Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 11 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Linz_ÖAMTC_Rettungshubschrauber_Christophorus_14-4406-3.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Rescue helicopter Christophorus 14 approaching landing platform of Hospital --Isiwal 06:38, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:07, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Good quality, but I think we don't need a helicopter in the corner of the sky - it would be better to crop to main subject IMO --Pibwl 20:45, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:02, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support It could perhaps be described as lead room? In any case, the subject seems clear and sharp.--Peulle 11:35, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek 19:56, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 23:14, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Nottuln,_Oldtimermuseum,_Porsche_911L_--_2021_--_4494.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Porsche 911L, Nottuln, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:11, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:28, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I have some doubts - isn't the perspective wrong?... --Pibwl 20:30, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
  • The perspective is not wrong. It is just a short distance. With a focal length of 29 mm it's a wide angle, but not extreme. And the photograph was taken at a lower position with orientation to the headlamps. Your usual view would be higher. --XRay 05:47, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:01, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support @Pibwl: I think the perspective is correct for this kind of shot. For instance, imagine yourself laying down on the ground next to a tower and taking a photo of it from its base. Obviously, the perspective will not be the same as if you had photographed it from a distance.--Peulle 11:31, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
    • I am aware of that, and I assume that it was the best pespective available in local conditions. Only I am not sure, if every subject is able to be photographed in a way, which produces a quality image, which usually should have not distorted perspective. Anyway, I am glad, that the majority find this image worthy. Pibwl 18:40, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support OK to me. -- Ikan Kekek 19:57, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 23:16, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Michelangelo's_David_-_right_view.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Michelangelo's David - right viewI --Commonists 12:01, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Overall too dark, head not in focus, OVERCAT --A.Savin 13:05, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done more light and sharpness,thanks --Commonists 15:40, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It's overprocessed now.--Peulle 10:30, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Yeah, looks a bit oversharpened; artifacts are visible. -- Ikan Kekek 20:00, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle (talk) 06:45, 10 September 2021 (UTC)