Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 13 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Main_entrance_to_Anfield_Cemetery.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Grade II listed entrance to Anfield Cemetery, Liverpool --Rodhullandemu 21:27, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdrawn
  •  Oppose cut off at top --Carschten 21:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    I disagree. All that needs to be in the image is there, a missing 5cm from a lightning rod is irrelevant and according to the objector, "And it‘s necessary that all relevant parts are on the photo". The top is irrelevant, it's a very difficult image to take anyway because of the intrusion of street furniture and lack of sunshine in Liverpool generally, and I challenge anyone to do better withouth being mown down by traffic. The criterion is Quality, not Perfection. --Rodhullandemu 23:14, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    to explain my short vote: “The criterion is Quality” yes, and a relevant part of the quality is the composition. And the composition is insufficient if you cut off parts of a building. It‘s an immobile object, so it isn‘t that difficult to photograph the whole gate. The verticals aren‘t straight, too. Not a QI to me. --Carschten 07:51, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose per Carschten. There are also dust spots in the sky. -- Ikan Kekek 10:12, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:11, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adlerstraße_13_Bronnamberg_HaJN_4133.jpg

[edit]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Milseburg 15:25, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]