Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 12 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Флигель_усадьбы,_Витославлицы,_Новгород.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Outbuilding of the estate in Vitoslavlitsy, Novgorod --Vsatinet 07:37, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good picture, please fix categorization. --Plozessor 10:06, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
    What issue wth categorization you mean? --Vsatinet 15:38, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
     Support The non-existing category "WLM/5310014003". --Plozessor 17:50, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
    I can't fix it :-). This category was automatically added when the photo was loaded for WLM Russia competition and WLM Russia team asks not to interfere with their engine. By my understanding it will be fixed after competition end. --Vsatinet 20:10, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
    ✓ Done It can be fixed easily by turning "red" category into hidden one (now not red), so I did it. --Екатерина Борисова 00:45, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
    The image was promoted but after several comments about categorization it seems like unassessed (outlined in blue). Is it now promoted or no? --Vsatinet 20:07, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
    You must be more patient :) --Екатерина Борисова 00:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
    When you add a comment to a promoted image, it resets to Nomination. Should use manual editing in such cases. Anyway, this has been promoted, this should not be in discussions. --Plozessor 06:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 07:25, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Архитектурный_ансамбль_Великорецкого_града_на_рассвете.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Velikoretsky Grad (by Новинская Г.) --FBilula 12:35, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Golden 13:12, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I like this picture, it's really impressive. But there is a problem with processing here. In the enlarged photo, we can see a strange texture. It looks unnatural. Alexander Novikov 17:25, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Саня, something went badly wrong during raw conversion or other processing, massively oversharpened. --Plozessor 10:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per others, overprocessed. --Sebring12Hrs 11:28, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:24, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Karahantepe2.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination A view of Karahantepe where an archaeological site in Şanlıurfa, Türkiye --Vincent Vega 17:39, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 11:16, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Needs perspective correction and quite prominent glare. --C messier 21:33, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Per rules, "oppose is assumed" when someone sends a promoted nomination to CR, changed C messier's comment accordingly. --Plozessor 04:02, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per C messier. --Plozessor 04:02, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment ok, looked like a landslide --Georgfotoart 11:06, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Audi_RS5,_Binz_(P1090702).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Audi RS5 Sportback in Binz auf Rügen --MB-one 22:02, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment The background is leaning. --Sebring12Hrs 16:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Thanks for the review --MB-one 18:28, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support OK --Peulle 06:35, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unfortunate lighting. Some parts of the car are too dark. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 16:12, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
    • @Spurzem: Thanks for the review. pushed the shadows a bit. --MB-one 07:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice now, thanks ! --Sebring12Hrs 07:40, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 10:31, 11 September 2024 (UTC)