Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 26 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Templo_de_Karnak,_Luxor,_Egipto,_2022-04-03,_DD_138.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Karnak Temple, Luxor, Egypt --Poco a poco 08:02, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --VileGecko 09:28, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Needs perspective correction. --Hillopo2018 11:26, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks rectilinear to me. -- Ikan Kekek 21:40, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support I can't see a perspective issue. --XRay 10:50, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support per Ikan Kekek --LexKurochkin 21:08, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:01, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Templo_de_Luxor,_Luxor,_Egipto,_2022-04-01,_DD_04.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Luxor Temple, Luxor, Egypt --Poco a poco 21:37, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. (A little bit color noise in the sky.) --XRay 04:24, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Needs perspective correction --Hillopo2018 11:26, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
     Comment The obelisk is vertical and so the composition is OK. IMO a really good example to have images without full perspective correction (all verticals). It's a good example for three-point perspectives too. --XRay 12:17, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
     Comment Actually, I think we should discuss the rule for verticals. In some cases it makes good images looking really unnatural. I would make it not so strict, and, yes, three-point perspectives are good in many cases. --LexKurochkin 21:05, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
    The wall on the left ISN'T vertical as you can see in similar pictures in the category Poco a poco 10:59, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
    One more reason for a pro review. --XRay 11:10, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support per xray. --Smial 07:58, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support per XRay and considering the comment of Poco a poco --LexKurochkin 21:05, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:03, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Mercedes-Benz_W460_1X7A5841.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz G-Wagon in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 11:18, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:16, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Blown out sky. Needs levelation. --Hillopo2018 11:29, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks fine to me. -- Ikan Kekek 05:12, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. --LexKurochkin 20:58, 22 September 2022 (UTC
  •  Weak oppose With Hillopo2018. --Augustgeyler 23:07, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:04, 25 September 2022 (UTC)