Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 03 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Durga_Pooja_at_Bhopal_(12).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Durga Puja in at Bhopal Madhya PradeshI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Suyash.dwivedi 12:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:17, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose WB is off, lacks detail --Poco a poco 20:10, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
The white balance isn't an issue here; the artist intentionally used yellow light to highlight the golden glow on the statue's face. -- Suyash.dwivedi 07:44, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose No issue with WB, the picture might reflect the real light conditions there, but DoF is not enough / the sharp area is too small. Should have used higher f-number so that at least the majority of the face would be sharp. --Plozessor 15:40, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --BigDom 03:50, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Milchstraße über dem Hochkalter und Hintersee, Ramsau bei Berchtesgaden (Berchtesgadener Land) - 1018-50.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Milky way over the Watzmann mountain in Berchtesgadener Land (Germany) --Аныл Озташ 21:41, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 12:16, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
  • I disagree. Wrong title. Watzmann is not in the image, but the Hochkalter. Object location have to be fixed too. --Milseburg 20:45, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Many thanks for the tip! File name and description as well as object location have been corrected. --Аныл Озташ 13:53, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Ok. No reason to oppose for me left. --Milseburg 14:48, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 07:28, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Hochkalter vom Hintersee, Ramsau bei Berchtesgaden (Berchtesgadener Land) - 0541.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination View from the Malerwinkel at Hintersee near Ramsau (Berchtesgadener Land, Germany) to the Watzmann and the Hochkalter massif - shot from the water --Аныл Озташ 21:41, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:02, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Title is wrong. Watzmann is not in the image, but the Hochkalter. Object location have to be fixed too. --Milseburg 20:45, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Many thanks for the tip! File name and description as well as object location have been corrected. --Anil Ö. (talk) 13:55, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment I would support if the discrepancy-note concerning the coordinates is gone.--Milseburg 15:04, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Already gone. --Аныл Озташ 16:17, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
 Support Ok now in my eyes. --Milseburg 19:27, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --BigDom 03:49, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Carla_Simón_Winner_of_the_Golden_Bear_for_Best_Film_2022_Nr_5.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Carla Simón Winner of the Golden Bear for Best Film at Berlinale 2022. By User:Elena Ternovaja --Seewolf 20:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose the shadows on the face ruins picture, sorry --Ezarate 23:01, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support IMHO it is OK for QI. Please discuss. --C messier 19:16, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support. Great, atmospheric, lively portrait with available light. Unavoidable image noise perfectly controlled, focus exactly where it should be. --Smial 13:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Smial. --Plozessor 17:38, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality --Jakubhal 05:14, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --BigDom (talk) 03:48, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Seattle_in_August_2024_-_067.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination University Bridge, Seattle --Another Believer 02:17, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:32, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Level of detail too low due to over processing. --Augustgeyler 05:03, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose perspective, strong banding in the sky, overprocessed. --Smial 10:48, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Augustgeyler and Smial. --Plozessor 14:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support I don't see the serious mistakes, so for me QI. On the other hand, I had problems with the photo of the cyclists, who were so tiny that they were barely recognizable among the blurry surroundings. -- Spurzem 21:15, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Plozessor. --Аныл Озташ 21:18, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --BigDom 03:46, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Breakway_in_Simacourbe_climb_of_Tour_de_France_2024_stage_13.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Breakway in Simacourbe climb of Tour de France 2024 stage 13 --Shougissime 19:41, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Oppose You have to look too closely to see where the tiny sharp main object is. Sorry -- Spurzem 21:12, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment that's the aim of the picture to look closely on the main topic of the picture. the breakway is small, 2 guys but all around you have the crowd, race vehicle, ambiance and scenery of what is the Tour de France. Main topic is in the focus and other elements are not in DOF but part of the picture because those elements contribute to the race. Moreover, this picture is already used on some wiki pages (not integrated by myself). --Shougissime 15:36, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Therefore the left and right parts and some at top and bottom would have to be cut out to work as composition for this goal. --Augustgeyler 11:36, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree here. Great sport photo and good technical quality and focus. A somewhat tighter crop is possible but not required imo. The context around the cyclists (the crowd, the road, the spectators, the billboards) is mostly interesting and give a more raw (as opposed to one picture-perfect newspaper images) image of the competition. I really like the images as it is.--ArildV (talk) 17:17, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Per ArildV. --Plozessor 07:26, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As stated above. There is a tighter crop needed to get this composition working. --Augustgeyler 10:44, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but per Spurzem --Jakubhal 00:21, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support per ArildV. The image composition is somewhat unusual, but I have no technically justifiable objections. ..Smial 11:22, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks for support. Picture is out of a standard frame, I don't want to crop a lot because the picture will lose its interest. Yes, there is a lot a informations but I think it illustrate very well what is Tour de France, sponsors, lots of vehicles, fans on the side of the road, a breakway in a climb and peloton chasing breakway without mercy. --Shougissime 17:15, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 07:26, 2 September 2024 (UTC)