Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 11 2017

• 
  • Nomination St Paul's Cathedral, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:56, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:24, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kaiser-Wilhelm Memorial, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 03:56, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:24, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clemenskirche, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:56, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:24, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church ruin Virigilienberg from the 13th/14th century, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:24, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:29, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Southern view of villa «Luft-Hof» on Neumarkter Strasse #26, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:24, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. FP? PumpkinSky 02:29, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Southwestern view of the order church Saint Nicholas of the Dominicans on Stadtgrabengasse #5, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:24, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:29, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle ruin Geiersberg, chapel Saint Anne and fortification walls on Geyersbergweg #24, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:24, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. FP? PumpkinSky 02:29, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former citizen hospital on Neumarkter Strasse #22, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:24, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:29, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nazca Lines, Nazca, Peru --Poco a poco 02:16, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:35, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Naghsh-e rostam, Iran --Poco a poco 02:16, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.PumpkinSky 02:27, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination House and restaurant "Lindenwirtin" in Duisburg-Duissern --Carschten 01:25, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:46, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination House Brauerstraße 20 in Duisburg-Duissern --Carschten 01:25, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:46, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination House Brauerstraße 22 in Duisburg-Duissern --Carschten 01:25, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:46, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination House Brauerstraße 22 in Duisburg-Duissern --Carschten 01:25, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:46, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination House Brauerstraße 24 in Duisburg-Duissern --Carschten 01:25, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:46, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A green lizard outside the San Diego Zoo. --Kong of Lasers 23:43, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline Nice thumbnail but it is totally blurry, no detail at all. Sorry, not a QI to me. --Poco a poco 02:45, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Harlingen-NL, lighthouse --Michielverbeek 21:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Sixflashphoto 22:17, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Zwolle-NL, main railway-and bus station --Michielverbeek 21:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:31, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Zwolle-NL, museum (Museum de Fundatie) with church tower in the background --Michielverbeek 21:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:31, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Zwolle-NL, sculpture and bridge (de Nieuwe Havenbrug) with church tower in the background --Michielverbeek 21:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Sixflashphoto 22:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination House Zieglerstraße 8 in Duisburg-Duissern --Carschten 20:20, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination House Zieglerstraße 8 in Duisburg-Duissern --Carschten 20:20, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cathedral (Siena) - Chigi chapel - Dome interior --Livioandronico2013 20:00, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:18, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monument to Lysicrates, Athens, Greece.--Jebulon 19:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:02, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Spherical lamps, Mitropoleos square, Athens, Greece.--Jebulon 19:21, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Construction site of Henle Villa in Duisburg --Carschten 18:57, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:58, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Villa Wilhelmshöhe 6 in Duisburg-Duissern --Carschten 18:57, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 20:32, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Port crane "Carola" of the former "Euskalduna" shipyards, in front of the Naval Museum. Bilbao, Biscay, Spain --Basotxerri 18:48, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 19:09, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Container tower in fron of the Naval Museum of Bilbao. Biscay, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 18:48, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 19:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Container tower in fron of the Naval Museum of Bilbao, detail. Biscay, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 18:48, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 19:12, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail of the port crane "Carola" of the former "Euskalduna" shipyards, in front of the Naval Museum. Bilbao, Biscay, Spain --Basotxerri 18:48, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 19:12, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail of a ship anchor chain in front of the Naval Museum. Bilbao, Biscay, Spain --Basotxerri 18:48, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Interesting and good quality -- Spurzem 19:13, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sunflower (Helianthus annuus), National Park Kozara, Republika Srpska --PetarM 18:35, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Maybe a bit of chroma noise in the sky but OK for me; try to reduce if possible. BTW, what lens do you use? Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:53, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The God Vishnu sculpture of Sheshnarayan Temple was built in the 10th Century. The sculpture is made of stone. (By Kumud.parajuli) --Biplab Anand 16:58, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline Not bad that shot, however the upper part IMO is too unsharp for a QI, sorry. --Basotxerri 18:55, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oude Lutherse Kerk, Amsterdam. --C messier 12:48, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:57, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nieuw Sint Anthonygasthuis, Leeuwarden. --C messier 12:48, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:21, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sint-Vincentiuskerk, Volendam. --C messier 12:48, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:21, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Keeper's house, Aa-kerk, Groningen. --C messier 12:48, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:22, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint-Martin Church of Vindrac-Alayrac, Tarn, France. --Tournasol7 14:11, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:22, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View on Conques, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 14:11, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline The upper part of the image is unsharp, not good enough for QI IMO, sorry. --Basotxerri 20:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint John the Baptist Church in Caylus, Tarn-et-Garonne, France. --Tournasol7 14:11, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rue Saint-Michel in Cordes-sur-Ciel, Tarn, France. --Tournasol7 14:11, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 19:17, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Window of the college Lapérouse in Albi, Tarn, France. --Tournasol7 14:11, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Theatre of Chemtou in Jendouba Tunisia during winter with lot of wheat inside --IssamBarhoumi 14:08, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline Image need perspective correction. Btw it's not enough sharp IMO. Tournasol7 14:13, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination New Gothic Parsonage of Mülheim-Kärlich built in 1885/86 -- Spurzem 13:51, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Becejły, Poland - wooden small house --Pudelek 09:37, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, Tournasol7 16:21, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Landscape near village Szypliszki, Poland --Pudelek 09:37, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice --Poco a poco 16:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Iłgieł Lake in Becejły, Poland --Pudelek 09:37, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:37, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Railway water tower in Międzylesie --Jacek Halicki 08:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:54, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of Nativity of the Virgin Mary in Mostowice --Jacek Halicki 08:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion troche blade kolory, na QI wystarczy --Pudelek 09:37, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Exaltation of the Holy Cross church in Rudawa --Jacek Halicki 08:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 09:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of the Assumption in Różanka --Jacek Halicki 08:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 09:28, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint John Paul II church in Międzylesie --Jacek Halicki 08:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:54, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ambondromamy, Mahajanga Province, northwestern Madagascar - Isalo IIIb Formation, Bathonian (Middle Jurassic) (by Archaeodontosaurus) -- Ikan Kekek 08:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Maastricht, Sint-Servaasbasiliek (Maastricht), view from the tower of Sint-Janskerk to the westwork --Berthold Werner 08:14, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 09:36, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sint-Servaasbasiliek (Maastricht), westwork an north portal --Berthold Werner 08:14, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 09:35, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Alte Hofhaltung in Bamberg --Ermell 06:39, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:14, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Door to the equipment house in the Antonistift in Bamberg --Ermell 06:39, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:03, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Prince's portal at Bamberger Dom --Ermell 06:39, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:03, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Residential house with former Lohengrin restaurant in Brennerstraße in Bamberg --Ermell 06:39, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Volkswagen Typ 1 Karmann Cabriolet at the oldtimer meeting in Kulmbach --Ermell 06:39, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. How many of these do you have? --Peulle 08:04, 8 September 2017 (UTC) Comment I presume you mean photos :-) This was the last one. But I got some more of another rallye. Thanks for the review. --Ermell 09:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Roundhouse park with John Street Roundhouse, a preserved locomotive roundhouse which is home to the Toronto Railway Museum. --ArildV 04:53, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 05:02, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Landsort Lighthouse at Öja island (Landsort), Stockholm archipelago's most southern point. --ArildV 04:53, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail of Landsort Lighthouse. --ArildV 04:53, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View towards Elevator 5, Annex. Arild Vågen --ArildV 04:53, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Elevator in Montreal tabour. Arild Vågen --ArildV 04:53, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Leonard at the Altar of Saint Leonard of the subsidiary church Pesenbach, Upper Austria --Uoaei1 04:45, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Leonard at the Altar of Saint Leonard of the subsidiary church Pesenbach, Upper Austria --Uoaei1 04:45, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Bartholomew at the Altar of Saint Leonard of the subsidiary church Pesenbach, Upper Austria --Uoaei1 04:45, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Crucifix at the subsidiary church Pesenbach, Upper Austria --Uoaei1 04:45, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mineral cable transport, Bulgaria --Poco a poco 03:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Please check for CAs. I added a note. --XRay 04:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
     Done Poco a poco 04:31, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
     SupportOK now. --XRay 05:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gopuram of the Po Klong Garai temple complex, Vietnam --Shansov.net 22:38, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:42, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
    Yes, very good. There's something that may or may not be a dust spot near the right margin fairly close to the top. Also, gopura is the singular of gopuram. :-) -- Ikan Kekek 02:45, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
     Done Dust spots removed --Shansov.net 14:41, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former House of the German Bundestag (“Langer Eugen”), Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:35, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good composition, but the verticals are not straight enough for me --Michielverbeek 05:25, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
     Comment I'll try to fix it. Hopefully it will work with the antennas. --XRay 05:34, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
     Fixed Thanks. It's fixed now. --XRay 15:17, 7 September 2017 (UTC) a Q1 --Michielverbeek 05:07, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The lighthouse south of the hamlet Falshöft at the Baltic Sea beach, territory of the village Pommerby, federal state Schleswig-Holstein, Germany --Matthias Süßen 12:01, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Sorry, only 1,14 MP (see guidelines); why a 1,14 MP picture with a camera of 20,2 MP? --Llez 12:29, 6 September 2017 (UTC) @Llez: : I uploaded a high-res-Version. The old settings were bad. Sorry.
     Support OK now --Llez 12:48, 6 September 2017 (UTC) I don´t thing that the old settings are bad. This one has a problem with the strong reflex vertical over the lighthouse. But i´ts good enough for QI. --Milseburg 14:49, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tuckesburg in the former zoo, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:29, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Leaves are slightly overexposed, but good quality overall--Nikhil B 08:05, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the top of the Minaret of Zitouna Mosque -- IssamBarhoumi 23:55, 3 September 2017 (UTC)can I withdraw it and renominate it please? --IssamBarhoumi 14:06, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination Theatre of Chemtou in Jendouba Tunisia during winter with lot of wheat inside --IssamBarhoumi 12:38, 3 September 2017 (UTC) is it possible that I withdraw it and renominate it ? thank you --IssamBarhoumi 13:39, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination: রূপলাল হাউজ. By User:Krabdallah --Moheen Reeyad 17:47, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Review Contrast between sun and shadow not good enough for Q1, but it might be repairable. Probably it would have been better to shoot this photo later on the day. --Michielverbeek 04:45, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Aeshna by User:Viktor Yepishin --Anntinomy 17:37, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Subway station in Moscow, Russia --Shansov.net 13:28, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Review IMO you have to make the left and right side of the hall brighter, while the center part is overexposed (see notes) --Michielverbeek 14:51, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
     Comment Well, I was trying to preserve the actual look of the station. Central part is certainly not overexposed, except for the lights --Shansov.net 15:08, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Elos aquaduct, Crete. --C messier 10:01, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Please check your image for CAs. --XRay 13:01, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Timios Prodromos monastery, Koroni, Greece. --C messier 10:01, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
    There is some cw tilt Poco a poco 20:29, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Casa Tosquella entrance, Barcelona. --C messier 10:01, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Ein Steinturm auf Rügen --Freddy2001 09:40, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Review The image is OK (perhaps a bit dark) but please check the categories: stone is far too general, for an adecuate category please look in the cairns section. --Basotxerri 11:24, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Bourg Saint Maurice railway station under the snow --Billy69150 08:18, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Review needed

Consensual review

File:2017-07-02_Tour_de_France,_Etappe_2,_Neuss_(76)_(freddy2001).jpg

• Nomination Die zweite Etappe der Tour de France 2017 durch NeussFrançais : Tour de France 2017, étape 2 --Freddy2001 12:48, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Nice photo, but who is this cyclist? It's not very sharp, but I think it is acceptable because it is quiet difficult to make this kind of photo --Michielverbeek 13:45, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Out of focus, need to identify cyclist and accordingly categorised -- KTC 14:14, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Image is not sharp, definitely not QI. It's not difficult to take such image with correctly selected exposure parameters --Shansov.net 14:16, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
• I think he is Reto Hollenstein. Poco a poco 14:30, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose It needs to be sharper to reach QI status. And yes, the rider's name must be in the categories.--Peulle 08:57, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --W.carter 08:16, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Duisburg,_Wilhelmshöhe_6,_2017-08_CN-03.jpg

• Nomination Villa Wilhelmshöhe 6 in Duisburg-Duissern --Carschten 18:57, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
•  Oppose The image looks very distorted and the branch as well as the car are disturbing. -- Spurzem 19:16, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Distortion and branch are OK for me, but the cropped car...--Jebulon 19:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment The parking situation in front of the villa is a photographer's hell. It's the best possible image from this position on public ground. It's far away from ideal, but in my view the image is okay for QI because the car is unavoidable. But it's your vote. --Carschten 20:14, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

• I think we should hear others. -- Spurzem 07:35, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose The branches are covering too much of the subject and the car is disturbing.--Peulle 08:58, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. Maybe a QI isn´t possible here. But if it´s the best possible image from this position on public ground it could be a VI. --Milseburg 10:50, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination I respect and understand your votes and opinions, thanks. I switched the status to "declined" for a faster archiving. --Carschten 18:30, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --W.carter 18:37, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Pinus canariensis (male) in Presa de las Niñas 02.jpg

• Nomination Immature microstrobilus (male cone) of Pinus canariensis in Presa de Las niñas. --Santamarcanda 00:14, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support PumpkinSky 00:39, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not a QI to me, sorry. Overexposure and lack of details, including pixelation. --Poco a poco 02:18, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Poco. -- Ikan Kekek 09:17, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose I didn't notice the problems in the upper left. PumpkinSky 12:50, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment In addition, I think like PumpkinSky, the photograph has good quality, and it isn't overexposed in general, only a specific part. Otherwise, I think the subject of the photograph (Immature microstrobilus, a male cone), is focused, sharp and, if you zoom-in it is possible to check cone in detail. Regards, Ivanhercaz 14:42, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment About the overexposed zone, what I have to comment is that if I wanted to take the subject of the photograph (the male cone) with a good light I couldn't low more the ligth. In my opinion, it is good exposed in general and is possible to check the details of the cone perfectly. Santamarcanda 15:18, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Try cropping it so the pixelization is gone. It might be a little tight crop on the top, but it'd probably pass QIC that way. PumpkinSky 18:15, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --W.carter 08:11, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Günzburg_BW_2017-03-13_13-39-38.jpg

• Nomination Günzburg, Frauenkirche --Berthold Werner 06:17, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Not sharp enough, a bit noisy and quiet dark, IMO a much lower f-value would have given much more quality --Michielverbeek 08:33, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support QI for me. --C messier 17:52, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose I must concede that despite the reasonably high resolution, Michielverbeek has a point here; the cherubs and angels aren't really sharp.--Peulle 11:23, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Sharp enough and QI for me. -- Spurzem 13:01, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Lower half of the image is less sharp, may be not sharp enough for QI --Shansov.net 01:51, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Peulle --PtrQs 11:53, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unsharp, sorry.--Jebulon 22:13, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Decline?   --Basotxerri 20:30, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Театр ім. Шевченка у Кривому Розі. Вид вночі.jpg

• Nomination Shevchenko Theatre in Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine. By User:Ryzhkov Sergey --Ата 19:50, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
• Promotion
• It needs a perspective correction, both sides are leaning in Poco a poco 04:20, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
  • @Poco a poco, Ruthven, Nino Verde, and W.carter: new version uploaded by author.--Aeou 17:58, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Ruthven 09:20, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Please, respect other opinions, it isn't a QI to me without a perspective correction --Poco a poco 11:56, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

• @Poco a poco: Haven't seen your comment, sorry. I liked the exposition and the framing, but now that you say that, I tend to agree. --Ruthven 15:19, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

 Support Poco a poco 18:53, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose Need to be corrected, as mentioned --Nino Verde 16:02, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --W.carter 18:43, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Chota_Anhik_Temple,_Puthia_(3).jpg

• Nomination ছোট আহ্নিক মন্দির, পুঠিয়া. By User:Maun Sarwar --Moheen Reeyad 17:18, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:10, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Looks like there is significant barrel distortion. --C messier 18:00, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment The building itself looks like a barrel if you see other pictures of that object.--Ermell 07:41, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Change to  Neutral, the buildings has some curves I see. --C messier 13:00, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Support per Ermell - C messier, please look at other pictures of this subject. The picture is not totally sharp, but the file is large and I think it's good enough for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 20:08, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   1----PumpkinSky 01:33, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Castle of Montrozier.jpg

• Nomination Castle of the Montrozier, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 00:06, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. FP?PumpkinSky 01:35, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose There are five high voltage power lines crossing the picture--Capricorn4049 04:03, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Sorry, I forgot to cut them before taking a picture, Tournasol7 08:07, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Moving <100 m away from your car to the other side of (or nearer to) the railway tracks would already help.--Capricorn4049 11:28, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose I'm not sure about the wires but there are blue CAs on the roof. --Basotxerri 15:17, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Basotxerri. -- Ikan Kekek 23:31, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't care about the wires. I didn't see the CAs. PumpkinSky 16:53, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --W.carter 18:42, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Courtyard facade - Maulbronn Monastery.jpg

• Nomination Courtyard facade of the Maulbronn Monastery, Germany --Llez 15:23, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:38, 5 September 2017 (UTC)}
• Sorry, I  Oppose, due to the weird distortion.I want to see these buildings line up reasonably, as shown in other photos I found via a web search. -- Ikan Kekek 22:44, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Info it is a stitched panorama of 14 (7x2) pictures in a short distance. It was impossible to go further back, for the trees would have hidden more and more of the complex. The front has a length of 45 m and was photographed in a distance of only 20 m (for the above mentioned reasons). In such a situation it is very difficult to get straight lines everywhere (see also the discussion here), even not with Panini projection (which I used) and additional manual correction (which I did also).
    In addition, the terrain isn't even but wavy, as you can see also in other pictures[1] [2], so also in my picture the terrain can't be even per se. --Llez 11:12, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

OK, I've lifted my oppose vote. -- Ikan Kekek 07:09, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Image is distorted, but it is panorama. I agree, that it is ok. May be need to add Template:Panorama to description. --Nino Verde 16:05, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Done Template added --Llez 19:29, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --W.carter 18:40, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Mezquita_de_Nasirolmolk,_Shiraz,_Irán,_2016-09-24,_DD_72.jpg

• Nomination Nasirolmolk mosque, Shiraz, Iran --Poco a poco 01:44, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 02:16, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
• There's a stray blue line between the upper left corner and the roof the water spout, and I'm not sure what the little white thing to the right of the hand atop the mosque is (a tiny cloud?). Otherwise, this is a worthy FP candidate, though some people would probably complain about the bright light creating glare on the right side (not because they should complain, but just because I know they would). -- Ikan Kekek 04:26, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

• Sorry, Ikan, I didn't get it. Could you add a note? Poco a poco 05:37, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

• I tried my best to note the spots. I hope you can see them now. -- Ikan Kekek 09:44, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Done Poco a poco 16:47, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

• Poco, what happened to the resolution? -- Ikan Kekek 21:42, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose until the resolution is restored - this photo is currently too small to pass QIC. -- Ikan Kekek 12:31, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Fixed now, sorry for that, the export settings were wrong Poco a poco 19:13, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

• Thank you. And of course I  Support, now that that's been resolved. -- Ikan Kekek 07:21, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Support I find the massive spot (flying bird) on the right disturbing.--Problem solved--Ermell 07:18, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose As per Ermell, but this problem is repairable --Michielverbeek 08:42, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

   Spot removed. Sorry, I oversaw that. Poco a poco 12:06, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality.--Capricorn4049 22:03, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --W.carter 18:39, 10 September 2017 (UTC)