Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 02 2015
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Hong Kong, China: A chinese junk in Victoria Harbour. --Cccefalon 04:05, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:33, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jerez, Spain: Catedral de San Salvador --Cccefalon 04:02, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:38, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cologne, Germany: The DITIB Central Mosque in Köln-Ehrenfeld --Cccefalon 04:02, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:08, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Loxura atymnus --Vengolis 03:53, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:06, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Zizula hylax --Vengolis 03:53, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:06, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Neurothemis tullia-male --Vengolis 03:53, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:06, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View at the historic center, Wolfsberg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:24, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:15, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle Bayerhofen on Bayerhofenstrasse #2, Wolfsberg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:24, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:16, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Order of Friars Minor Capuchin church of the Assumption on Alois-Huth-Strasse #6, Wolfsberg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:24, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:48, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside shrine “Swentzel Stoeckl“ on Alois Huth Strasse, Wolfsberg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:24, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:48, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside shrine “Swentzel Stoeckl“ on Alois Huth Strasse, Wolfsberg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:24, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:48, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Porsche 911 Carrera (2011) in Toulouse --PierreSelim 20:11, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good composition and good quality -- Spurzem 20:43, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination BMW 600 called Big Isetta was built from 1957 to 1959 -- Spurzem 18:09, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. Ich sag mal lieber nix weiter ;) --Ralf Roletschek 18:47, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Interior of Vigala Church. Kruusamägi 17:41, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:47, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Interior of Vigala Church. Kruusamägi 17:41, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:47, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Interior of Vigala Church. Kruusamägi 17:41, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:55, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from the waterfall over the park Grugapark, the Tummelwiese up to the tower Grugaturm --Tuxyso 17:32, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:53, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination BMW Isetta at BMW Isetta meeting in Bad Wörishofen -- Spurzem 17:06, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:53, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lonely plant (Salicornia Salicornia) sometimes braving the harsh elements. Location, Noarderleech Profince Friesland in the Netherlands.
Famberhorst 16:05, 30 August 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Good composition.--ArildV 16:10, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Lonely plant (Salicornia Salicornia) sometimes braving the harsh elements. Location, Noarderleech Profince Friesland in the Netherlands.
-
- Nomination Paw prints of waterfowl in the mud. Location, Noarderleech Profince Friesland in the Netherlands.
Famberhorst 16:05, 30 August 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Villy Fink Isaksen 19:31, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Paw prints of waterfowl in the mud. Location, Noarderleech Profince Friesland in the Netherlands.
-
- Nomination Croatia, Pula, Arch of the Sergii from east --Berthold Werner 14:04, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:09, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Face of Laocoon in Vatican --Livioandronico2013 13:48, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 16:04, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ceiling in Duomo (Lecce) --Livioandronico2013 13:47, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:08, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moscow. A view on Balchug Street from the Bolshoy Moskvoretsky Bridge. --Dmitry Ivanov 13:38, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:09, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hörnum, Sylt, Germany; Church St. Thomas --Optimist4343 11:13, 30 August 2015 (UTC)]]
- Promotion Good quality.-ArildV 16:07, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jetty in Sandhamn with pilot boats. --ArildV 10:59, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:38, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House in Sandhamn, Stockholm archipelago. --ArildV 10:59, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:52, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Val de Piciudel vally at sunrise in Val Longia in Gröden - South Tyrol --Moroder 10:22, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Impressive and QI for me. --Johann Jaritz 11:40, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Sebastian church in Poręba 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:58, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:48, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Sebastian church in Poręba 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:58, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:35, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Sebastian church in Poręba 3 --Jacek Halicki 08:58, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:36, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cemetery in Poręba --Jacek Halicki 08:58, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:35, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House in Starkówek --Jacek Halicki 08:58, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:50, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A female Large Cabbage White (Pieris brassicae), nectaring on a thistle flower. Çamardı, Niğde - Turkey. --Zcebeci 08:49, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:03, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Berger's Clouded Yellow butterfly (Colias sareptensis), Balcılar Road, Taşkent - Konya, Turkey. --Zcebeci 08:49, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:03, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The gondola of the tethered Balloon in Tallinn, Estonia. --Cayambe 08:21, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:03, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Island Escape (ship, 1982) --Christian Ferrer 08:07, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good quality. Might go for FP. --Johann Jaritz 08:18, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Huvudskär lighthouse. --ArildV 07:40, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:18, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Meadow at Strandbadweg near Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 07:35, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good --Poco a poco 07:47, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination San Cristóbal lava lizard (Microlophus bivittatus), Punta Pitt, San Cristobal Island, Galapagos Islands, Ecuador --Poco a poco 07:16, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 07:56, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Galapagos land iguana (Conolophus subcristatus), Santa Cruz island, Galapagos islands, Ecuador --Poco a poco 07:16, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --ArildV 07:30, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marine iguana (Amblyrhynchus cristatus), Las Bachas, Baltra island, Galapagos islands, Ecuador --Poco a poco 07:16, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --ArildV 07:30, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Santo Domingo, Quito, Ecuador --Poco a poco 07:16, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:03, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Las Grietas, Santa Cruz island, Galapagos islands, Ecuador --Poco a poco 07:16, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:03, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sailing boat outside Sandhamn, Stockholm archipelago. --ArildV 07:16, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good, but please, fix the note. --Poco a poco 07:18, 30 August 2015 (UTC) Done Thank you.--ArildV 07:30, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of St. St. Joseph, catholic church St. Martin in Stühlingen-Grimmelshofen, Germany. --Llez 06:38, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:50, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of St. Mary, catholic church St. Martin in Stühlingen-Grimmelshofen, Germany --Llez 06:38, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice.--Famberhorst 06:47, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Linienstraße 40, Berlin-Mitte. --Code 06:22, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:50, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dalian, Liaoning, China: The Beida Suspension Bridge --Cccefalon 06:10, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:49, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dalian Liaoning China: Flower dome of the new Dalian Botanical Garden --Cccefalon 06:10, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:06, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Libellago lineata, female -- Jkadavoor 05:58, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:49, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination PH-TOH balloon on the Hot Air Balloon Festival in Joure province of Friesland in the Netherlands.
Famberhorst 05:13, 30 August 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. May be better with less sky on the right and ballon centered. --XRay 05:45, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Done. Thank you.--Famberhorst 06:45, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination PH-TOH balloon on the Hot Air Balloon Festival in Joure province of Friesland in the Netherlands.
-
- Nomination View from the water on the Alde Feanen of It Fryske Gea. Valuable nature in profince Friesland in the Netherlands.
Famberhorst 05:13, 30 August 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:06, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination View from the water on the Alde Feanen of It Fryske Gea. Valuable nature in profince Friesland in the Netherlands.
-
- Nomination War memorial in the hamlet Börnste, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:41, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:06, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Green Black spotted Bug fly (Coleoptera) at Rajbiraj, Saptari, Nepal --Tulsi Bhagat 02:22, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient depth of field. The species needs to be identified for becoming a QI. It's not a fly., Coleoptera is correct. Please learn from this. --Cayambe 15:50, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Green Black spotted Bug fly (Coleoptera) at Rajbiraj, Saptari, Nepal --Tulsi Bhagat 02:22, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. Unsharp, Noise, bad crop. Typical for photo taken by smartphone. --XRay 07:12, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Green Black spotted Bug fly (Coleoptera) at Rajbiraj, Saptari, Nepal --Tulsi Bhagat 02:22, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. Unsharp, Noise, bad crop. Typical for photo taken by smartphone. --XRay 07:12, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Thomisidae feeding Junonia almana on Acmella ciliata --Jkadavoor 08:31, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry,very parts out of focus --Livioandronico2013 10:02, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Downsampled as DOF is not enough for full resolution. Still may not QI enough. No worries. :) Jkadavoor 02:56, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lava gull (Larus fuliginosus), Santa Cruz island, Galapagos islands, Ecuador --Poco a poco 16:24, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support The bird thought it wasn't photogenic, and adding a little exposure wouldn't hurt, but it's certainly QI IMO. --Mgimelfarb 03:55, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mexican Sombrero.--لا روسا 16:43, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Too tight crop, if you have no possiblity to increase it, then it isn't a QI to me Poco a poco 19:39, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
@Poco a poco: i uploaded a new one, review it please.--لا روسا 20:14, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
That one looks better. If you lighten it up I'd support Poco a poco 18:03, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
@Poco a poco: Done, alright or another modification.--لا روسا 19:39, 29 August 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:20, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Mexican Sombrero.--لا روسا 16:43, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Panaroma of Riga and Daugava. By User:Pudelek --Σπάρτακος 15:47, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Saint Luke the Evangelist, detail of a pulpit, church of the Sagrario, near the Cathedral of Granada, Spain. By User:Jebulon --Σπάρτακος 15:42, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Beach of Silbersee II near Sythen in the sun light of the early morning (golden hour), Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 15:24, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn I withdraw my nomination There are better photographs ... --XRay 08:08, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Close-ups of Clitoria ternatea flower clicked at Rajbiraj, Saptari, Nepal --Tulsi Bhagat 06:49, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Jpeg artefacts. Why not using a real cam instead of a smartphone? Your skills deserve, that they are not nullified by a bad camera. --Cccefalon 07:55, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jasminum polyanthum at Rajbiraj, Nepal --Bijay chaurasia 02:11, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Jpeg artefacs. What about using a real camera instead of a smartphone? Your skills deserve, that they are not nullified by a bad camera. --Cccefalon 07:53, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Galapagos mockingbird (Mimus parvulus), Santa Cruz island, Galapagos islands, Ecuador --Poco a poco 15:33, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Bit to bright, can you postprocess it? Denis Barthel 16:41, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Done Poco a poco 18:48, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Support IMO OK for QI.--XRay 08:10, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Texas School Book Depository in Dallas, Texas (United States). --Michael Barera 00:34, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Basically a good picture, but tilted and rotated. Also the shadows on the right are a little harsh. Can you fix that? --Tsungam 13:02, 18 August 2015 (UTC) CommentSuch a historical building deserves the improvements requested by Tsungam...--Jebulon 21:10, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Done I have attempted a tilt and perspective correction. Dllu 17:26, 27 August 2015 (UTC) SupportThanks--Jebulon 20:41, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
There is a pink frame, needs a tighter crop. --C messier 09:04, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Avaste soo päikesetõusul (3).JPG
[edit]- Nomination Avaste bog. Kruusamägi 00:10, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
- Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:31, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Not convinced, I see no sharpness here, sorry. --Poco a poco 17:47, 31 August 2015 (UTC) I withdraw my nomination Kruusamägi 20:54, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Hubertl 12:36, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
File:Natural_scene.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Sun set with darky background natural scene from Rajbiraj-5, Saptari, Nepal --Tulsi Bhagat 06:24, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Horizon is tilted, lots of noise and JPEG artefacts --Florian Fuchs 05:08, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Comment I don't get JPEG artefacts-- Tulsi Bhagat 17:57, 28 August 2015 (UTC) - Support Nice photo--Jay chaurasia 10:32, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Tilted and noise reduction has created artifacts in the sky and lack of crisp detail for a photo less than 3 Mpix large. Lens flare in the middle. Title and description in file page too vague. (and considering that foregound underexposure is a desired effect) --C messier 10:47, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose per C messier. As I repeatedly mentioned, a smartphone lens can hardly deliver quality that is sufficient for QIC. --Cccefalon 15:41, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --C messier 10:49, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
File:Capra aegagrus (Chèvre sauvage) - 61.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Wild goat in Ardèche --Medium69 18:16, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose I'd like to discuss this photo, for me the only in focus is the head of the animal due to DOF too shallow but I'm in doubt if the quality in general is good Ezarate 23:31, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined --Hubertl 12:44, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
File:Rhinocypha bisignata male-Kadavoor-2015-08-20-001.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Rhinocypha bisignata, male --Jkadavoor 10:40, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose sorry, absolutely too dark.--Hubertl 11:17, 27 August 2015 (UTC)- Comment Are you reviewing the background or the subject? Do you know this is a black damselfly with highly fluorescent wing marks? Every bits of his wings and eye details are captured here. This may be the most funny review I ever get. (This is a hip bath shot inside a forest stream and the background is dark soil. Here it is stone and I'm not lowered that much; so an inclined view.) Jkadavoor 11:36, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment please, be patient and calm down (and don´t argue personal), maybe I´m absolutely wrong, maybe not. I looked at the picture with a calibrated monitor, it´s daylight. Maybe this is different to your monitor equipment. There is another problem too, the head is completely out of focus. I send it to CR, ok?. Nothing happens yet... --Hubertl 11:41, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry for my quick response. I'm more of a subject enthusiast than a photographer. So how I see my subjects may very different to others. And what important to me may not a concern for others. That's why add more info. Here this is an endemic species with many interesting features. It is black with highly reflective wing marks. The wings have wrinkles; it is not plane and flat like most others. It's habitat is inside the water stream; not on sides. Regarding DOF: Shallow DOF and OOF are different. It's quite natural that DOF will decrease when we approach close. I uploaded two more images in reverse order how I photographed it. here reasonable DOF; even legs are in focus. But it is only a 1:8 or less magnification macro. Here more closer; so less DOF. The current nom is an uncropped straight out of camera frame. High magnification showing details not visible to eyes. So it is a macro. (I think I explained a lot. Now I don't care whether it is declined or not.) Jkadavoor 12:34, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Weak Support I do not know if what I write is fun, and if you do not care then withdrew the photo! However I think it is a special case and you can accept--Livioandronico2013 12:58, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support--Jebulon 14:15, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe 16:52, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
OpposeI fully understand, that this picture is a rare subject in a special situation. But that is not, what QI is about (if it would, many other declined pictures should be accepted). Regrettably there is no award for the "Special subject picture", else you would deserve it. Denis Barthel 06:46, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
- There is nothing special here. I've only a laptop. But I rechecked my settings with en:Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/Header#Is my monitor adjusted correctly?. I can see three circles in "shadow detail" section and almost three in "highlight detail" section. I can see all parts of this damselfly. In fact, details in black parts are more clear than in my old natural light shot. Only difference here is dark background which can't be brightened. Let me know if I miss something. Jkadavoor 07:56, 28 August 2015 (UTC) "[On laptops,] correct adjustment on one part of the screen might be incorrect on another part for a stationary head position." This might me my issue. :( Jkadavoor 08:02, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
- I uploaded a brightened version; removed two reflecting dust particles collected on his furs too. The four marks on his wings are a bit overexposed for me now. Better? Need opinions, please. Jkadavoor 10:06, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support Way better now, go for it. Thank you. Denis Barthel 16:42, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support very good --Christian Ferrer 11:20, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Your words, Jkadavoor: This may be the most funny review I ever get. No, this not at all a funny review, especially not my comment. It's not fun to deal with such answers during a nomination process. As Denis said already and I demanded, it's far better now. --Hubertl 03:46, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hubertl, I don't want to comment/apologize again on a matter I already done ("Sorry for my quick response"). But it seems there is difference in our monitor calibrations (from your comment on a Neopithecops zalmora here). My monitor is much tolerant to shadow details though magnifies highlights. :) Jkadavoor 05:42, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- I didn´t critisized the quick response. I was talking about the background, which was too dark. --Hubertl 07:29, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- Dark bg is common problem when flash is used. It is because flash will reflect from the subject and recorded by sensor; but there is only farther objects in bg which can't reflect any lights. People overcome it either by increasing the ISO or by using slow shutter speed. First will add noise unless we have a pro camera. Second will cause double exposure affecting sharpness as described here. I'm trying my best to learn the tricks. Thanks again. Jkadavoor 08:49, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support The last version is very beautiful! And it's an interesting dragonfly too. What about FPC? I would support it immediately. --Hockei 17:33, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Hubertl 12:40, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
File:Duvenstedter_brook_moorsaal_1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Birch trees and bog in the nature reserve Duvenstedter Brook near Hamburg --Dirtsc 15:10, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Pudelek 16:45, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad quality. --Hockei 17:20, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose CA, and artifacts probably by noise reduction. -- Smial 08:48, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Hubertl 12:43, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
File:Lsg_westerhever_schafe_1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Westerhever in north-frisia, two sheep on the dike --Dirtsc 15:10, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:30, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Ummh, not really sure that it is a QI, there are artifacts, some areas are overexposed, sharpening halos, the right guy is unsharp due to shallow DoF, please, let's discuss --Poco a poco 20:07, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose as Poco a poco says. Denis Barthel 22:32, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose As Poco. Sorry, bad quality, but nice with better composition: it's tilted--Lmbuga 12:51, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Noise reduction and sharpening are in conflict. DOF and composition are ok. -- Smial 08:51, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined --Hubertl 12:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC)