Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 01 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Wuppertal_Vohwinkel_-_Bahnhof_03_ies.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Bahnhof in Wuppertal-Vohwinkel. By User:Ies --Atamari 17:12, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 17:56, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I disagree, this foto needs a perspective correction. --Hubertl 18:16, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done --Atamari 08:40, 27 August 2015 (UTC) check signature, Atamari... --Hubertl 21:19, 26 August

2015 (UTC)

  •  Support ok for me now! --Hubertl 10:40, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 20:52, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Leipzig völkerschlachtdenkmal.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Völkerschlachtdenkmal, Leipzig, Germany. --Palauenc05 14:44, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:47, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not really sharp, strong banding in the sky. A pity - the composition is quite good. --Code 09:13, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the hint. I've sharpened the monument an "repaired" the sky. --Palauenc05 21:49, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support from me. --Tsungam 06:48, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Hockei (talk ) 19:20, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 09:17, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 20:33, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Dian HP, 2015-08-22.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Indonesian composer Dian HP. Crisco 1492 17:19, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Not sharp enough to 1,687 × 2,359 pixels IMO, yellowish IMO (Normal with ISO 800, F2.8, but QI?)--Lmbuga 19:10, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment The wall behind her is a very pale blue, which has thrown the white balance off. I have reworked with less denoising so that more detail comes through, but this forum generally has issues with noise. Though she posed, this was not a studio shot; I caught her after the launch of a poetry collection and there was only standard interior lighting. Crisco 1492 23:36, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose "Discuss" (others can think). Not QI for me, sorry.--Lmbuga 09:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 16:55, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Duvenstedter_brook_dovenham_1.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Birch wood in the nature reserve Duvenstedter Brook near Hamburg --Dirtsc 15:10, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Full of artefacts. --Hockei 17:17, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
     Comment Please specify, where you see artefacts. I see grass and intended unsharpness in the background. --Dirtsc 07:48, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
     Comment Noise artefacts. Please take a closer look. And as far I can see posterization. --Hockei 13:50, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 16:55, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Duvenstedter_brook_dovenham_2.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Birch wood in the nature reserve Duvenstedter Brook near Hamburg --Dirtsc 15:10, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Full of artefacts. --Hockei 17:17, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
     Comment Please specify, where you see artifacts. I see grass and intended unsharpness in the background. --Dirtsc 07:48, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
     Comment Noise artefacts. Please take a closer look. And as far I can see posterization. --Hockei 13:50, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 Comment The unsharp areas look like photographed through structured (rolled plate) glass. -- Smial 08:43, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 16:54, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

File:सयपत्री_फूल_(२).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Tagetes clicked at my own kitchen garden, Rajbiraj, Saptari, Nepal --Tulsi Bhagat 06:24, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose incorrect white balance --Ralf Roletschek 06:28, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment correction made --Tulsi Bhagat 08:54, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment i have upload a new version. --Ralf Roletschek 19:05, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Nothing sharp. Old problem with smartphone lens. --Cccefalon 09:57, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Weak support It's ok! --Jay chaurasia 10:32, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support better view --Soni Chaurasia (talk) 11:03, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose--ArildV 11:52, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Posterization, lack of sharpness, halos, overexposure and oversaturation, definitely no QI. Tulsi Bhagat I hope that the pros above are not a consequence of canvassing Poco a poco 14:20, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality --Vengolis 18:36, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 16:53, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

File:White_Baijayanti_Flower.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Petunia axillaris at my own home, Rajbiraj, Saptari, Nepal --Tulsi Bhagat 06:24, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:16, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Jpeg artefacts. Just smartphone quality but not good enough for QIC. --Cccefalon 09:58, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose DoF too shallow, noise, sharpening artifacts --XRay 18:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Smartphone image but it looks ok. --Soni Chaurasia (talk) 15:00, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support looks to be quality even captured from smartphone. --Jay chaurasia 10:30, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The new version is a improvement but artifacts, low level of details. --ArildV 11:58, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Lack of sharpness in spite of the fact that it is oversharpened Poco a poco 14:42, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality --Vengolis 18:35, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 16:52, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Wuppertal_Neuenhof_0023.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Löwenzahn im Gegenlicht, Wuppertal --Atamari 09:53, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Loses a bit of sharpness near the top of the image, but the majority of the subject is in focus and the aesthetics are very nice. --Crisco 1492 13:22, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree, corner is overexposed, bad cut, flares and too dark --Jacek Halicki 14:04, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose with Jacek.--Jebulon 19:47, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 16:51, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Pink_rosa.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Colour composition light pink with water droplets; Rosa --Tulsi Bhagat 01:47, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Disturbing relation between the exposure of foreground to background. Denis Barthel 16:14, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I've uploaded new version of this file. --Tulsi Bhagat 02:18, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Now the crop is much to tight, I am sorry. Denis Barthel 22:28, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment bad crop --Atamari 19:47, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
  • and not really sharp. Its a photo from a phone... --Ralf Roletschek 19:54, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Water droplets are too good as realstic. --Soni Chaurasia 16:06, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support seems ok. --Jay chaurasia 10:28, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Crop should be better, sharpness and DoF too, filename must be better, filesize too. --XRay 14:39, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality --Vengolis 18:33, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 16:50, 31 August 2015 (UTC)