenbach, Diex, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:20, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 03:24, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside shrine in Grafenbach, Diex, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:20, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 03:24, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fresco of Martin of Tours at the wayside shrine in Grafenbach, Diex, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:20, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 03:26, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fresco of Saint Florian at the wayside shrine in Grafenbach, Diex, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:20, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 03:26, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Berggasse" in Grub (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 03:18, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:23, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Berggasse" in Grub (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 03:18, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:23, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kellergasse „Berggasse" in Grub (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 03:18, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:23, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Berggasse" in Grub (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 03:18, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:28, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Berggasse" in Grub (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 03:18, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:28, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flowers on the vegetable garden in Planons Domain, Saint-Cyr-sur-Menthon, France. --Chabe01 00:12, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:37, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Corn hanging in one of the two stables of the Planons farm, Saint-Cyr-sur-Menthon, France. --Chabe01 00:12, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:37, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Agricultural machinery in the barn of the Planons farm in Saint-Cyr-sur-Menthon, France. --Chabe01 00:12, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 03:29, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bust of Jacques Pierre Louis Puthod in Bâgé-le-Châtel, France. --Chabe01 23:37, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 03:37, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. Nicholas Church in the Kyiv Pechersk Lavra -- George Chernilevsky 22:18, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:27, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dome of the St. Nicholas Church in the Kyiv Pechersk Lavra -- George Chernilevsky 22:18, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:27, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Burmeisterska huset à Visby.Svenska: Burmeisterska huset i Visby.Ceci est une photographie d' un bâtiment protégé en Suède, portant le numérodans la base du RAÄ.Ce document a été réalisé avec le pack Sterenn mis à disposition des photographes par Wikimédia France.En tant que détenteur du droit d’auteur, je publie cette œuvre sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2019. --Pymouss 22:15, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:57, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Pioneer, Eugene, Oregon, United States -Another Believer 21:13, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 03:42, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kehlhof railway station --JoachimKohlerBremen 20:07, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:39, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Barrage de Sault-Brénaz, septembre 2019. --Benoît Prieur 18:47, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:36, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Potter's wheel --Vijay B. Barot 17:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Decline ISO much too high, leaving noise --Rodhullandemu 18:04, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rani ki vav - Patan - Gujarat--Vijay B. Barot 17:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Chenspec 21:27, 24 September 2019 (UTC) - Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination Rani ki vav - Patan - Gujarat--Vijay B. Barot 17:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rani ki vav - Patan - Gujarat--Vijay B. Barot 17:54, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:28, 24 September 2019 (UTC) - Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination Rani ki vav - Patan - Gujarat--Vijay B. Barot 17:54, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Square at Av Combatentes da Grande Guerra, Setubal, Portugal --Poco a poco 17:30, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 17:42, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination City hall square, Setubal, Portugal --Poco a poco 17:30, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 17:42, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dom Luis I bridge, Porto, Portugal --Poco a poco 17:30, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 18:13, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Port of Setubal, Portugal --Poco a poco 17:30, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 20:07, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fort of Adilabad : Trabeated Styled Gate is a study of early experimentation by architects and builders. By User:Debasish NMRK --Sumitsurai 17:00, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry! not sharp enough. --Steindy 23:22, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Catholic Church in Biebergemünd-Kassel, Hesse, Germany --Milseburg 16:39, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 17:43, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Salisbury Cathedral nave and the ceiling paintings --Sumitsurai 15:56, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:11, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dornier 328 at ILA 2018 --MB-one 15:46, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality--Armenak Margarian 16:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Osios Meletios monastery. --C messier 12:12, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality--Armenak Margarian 16:52, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The church of Saint Nicholas at Aigosthena. --C messier 12:12, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality--Armenak Margarian 16:52, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Alikianos bridge after its collapse, Crete. --C messier 12:12, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:13, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Khatchkar near chapel in Khot village, Sunik province, Armenia.User:Արզումանյան Սոնա --Armenak Margarian 12:01, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 20:39, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Southern Square-lipped Rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum simum) at zooParc in Beauval (Saint-Aignan, Loir-et-Cher, France). --Gzen92 11:07, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality--Armenak Margarian 12:09, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Meerkat (Suricata suricatta) at zooParc in Beauval (Saint-Aignan, Loir-et-Cher, France). --Gzen92 11:07, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality--Armenak Margarian 12:12, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Traben-Trarbach, Hotel Bellevue, Aacher Straße 1 --Berthold Werner 08:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --D-Kuru 13:52, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Traben-Trarbach, Hotel Bellevue, Aacher Straße 1 --Berthold Werner 08:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --D-Kuru 13:52, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Reithaus in Weimar --Carschten 07:40, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:54, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Reithaus in Weimar --Carschten 07:40, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:54, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Houses in the Weimar Old Town --Carschten 07:40, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:54, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sphinx grotto in the Park an der Ilm in Weimar --Carschten 07:40, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
The photo tilts slightly to the right side. --Steindy 10:15, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Done image rotated. A small horizontal tilt is normal because of the side view. --Carschten 10:45, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
This is not a real side view. I also had not voted against, but asked you to make this small and simple correction. Everything fits, which is why I like to agree with Support. --Steindy 12:35, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Park an der Ilm in Weimar --Carschten 07:40, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:54, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Westerheversand Lighthouse --Matthias Süßen 07:18, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:12, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chapel of the cemetery of "Holmer Beliebung" in Schleswig --Matthias Süßen 07:18, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment strong (chromatic) noise in the brightened shadows, perspective distortion. Fixable? --Carschten 07:47, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded a new version --Matthias Süßen 10:16, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
weak Support: image quality is not the best and there are several blown highlights, but better now and ok for QI to me. --Carschten 10:45, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The manor house of Louisenlund --Matthias Süßen 07:18, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion nice --Carschten 07:47, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The manor house of Ludwigsburg --Matthias Süßen 07:18, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion good --Carschten 07:47, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roggenburg Monastery --Matthias Süßen 07:18, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion QI to me --Carschten 07:47, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rectory in Burgebrach --Ermell 06:53, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Matthias Süßen 07:25, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Klausstein Chapel in the Ailsbach Valley in Franconian Switzerland --Ermell 06:53, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Matthias Süßen 07:25, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination An interior view of St.-Josefs-Kirche, Frankfurt-Höchst --DXR 06:22, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Matthias Süßen 07:25, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 19 Market Square in Dzierżoniów --Jacek Halicki 05:56, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:31, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 21 Market Square in Dzierżoniów --Jacek Halicki 05:56, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:31, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 22 Market Square in Dzierżoniów --Jacek Halicki 05:56, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. The shoe on the right side can be removed. --Steindy 10:31, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 23 Market Square in Dzierżoniów --Jacek Halicki 05:56, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Matthias Süßen 07:25, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 24 Market Square in Dzierżoniów --Jacek Halicki 05:56, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --DXR 06:26, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue in Sanssouci Park at night in Potsdam, Brandenburg, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:08, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:08, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Door (from inside) of the the Saint Peter and Saint Paul church of Autoire, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 05:08, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:07, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Landscape in Tongariro NP, North Island of New Zealand. --Tournasol7 05:08, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --DXR 06:23, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Window of the Saint Lawrence church of Saint-Laurent-les-Tours, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 05:08, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination L'îlet à Cabrit, Terre de haut--Filo gèn' 04:26, 24 Septembre 2019 (UTC)
- Decline Horizontal correction needed. --Manfred Kuzel 04:47, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Poor smartphone image quality, lack of details --Uoaei1 15:27, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Berggasse" in Grub (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 03:51, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:05, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Butler-Perozzi Fountain, Ashland, Oregon, United States -Another Believer 03:31, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:59, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chapel 's Gonnet family in the East-cimetery Lille (Fr).--Pierre André Leclercq 21:58, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry! Not sharp and noisy. --Steindy 23:37, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination OK! Seems difficult to fix and I need some time. Thanks for your review! --Pierre André Leclercq 08:40, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View northwest over Hamilton Square from St Mary's tower. --Rodhullandemu 20:30, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
There are 2 lens spots in the sky. --Steindy 21:57, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Comment Fixed, I think Rodhullandemu 06:34, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Support Okay now. Good quality. --Steindy 12:41, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grade II listed row of shops on Chester Street, Birkenhead. --Rodhullandemu 20:30, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
There are some lens spot in the sky. --Steindy 22:00, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Comment Fixed, I think Rodhullandemu 06:34, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Support Okay now. Good quality. --Steindy 12:41, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Pry House, Antietam National Battlefield --Acroterion 03:05, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Could you check your tilt please? I think it needs some rotation clockwise. --Podzemnik 03:57, 23 September 2019 (UTC) Rotated and a little more perspective adjustment, thanks ~~~~
Support Not perfectly vertical but better, thanks --Podzemnik 05:49, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Pry barn, Antietam National Battlefield --Acroterion 03:05, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion I don't want to pixel peep but there is a big dust spot in the middle of the wall that is in the shade + probably some leftoverw from cloning on the top right. Otherwise both images are high end QI. --Podzemnik 03:57, 23 September 2019 (UTC) Both fixed, thanks Acroterion 00:35, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Support Thanks --Podzemnik 05:49, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A prism --D-Kuru 00:01, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- Decline Too noisy, sorry. Also I think this image should be lighter. --Till.niermann 09:59, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rock Glen Falls, Ontario, Canada. --The Cosmonaut 15:46, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Chenspec 21:31, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Zebra, seen in Serengeti, Tanzania. --Zenith4237 00:23, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:13, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
I personally think the other two zebra images are better but in all cases, categorization as well as identification of animal genus and location needs to be added. --GRDN711 13:48, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Chenspec 21:52, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Elephant walking across street. Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania. --Zenith4237 00:23, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Please add categories. --Till.niermann 05:53, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Chenspec 21:52, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fireworks in Dresden at night. --PantheraLeo1359531 11:23, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Tilt CW or distorted. (See bulding at left). Fixable --George Chernilevsky 14:45, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Done Thanks for the review, I tried to fix it. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:15, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Chenspec 21:54, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stonehenge rocks from the north --Sumitsurai 17:15, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion good enough for QI but a jacket is visible on the right side of the photo, can you fix it?--Armenak Margarian 17:34, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
The stones look greenish --Poco a poco 17:55, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Done Thanks Armenak Margarian and Poco a poco. Have corrected as per suggestions. Is it ok now? --Sumitsurai 14:23, 24 September 2019 (UTC) Good for me--Armenak Margarian 17:02, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rani Vabani Rajbari. By User:Shafiul Islam Shaikot --RockyMasum 15:32, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
- Decline It needs a perspective correction --Michielverbeek 17:12, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
no reaction within a week --Michielverbeek 17:15, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vault of the Old Men canal in the curtain of the door of Roubaix.- Lille (Fr). --Pierre André Leclercq 10:21, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Perspective correction needed. --Manfred Kuzel 04:42, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
DonePerspective correction . Thanks for your review!--Pierre André Leclercq 09:27, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 03:04, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Hertha_BSC_vs._West_Ham_United_20190731_(149).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Robert Snodgrass, player of West Ham United. --Steindy 00:00, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
- Oppose Crops, imho not sharp enough --Podzemnik 00:20, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- I disagree. Really not sharp? I see every hair from the beard, every hair from the eyes, every hair on the head and the pores of the skin. --Steindy 10:00, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose head cropped --Charlesjsharp 15:04, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support Focus is on the eyes, and crop is acceptable for me --Uoaei1 19:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose In this case, the image has been cropped in post; it did not come out of the camera with this resolution. As such I find the top and bottom crops unworkable for QI.--Peulle (talk) 07:25, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Comment @Peulle: I am amazed that you can see for sure how I took my photp and how I edited my photo. I find such clairvoyance very unfriendly! I can only tell you, they are wrong, which can be seen in the inserted original photo. I made this photo original with 5,472 x 3,648 px (this is the original resolution of the Canon EOS 7D Mark II) during the match ("live"). In fact, I have only made a correction of the colors and the photo for better compatibility with me usual format 2,000 x 3,000 px adjusted. I have not even increased the sharpness. For some other photos, I am not sure what "fixes" everything with fotoshop, or rather falsifies it. --Steindy (talk) 11:53, 25 September 2019 (UTC) PS: If you enjoy it, I'll withdraw my nomination...
- I'm not clairvoyant, I'm just applying logic: you took a photo with 5,472 x 3,648 resolution and turned it into 3,000 x 2,000. This can only be done either by cropping (which means you have cropped out part of the man's head), by means of downsizing (which is a direct decline in my book), or by having the original shot cut the top and bottom, which is equally damning as far as my voting for promoting it is concerned. I don't see this as unfriendly, it's just my opinion. If enough other users find such issues trivial, they can still vote in favour of it - that's how the system here works. I think it would be a good idea if you begin to see people's voting against your photos not as an attack on you personally, but as an expression of their opinion. Sometimes they're right, sometimes they could be wrong. We'll see what the consensus of this one is once enough people have voted.--Peulle 06:55, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support Focus is on the eyes.--Ermell 07:32, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't care that much about the crop, but the blur (motion blur or camera shake) is indeed a problem. If it was my photo, I wouldn't have nominated it for QI -- so this photo I can only oppose; very simple. --A.Savin 13:14, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per A.Savin: blur. --Carschten 11:32, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
- Withdrawn, with thanks for the friendly comments. --Steindy 12:33, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Decline? --Carschten 11:32, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
File:Nagharekhaneh_Chahartaq_(LRM_EX).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Nagharekhaneh Chahartaq By User:Nikon Sajjad salemi --Hanooz 14:31, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Impressive view, but noise and unsharpness visible even from preview size. --C messier 12:40, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Support For me is it a great image with satisfying sharpness. Please discuss -- Spurzem 15:18, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Support It looks good for me. --IM3847 17:21, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Also seriously deformed, please look to the left background --Michielverbeek 18:53, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Per others. Further more missing description, metadata and no meaningful filename. --Milseburg 20:28, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Too noisy for such a small resolution imo.--Peulle 07:18, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined --Peulle 08:18, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
File:Porsche 356 No. 1 Roadster, 70 Years Porsche Sports Car, Berlin (1X7A3878).jpg
[edit]- Nomination 70 Years Porsche, DRIVE. Volkswagen Group Forum --MB-one 09:05, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- Decline Der Kenner sieht, dass es ein Porsche 356 ist (oder nicht?), evtl. auch der erste Roadster, wofür aber das Rad nicht zu sprechen scheint. Ist eventuell eine genauere Beschreibung des Bildgegenstandes möglich? Im Übrigen hätte ich die Stoßstange (Stoßfänger) nicht abgeschnitten. -- Spurzem 10:51, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:57, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose The image is sharp. But what will it show me? Further the composition with the cropped bumper is not good. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 15:28, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Spurzem. Also low DOF. At least the wheel as the main subject should be completely sharp, not only partly. --Smial 12:45, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose I must agree with the others in this case.--Peulle 07:19, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Peulle 08:17, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
File:31.Ulica_-_Studio_teatralne_Scena_na_Scenie_-_Opowieści_wiatru_-_20180707_1627_7065_DxO.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Onstage Theatre Studio in the show "Tales of the Wind" at 31. ULICA – The International Festival of Street Theatres in Kraków --Jakubhal 04:05, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Is it allowed to photograph children in public places in Poland? --Steindy 12:34, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
- Steindy - this is a picture of a public event in a public space. Under the current legal regulations in force, distribution of an image of a person being just a detail of the whole, such as a gathering, a landscape, a public event, requires no permission. --Jakubhal 17:43, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
- I can not believe that, but I do not want to decide that. No review. Other opinions please. --Steindy 22:44, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
- Ok, consensual review --Jakubhal 12:05, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- Im öffentlichen Raum, noch dazu bei einer öffentlichen Veranstaltung, darf man fotografieren was vor die Linse kommt. Nur bei Personenfotos muss der Baustein „Persönlichkeitsrechte beachten“ gesetzt werden, was hier der Fall ist. --Manfred Kuzel 10:32, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- Manfred Kuzel, if I understand you correctly, you are referring to the usage of template {{Personality rights}}. I do use it always for all public event photos and I also used in this case. Jakubhal 10:56, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- Jakubhal, it is about the question of Steindy, whether it is allowed in Poland to photograph children in public places. My answer: "In public space, in addition to a public event, you can take pictures of what is in front of the lens. Only with photos of people the module "privacy rights" must be set, which is the case here." --Manfred Kuzel 05:08, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- Ok, consensual review --Jakubhal 12:05, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- I can not believe that, but I do not want to decide that. No review. Other opinions please. --Steindy 22:44, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
- Steindy - this is a picture of a public event in a public space. Under the current legal regulations in force, distribution of an image of a person being just a detail of the whole, such as a gathering, a landscape, a public event, requires no permission. --Jakubhal 17:43, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support The quality seems OK. As for the personality rights issue, it is allowed to capture a scene or public landscape with people in it. Photographing people where they are the main subject is more of a problem; here, the children are the background to a scene, and they must take into consideration that when attending a public event, some people might take photographs of the event and capture them as well.--Peulle 07:25, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 08:17, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
File:2019_Pałac_w_Brodziszowie_3.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Palace in Brodziszów 1 --Jacek Halicki 06:40, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Sorry but this doesn't look very good. The sky seems way to bright and the building (and leaves) overprocessed. Don't know what happened here; camera shake with an attempt to correct in post, maybe? --Peulle 06:59, 18 September 2019 (UTC) --Peulle 07:00, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support I disagree. Good for me; the building is in focus, I don't see a camera shake. --Tournasol7 07:10, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roletschek 10:43, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support See below. --Smial 09:14, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support Good for me -- Spurzem 19:52, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Peulle --Carschten 08:06, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Seven Pandas 22:39, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
File:2019_Pałac_w_Brodziszowie_4.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Palace in Brodziszów 2 --Jacek Halicki 06:40, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Same problem as the other one; the building simply looks too smooth. Too much NR? --Peulle 07:01, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support Sharpness is good. Pro from me. --Tsungam 07:26, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roletschek 10:44, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support The image looks a bit soft overall, but this can also be due to the very soft lighting. Photos with direct sunlight often appear sharper due to the high detail contrasts, even if the other shooting conditions (subject, camera, lens, aperture setting) have not changed at all. At least I don't see any of the typical annoying artifacts that occur with excessive noise reduction. --Smial 09:13, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Spurzem 19:54, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Peulle --Carschten 08:06, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Seven Pandas 22:40, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
File:2019_Pałac_w_Brodziszowie_5.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Palace in Brodziszów 3 --Jacek Halicki 06:40, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:08, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose I think it has too much NR.--Peulle 11:57, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support QI --Ralf Roletschek 10:45, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support See above ;-) --Smial 09:15, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Spurzem 19:56, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Peulle --Carschten 08:06, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Seven Pandas 22:40, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
File:বড়_আহ্নিক_মন্দির.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Bara Anhik Mandir. --RockyMasum 14:48, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Looked like a very slight right tilt, perhaps not taken from the center? Still sufficient quality for QI --Axel Tschentscher 15:11, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but it also looks oversaturated. The green is just too much --Podzemnik 02:16, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose perspective issues, pixelation --Carschten 08:05, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Peulle 08:16, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
File:2019-07-06_BeachVolleyball_Weltmeisterschaft_Hamburg_2019_StP_0299_LR_by_Stepro-2.jpg
[edit]- Nomination 2019 Beach Volleyball World Championships; Mariafe Artacho (AUS, Australia) celebrates her victory for place 3; bronze medal --Stepro 01:28, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:54, 15 September 2019 (UTC) - Oppose I disagree. Face is not sharp. --Ermell 07:04, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support Photographic shots with high sensitivity settings always lose some of their sharpness of detail, which is in the nature of things. It is very pleasing that the photographer did not flatten the noise with the steamroller and thus achieved an overall very balanced image impression. Please note the difference between studio photography and action photography. --Smial 10:56, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose I know the difference between studio photography and action photography. For me it is not sharp enough and too noisy. --Steindy 13:26, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support Very good for me -- Spurzem 19:53, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Ermell, --Cvmontuy 17:43, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support wie Smial --Ralf Roletschek 10:54, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose not sharp enough and too noisy Charlesjsharp 15:26, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- Question In my understanding of the rules this pic should have been promoted 2 days ago? --Stepro 16:39, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support per Smial, but why is this still open für voting? It had 4 supportive votes four days ago. —Granada 17:12, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support It's a close call, but Granada is pretty much the best sports photographer we've got here. If she says it's good enough, that holds good for me. As for the promotion issue, somebody has to actually execute the decision after 48 hours (after last vote); if nobody does, people are still free to vote.--Peulle 07:28, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 08:15, 26 September 2019 (UTC)