Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 23 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Mercedes-Maybach G 650 Landaulet Ersatzrad IMG 0755.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Wheel of the Mercedes-Maybach G 650 Landaulet at IAA 2017 --Alexander-93 14:51, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good composition, perhaps a bit over sharpened but QI for me -- Spurzem 19:43, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not for me; the centre is out of focus.--Peulle 20:01, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Main subject is not in focus. --Shansov.net 19:36, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp, strong CAs on the black rubber --PtrQs 20:42, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp/Main subject not in focus. --Sandro Halank 22:13, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 20:57, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Bugatti Chiron 0-400-0 tire IMG 0726.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Wheel of the Bugatti Chiron at IAA 2017 --Alexander-93 14:41, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Not sharp enough, I'm afraid. --Peulle 15:38, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Impressive image of this wheel and sharp enough for QI. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 19:39, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Image is not sharp, may be not in focus. --Shansov.net 19:34, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp, strong (sorry, mixed it up with the Maybach wheel) CAs on the black rubber --PtrQs 20:37, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp. --Sandro Halank 22:14, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 20:58, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

File:17-09-07-Wikidaheim-Graz_RR70618.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Billa in Graz --Ralf Roletschek 12:35, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Sorry, but the pole in the very middle destroys any composition and the darkening of the sky is too abvious and brutally executed. --PtrQs 18:35, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
    •  Comment So I'm the only one who thinks the top of the building being dimmed by the sloppy dimming of the sky and who feels that the top of the pole is conspicuously darker than the rest of it? And ain't that what makes the technical 'Quality'? --PtrQs 20:18, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support I don't agree. Composition shows a supermarket in a modern environment so IMO the pole does not destroy anything. Sky is also well done --Michielverbeek 20:54, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - Perfectly acceptable to me, too. And what's wrong with portraying the sky as it was? This isn't FPC, where the type of weather is judged for "wow" or the lack thereof; this is QIC, where we simply judge the quality of the photograph. In the context of QIC, any weather is just as good as any other, if the picture is well taken. -- Ikan Kekek 21:25, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Slight perspective correction may be needed for the right part of image --Shansov.net 05:38, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support A bit noisy but still o.k.--Ermell 07:17, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 15:37, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 20:59, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

File:WAP7 Rayalseema express 03092017.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Rayalseema express being hauled by WAP7 near Lingampally--Nikhil B 02:23, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. IMO DoF too small, focus problems. --XRay 04:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
  • @XRay can you please tell me where was the focus missing? IMHO, entire train is in focus. Thanks for the review. --Nikhil B 05:31, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 Comment IMO the whole train is out of focus. The front isn't sharp auf with f/5.6 the DoF is too small. I've seen the problems with a lot of photographs. May be there is a problem with your lens. But if you think th photograph is OK, please feel free to set it to "discuss". --XRay 10:10, 15 September 2017 (UTC).
Ok thanks --Nikhil B 02:17, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 Oppose per XRay. Also seems tilted down to the right. -- Ikan Kekek 20:12, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 Comment I wonder why railroad-related pictures taken by that user look somewhat too smartphony for a real DSLR... Are they cropped too tightly or that problem is caused by a kit lens? It really doesn't look like ISO 200 to me... --Shansov.net 02:48, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
@Shansov.net I don't use bigger lens for taking railroad pictures because they are too noisy and unsharp. I use smaller lens (18-55mm standard kit lens) for rail photography, which means most of my rail photos are cropped heavily. Thanks --Nikhil B 08:13, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Good for me. I can not see that anything tilts down to the right. -- Spurzem 15:41, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 21:01, 22 September 2017 (UTC)