Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 11 2019
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse „Kirchweg“ in Stillfried (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:12, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kellergasse in Grub an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:12, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse in Grub an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:12, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse in Grub an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:12, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse in Grub an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:12, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parish church Saint Oswald in Sankt Oswald, Eberstein, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:26, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:56, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parish church Saint Oswald in Sankt Oswald, Eberstein, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:26, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:56, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Northeastern view of the Alpine hut Steinerhütte in Sankt Oswald, Eberstein, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:26, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:53, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Northern view of the Alpine hut Steinerhütte in Sankt Oswald, Eberstein, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:26, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:53, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Carinthian Blondvieh at the hiking track #341 in Sankt Oswald, Eberstein, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:26, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:51, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside Cross in Merfeld, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:20, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:27, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Püttmann Mansion, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:20, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:27, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hot air balloons at the 49th Montgolfiade in Münster (1st race), North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:20, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:29, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination BMW Mini “John Cooper Works” ath the Car exhibition on the potato market in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:20, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:29, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Barn at Appomattox Cort House National Historical Park --Acroterion 01:46, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Vengolis 02:01, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Buildings on East Patrick Street in Frederick, Maryland --Acroterion 01:46, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Vengolis 02:01, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Springfield Rd, St Albans, Christchurch --Podzemnik 00:36, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:35, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Foggy Peak (left) and Castle Hill Peak (right), Torlesse Range --Podzemnik 00:36, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:30, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mute swan cygnet pontoon in Prospect Park, New York City --Rhododendrites 21:36, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --D-Kuru 01:19, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Burghers of Calais in front of the town hall of Calais --Milseburg 19:04, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, perspective optimal --PantheraLeo1359531 20:13, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lmbat Monastery in Shirak province, Armenia --Armenak Margarian 18:21, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --DXR 19:14, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A hypercomplex (numbers with more than 2 dimensions) Mandelbrot set. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:29, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good graphic as always. --D-Kuru 01:21, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trier, Liebfrauen, Teil des UNSECO Welterbes Trier --Berthold Werner 14:03, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --DXR 15:35, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trier, Hauptmarkt 4, 5, Sternstraße 7, Maria mit Kind --Berthold Werner 14:03, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:30, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bendorf Sayn, Schloss Sayn --Berthold Werner 14:03, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quailty. --Steindy 16:58, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bendorf Sayn, Koblenz-Olper-Straße 175 --Berthold Werner 14:03, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quailty. --Steindy 16:58, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bendorf Sayn, Koblenz-Olper-Straße 175 --Berthold Werner 14:03, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quailty. --Steindy 16:58, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination African elephant near Namutomi, Etosha, Namibia --Axel Tschentscher 13:37, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:41, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination African elephant at Okaukuejo, Etosha, Namibia --Axel Tschentscher 13:36, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:41, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cape Ground Squirrel, Solitaire, Namibia --Axel Tschentscher 13:34, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --D-Kuru 01:18, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination African leopard near Okevi waterhole, Etosha, Namibia --Axel Tschentscher 13:32, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:41, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Green Theatre of Bishkek in the show "Karagul botom (Song of stones)" at 31. ULICA – The International Festival of Street Theatres in Kraków --Jakubhal 13:28, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality--Armenak Margarian 18:34, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tour du Guet, Calais, France --Milseburg 13:18, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 13:28, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pascale by Alfred Blondel (Brussels). --Benoît Prieur 13:09, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 13:29, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stèle 1830-1930 près des étangs d'Ixelles (septembre 2019).jpg. --Benoît Prieur 13:03, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Armenak Margarian 18:27, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A west view of Mode Gakuen Cocoon Tower, as seen from the Tokyo Metropolitan Government Building No.1 --DXR 11:09, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Armenak Margarian 18:38, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The head of the light house as seen from the Schinkelturm at Cape Arkona. Alternative version. --PantheraLeo1359531 10:31, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 10:36, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The shaft of the light house as seen from the Schinkelturm at Cape Arkona. --PantheraLeo1359531 10:29, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 10:36, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Watermills in Nord Abbaye de Maroilles in Nord, France. --Pierre André Leclercq 09:51, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --PantheraLeo1359531 11:28, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Watermills in Nord Abbaye de Maroilles in Nord, France. --Pierre André Leclercq 09:51, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 10:40, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Watermills in Nord Abbaye de Maroilles in Nord, France. --Pierre André Leclercq 09:51, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --DXR 11:09, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Watermills in Nord Abbaye de Maroilles in Nord, France.--Pierre André Leclercq 09:49, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --DXR 11:09, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Military orchestra in front of the Stockholm Palace - piccolo player --Kritzolina 09:45, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Axel Tschentscher 13:48, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Peacock (Inachis io) --Charlesjsharp 09:05, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Sorry, but the right upper wing is out of focus. --Axel Tschentscher 14:00, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chestnut heath (Coenonympha glycerion) --Charlesjsharp 09:05, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 09:29, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination False grayling (Arethusana arethusa) --Charlesjsharp 09:05, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 09:29, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Columbus Market, Valencia, Spain --Poco a poco 07:13, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:13, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Soldiers' and Sailors' Monument, Indianapolis, USA --Poco a poco 07:13, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 09:32, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Montón, Teruel, Spain --Poco a poco 07:13, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:16, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination National Museum of Pottery, Valencia, Spain --Poco a poco 07:13, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 08:26, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bergsbotn seen from lookout point at Moltebærhagen --Frankemann 06:53, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Could do with some more contrast. --Ermell 07:06, 8 September 2019 (UTC) Info Done --Frankemann 16:32, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The industrial area of the former Senjens Nickelworks --Frankemann 06:53, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:06, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Two boys at the harbor in Gryllefjord --Frankemann 06:53, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion A bit dark, but quality is good. Also left crop is not excellent done --Michielverbeek 07:12, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trangstraumen bridge --Frankemann 06:53, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Muntashir.islam 08:24, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Red tower of castle Burgk at the river Saale --Ermell 06:52, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:14, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Alpine tarn on Lewis Pass, South Island of New Zealand. --Tournasol7 06:49, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:35, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Phormium cookianum in Westland National Park, New Zealand. --Tournasol7 06:49, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 08:26, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bell tower of the Saint Sauveur Church in Sévérac-le-Château, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:49, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:03, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cloister next to treasury of medieval goldsmith in Conques, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:49, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:02, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bell tower of the church of Balsac, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:49, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:08, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pascale by Alfred Blondel (Brussels). --Benoît Prieur 06:26, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:07, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Residential house on Beckholmen built in 1893. --ArildV 05:10, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Batteri Arholma is a former (1968-2000) Swedish coastal battery on the island Arholma in Stockholm archipelago. --ArildV 05:10, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:50, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Remains of the German freighter MF Fortuna on the islet Norsholmen, Fårö. --ArildV 05:10, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of St Mauritius in Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:59, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lüdinghausen Gate, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:59, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Woodend Beach, Canterbury, New Zealand --Podzemnik 04:49, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:59, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mt Bradley from Mount Herbert Walkway --Podzemnik 04:49, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:59, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Woodend Beach, Canterbury, New Zealand --Podzemnik 04:49, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:59, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Woodend Beach, Canterbury, New Zealand --Podzemnik 04:49, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:59, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Malpe Beach in Karnataka, India by KshitizBathwal --IM3847 17:22, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose The file was nominated for deletion. Let's wait for the DR to be over, then you can nominate the photo again --Podzemnik 05:01, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Christ Church, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:24, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Bitte korrigiere die horizontale Ausrichtung, sie wirkt insbesondere im oberen Turmbereich störend. --Manfred Kuzel 04:49, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Hmm. Finde ich irgendwie nicht. Du meinst die Linien sollen sich ein wenig nach innen neigen? Das wäre die Vertikale. Aber was an der Horizontalen störend sein kann, weiß ich nicht. Die Kirchenfront horizontal ausrichten wäre auch perspektivisch unschön. --XRay 05:09, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Meiner Meinung nach sollte der Giebel (oberer Teil der Fensterfront) horizontal verlaufen. --Manfred Kuzel 05:11, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
@Manfred Kuzel: Ich hab's dann doch mal versucht. Was meinst du dazu? --XRay 05:21, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Support Dazu sage ich: "Perfekt korrigiert und ein klares QI". --Manfred Kuzel 04:40, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Torre de Belém - torre fortificada na freguesia de Santa Maria de Belém em Lisboa, Portugal --Berthold Werner 08:22, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Die horizontale Ausrichtung insbesondere im oberen Turmbereich, aber auch an der Basis, wirkt störend. Könntest Du das leicht korrigieren? --Manfred Kuzel 04:29, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Done So besser? --Berthold Werner 11:46, 7 September 2019 (UTC) - Promotion Support
Schaut gleich besser aus, QI für mich. --Manfred Kuzel 05:20, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Torre de Belém - torre fortificada na freguesia de Santa Maria de Belém em Lisboa, Portugal --Berthold Werner 08:22, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. Elias Church in Chernobyl -- George Chernilevsky 21:35, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:57, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Habour in Bungenäs built for the former Bungenäs kalkbruk. --ArildV 16:48, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Info There are three serious mistakes in the sky. --Steindy 18:32, 5 September 2019 (UTC) Done Thank you for review--ArildV 06:51, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:15, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fortress of Saint Philip, Setúbal, Portugal --Poco a poco 13:00, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion some dust spots in the sky should be removed --Armenak Margarian 13:54, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
ok, thanks, will take care of it soon --Poco a poco 19:22, 18 August 2019 (UTC) it's ok now --Armenak Margarian 04:47, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Objekt in der Kellergasse „Kirchweg“ in Stillfried (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 03:59, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
- Review
The perspective correction needed. --Tournasol7 04:13, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Done
Perspective corrected. --Manfred Kuzel 04:34, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: monument in Ukraine, number: 74-101-0001I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2019. By User:Alex Arendar --大诺史 03:24, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
- Review
Nice. Please remove the CAs at the branches. --XRay 04:38, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Cathedral of Salta, Argentina --Bgag 00:20, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Ιnscription in Saint Contantine church, Avdou, Crete. --C messier 21:54, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Adult and child skeleton in Groningen Universiteitsmuseum. --C messier 21:54, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Mosaic floor of the Roman pavilion, Birkenhead Park, depicting fish, wading birds etc. --Rodhullandemu 21:37, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: A circle structure with vanishing point perspective. --PantheraLeo1359531 18:58, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Hot air balloons of Jura Balloon Cup over the Saint Nicholas church in Przyrów --Jakubhal 11:54, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Hot air balloons of Jura Balloon Cup --Jakubhal 11:54, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Saint Anne church in Eisenach, Thuringia, Germany. --Tournasol7 08:13, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Old Nepali Newar Peoples wearing traditional hat- Dhaka Topi-Patan Durbar Square --Bijay chaurasia 18:47, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --C messier 12:23, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Entrance Wall of Patan museum-Patan Durbar Square --Bijay chaurasia 18:47, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --C messier 12:23, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Krishna Mandir-Patan Durbar Square --Bijay chaurasia 18:47, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose IMHO, too unshap. --C messier 12:23, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Krishna Mandir-Patan Durbar Square --Bijay chaurasia 18:47, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Bad bottom crop IMHO (cropped feet). --C messier 12:23, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Strandgalopprennen Wustrow 2018 --MB-one 13:12, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Schönes Motiv, sehr gute Komposition, aber zu hell. Und von Galopp sehe ich nichts. -- Spurzem 13:42, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Belichtung korrigiert. Das Foto entstand am Rande des Rennens. --MB-one 09:18, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Sehr gut! -- Spurzem 20:51, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Carnival fountain in Andernach from 1988 Spurzem 21:27, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
It looks tilted slightly to the left. --C messier 12:13, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
@C messier: Done. Probably you were right. Thanks. -- Spurzem 19:34, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --C messier 12:00, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Airbus A350-1000 at Paris Air Show 2019 --New York-air 19:01, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Tilted clockwise and IMHO, tight crop. Fixable? --C messier 14:07, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Same situation as in the other image. If I tilt it, the crop would be even worse on the left side.-New York-air 19:05, 2 September 2019 (UTC) Insufficient quality. --Seven Pandas 13:13, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Hertha_BSC_vs._West_Ham_United_20190731_(041).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Eduard Löwen, Hertha BSC Berlin --Steindy 08:43, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
- Oppose It looks overprocessed to me. Like too much limuninace was applied, there is no detail left --Podzemnik 05:00, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry Podzemnik, I don't know, which details you are missing and I don't know, what "limuninace" is. The "overprocessing" is the quality of a Canon 2,8/300 objectiv. --Steindy 11:33, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- No worries - I meant "luminance" :) Let's hear other opinions--Podzemnik 01:13, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Okay, now I understand what you meant. Sorry, I do not know what I could do better with this picture ;-( --Steindy 09:53, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support besser kann man das mit heutiger Technik nicht darstellen. --Ralf Roletschek 12:39, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support Good image and good quality -- Spurzem 13:16, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Podzemnik --Manfred Kuzel 13:36, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- Info The contraindication of Manfred Kuzel is a revenge act because I had dared to value two deficient pictures (stripes, moiree) of him negatively. It is sad how some users behave... --Steindy 14:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- Anmerkung:Ich bin nicht allein mit dem Vorwurf der Revanche konfrontiert, wie man bei Durchsicht der Nominierungen leicht feststellen kann. --Manfred Kuzel 16:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- It is sad, far hate can lead. EOD --Steindy 19:04, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- Anmerkung:Ich bin nicht allein mit dem Vorwurf der Revanche konfrontiert, wie man bei Durchsicht der Nominierungen leicht feststellen kann. --Manfred Kuzel 16:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- Info The contraindication of Manfred Kuzel is a revenge act because I had dared to value two deficient pictures (stripes, moiree) of him negatively. It is sad how some users behave... --Steindy 14:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Looking at the image, there's motion blur on the hand, and there seems to be a general level of overprocessing; it seems too smoothed out.--Peulle 19:42, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? --Milseburg 12:46, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- Info @Podzemnik and Peulle: Withdrawn! I'm not the plaything of meaningless comments. Apart from the white balance and the reduction of the picture noise, nothing is "overprocessed" at the picture. Football players generally have not only their feet moving while walking but also swinging their hands, which of course results in a slight blur even at 1/800 of a second. Higher than ISO 1000 I did not want to go in the mix between cloudy skies and light rain and floodlights, because then the noise would have become stronger. Believe me, I know a bit about my specialty football (since 45 years!). Thanks for the motivational comments. I therefore withdraw my nomination! Special thanks to Manfred Kuzel for his revanchefouls. Yours sincerely --Steindy 22:07, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
File:Great_banded_grayling_(Brintesia_circe)_Hungary.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Great banded grayling (Brintesia circe), Bükk National Park, Hungary. By User:Charlesjsharp --Smial 14:59, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Distracting background, head not in focus, generally not very sharp for FS --Axel Tschentscher 15:18, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- Distracting background is no basis for oppose vote in QI. Charlesjsharp 08:34, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- It is, actually. Please see Composition section of the Guidelines: "Foreground and background objects should not be distracting.". Not sure what I think of this particular image, though - I guess the twig in the foreground is a bit annoying ... --Peulle 15:17, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined --Seven Pandas 20:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
File:2_and_4_Princelet_Street_E1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination 2 And 4 Princelet Street, Tower Hamlets, London --Bobulous 16:32, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Seriously deformed --Michielverbeek 16:50, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- Perspective is natural, not an error, and this shot shows the composition as it appears to the human eye. --Bobulous 19:45, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose People who see the houses like that, probably need to visit an eyes ambulance urgently. -- Spurzem 07:51, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- This was taken with a rectilinear lens, so this is exactly how the lines looked when standing at that position on the street (trust me, I was there and my eyes don't need an ambulance). If I applied artificial perspective corrections to this image to make the house fronts perfectly rectangular it would look false and quite absurd.--Bobulous 11:46, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective lean doesn't work with this angle.--Peulle 11:39, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- Question are there other photos that show this odd distortion? Seven Pandas 14:00, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- see [1] it's not distorted one bit in that photo Seven Pandas 14:03, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Comment Most cameras are deforming the image a bit and this might differ from camera to camera and from composition to composition. You are standing very close to the buildings so this deformation is very serious. What you see is not what you get, unfortunately. Those verticals (three notes) have to be straight and it is very far from it and impossible to get straight by Lightroom. A larger distance and a stronger zoom might have been better, but probably it is impossible to make an excellent photo of those houses. --Michielverbeek 14:07, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- I'll point out that all three lines are perfectly straight (and I have just confirmed this), they're just not perfectly vertical, nor are they parallel to each other. That's perspective, and I don't feel that it makes an image less informative when the aim is to show how these houses look, in this case when stood at the end of the street. You are correct in your guess that there's not much leeway in terms of moving further away while keeping both houses in view, and the alternative of capturing a perfectly rectangular shot of a smaller portion of the scene seems much less useful in my opinion. But if images displaying perspective are currently out of vogue then I'll not nominate anything similar for quality image status for the foreseeable future.--Bobulous (talk) 19:44, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- In QIC, it has become the norm to correct the perspective before nominating. Please see the "Distortions" section in the Guidelines. There are exceptions, where the perspective warp is purposely part of the composition, like these examples: 1, 2, 3. You can find more examples of such images in the Quality images/Technical/Perspective category.--Peulle 15:11, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- I captured the photo, culled it, and nominated it, so it's fair to say that the perspective is a deliberate part of the scene. And let's be honest, this is entirely subjective: if those three images you link were submitted to these same reviewers they'd be shot down for the same reasons they've given here. As would some of the winners of Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 which show very strongly converging vertical or horizontal lines (or both in the case of the shot of Al-Khazneh).--Bobulous (talk) 15:14, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Peulle 19:39, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
File:Marché_bio_place_Albert_Thomas_-_La_Ferme_des_Hautes-Terres.jpg
[edit]- Nomination The merchant in her van show his organic farming products. --Touam 10:41, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Good quality. --Jolmia 13:12, 6 September 2019 (UTC)Jolmia 13:47, 6 September 2019 (UTC)- Oppose Nice woman but bad composition of the image. Further some parts are not sharp. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 13:26, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- Comment After reviewing again: composition is not good enough. --Jolmia 13:43, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- Info Please see new version with little improvments I hope. --Touam 14:18, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined --Milseburg 12:33, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
File:View_over_Bajep_Sårjåsjávrre_and_Sårjåstjåhkkå.jpg
[edit]- Nomination View over Bajep Sårjåsjávrre and Sårjåstjåhkkå --Frankemann 19:53, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:00, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Underexposed image. --Muntashir.islam 08:54, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support Indeed the photo is dark, but everything is sharp --Michielverbeek 07:33, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose too underexposed Seven Pandas 13:59, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose The sharpness is only mediocre (diffraction blur? too strong noise reduction?), at the same time there are strong sharpening artifacts. And the shot is actually somewhat underexposed. A pity, because the lighting situation and also the composition are really appealing. --Smial 20:23, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Peulle 19:38, 10 September 2019 (UTC)