Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 08 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Cyprus_wheatear_(Oenanthe_cypriaca)_juvenile_sub_adult.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Cyprus wheatear (Oenanthe cypriaca) juvenile sub adult --Charlesjsharp 08:35, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Oppose Incorrect composition. Tail feathers cut off. --Steindy 10:00, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
     Support Wildlife's like footballers; they won't always pose the way you want. A minor quibble. Rodhullandemu 10:12, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
    Steindy's revenge voting should be subject to sanctions --Charlesjsharp 12:08, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:34, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:44, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Could maybe benefit of a crop above ? Too much empty space IMO. Not enough for a decline…--Jebulon 00:24, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:24, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

File:FC_Admira_Wacker_Mödling_vs._FC_Red_Bull_Salzburg_2018-04-15_(012).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Jonathan Scherzer, footballplayer of FC Admira Wacker Mödling. --Steindy 00:37, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:37, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose head crop - and is it downsized? --Charlesjsharp 09:19, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
    Now Charlesjsharp' circus is starting again. I would have been surprised if it weren't for that. Yes, three hairs are missing!!! --Steindy 23:55, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good, striking photo of a player during a game. -- Ikan Kekek 07:54, 3 September 2021 (UTC){
     Oppose Sorry sharp photo, but unfortunately bad top crop. Please add some canvas at the top and fill this blank space. It might become a quality photo --Michielverbeek 05:41, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose bad top crop, looks unbalanced --Kritzolina 07:47, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not three hairs, but substantial part of the head (which should have some free space above anyway) is missing. --Nefronus 13:14, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 Comment Lesson learned: "a substantial part of the head is missing". --Steindy 23:23, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:28, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Madonna_Bridgewater_-_Raphael_(Borbone_Collection).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Madonna Bridgewater - Raphael (Borbone Collection).jpg --Commonists 18:16, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 21:16, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I don't think the colours can be true --Charlesjsharp 14:49, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 11:38, 7 September 2021 (UTC)