Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 14 2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Weidenweg5.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Historic monument in Lower Saxony --M. Krafft 10:00, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Support Good quality. An english description would be nice. --XRay 14:45, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
     Oppose - Overexposed. --Mattbuck 08:56, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sky shows clipping in blue channel, too high contrast. In such cases it is good practice to control the highlights. Most cameras can show histograms or have a function to show clipping areas on the display. If this occours, you can do another shot with appropriate exposure correction. The midtones and dark parts of the image can be enhanced afterwards e.g. by s-curving. This has of course limitations, but if you photograph in raw format, a lot is possible. A once blown higlight is regularly not repairable. -- Smial 10:59, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Basel_-_Museum_Tinguely6.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Basel: Museum Tinguely --Taxiarchos228 06:09, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good, but left side leaning in a little bit. --Cccefalon 06:16, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
    it's not leaning, see note --Taxiarchos228 06:00, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
    Yes it is, zoom in on the left end and scroll up/down with mousewheel, you'll see the wall moves compared with the cursor. Also the leaves are problematic. Mattbuck 19:33, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
     Not done Mattbuck 08:38, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
    don't agree --Taxiarchos228 04:40, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support--Ralf Roletschek 23:04, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support agree with others, it's leaning in a bit, but it's is a very very little bit and it's acceptable here IMO Christian Ferrer 17:13, 10 September 2014 (UTC).

File:St. Johannes Mittelschiff.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Church St. John Baptist Central nave Arnsberg Germany--Optimist4343 09:51, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Good quality. --Marianne Casamance 11:15, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
    Sorry but sharpness is not so god, parts are overexposed and there is magenta ca on the left side. --Berthold Werner 11:45, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
     Oppose Per Berthold Werner and more GPS coordinates are missing and should be better categorized,sorry --Livioandronico2013 11:57, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
     Oppose - Not sharp enough for QI, concerns not addressed. Mattbuck 23:26, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Angkor_Wat,_Camboya,_2013-08-16,_DD_065.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Angkor Wat, Cambodia --Poco a poco 16:21, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Please see note--ArildV 06:53, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
     Oppose due to left side unsharpness. Mattbuck 19:40, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
    This one is, IMHO, a QI after some improvements --Poco a poco 21:11, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
     Support Ok now --Livioandronico2013 08:26, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

 Support Ok--ArildV 06:25, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Filmarchiv Austria Laxenburg Uhr DSC 4717w.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Film Archive Austria at Old Castle, clock in the court yard, Laxenburg, Lower Austria --P e z i 18:47, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Tilted (clock should be a circle, not an ellipse) --MB-one 19:13, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
     Support Full vertical correction really doesn't make any sense for an object like a watch... --DXR 20:47, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
     Support --Uoaei1 12:31, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
     Support--JLPC 07:12, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

 Support --Livioandronico2013 20:51, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

File:SchleusenanlageFahrenholz1.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Watergate and Needle dam in the Ilmenaukanal, Fahrenholz, Samtgemeinde Elbmarsch, Landkreis Harburg, Lower Saxony. --M. Krafft 15:24, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support QI -- Spurzem 19:53, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
     Oppose overexposed clouds, chromatic aberrations, poor detail --A.Savin 11:52, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - per ASavin. Mattbuck 22:36, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - per A.Savin. --Kreuzschnabel 20:39, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Berlin, Alte Bibliothek -- 2013 -- 4544-50.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Alte Bibliothek, Berlin, Germany --XRay 00:07, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Good, but please reduce/eliminate the red fringes (see annotation) --Cccefalon 05:08, 2 September 2014 (UTC) --Cccefalon 05:08, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ Fixed It's fixed. Thank you.--XRay 15:18, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
     Oppose Overexposed sky with color banding, not a QI for me. --Iifar 18:51, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - CA, colour banding. Mattbuck 17:04, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Basel_-_Roche_Tower_-_Baufortschritt_August_2014-3.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Basel: Roche Tower during construction on 6th August 2014 --Taxiarchos228 18:58, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Perspectives : both sides are leaning in --Christian Ferrer 10:54, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
    no, it's not, this image was corrected --Taxiarchos228 19:22, 1 September 2014 (UTC)  Oppose not done --Christian Ferrer 05:24, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
    here is n.th. to be done --Taxiarchos228 04:52, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
    It is definitely leaning in. Mattbuck 20:57, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
    I've seen another nomination of this building before, it gives the illusion of leaning in. However, in this image the left side actually is leaning in which will need correcting first. Take a look at some of the other buildings on the left. --Lewis Hulbert 20:16, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
the left side is not leaning but it is build so that it's reducing easyly, cf. File:Basel - Roche Tower - Baufortschritt August 2014-6.jpg --Taxiarchos228 04:37, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
  • The image you show is also leaning in, and a lot in more! (see building at left) --Christian Ferrer 17:27, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
The building on the left side is not leaning (see note) --Wladyslaw (talk) 04:36, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose perspective correction is not done (easy to fix). --Iifar 15:57, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Boys_playing_in_Avenida_Paulista.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Boys playing in Avenida Paulista --The Photographer 14:25, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
    I am afraid, that you cannot publish this kind of pictures in Brazil, which is together with Spain, one of the most restrictive countries regarding personality rights. Read more here Poco a poco 15:38, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Thanks. This was taken with permission --The Photographer 15:49, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
    Ok, I am ready to promote if you improve the description / categories Poco a poco 10:11, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
    Categories look ok, but I'm not convinced this is QI. The left side is not in focus. Mattbuck 19:49, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Main subject (boy on skateboard) is in focus and remember that this picture was in movement. Thanks --The Photographer 09:21, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Von_Rekk_Mansion.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Vilgelmina (Minna) Von Rekk mansion at Pyatnitskaya street in Moscow, Russia. --Nino Verde 11:35, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Review Perspective issues, including a barrel distortion. --Cccefalon 11:43, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
     CommentIt is panorama gathered from 4 shots. Thus distortions are present. --Nino Verde 11:47, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
     Comment Perspective distorion can be handled for stitched panoramas, especially when it consists of a considerably small amount of images. Should be not an excuse. --Cccefalon 13:02, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
    I'm willing to  Support this one. Mattbuck 19:33, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Algérie-Roumanie_-_20140604_-_12.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Algérie-Roumanie - 20140604 - 12 --Pleclown 10:54, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Too tight crop (why?) and very noisy; nice moment nevertheless. --Kadellar 12:18, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
  • The crop is tight, because i can't have a wider one :) I was very close to the players and the action was quick, I didn't had time to recenter. See the full image (no crop, no tilt) here Pleclown 20:25, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree. Some noise is inevitable if you want to catch fast movements in sports. Very good shot regarding the circumstances. --Smial 09:46, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
  • The wider view is much better imo, more interesting. I can stand quite a lot of noise, I'm used to indoor sports, but I think this one has too much, sorry. --Kadellar 16:15, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Luminance- and chromatic noise are too much, sorry.--Jebulon 16:44, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Very tight crop but good quality for me. I can't agree with Jebulon. -- Spurzem 21:13, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Very noisy. While I think this is one of your better ones from the game, I don't believe it's good enough for QI. Mattbuck 21:41, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Tight crop. Noise is improvable--Lmbuga 02:18, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Of course there is going to be noise; our uploader shot that up at ISO 3200 under low light and got a shot that you just can't get without cranking up the ISO. IMHO, this is more than good enough for a QI. Collard 23:58, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I'm sorry,but i think like Lmbuga --Livioandronico2013 19:46, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Weil_am_Rhein_-_View_from_Vitra_Slide_Tower2.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination View from Vitra Slide Tower --Taxiarchos228 20:57, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Good quality. --XRay 17:36, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
    Many dust spots, perspective issues. --Mattbuck 20:35, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
    Sorry. you're right, Mattbuck.--XRay 05:13, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 QuestionSorry, but now, who supports and who opposes ?--Jebulon 20:03, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Well I  Oppose and XRay has struck their support. Mattbuck 21:19, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Dust spots. -- Smial 11:17, 11 September 2014 (UTC)